|
Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Monday, December 18. 2006Heartless? "Climb mountain at your own risk"
Either that, or sign something comparable to a DNR note: "We accept the risk, and we're on our own." Along with generous life insurance which covers it, to take care of your kids' educations. Mt. Hood has no guardrails, and no McDonalds. It is a dead-serious deal, and everyone knows that. The danger is the appeal. Why should the citizens of Oregon subsidize macho stunts like these with their hard-earned taxes? Isn't the whole point of climbing to risk life and limb? To encounter mortal danger when life is otherwise so soft, safe and protected? To find a trail without guardrails? To find a place where you cannot be rescued, and cannot find a McDonalds or a mall, and must face nature's harsh face? I have had just two friends who "climb." One saw his mother fall to her death on the Matterhorn (photo). The other saw his best friend fall to his death in a snow-covered crevasse in Alaska, and roped down to pull up the mangled body. Neither of them "climb" anymore: unpleasant memories. Death, when voluntarily courting mortal danger, is not a tragedy. It might be heroic, as in war, or an accepted risk, but not tragic: in our cozy, modern American life, you have to go well out of your way, and spend serious money, to find serious risk - unless you do something stupid and emotional like stepping on thin ice, or trying to outsmart the stock market. There is no tragic flaw involved. On Everest, you are on your own, and it is strewn with freeze-dried bodies as memento mori. I admire folks who take on such adventures. I do not care for heights, however. If you want a safe, comfy vacation, go to Tinsley World instead of Mt. Hood, or take a walk around the neighborhood with the pup and the camera. If you die on a mountain, we will remember you as someone with cojones, but not as tragic. People die on mountains all the time, but it only makes the news during slow news weeks. Hope the last two are OK, and that they can find another hobby.
Posted by Bird Dog
in Our Essays, The Culture, "Culture," Pop Culture and Recreation
at
07:47
| Comments (16)
| Trackbacks (0)
Wednesday, December 13. 2006Doo, doo, doo, lookin' out my back door: Mr. Red-TailOut my CT back door yesterday morning - Mr. Red-Tail. He is mainly looking for our fat squirrels. Bird Dog told me he saw one go for a duck decoy in his driveway. The tree? One of those unpleasant, alien Norway Maples we have all over New England these days: it would be nice if they all caught a disease.
Posted by Gwynnie
in Hot News & Misc. Short Subjects, Our Essays
at
16:57
| Comments (2)
| Trackbacks (0)
New Hampshire Update
But there are less of those folks now, relatively speaking. Two-thirds of NH residents were born outside of the state, and arrive with different values, and different politics. It's a sad thing for other Yankees, too, who have counted on NH to hold the fort for traditional Yankee values of endurance, thrift, honor, independence, grumpiness, and the Live Free or Die spirit which basically wants to tell the govt to f-off. Story about it in the CSM. Image is Robert Frost's farmhouse. Tuesday, December 12. 2006The Elusive Benefits of DiversitySowell speaks out on the case now before the Supreme Court in which
Indeed, the whole "diversity" concept only arose AFTER it became abundantly clear that integration and busing had failed completely to improve the achievement of either black or white students, and in fact was correlated with a substantial decline in standards and performance. Needing some rationale to continue the experiment, the left created the concept of diversity - an ideal one, too, since its benefits can never be proved or disproved, only asserted as an article of faith. Anyways, the Court should reach a decision by late spring. Above, the author of 1954's Brown v. Board of Ed. Sunday, December 10. 2006What did Tony Blair mean?Britain's clever triangulator, who learned how to do it at the feet of the master, Bill Clinton, delivered a much-appreciated speech on immigration. Excerpts, plus the whole thing, on video at Flopping Aces (h/t, Sisu). But was it really a speech which abandoned the notion of multiculturalism? Auster doubts it, as do I. I think he is trying to straddle the fence. Nevertheless, the speech was right. But like all talented politicians, you never know what they believe - if anything: everything they say is part of a game. Addendum. Our commenter says: You don't really even need to bother parsing his words, Bird Dog - net immigration has increased from 40k per year under the last conservative govt. to 250k at least under labor, and that's with a higher rate of emigration - many of them Brits running away from the multicultural paradise Labor is trying to create. Under such circumstances, "multiculturalism" is not just one policy approach that can be embraced or rejected, it's a fait accompli.
Compassionate WarThis is one heck of a subject for a Sunday in Advent, but I need to get this off my chest to feel better. When a nation decides it needs to go to war, it has to be ruthless, barbaric, and indifferent to life and property. We learned in Vietnam, and Russia learned in Afghanistan, that careful, "hearts and minds" warfare does not work. I am not saying that we should have, but we could have nuked Hanoi and ended the thing right there. The US will not carpet-bomb, or fire-bomb Fallujah - or Baghdad. Or Tehran. Surely not nuke any place in the Middle East. Why not? Because we have become too civilized for total warfare. And because the enemy is dispersed and hidden amongst an innocent, and even largely supportive-of-freedom, population. When we bombed Cologne, Berlin, and Hiroshima, we did not worry about these things. If the war in Iraq were a true war, we would have already bombed Iran, which is supporting the "insurgents." This is not a "war" in Iraq: it's a magnified "police action," or "surgical action," with the best of intentions - but now the enemy is those who oppose a free Iraq - and not the US, really: they want to kill eachother. We are just in the way, like sitting ducks, or like cops chasing mobsters in Chicago. Same in Afghanistan - another civil war, sort-of, in which the Taliban mobsters appear to be entirely intact, and the government quite dependent on outside military and financial support. No-one has figured out how to deal with such situations militarily - as long as we decide not to use total war methods. Or as long as we do not have the patience for long-term military quasi-police-type presence, as we have in South Korea and Bosnia. But no-one has figured out how to deal with it diplomatically, either. There is no effective in-between, which is why Darfur is ignored by the world: it's like an event of nature, a hurricane or tsunami. Except that it is evil human nature instead of weather. Compassionate warfare in the Third World - or in any world - does not work. Power is useless if you will not use it, and if everyone knows that you won't. And knows that your own country's press will wear you down, if the guerilla/terrorists don't. I sure do not have the solution, nor do I wish to see fine, innocent Iraqis - or Iranians - killed. All I know is that soldiers must die, but I hate to see them killed when we handcuff ourselves with compassion and civilized ideas, and the opponent does not. War with rules is an oxymoron, and the Jihadists know this as well as the Japanese and the Germans did. Thursday, December 7. 2006Dear SantaWell, it's time again for my Christmas Wish List. And now that we finally have a Dem congress, maybe I will get everything I want. Here it is: 1. Free money. Lots of it. Why can't the government just print some extra and mail it to us? Why? What would it cost them? Those stingy Repubs just won't do it. Grinches. I'd bet it costs less than 1/10th of a penny to print a ten thousand dollar bill. And at a 50% federal tax rate, they would get $5000 back for a $.001 investment in one year. How bad is that? 2. Free "Legal Care." You have no idea how much my companies 3. Free Dental Care. Do you know what my periodontist wants to fix a bad tooth? More than I pay my tax accountant. You age, and the teeth just don't hold up. It's not fair. Gimme money. 4. Free college and grad school. Got kids? Grandkids? Someone has to pay the bill. Why me? These are after-tax dollars, and it hurts. Let Uncle Sam pay the bill, if he wants everyone to be overeducated cube dwellers, squinting at screens like I am doing right now. 5. Free Chateau Margaux '89. Hey - that could be a slogan, like "Free Mumia" or The Chicago 7 or whoever. Why should I have to work my butt off for a basic happiness? Not fair at all, because some can afford it without even thinking. Happiness is in the Constitution, isn't it? Or is it in the Declaration of Happiness? You just know that somebody, somewhere, is making a profit on this stuff. 6. Free cars. All of our salesmen get them. Why can't I? I'll take two of these. One red, one yellow. 7. Free vacations. Why should I pay for them? I need them, to maintain my productivity and health and my cheerful approach to life and work. It's a Right, isn't it? And when I am unhappy, everyone else gets unhappy. Not good. 8. Free tickets home for Christmas for illegals. One way. Fix your own countries, people. This one is ours. We, and our ancestors, have had to fix it a few times, and we are still trying. No reason you cannot do the same. 9. Free Digital Cameras. Why should a wealthy nation like ours require folks to buy their own, when they become obsolete in a year? We, as a nation, can afford to take care of everyone's camera needs, if we only cared enough. Photos are a basic right, enshrined in the Constitution - right? It's like free speech, or free self-expression, or something like that. 10. Free ammo. Do you have any idea what the new, lead-free ammo costs? Any nation with gun freedoms can surely afford free ammo for all of its citizens. If we can send a man to the moon, ...etc. Plus it's also in the Constitution. Let's begin with shotgun ammo. The 9 mm stuff can come later: it's called "incrementalism." 11. Free Veterinary (and Medical) Care. Do you have any idea what the wife's vet bills add up to? Worse than our Barrister's, I'd bet. His wife has more horses that mine does, but mine has more doggone dogs. Not to mention my hunting dogs. Vet bills are far worse than medical bills, or otherwise I would go to my Vet when I get sick like Skink does. Free Vet Care, NOW! Including dog Stress Management! When I miss a bird, my dog gets very stressed out... and I miss a lot. If you really cared, you would pay my dog's shrink bills. That's it for this year. Back to ya next time, Santa, With deep appreciation for all that you do - we love ya, dude. The Chairman Crisis of the Week: Climate Change on Mars (with a humble and heart-felt apology to the entire Dutch Community)
There may be a risk that Martian craters, now in their pristine natural form, may fill with water and be destroyed like Crater Lake in the image. Water vapor will doubtless add to the heat-trapping of Martian warming, and erosion will release more CO2 from the soil and rocks, creating a true crisis for Martian planetary stability. An atmosphere means weather, and weather means bad weather, like Katrina. Thus the policy of environmental destruction continues unabated under Bush. But what can we, as individuals, do to save the Martian environment from further degradation? More recycling and more car-pooling are fun places to start. Another good idea is to have a neighborhood "Save the Martian Environment Party." Serve Mars-friendly hors doeuvres and snacks, and exchange ideas about what we all can do to save the Martian environment. Remember: No idea is wrong! It's fun, and Mars-friendly! (Editor's Note: "Neighborhood Save the Martian Environment Party" is a UN trademark. Used with permission. "No idea is wrong" is a trademark of the US Department of Education. Also a shared international trademark of the EU Department of The People's Education, Sub-Directorate of Empathy, Pity and Condescension, Sub-sub Division of Cheerful Slogans For the Ignorant Masses. Used with permission, of course.) (Editor's Second Note: Our most humble apologies to the Dutch, and all those of Dutch extraction and to the entire Dutch community, who might have been offended, or felt insulted, by any unintentional negative connotations regarding flooding of Martian land. We know the Dutch would know how to deal with Martian flooding, and supportively and admiringly invite them to give it a try - you go straight up in the air, then take a hard left at the Moon. That will take you right there. It's the big red thing on the right, just before the Asteroid Belt.)
Posted by Bird Dog
in Hot News & Misc. Short Subjects, Our Essays
at
05:55
| Comments (9)
| Trackbacks (0)
Wednesday, December 6. 2006All We Want for Christmas is Our Two Front Teeth
For readers, we have a fine cadre of congnoscenti, who are hip to our deal and down wid us. You all have a capacity for irony - which means a decent IQ. But, for Christmas, we want a mass market, like Michelle and Glenn. No - we want to be bigger than them: we want to be Glenn and Michelle and Kos and Powerline combined, and invited to the White House for chats! But, sadly, we just aren't good enough for that dream. Delusions of grandeur! We don't even want money...well, we do want money, but we expect none from Maggy. She is cheap: we work for free. Galley slaves! Rescue us! Please, Santa! We will be a one year-old blog (or two, really, depending on whether you count it from when we signed up with Truth Laid Bear) in February. Blogroll us, and link us, for Christmas! We are sorta, kinda unique. Email us to your million intelligent, skeptical, inquiring friends, who might be deprived of their Daily Maggie's - to their detriment. Gift-wrapping included! And the price is right! What a fine gift!
Posted by Bird Dog
in Our Essays, The Culture, "Culture," Pop Culture and Recreation
at
05:59
| Comments (8)
| Trackbacks (0)
Monday, December 4. 2006Color coding
Plus it's getting harder to tell what color anyone is, anyway: everybody is getting mixed skin DNA. For example, what color is Derek Jeter? And do you really care? In our offices, they are all sorts of Indians, Asians, who knows what? You don't even think about it - they are all humans. Heck, our own Editor Bird Dog is part Iroquois. Do you care? He is part dog, also (which has helped him get into the best dog schools). Let's arrange folks by character, energy, brains, talent, discipline, interest, etc. This skin thing has got to go. It is just too stupid. But I see some libs are still trying to count their Crayolas. Eliott Spitzer, for one. NY Sun. Supreme Court. Good case. Fallacy of the Week. Begging the Question: It's all in the premise
This one goes back to the astonishing Aristotle, and hence to the Roman Petitio Principii. That is, pleading, or begging for the premise to be accepted. What is fun about this fallacy is that the statements may be fully logical, but erroneous because they are circular: if you accept the premise, then the conclusion logically follows. As in: My premise is A=B, so I will create another assertion which implies, or is built on, or derives from, the notion that A=B. The classic example of this form of logic abuse is "When did you stop beating your wife?" The premise contains the accusatory conclusion. Also known as "circular arguments," such arguments can seem persuasive if you don't step back and examine the often-hidden premise. They are technically "informal fallacies," because the error is not within the "form" of the argument: the form can be fine while the basis is flawed. Example: God created the earth and its creatures five thousand years ago. Well, that hidden premise is that every word of the Bible is scientifically and chronologically true according to modern thinking. If you accept the premise, then I suppose you must accept the conclusion. Example: Massachusetts politicians alarmed by rapid erosion of Cape Cod: Blame Bush's global warming. Hidden premise/assumption: man-made warming is raising sea levels and washing Cape Cod out to sea. Of course, there is no evidence for that mechanism - Cape Cod was disappearing in Thoreau's time, and he commented on it. The wise will buy Monomoy Island real estate, which is where the sand is being deposited. Hey - it's the next Nantucket. Example: All of the money from our healthy economy is going into the pockets of wealthy corporate thieves. The notion, or premise, that wealth consists of a finite number of dollars is a famous fallacious assumption of the economically illiterate. If that premise were true, the socialists would have an argument. But the premise is wrong: wealth is created, almost miraculously, out of work, investment, creativity, and risk. There is no end to it. Another famous example which contains this fallacy, from the late, lamented Johnny Cochran: "If the glove don't fit, you must acquit." How many assumptions are built into that assertion, besides the stated one? Enough for an acquittal by a jury which couldn't see his tricks, or refused to. The assumptions of the premise were, of course, that a murderer would only wear gloves that fit well, that blood-soaked gloves would not shrink, etc etc - but, most of all, the assumption that the jury would welcome any excuse to acquit. They took the bait and swallowed the hook, too. Always examine the premise or assumption of an argument before taking on the logical flow. They are commonly hidden, or implied by tricksters so that it all seems to make sense if the premise is accepted. That is Rule #1. Friday, December 1. 2006Bull Moose and Bear: A True StoryThis true story came in over the transom today:
by Doug White, September 16, 2006 We all have read about or seen movies entitled, 'The Longest Day', 'The Longest Yard', or 'The Longest Mile'. Well, I am going to tell you about "The Longest Minute" of my life. Reed Thompson and I had been hunting hard for five days. The day was Thursday, September 7, 2006. The weather had turned from beautiful sunny skies to gale force winds and the blasting rain that comes with fall storms. Never has the weather dictated hunting time to us, so out we ventured into the Alaska bush. Not seeing a single bull for several days, we decided to hunt an area downstream that had always produced one. Late in the evening, we were walking down a raised half mile long finger of ground that was full of grass and alders. This turf was slightly higher than the swampy tundra on either side of it. We had slogged across the swamp as quickly as possible, during a sudden deluge, to get to the downwind point. Our hope was that our passage would not be observed with the sudden increased wind and rain. About halfway down the finger, Reed turned to me and said, "I think there is a moose up ahead. It looks like two white sticks in the grass. It would surprise me if it was not a moose." I glassed the area about one hundred yards ahead and to the left. With Reed's help, I zeroed in on the two white sticks and watched them for several minutes. With the slightest movement, the two sticks transformed into a white paddle and then back to the two sticks. The bull had moved his head ever so slightly. I moved my scope out to ten-power and focused in on the two white sticks as Reed moved about ten yards further down the high ground. Then as Reed focused on the white points, I moved to his location for a better shot. Reed began moving toward our quarry as I watched for movement though the scope. With nothing solid or high enough to rest my rifle on, I was forced to aim free-hand. When Reed had taken a few steps, I saw the horns rock to the right and then back to the left. The big boy then stood up and was looking directly our way. Even with the forty mile an hour winds blowing directly at us, he sensed our presence. I squeezed off a round from my Browning .338 and felt good about the shot, but the bull took two or three steps to my right and disappeared out of sight behind some alders. Reed could still see him and shouted, "Do you want me to shoot him?" I yelled back at him to go ahead because I did not want the bull running too far. I heard his shot as I was scrambling forward to get a better look. After a thirty yard hustle, I was able to see the huge fellow still standing. I put another shot into him and watched him drop. We both hesitantly, but with great excitement, approached this giant and realized that he was dead. This was a mature bull with a beautiful rack and the biggest body mass I had ever seen. The fun was definitely over; now, the real work was ready to begin. After consulting the GPS, we noted that we were a half mile from the slough and boat. It was decided that both of us should return to the boat to discard unnecessary items and return with the gear needed to prepare and pack out the meat. We placed red and blue handkerchiefs high in an alder bush so that the sight could be located from the adjacent high ground. This was the easiest half mile hike of the day. I was pumped up and excited beyond explanation.
Continue reading "Bull Moose and Bear: A True Story"
Posted by The Barrister
in Hunting, Fishing, Dogs, Guns, etc., Our Essays
at
12:36
| Comments (7)
| Trackbacks (0)
The Husband Store
When women go to choose a husband, they have to follow the instructions at the entrance: "You may visit this store ONLY ONCE! There are 6 floors and the values of the products increase as you ascend the flights. "You may choose any Item from a particular floor, or may choose to go up to the next floor, but you CANNOT go back down except to exit the building!" So, a woman goes to the Husband Store to find a husband. On the 1st floor the sign on the door reads: Floor 1 - These men have jobs. The 2nd floor sign reads: Floor 2 - These men Have Jobs and Love Kids. The 3rd floor sign reads: Floor 3 - These men Have Jobs, Love Kids and are extremely good looking. "Wow," she thinks, but feels compelled to keep going. She goes to the 4th floor and the sign reads: Floor 4 - These men Have Jobs, Love Kids, are Drop-dead Good Looking and Help with Housework. "Oh, mercy me!" she exclaims, "I can hardly stand it!" Still, she goes to the 5th floor and sign reads: Floor 5 - These men Have Jobs, Love Kids, are Drop-dead Gorgeous, help with Housework and Have A Strong Romantic Streak. She is so tempted to stay, but she goes to the 6th floor and the sign reads: Floor 6 - You are visitor 31,456,012 to this floor. There are no men on this floor. This floor exists solely as proof that women are impossible to please. Thank you for shopping at the Husband Store. ------------------------------------------- To avoid gender bias charges, the store's owner opens a New Wives store just across the street. The 1st first floor has wives that love sex. The 2nd floor has wives that love sex and have money. The 3rd through 6th floors have never been visited.
Posted by Gwynnie
in Our Essays, The Culture, "Culture," Pop Culture and Recreation
at
08:29
| Comments (2)
| Trackbacks (0)
Thursday, November 30. 2006The Long-awaited Bovine Final ExamI know you all have been waiting eagerly. We have promised this exam for many months, but today is a good day for it. All beasts have been featured on Maggie's Farm. Multiple choice! Answers on continuation page, for you slackers. Here it is: 1. The animal below is a: Holstein, Texas Longhorn, Auroch, Swiss Angus 2. The beast below is a: Shetland Shorthorn, Bison, Yak, Musk Ox
3. The animal below is a: Jersey, Guernsey, Brown Swiss, Shorthorn
4. The animals below are: Black Angus, Holstein, Jersey, Auroch
5. The beast below is a: Holstein, Hereford, Shetland Pony, Gateway Logo
6. The critter below is a: Big MF, Brown Swiss, Shorthorn, Polled Hereford
7. The creature below is a: Holstein, Mottled Swiss, Guernsey, Holstein 8. The nasty creature below is a: Cow, Cat, Goat, Bird
9. The giant beast below is a: Longhorn, Shorthorn, Spanish, Hereford Bull
10. The milker below is a: Dark and Stormy, Brown Swiss, Shetland Shorthorn, Limousin
11. The happy animals below are: Black Angus, Brown Swiss, Polled Herefords, Brown Swiss
12. This gentle and friendly animal is a: Water Buffalo, European Bison, Cape Buffalo, Yak
13. A hard one: This breed of beef cattle is: Hereford, Shorthorn. Limousin, Charolais
14. An Ox is a(n): older bull, older steer, breed of cattle, word for a big cow 15. There are how many surviving species of wild bovines? 3, 7, 12, 17 16. "Polled" means: they grow large horns, they don't grow horns, they are born without testicles, their horns are cut off. 17. This is a: Polled Hostein, Apache Ghost Cow, Limousin, Charolais
18. Wuzzat?
Continue reading "The Long-awaited Bovine Final Exam"
Posted by Bird Dog
in Our Essays, The Culture, "Culture," Pop Culture and Recreation
at
05:15
| Comments (10)
| Trackbacks (0)
What is Ducks Unlimited?
By 6 pm, we will be ready to receive an onslaught of 180 well-dressed guys with an open bar, and a fine steak dinner later, with about 70 cool raffle items, 30 Live Auction items including stuff like a 10-day African Hunting Safari for four, and 9 days in Morocco for two with a full-time guide, and dove shooting in Argentina for three days. Even a wild boar hunt in Texas, and a traditional layout duck hunt on Long Island, and other equally cool stuff like his-and-her Rolexes, and lots of guns, too. The place will be decorated for Christmas. Like modern-day Christmas, our event is a jolly, earthly, material festivity with a spiritual purpose. For many people on the left and right coasts, DU is not as familiar as it is in the heartland of the US and Canada, but with over 11 million acres of wildlife habitat under protection, and over 800,000 members, it is a big organization, and does nothing but good works, with minimal lobbying, and no political action. Contrary to the impression of some, DU isn't all about ducks - it's all about protection of fragile and threatened habitats which support all sorts of critters and birds. While probably most members of DU rarely hunt, DU does have a bit of a hunting flavor to it. Why? Good hunters know the land, and have a feel for it, like the Indians did. The wise ones know the plants and trees and birds and the geography and the habitats. Hunters are the most serious conservationists, because they really get out there, off the beaten path and into the wild world. Your average "greeny" rarely loses their boot in a bog, or surprises a moose in a meadow, gets near-frostbite in a duckboat at 4 AM in a January snow, awaiting sunrise, or watches a red fox trotting home in the early morning from their tree stand, or even sees a Woodcock twitter through the birches. It isn't an abstraction when a subdivision destroys your favorite grouse cover, or fills in your favorite duck swamp "for the tax revenue". All of us Maggie's Farmers consider DU worthy of our effort and our giving. We consider it part of good stewardship - good citizenship, and it's good fun too. You can read all about DU here.
Posted by Bird Dog
in Natural History and Conservation, Our Essays
at
05:00
| Comment (1)
| Trackbacks (0)
Wednesday, November 29. 2006The growth of wisdom: Boobs are good
Posted by Gwynnie
in Our Essays, The Culture, "Culture," Pop Culture and Recreation
at
09:27
| Comments (6)
| Trackbacks (0)
Yeah! Racism!The kerfuffle about this Richards guy, who I know nothing about and never saw the TV series, who called some hecklers "niggers" in an ill-considered effort to be edgy and funny, just one comment: the joy and sense of confirmation of the race-mongers has been palpable. They feel relief, like being given a gallon of gas to get to the next gas station. For people who build their careers, and base their incomes, on tracking down racism, any public stupidity becomes a cause celebre. It unveils the "dark undercurrent of latent racism", or BS like that. Why? Because nowadays there is so darn little racism in America that race-mongering is a dying profession, like manufacturing buggy whips. So anytime some moron, especially an actor or some similar fool, says something stupid, it has to rise into a very BIG DEAL. Race-mongering has become a very desperate career - and that is a good thing for America, as long as we do not take it seriously when Jesse and Al find an excuse to get themselves in the news again. In an era when Condi Rice is Secretary of State, and Obama is running for President, the racial witch-hunting seems a bit silly, and dated. America has reason to be proud to be the most post-racism nation on the planet. We have become a "content of our character" country, as MLK dreamed. Tuesday, November 28. 2006How the Irish Saved Civilization, etc.
The Norsemen terrorized the British Isles during the dark ages, raping, burning, killing and pillaging...all the fun stuff Vikings liked to do, but also settling and colonizing, to some extent, until the French-speaking Norsemen of Normandy finally took the whole place over in 1066, more or less. Monks huddled on top of inaccessible places like Skellig Michael to elude them, and dedicated their lives to prayer and the copying of the ancient classical writings. We first learned about Skellig Michael on the old PBS Civilization series by Lord Kenneth Clark (that was good TV - every kid should see it). And then more in Thomas Cahill's wonderful How the Irish Saved Civilization. I like all of Cahill's stuff, especially Desire of the Everlasting Hills: The World Before and After Jesus. I have been to Skellig Michael. Took the little fishing boat out there and climbed those endless narrow stone-cut, railing-less, acrophobia-inducing steps almost to the top, where their stone huts still sit in the wind and clouds. Would not recommend going to Ireland without going down there. Image: A view from Skellig Michael.
Posted by Bird Dog
in History, Our Essays, The Culture, "Culture," Pop Culture and Recreation
at
05:50
| Comments (2)
| Trackbacks (0)
Sunday, November 26. 2006Highways to Heaven?Instapundit posted a link to this piece by Bennett in praise of our interstate highways. They get no praise from me. The romance of the open road? No thanks. Boring as hell. Not only that, the interstates were little more than a boondoggle for the car and real estate business. Why a boondoggle? Because these roads were bought by the taxpayers. The railroads, on the other hand, were paid for by the railroads. The highways created the urban sprawl which all aesthetes and conservation-minded folk, like me, deplore. Only those who live on the coasts know what these highways did to destroy, permanently, natural and agricultural areas - and to damage the railroad industry with government roads. I use them all the time, but I resent their existence nonetheless.
Posted by The Barrister
in Our Essays, The Culture, "Culture," Pop Culture and Recreation
at
15:33
| Comments (0)
| Trackbacks (0)
Thursday, November 23. 2006Jonathan Edwards: Founding Grandfather
The most interesting book I've read this year - George Marsden's recent biography of Jonathan Edwards. I am about halfway through it, but find it difficult to put down. (It won the Bancroft Prize.) Marsden weaves late colonial history, theology, Edward's complex life (his struggles with faith, struggles with temptation, struggles with character flaws, his depressions, his never-resting intelligence), and the daily life of the times into a darn good tale. And Marsden does know his theology. Connecticut's Edwards (1703-1758) is one of the most compelling and important figures in American history - probably more important than the Founding Fathers: he helped lay the cultural foundation on which the national institutions were constructed. I see him as the evolutionary link between the Puritan Pilgrims and the world of the Founders. His view of the world was far better known in the colonies in 1776 than were the works of John Locke - or of anyone else: sermons were best-sellers in those days. Isolated: not really. Did Edwards read Locke? You bet. Locke was his great inspiration (except for scripture), at Yale (then a divinity school). Newton and Rousseau too: these New Englanders were plugged into the latest European thinking. His life and preaching remain a part of America's national DNA. As theologian, theological logician, preacher, and the preeminant evangelist of the Great Awakening, he has been and remains the dominant figure in the history of American religious life - and a major international figure, too, because of his role in the worldwide movement that puritan Reform (Calvinism) represented. So he is well worth reading about. From the Booklist review:
A quote from Marsden's excellent Introduction:
Posted by Bird Dog
in History, Our Essays, Religion, The Culture, "Culture," Pop Culture and Recreation
at
11:50
| Comments (0)
| Trackbacks (0)
The Yankee view of the world: A cold, rainy Thanksgiving morning in YankeelandSo-called "nice weather" doesn't mean a thing to real Yankees. We exult in challenging weather, and love to go out in it to do things. Indeed, we look down on the "soft," who want life to be easy, overly comfortable, over-heated, and overly safe. We like hard stuff, and we like to teach ourselves discipline. We do not respect the soft, lazy, easy parts ourselves - and rightly so. But we do not disdain good sex or good wine or good company. Even mediocre wine. And neither did the Puritans, as they were disparagingly termed. Furthermore, we are raised to expect life to bang us up, draw some blood, break our hearts, make us shiver in the wet cold sleet, rust our guns, damage our faith, strain our capacities, get us lost in the financial, spiritual, metaphysical, or literal woods, disappoint our fondest hopes and dreams, make us hurt by friends and injured by enemies, drag us towards sin and pride, face us with risk, hand us loneliness and doubt, confront us with danger, add sorrow to our basket of sorrows, and even to kill some of us. But we must give thanks for the chance to engage all of it, for better or worse, as best we can, with such gifts and such weaknesses as we are given. Can we take delight in the moments of joy and pleasure? Of course. But those are the exceptions: the dessert, the country pies of life. No God promised us a rose garden: only politicans do that. God gave us mainly a chance for salvation of our souls - and interesting weather, and an interesting, complex, difficult life, to contend with, without all of the tools we really need....except the ablility to connect with God's love, if we want to. It's about Grace.
Posted by Bird Dog
in Our Essays, The Culture, "Culture," Pop Culture and Recreation
at
10:32
| Comments (4)
| Trackbacks (0)
Tuesday, November 21. 2006The "second bill of rights" ?When ye olde brain is hungy for a completely new thought or piece of info, ye olde fingertips often click on One Cosmos or, in this case, on View From 1776 in which, in a discussion of social contracts, he quotes from FDR in 1944 asserting something that I did not know had ever been so
This guy ran for President four times and tried to control the Supreme Court in ways no-one had before or has since, but I will not launch into an anti-FDR rant right now. It is just interesting to see how he invented a "second bill of rights" out of whole cloth and, in the process, undermined the entire independent, family-centered American way of life. "We have accepted, so to speak..." Huh? What? This is noblesse oblige in its most insidious, malignant form, with the royal "we." I'm the prole, you are the Great Benefactor, right? Another question: How come they never include free legal care on the lists? That would seem basic for a country with rule by law. How many people still believe that this sort of stuff is actually in the Constitution? P. J. O'Rourke
We have read every book he has written, with great amusement, and we have even publicly indicated a half-serious interest in hunting grouse and woodcock with him in New Brunswick. The subject of P. J. comes up becomes Wizbang has been thinking about humorous conservatives, and those folks seem to enjoy New Hampshire's P.J. as much as we do. And, to save us the trouble, Wizbang has an archived quote from All the Trouble in the World, which is good fun:
There's an entertaining interview with him here. And also in Cigar Afficionado.
Posted by Bird Dog
in Our Essays, Politics, The Culture, "Culture," Pop Culture and Recreation
at
11:26
| Comments (2)
| Trackbacks (0)
Friday, November 17. 2006A few quotes from the quotable Milton Friedman
Many people want the government to protect the consumer. A much more urgent problem is to protect the consumer from the government. I stand for the values of freedom, not just the practical benefits. Even if free market economics was not the most efficient system, I'd still be in favor of it because of the human values it represents of choice, challenge, and risk. Nobody spends somebody else's money as carefully as he spends his own. Nobody uses somebody else's resources as carefully as he uses his own. So if you want efficiency and effectiveness, if you want knowledge to be properly utilized, you have to do it through the means of private property. Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. I think it's really disgraceful that the Republican Party, which preaches holding down the size of government, should have been, and the Bush administration should have been, such a big spender. I have found no reason whatsoever for having a public school system. You would have a better educational system—elementary and secondary system, if the government were not involved. Industrial progress, mechanical improvement, all of the great wonders of the modern era have meant relatively little to the wealthy. The government solution to a problem is usually as bad as the problem. Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program. The most important single central fact about a free market is that no exchange takes place unless both parties benefit. We cannot expect existing businesses to promote legislation that would harm them. It is up to the rest of us to promote the public interest by fostering competition across the board and to recognize that being pro-free enterprise may sometimes require that we be anti-existing business. A society that puts equality ahead of freedom...will end up with neither. The only way that has ever been discovered to have a lot of people cooperate together voluntarily is through the free market. And that's why it's so essential to preserving individual freedom. Concentrated power is not rendered harmless by the good intentions of those who create it. Most economic fallacies derive from the tendency to assume that there is a fixed pie, that one party can gain only at the expense of another. President Kennedy said, "Ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country."... Neither half of that statement expresses a relation between the citizen and his government that is worthy of the ideals of free men in a free society. School should be fun! And easy!
It's the same old story: spending does not correlate with results. What does school spending correlate with? Teacher's union votes. EDUCATION RESULTS ARE CULTURAL. Math is too hard - can't the kids do something creative? To develop and express their special selves? And to have fun? Abe Lincoln learned more in a one-room schoolhouse with a wood fire and a only a Bible to read and a teacher with a paddle than kids do today. Not even air conditioning! Most American kids want everything to be easy, and they want work to be nothing more than a short path to a second childhood, called "retirement." I suppose the new way is just not the old Yankee view of life. Our material comfort and success is biting us in the behind: it is both a blessing and a curse. Perhaps, in time, this lazy approach to life will lead us back, against our will, to our true gritty selves. Image: a Kansas one-room schoolhouse
« previous page
(Page 183 of 191, totaling 4769 entries)
» next page
|