We are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for.
I can't say I often bother to read anything about psychology experiments anymore. But the reason for that is that a great portion, perhaps the majority, maybe the vast majority, are done using college students as subjects. Other than HS students, what group of people are less worthy of psychological study than college students. They know very little, especially about themselves. They are driven buy little more than an overarching desire to have sex and/or seem intelligent and/or be every bit as unconventional as everyone else. Terrible people to use to study anything about humans in general.
The link under "in the sciences, generally" goes to a report that deals mostly with the psychological studies, though it does deal with the publishable-fluctuation bias. I have no experience with the small experiments, but in the megabuck one-shot-only experiments we spend almost as much time on understanding the uncertainty as on the measurement itself, and try to account for those fluctuation biases (also known as "look elsewhere" effects). I've heard people ask that one group's unblinding be delayed until after another group's analysis was approved, because their analyses overlapped.