|
Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Wednesday, November 15. 2006A business-as-usual war strategy? I have supported Mr. Rumsfeld a long time, and never saw a clear summary of the other side of the story. General Zais' story below resonates with me from my Vietnam experience as a minor player under a really incapable SECDEF, Rob't "Yo-Yo" MacNamara. Zais says its the Pentagon civilians who want the expensive techno-toys, but I'd say "No way!" It's the Air Force and Navy brass who have nothing better to do than push civilian appointees around - remember Jack Nicholson's line in "A Few Good Men"?
This gets said to every civilian greenie in the Pentagon. I remember when Dave Packard became Assistant SecDef, and a General said he felt reluctant to bully a guy with (at that time) $400 million, as though not bullying was something remarkable. After reading this, I think a lot of things are clearer, even if it is an advocacy piece; at worst, it deserves a cogent rebuttal, but I don't somehow expect I'll see one...........
Continue reading "A business-as-usual war strategy?" More Fra AngelicosTwo small Fra Angelicos have been discovered. Cool story, at Never Yet melted. Below is my photo of the convent of San Domenico on the road between Fiesole and Firenze where Fra Giovanni di Fiesole, aka Fra Angelico (born Guido di Pietro) worked and lived. You walk in there, and the church is dark, dusty, and empty. Not even an old lady to accept a donation for the church.
You turn the switch for the bare hanging lightbulb in each little side chapel, and you see magical stuff like this:
Posted by Bird Dog
in Our Essays, The Culture, "Culture," Pop Culture and Recreation
at
08:48
| Comments (0)
| Trackbacks (0)
Tuesday, November 14. 2006Bovine of the Week: Holy Cow! Are Episcopalians not into Jesus?
The new head of American Episcopalians doubts Jesus' unique divine nature. (h/t, News for Christians). Maybe she should find another job? But could she find one? Divinity School does not prepare anyone for anything but help with worship. That is a fine thing indeed, but what if you want to worship anything? What if everything and anything is sacred? That's not religion - that's something else. WalMart always needs cheerful greeters. I have no doubt that she is a bright gal, but I am not sure that she has heard the music. Image: Yes, that is the golden calf which is, no doubt, a path to God for modern Episcopalians. And all the people said "Moooo." Hey - we do dig cows, but we do not worship them, golden, or otherwise. Hmmm... if those ancients had discovered ice cream from those cattle, they might have had a worthy object of devotion. Just kidding. Saturday, November 11. 2006Radical Kids: It's about getting chicks
Why? Because these are kids. Like many (non-Asian) kids, they try to find their own way to stand out and be noticed, and being a young rebel is one way. (Of course, being good at something, achieving something, and getting decent grades in challenging courses, might be a bit more mature.) On the other hand, getting your name in the paper about the Pledge could be the best way for an otherwise-undistinguished white boy with average grades to get into the University of Michigan Law School. In my experience, campus radicals are the guys who secretly, or even unwittingly, wish they could have been on a team - preferably the ultra-hip Lacrosse team. Name me one guy who didn't want to be on the Lacrosse team. Or at least the football... or any sports team. I know - I wasn't. The "radical" girls were just dogs with an attitude, as I recall. Hated their mothers, or something like that. Nice. Wonder what they are doing today? Probably on play dates with other moms, or, at worse, valiant single mothers by guys who just wanted to get laid... or maybe working at Vogue. But there was a basic lesson for guys: don't get involved with gals who hate their mothers, because they will hate you, too, in time. There was a line somewhere in The Strawberry Statement where someone - maybe the author James Kunin - confessed that he was attracted to radicalism to get dates, which he had trouble getting. That "statement" stood out as one truly human and humane statement in that book about that silly period. Kunin was nobody's fool and. like most Lefties, a closet capitalist - he sold a ton of books, and got a movie deal. The Che t-shirts? Means no more than James Dean t-shirts used to mean. Which is: "I wish I were a tough SOB with an edgy, pointless mission in life instead of Mom and Dad's pampered college student with a BMW and a C+ in Rocks for Jocks, in comfy, decadent, free America." Someday, these kids' kids will look at these old photos say laugh and say "Dad - I can't believe that was you!" For some kids, being obnoxiously irreverent is good sport, and can turn a nobody into a somebody. It's tough, as a young person, to accept that we are all nobodys. Does irreverence towards the things that I hold most dear piss me off? Of course. But I knew such kids in college: it is designed to have that effect. Let's not react like Moslems to foolish kids, or like our parents - or grandparents - did to the great Elvis! Or, God forbid, the Beatles. "Turn that crap down!" The thing that cracks me up most about such stories is when the grown-ups admire them. That is a sure sign of arrested development, but many college faculty never fully grow up, due to insulation from hard knocks and ordinary reality in the ivory towers. Not that I do not, in some ways, envy those who can devote their life to the world of ideas... Nice gig, but too political for me. Thursday, November 9. 2006Political Parties, Pragmatism, and the ElectionWelcome, RWNH readers. Check out our blog, while you're here. You might like it, and the price is right. The loudest voices in political parties tend to be the ideologues, and ideologues always want ideological purity. Ideologies become almost like religions to some people but, like religions, most of them are wrong. (I write this as an old-fashioned Yankee conservative ideologue, for whom freedom from government intrusion, control, taxation, and annoyance is a primary consideration. And defence, of course, for national elections.) But American political parties are not liberal vs. conservative,and definitely not Left vs. Right - whatever "right" means. Both parties, most of the time, are pragmatic in governance, with a few sexy issues thrown in as red meat to their ideological base. (The news rarely reports the 99% of non-controversial governance that goes on in the executive offices of administrations, from the local to the federal.) Purity is not a good thing: internal debate is much more wholesome and American - unless politics is a religion to you. Mutts are always healthier than pure breeds. When you think about it, how do party affiliations begin? They are either inherited via argument or habit, or someone who wants to get into the game tends to join the party that has the most power where they live. I repeat: the Republican Party is not a Conservative Party, nor is the Democratic Party a Liberal or Socialist Party, in essence. Nor should they be, but the ideologues always want them to be. That is natural. What parties are, in essence, are fund-raising financial organizations designed to elect people who join their club, and to provide and support debate and opposition. Like baseball teams. That is why I was offended when a conservative Repub challenged liberal Republican Chaffee in RI, and I have no doubt that the damage from the primary is why Chaffee lost reelection: the controversy interfered with his quietly winning as people named Chaffee tend to do in RI, like people named Kennedy in MA. And this is why I was offended by Lamont's primary challenge to Lieberman. Both of those challenges were done on the grounds of ideological purity, as if motivated by Stalinist party-line doctrine. That is silly, and self-destructive: it's a big country, with many points of view on things (and anyone who disagrees with me is, of course, also Wrong Wrong Wrong). America is a majority conservative, tradition-respecting country, but above all, it is a pragmatic country. DeToqueville figured out, a long time ago, that pragmatism was a big part of our genius as a nation. While we tend to think that the two parties do tend "conservative" and "liberal," in fact there is plenty of overlap. For one example, the federal budget grew faster during Bush's time than it did during Clinton. So who is fiscally conservative, really? And who is the big spender? (Yes, I know about the war, but that is just part of the spending of our money. And yes, I know, Clinton was restrained by Repubs - but Repubs cannot restrain themselves!) Why was that? Bush was trying to be a pragmatist, not a conservative. Same as his dad, same as B. Clinton, same as Nixon, same as John F. Kennedy, same as Truman, same as Eisenhower. FDR, I believe, was a pragmatist who was captured by ideologues. Our (and my) conservative hero, Reagan, was a great teacher, but he was not even able, in eight years, to get a majority to close the highly annoying and intrusive federal Department of Education. His most important domestic accomplishment was to add some good folks to the Supreme Court - and the same goes for Bush. My point is highlighted by the number of conservative Democrats who have been elected this go-round, including, late last night (giving the Dems a Senate majority), the seemingly excellent candidate Jim Webb of Virginia. Good for them. It's healthy - and sane, because you could not build a national party with 100 Ted Kennedys or with 100 Tom Tancredos (although I do like Tom very much). So although it makes it convenient for the MSM and blog ranters to ideologically divide the parties, and then demonize the image of the party they dislike, and to idealize the image of the one they like, usually the reality is not exactly like that. What I want to see are most conservative Dems from the South and the West, and more liberal Repubs from the Northeast and California. Rahm Emanuel learned this from Clinton - or vice versa. Yes, it makes things more complicated but, heck, it the whole system was designed to be complicated, on purpose. Is this really about the election? Not really, I guess. Mid-terms are usually rough on incumbent parties, and this was no different - except that the margin had grown so thin since the 1994 Gingrich Revolution that it tipped the balance. But conservatives always have a tough challenge: their goal is to devolve power back to the people and to localities - which means undoing more than doing. A tough row to hoe, always. Even for Reagan. Like Christians in the Coloseum, conservatives shine most brightly in adversity, and in opposition. Cheerful warriors! Wednesday, November 8. 2006"Stop talking about facts - you're hurting the cause"
Read the whole piece. Classic case of abusing science for a political agenda. The scientific debate hasn't ended: it has just begun. Image: a spectroheliogram image of good old Mr. Sun Tuesday, November 7. 2006Adirondack Hunt: Thanks for askingRe-posted from Nov 1, 2005. Was that trip a year ago?
Our bird hunting trip to the Adirondacks this past weekend was a delight, thanks to excellent, lively companionship, but no thanks to an unseasonably early dump of 16" of snow on Tues/Weds. Conditions up north were not ideal for grouse, or for walking in the deep woods and gnarly alder patches. Nevertheless, the mix of good guys, birds, dogs, guns, and tough-walking, leg-challenging woods, followed by excellent tobacco and moderate amounts of good alcohol, is always one hell of a fine combination for the average American male. And, as I always say, "Hunting isn't shopping." Especially the way I have been shooting this year. On Saturday we headed east, close to Lake Champlaine, where there was no snow, and we had the good fortune to run into a couple of migrating flights of woodock (one flush every five minutes), which redeemed our trip, as did our gala game dinner Saturday night at our gracious hosts at The Hungry Trout, featuring trout, moose, woodcock, grouse, Canada Goose, venison and duck, accompanied by witty conversation and good stories, both the lies and the true. Thanks to a pal's Citation, (next time you are in one, ask the pilot to show you how fast he can climb that machine, and then lean back) the trip was rapid and luxurious, with all necessary adult beverages. NetJets is one way to do it, but there may be better deals if you shop around, or so I am told - but I do not play in that league. This photo from Friday, up towards the Canadian border, close to Dannemora, NY. Monday, November 6. 2006Rove admits "We thought we could steal just one more election."
In a moment of uncharacteristic candor, the genius went on to say that "I have the Diebold master key code in my briefcase, and I can get any result I want, just through my laptop - even without our usual black voter intimidation program and our magic chad trick." "The only risk was that we overplay our hand with the computer voting," he bragged. "but now that the Dems are on to us, we may need to go to Plan B - martial law." News reports from Pierre indicate that Dick Cheney has already retired to what is rumored to be his CIA-constructed "duck blind" command center in South Dakota, ready to put Plan B into effect at a moment's notice. Before removing his wig and scarf to make a quiet, if stumbling, exit, Rove added "Don't try to come up here after the election with no ACLU lawyers - Cheney fired his warning shot last fall, so now everyone knows what he is capable of." Climate politics, and the (lack of) costly garments in the warmer future
Monckton has a series in the Telegraph: Climate Chaos? Don't believe it, which I highly recommend. If I could remember who linked it, I'd give them credit. Quotes:
Is Mr. Stern a fearmonger? You bet. TCS. Do human activities effect climate? Sure - they have for 10,000 years, at the margins. But we just have to cope with change. Change is always with us, and we humans are clever sorts. Image: Work garb in the year 2050, as predicted by global warming fearmongers. Image scientifically demonstrates that the crisis of global warming will result in women going around in scanty clothing. The so-called experts never calculate in just how much money we will all save on winter coats and long johns - and winter heating. Plus the ladies can give their seal coats back to the baby seals. Sunday, November 5. 2006Does God want you to be rich?
However, I suspect larger, deeper issues than these preoccupy God, and that "life in abundance" does not mean owning five expensive cars, or a 10,000 square foot house, or having a million sycophant friends, or a gun room full of Purdys and Perazzis - however pleasing and desirable those things may be. Speaking as just one regular guy, who is wealthy by world standards but well below average by my local neighborhood standards, it has always seemed that God is more interested in humbling me, and teaching me gratitude, and seeking my devotion, than in raising me up by worldly measures. But what I want to post is a quote from Nelson Mandela, with good comments following from Worstall, which which I agree:
Saturday, November 4. 2006Political Sleight of Hand
What they did was to say "Look at Obama and Foley, don't look at us." Reid, Pelosi, Kennedy, Dean, Gore, etc. all went into hiding (Kerry's gaffe blew that scheme, and Dean has trouble keeping his mouth shut), and the MSM cooperated mightily to distract the country with the fresh face of the likeable but thus far unaccomplished Obama - a guy with no track record who goes to church, and with the now-unlikeable mug of sleazeball Mark Foley. This is indeed a strategy of distraction: distraction from the people who may be in charge of the House, and from their unspoken (and unspeakable) goals. Above all, remember: It's NOT THE ECONOMY, STUPID. And just one additional question: How come the Dems can call Michael Steele a "Republican lawn jockey" but you cannot call Obama a "Dem plantation slave"? The real secret is that the Dems only love blacks and gays and women, etc. as long as they stand with their wealthy and privileged Dem masters. When they think for themselves, and stray from the Plantation, they are tracked down by the Party Hounds, and find themselves targets of hate, and in big trouble. It is a filthy business. Friday, November 3. 2006Not wacko enviros: Overfishing and the Atlantic fish crisis
The tale of woe is highlighted this week by a piece via the AP here, and another at the WaPo here. It's the tragedy of the commons. And these commons" aren't really all that large. Most of the Atlantic is very thin in fish. They congregate, during their migrations, on the banks, like George's Bank, Stellwagen, and the Grand Banks, where their food is plentiful.
The Bush administration, interestingly, has made some real progress towards unwinding some of the anti-conservation regulations in the Atlantic fisheries, but New England politics remains a factor: commercial fishing is "a way of life," despite the fact that it is now dominated by what you might call "Big Fishing." Bush has been a staunch conservationist about fishing in general, also here, most recently. This summer, he signed a bill creating the world's largest marine preserve. I always have hoped that fish farming would ge a good solution. It's been successful in some ways in some areas - salmon, for instance, oysters and mussels. But problems with disease transmission sunk the cod farming attempts in Canada. It may be far too late to rebuild the Atlantic fishing stocks. There is a tipping point at which restoration cannot occur. And it is a damn shame, because for us at Maggie's Farm, we care not only on conservation and stewardship grounds - we love to eat fish, and we love to go fishin'. We gain hope from the story of the Striped Bass, which is having a real resurgence since commercial fishing for them has been controlled. I just finished a book, The Doryman's Reflection: A Fisherman's Life, by Paul Molyneaux. It's not a great book, but it gives a good flavor of what is going on from a guy who has seen the transition from the old to the new ways of fishing, and who understands the regulations, and the science too. The concern about our fish is not wacky greenie hysteria, it's not crying wolf. It is as real as what happened to the Passenger Pigeon and the Buffalo. There is a role for government here (is that not shocking to hear from us libertarian-minded folks?), and it shouldn't cost the taxpayer a penny. But, if done right, it will hurt the brave fishermen who daily risk their lives in the rugged and most dangerous occupation in the US. Sad, but necessary: these are not guys who could switch to an office job. The industry has succeeded beyond its ability to sustain itself.
Posted by Bird Dog
in Hunting, Fishing, Dogs, Guns, etc., Our Essays, Politics
at
12:01
| Comments (2)
| Trackback (1)
Thursday, November 2. 2006Sic Semper TyrannisThe news has just come out The proposed constitution had been roundly criticized for its anti-democratic nature, yet had been massively promoted by an alumni council that had already violated its own constitutional election rules in anticipation of the constitution's passage. An overview of the whole saga can be found at Joe's Dartblog, here. Let's see whether they do like the EU, and try it again in a year or two. Animal of the Week: Musk Ox
They are the Bison of the Tundra - but they are not bovines, despite their appearance and name. They are closer to goats. Remarkably, there is a group in Alaska which is breeding them for domestication, which does seem 6000 years too late. A bit about these remarkable critters here. Can they be hunted? Once you get up there, it's too much like shooting a cow in a pasture. The Eskimos kill them, though, but they kill anything, including seagulls.
Posted by Bird Dog
in Natural History and Conservation, Our Essays
at
05:51
| Comments (2)
| Trackbacks (0)
Wednesday, November 1. 2006Little mistakes, and big mistakes: Dr. Bliss on KerryWelcome to the Farm, all of you friendly visitors from RWNH. Check out ye olde blogge, and visit us again - we are unpredictable, and pretty good.
Let me begin by saying that I do not think that Kerry misspoke. I believe he said what he meant, regardless of whether it is what he was scripted to say. Why do I think that? Because what he said is classic, typical Eastern lefty condescending elitist talk: I hear this kind of thing at every Cambridge cocktail party. It is completely normal talk in the Kerry's circles. And because he is still stuck in 1968. But, just for the heck of it, let's be generous and give him the benefit of the doubt, and imagine that he made a non-Freudian slip of the tongue. Say he made a little mistake of wording, but that can be a big mistake for politicians: they are not supposed to ever say what they really think. And when they make a mistake, regardless of how it occurred, the right thing to do is to say that you goofed. Everybody makes mistakes in life - mistakes of judgement, impulsivity, recklessness, fecklessness, foolishness, nervousness, over-emotionality, or sheer cussedness. But mistakes stick to a person when: 1. they crystallize something already felt about the person (eg Dukakis and the tank helmet, or Dean's scream). 2. the mistakes are so repetitive that it is clear that they are not anomalous, but personal characteristics (eg Clinton and Monica, or Mark Foley - remember him?). 3. they are mishandled in such a way as to make a smaller goof into a big mistake (eg Clinton and Monica). We recommend self-deprecating humor as the best way to go. 4. it's a key moment, like an election, (or in romance) when every little thing is scrutinized. (eg in a passionate moment with Bill, sighing "Oh, Carl, you're so...manly.") Kerry's little slip had the misfortune of embodying all of the above. Image above: Kerry at Yale, where his grades were worse than George Bush's. Believe me - neither of them could get into Yale today.
Image: from AOL news. (Editor's note: Dr. B emailed me this incomplete draft to look over, but I figured we'd post it due to timeliness. She can complete it at her leisure. I added the images.)
Posted by Bird Dog
in Our Essays, Politics, Psychology, and Dr. Bliss
at
13:24
| Comments (4)
| Trackbacks (0)
Saturday, October 28. 2006Aliyah Diary: Protestants, Catholics, and JewsThanks to our Aliyah Diary guest author for bringing to our attention Armand Laferrere's essay The Huguenots, the Jews, and Me. Laferrere's piece explains some of the history of the growing links between Protestants and Jews in a hostile world. The book by Matthew Levitt is Hamas: Politics, Charity and Terrorism in the Service of Jihad. Levitt, now deputy assistant secretary for intelligence in the Treasury Department, is interviewed here. Levitt's "Hamas" (AZURE 26, Autumn 2006, reviewed by Leiter) and Laferrere's "The Huguenots, the Jews, and Me" are conceptually A quote from Leiter's review: "...It is in this context that Levitt makes one of his most important contributions to our understanding of how terror works. Fungible funds, it turns out, are only part of the problem. The crossover between dawa and terror, he shows, extends to works of charity themselves. Ambulances are used to transport suicide bomb belts, schools are used to hide weapons, and charitable organizations are used as recruiting centers for terrorists. Hospitals are used to procure ingredients for bombs, such as the nitric acid and hydrogen sulfide used to produce nitroglycerin explosives, and hydrogen peroxide to make an explosive called tatp, which is favored by Hamas. Dawa-supported doctors use their freedom of travel privileges to smuggle suicide bombers into Israel. Likewise, libraries supported by the Hamas dawa are used for the dissemination of radical sermons glorifying death and murder, and in what is perhaps the most potent symbol of the link between dawa and terror, mosques are used for storing weapons and hosting operational meetings. In short, Hamas offers a holistic religious doctrine that treats good works toward coreligionists and terrorization of the enemy as two sides of the same coin." Friday, October 27. 2006Bovines of the Week: Beef Cattle - Old-fashioned breedsAny breed of cattle can be - and is - made into hamburger meat, including old Daisy herself, when her milk production slows down. But today we'll just look at two of the historically popular American beef cattle. The Shorthorn is a relatively minor breed now, but when it was brought from England in the late 1700s it became popular. It had its origins in Roman times. This is a bull:
The Longhorn was brought to the New World by the Spanish, and was the main Western breed until replaced via hybridization, and by other breeds like the Angus and the Hereford, by 1900. Now it only exists on refuges and there are few breeders, but its gene pool might have something to offer today's breeders.
Posted by Bird Dog
in Natural History and Conservation, Our Essays
at
08:15
| Comments (0)
| Trackbacks (0)
Thursday, October 26. 2006Distract the Morans
Our News Junkie made a good point the other day when he mentioned distraction as the Dem election strategery. Like good attorneys, politicians can always find a case to make for themselves, regardless of its relevance - or honor, or honesty. That's their job, and that's why politicians are among the most despised professions in the US. The problem, in a mid-term election like this, is that the nation is prosperous, the economy is great, everyone has a job, the bad guys are on the defensive and leaving us alone here, the old folks have their free medicines, the Dow is up, and all is rosy in America the Beautiful. The Iraq War has turned into little more than an aggressive policing, and they may build a fence to protect us from the Mexican invaders. So clearly the Dems, with their allies in the MSM, have come up with the only logical strategy, or "theory," as we lawyers term it. This theory appears to be "Distract the moron voters:" Don't talk about the economy - talk about Mark Foley. All of the above seasoned with the usual and time-honored "Scare the blacks," "Scare the old folks", "We care," "Let the dead felons vote," "Scare the women who want abortions," "Saddam wasn't all that bad," "Time for a change," and "Promise the suckers more freebies." The MSM is clearly on board with this plan, as expected. My message to the Dems: Tell me plainly what you are FOR, and what you want TO DO, and I will decide how to vote. Wednesday, October 25. 2006Three funny guys: Tom Sharpe, Peter de Vries, and Carl HiaasenThese three dudes are the modern masters of farce, absurdist and semi-black humor. They all have no trouble making fun of earnest silliness, and all of their humor is dead serious. A friend turned me on to the Brit Tom Sharpe, who has never been afraid of political correctness. But I never knew about his Wilt series, which is on the way to me from Amazon at this moment. I had only read his two which were set in South Africa. The mental hospital staging a Zulu War as a therapeutic theater piece with the patients taking sides with real weapons is just unbelievable. But so are the people with the rubber suit fetishes. Peter de Vries, a long-time editor at The New Yorker and Editor of Poetry magazine, and long-time resident of Westport, CT now, alas, dead, wrote a number of droll, warmly satirical novels, most of them about life in Fairfield County. He is the most religious atheist writer I can think of. Adultery, social climbing, book clubs, alcohol abuse, horny adolescents, existential crises, wonderful misfits, nouveau riches, do-gooders, old-time eccentric grouchy Yankees, wacky preachers, and hearty golfers are the grist for his mill. Favorite De Vries quotes: "Nostalgia isn't what it used to be," and "It is the final proof of God's omnipotence that he need not exist in order to save us." One more: "I was baptised, but it didn't take." Can you label this genre "comic seriousness"? Carl Hiaasen - bio here - prize-winning Florida journalist and co-songwriter with the late lamented Warren Zevon, has a feel for the dark side of South Florida culture (is there a bright side?) which he illuminates with such characters as Skink, the one-eyed ex-Florida governor who lives in the swamp, eats only road kill, and trusts only vets for medical help. My favorites are Skin Tight, Double Whammy, and Tourist Season.
Posted by Bird Dog
in Our Essays, The Culture, "Culture," Pop Culture and Recreation
at
07:01
| Comments (0)
| Trackback (1)
Tuesday, October 24. 2006The paradox of conservatism: Seeking government power to increase freedom
In the famous words of Bill Buckley, "The job of conservatives was to stand athwart history, yelling, stop." It seems to be almost impossible to do, practically. And in democratic systems, everything is about the politically practical. It's accidentally built into the DNA of the system, (although giant American federal bureaucracies handing out money and rules never was intended - or even envisioned -by our founders who detested the giant European bureacracies and centralized state systems, as in France). Not everyone respects that heritage of ours. This week, I heard a voter quoted on the radio "Bush is focused on Iraq, but what is he doing to take care of me?" We have all heard such statements, because that attitude is pervasive, and, I believe, enormously destructive. So how do conservatives hold on to power when the population has been trained for two or three generations of Left-tinged rule to reflexively expect "government to fix it" - whatever it may be? There is only one way: to fill the nation with vigorous, optimistic, freedom-oriented, inspiring, courageous talk about the American way of life and the opportunities available to everyone to go out there and try to build whatever life they envision. Reagan knew how to do that. Bush has not the talent, nor the taste, for dramatic rhetoric - and neither did his dad. The subject comes up because of two blog pieces over the past week addressing the "totalitarian" impulses of the Left. We have often written on that topic at Maggie's Farm. Sisu from a piece titled "Simply an affirmation of naked power":
Dr. Sanity, from a piece entitled "The Political Left and their Totalitarian Dreams":
I do believe that the Left has totalitarian dreams - a morally lost person can decide that the ends can justify the means if he cares about the "common good," and is certain that he's right. That is referring to the Left: I do not believe that all Dems have similar dreams, but I do think that they almost always favor policies which expand the federal state and its power - always for the "common good", mind you. C.S Lewis, as quoted by Samizdata:
Power, unlike money, is a zero-sum game. Every incremental increase in federal governmment power and authority over our lives is at the price of a bit of individual and local power and autonomy. And with that price goes a bit of the human spirit and a bit of what makes America unique in the world. Monday, October 23. 2006Look out! Here comes "the common good" againThere are two phrases which drive me nuts. One is "root causes," and the other is "The common good." Expensive consultants have advised the Dems that "the common good" might be a good theme for them. They even imagine that wrapping themselves in a virtuous, John Stuart Mill-sounding cloak could help bring Christians on board. After all, who is against "the common good"? But there are many ways of looking at the common good. I know what the Dems mean by it: they want to increase dependency on the Federal govt, and therefore on them. In fact, our Bird Dog wrote on this subject one week ago: Is a nation a family? We can expect more of this "It takes a village" stuff over the next two years, I believe. As Hillary Clinton now-famously said in 2004: "We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that (tax relief) short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." From a piece by Zoll in The Christian Post (h/t, News for Christians):
The whole thing here. Sunday, October 22. 2006Aliyah Diary: Stopping PowerEditor's Note: This is one of a series of occasional reports from our friend Nathan, who is "making aliyah" this year. For more info about this, and for past postings, click the Aliyah Diary category. I have to say that I am both amused and pleased to see Nathan getting comfortable with firearms. Most Jewish, urban psychoanalysts are not - and that is fact, not stereotype. Aliyah, October 21
Continue reading "Aliyah Diary: Stopping Power" Saturday, October 21. 2006Kinglet City
Yesterday was classic New England weather - 50 degrees and clear in the morning, 70 degrees, drizzling and calm at noon, then branch-breaking wind gusts with a 25 degree temperature drop at 4 pm. By night-time, it felt like fall had truly arrived, and today it was clear and crisp, and the maples showed some red. All day long, small flocks of Kinglets were fluttering around the shrubs, and poking into the sedum, outside my window. Close enough that you could occasionally get a slight glimpse of the red crown, if they tilted their heads in the right way. But, basically, you cannot count on that as an identifying feature. These drab, tiny warbler-like guys - but smaller than warblers - weigh about a quarter of an ounce, lay clutches of 12 eggs (a clutch can easily weigh more than the mother), and winter wherever the temperatures stay above 25 degrees. The flocks outside my window are working their way south, but I hope they will hang around for a while. They must have had a good breeding year up in the coniferous forests, because I have never seen so many. Image borrowed from the excellent CLO site.
Posted by Bird Dog
in Natural History and Conservation, Our Essays
at
16:30
| Comments (3)
| Trackbacks (0)
Friday, October 20. 2006Silly Season
It's just as well. There is such thing as an unwholesome preoccupation with political issues, as there can be with anything else. There is reason to believe that people are more motivated to vote against someone, than for someone. Anger and hatred are powerful human motivators, and everyone is cynical about politics and politicians except the youth - who don't know any better. So it's smears and fears season. AKA "silly season." Everybody enjoys voting in national elections, but mid-term elections tend to bring out the most engaged, and the most emotional, which brings out the lowest human impulses - and in the political world, that is lower than whale poop. Thus the theme for both parties is "crank up the emotion." In mid-terms, in which many registered voters do not even know the names of their Reps, or even their Senators, "Get out the vote" is the name of the game. Get warm bodies into the voting booth, and room-temperature bodies if that's all you can get. Is this election more important than any other? Probably not, because I do not think it will have any effect on the war against Islamofascism (Americans will never put up with dhimmitude.). Every election is important, though. Isn't it funny how, when your team wins - it's "The people have spoken," and when your team loses, it's "The people are brainwashed morons"? May the best team win. Just do me one favor: before you pull that lever, make sure you know where Nancy Pelosi stands on the issues of the day -because that is who you are voting for or against, ultimately. The Speaker, the Whip, and other leadership run the show. The Reps are just little soldiers, and if they don't play ball, they won't be able to bring the pork home for their re-election.
Posted by Dr. Joy Bliss
in Our Essays, Politics, Psychology, and Dr. Bliss
at
13:33
| Comments (0)
| Trackbacks (0)
Bovines of the week: Wild Cattle
Mooooo. Are you tired of our cattle interest over the past couple of months? Well, just a couple more cattle posts to go, then the final exam. Today, wild cattle. There are 12 species of wild bovines left. We already learned that the mighty Auroch, the prized game animal of Polish kings and the ancestor of the domestic cow, has been extinct, alas, since the 1600s. We all know the American Bison and the Cape Buffalo - a member of the Big Five great game animals of Africa (image above), but you cannot name all twelve, and neither can I. Here they are. Note that the Musk Ox is not among them. It's not a bovine, and it is more closely related to goats. Image of a friendly Cape Buffalo from the very fine wild cattle site.
Posted by Bird Dog
in Natural History and Conservation, Our Essays
at
06:43
| Comments (3)
| Trackbacks (0)
« previous page
(Page 184 of 191, totaling 4769 entries)
» next page
|