Sunday, March 28. 2010
 When Christ rode into Jerusalem down from the Mount of Olives on a colt (or small horse, or donkey - whatever) on Palm Sunday, he was greeted with Hosannas by excited crowds who believed him to be the Messiah.
His teachings and his miracles had become famous. People threw their cloaks on the road and, presumably, palm leaves, for his horse to walk on.
Much of their enthusiasm was unwarranted, however: the Jews were hoping for a political messiah (using the word "king"), more than they were hoping for the messiah who came to tell them that much of what they believed about being in relationship with God was wrong - and claiming that he had the authority to say so.
"Salvation," for the crowds, meant salvation from the Romans, and "the kingdom of God," in the Hebrew Bible, referred to the literal restoration of a nation of Israel under God, as had been promised to David. There was no concept at the time, I believe, of the now-Christian idea of salvation or the Christian idea of "the kingdom of God." Furthermore, Jesus had no interest I am aware of in politics or governance and had no beef with the Romans.
A radical for sure, in his apparent renunciation of the ordinary world.
There is plenty of discussion about what is understood by the kingdom of God.
My own view is that it refers to God's domain, ie the universe of those souls who seek relationship with God - not any literal kingdom but a "spiritual" (I hate that word), unworldly kingdom. Maybe "transcendent" is a better word.
I suspect that the Jews who welcomed Jesus to Jerusalem were deeply disappointed to discover that Jesus' mission was not worldly, but other-worldly: only a few handfuls of people remained to constitute what the scholars term the "Christ cult" after the crucifixion. It took Paul's inspired work to rebuild on the foundation.
(That's just my amateur take on it all. I am no expert.)
Image: Fra Angelico's Entry into Jerusalem
In the wake of Obamacare, the MSM has been busy this week reinventing a partisan myth - the myth that Conservatives and "regular Americans" are violent, white, chronically angry, racist, homophobic, greedy, selfish, mouth-breathing troglodytes.
Shrinks know all about myth creation, because most peoples' life stories are personal myths. These political myths, however, are deliberately constructed, mass ad hominen smears on millions - including me. I do not mind non-violent political anger at all, but I do mind smears.
Just a few posts on the recent propaganda I noticed today:
- The Washington Post Reminds You, All Criticism of the President Is Racist
- Powerline: More Thoughts On Liberal Political Violence
- "Dozens" show up at Nevada Tea Party
- Jammie: Frank Rich Loses Me at Kristallnacht
Alinsky on rubbing raw the sores of discontent.
It has already worked: I am entirely sore about Alinsky and his minions. As I always ask, "What sane human would want State power over a fellow citizen?"
The major media has neglected to examine one of the major sections of ObamaCare, its long term care program CLASS, the Community Living Assistance Services and Supports Act.
The New York Times’ chosen "New Old Age" guru, wrote on March 24 that,
I’ve read so little about the Class Act in recent weeks that when President Obama signed the health care bill yesterday, surrounded by a gaggle of happy Democrats, I had to call the National Council on Aging to reassure myself that yes, this often overlooked but potentially transformational program remained part of the package.
Of course, the Wall Street Journal did manage an op-ed, last December, “Congress’s Long Term Care Bomb,” written by a professor of health-care management and insurance and risk management at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School.
But CBO and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) have identified parts of the program that will subject it to considerable financial risk.
First, those who enroll would likely be more apt to need care and will be more expensive to cover than those who buy private insurance. To cover its costs, the program would have to charge more than private insurers.
The best objective and factual summary and analysis of CLASS I’ve found is that by one of the preeminent global consulting firms on benefits, Towers Perrin.
The Senate version is projected to bring in $72 billion, with an average monthly premium of $123. The initial positive cash flows come, of course, from the five-year period before participants vest, when premiums are paid but benefits are not. Tens of billions are foreseen to flow into the trust fund during those five years. In later decades, however, the flows would turn negative and increase the federal deficit.
(Note that $72-billion is over half of the highly doubtful supposed first 10-year federal budget deficit reduction of ObamaCare, which itself ignores the tens of $billions of mandates in Medicaid imposed on the states from the majority of ObamaCare’s increased coverage of the uninsured and the tens of $billions of extra costs imposed on private firms that continue retiree prescription benefits.)
Let’s look closer at that estimated 2011 average premium of $123 per month, or $1476 per year.
I checked the standard risk premiums charged in most states by one of the largest top-rated long term care insurers for an individual to have a lifetime benefit period, as in CLASS.
Insurers cover working and non-working applicants. CLASS will only enroll working participants, who are more likely to be of reasonable health if working. As the CBO points out, non-working spouses are more likely to have impaired health and are more likely to enroll than are workers, which increases the actuarially required premiums. Insurers will cover seriously impaired risks at about a 50% higher premium than standard risks, and only for a 6-year benefit period versus the lifetime benefit period in CLASS (average benefits actually needed by all insurer claimants is about 3-years), while insurers reject some applicants with severely impaired health. The CBO did not reveal the details of its analysis, but one may expect that these factors and others were considered.
To get at an apples-to apples comparison of a $50 dollar a day benefit, I further adjusted the insurer rates downward by 30%, as would be charged for a joint policy with spouse from that insurer, to estimate efficiencies of marketing and administration to a larger pool mostly garnered via the workplace in CLASS. Further, CLASS will not be paying commissions to agents as does insurers, so I subtract another 5% from the adjusted insurer premiums below, for a total reduction of 35%. The elimination period, or time to have the qualifying inabilities to manage activities of daily living, by the insurer is 30-days. In parentheses I include the insurer’s annual premium for a preferred risk. CLASS has substantially more liberal reinstatement provisions for non-payment of premiums than this or any insurer, for example, along with other provisions which increase the cost of the program. CLASS subsidizes those of low income, but claws back part of their benefit if qualified for Medicaid, which private insurers don’t.
CBO estimate of average premium for CLASS in the Senate version enacted: $1476
Adjusted Insurer Premium: Age 25 $373.93 ($317.84); Age 40 $483.91 ($411.33); Age 60 $978.82 ($832.00).
Unadjusted Insurer Premium: Age 25 $575.28 ($488.99); Age 40 $744.48 (632.81); Age 60 $1505.88 ($1280)
An $80/day benefit insurer premium is higher, but still below the CLASS initial estimated premium, which includes a $75/day benefit for nursing home care which is much less preferred or used by claimants than the $50/day for home health care.
The House version of CLASS included non-working spouses, according to the CBO more likely to have impaired health and more likely to enroll than are workers, at the following estimated annual premiums: Age 18-39 $1632, Age 40-49 $1728, Age 50-59 $1824, Age 60-69 $2772. The actuaries estimate anticipates that those older are much more likely to enroll than those younger. One may expect political pressure in coming years to open CLASS to non-working spouses.
So, first of all, it does seem that CBO and actuaries did a reasonable job of estimating initial CLASS premiums, though the Medicare chief actuary did warn that, as the WSJ op-ed indicates,
[P]remiums would be set so high they would discourage healthier people from buying in. As the healthy stayed on the sidelines, the program would have to charge more to those who did enroll. This in turn would price more people out of the program, risking what the memo called an "insurance death spiral."
An insurance death-spiral occurs as due to adverse selection, when the healthier don’t join or leave the program, and the costs of the remaining less healthy escalate future premiums, leading even more of the healthier to leave or find other alternatives. The death-spiral leads to the program’s costs rising to bankruptcy, otherwise. Although CLASS says they won’t have to, one may expect a future Congress to bail it out with taxpayer funds rather than abandon this new entitlement.
Private long term care insurers have not opposed CLASS. Of course, they expect that the added consciousness of the need for long term care insurance prompted by CLASS marketing at workplaces will, together with insurers’ lower premiums, increase their own sales. Similarly, life and annuity insurers may expect increased sales of their products that contain a long term care component.
That just leaves taxpayers on the future financial hook for CLASS, and disappointed ObamaCare supporters on the hook for letdown.
As Ed Morrissey points out from the latest Washington Post poll on ObamaCare, opposition continues to mount. Relatively few are aware of the details of the CLASS failure, so more should be expected to become disappointed in the non-classy failure of Democrats to be responsible.
Jamie Oliver's Ministry of Food Control.
Governments love controlling people, don't they? It's a mental disease. Power is a drug for those susceptible to its perverse appeal.
Deresiewicz begins his 2008 essay The Disadvantages of an Elite Education thus:
It didn’t dawn on me that there might be a few holes in my education until I was about 35. I’d just bought a house, the pipes needed fixing, and the plumber was standing in my kitchen. There he was, a short, beefy guy with a goatee and a Red Sox cap and a thick Boston accent, and I suddenly learned that I didn’t have the slightest idea what to say to someone like him. So alien was his experience to me, so unguessable his values, so mysterious his very language, that I couldn’t succeed in engaging him in a few minutes of small talk before he got down to work. Fourteen years of higher education and a handful of Ivy League degrees, and there I was, stiff and stupid, struck dumb by my own dumbness. “Ivy retardation,” a friend of mine calls this. I could carry on conversations with people from other countries, in other languages, but I couldn’t talk to the man who was standing in my own house.
It’s not surprising that it took me so long to discover the extent of my miseducation, because the last thing an elite education will teach you is its own inadequacy.
Luke 19: 29-40
29When he had come near Bethphage and Bethany, at the place called the Mount of Olives, he sent two of the disciples,
30saying, “Go into the village ahead of you, and as you enter it you will find tied there a colt that has never been ridden. Untie it and bring it here.
31If anyone asks you, ‘Why are you untying it?’ just say this, ‘The Lord needs it.’”
32So those who were sent departed and found it as he had told them.
33As they were untying the colt, its owners asked them, “Why are you untying the colt?”
34They said, “The Lord needs it.”
35Then they brought it to Jesus; and after throwing their cloaks on the colt, they set Jesus on it.
36As he rode along, people kept spreading their cloaks on the road.
37As he was now approaching the path down from the Mount of Olives, the whole multitude of the disciples began to praise God joyfully with a loud voice for all the deeds of power that they had seen,
38saying, “Blessed is the king who comes in the name of the Lord! Peace in heaven, and glory in the highest heaven!”
39Some of the Pharisees in the crowd said to him, “Teacher, order your disciples to stop.”
40He answered, “I tell you, if these were silent, the stones would shout out.”
Saturday, March 27. 2010
Arizona getting tough on illegals. I guess it feels to them like an unarmed invasion and, in a sense, it is. Armed too, in many cases.
Why Mexico cannot make their beautiful warm country a place where people want to live, or even to immigrate to, is beyond me. I do not know why they make it so difficult, if not impossible, for people to move or work there either. They would benefit immensely from 100,000 genius techies, finance wonks, and engineers from India and China and Singapore.
Mrs. BD is now considering this idea for an August trip: barging through Provence on the Rhone and the canals.
I told her the choice was between that trip and finishing getting my teeth fixed. It's called Fun With Implants. (Of course, if Obama would pay for my teeth then I could do both. Maybe I should write a note and cc Reid and Pelosi and tell them I'm ready for my new choppers right now.)
My Mom and Dad took one of these trips a few years ago. She said their plump Chef decided to try the balloon ride one time, got about 10" in the air and leaned out to tell the Sous-chef some last minute cooking detail and fell out of the basket into the canal. Hilarity ensued.
Also on my bucket list: Sailing cruise down the coast of Turkey. Yes, I do want to visit Turkey again - with digital camera this time. I like the people, the food, the landscape, the markets, the history, the ruins, and their fruit and wines.
Carpe diem. Cave canem. Gnothi sauton, too.
I don't want you to bail out my mistakes, America, and I don't want to bail out yours. Take your lumps! It's the free market; prices have to find their real level. I'm underwater in my stocks, and nobody cares. It will come out OK in the end.
Paraphrased from Larry Kudlow, on the radio this morning re government support of artificially high housing prices.
Why believe in a conspiracy when stupidity is explanation enough? With that at the front of my mind as a major caveat to my and others’ conjecture, aside from not knowing what is going on in the privacy of White House meetings, there may actually be a secret purposeful plan behind President Obama’s public undermining of Israel.
Stupidity isn’t enough of an explanation:
First off, there’s every reason to believe Obama’s pledge to be a “transformative” president. Nearly every policy, law and appointment from him and his allies have been distinctly left of those from previous Democrat and Republican administrations.
Second, there’s every reason to believe that Obama and his counsels are aware, how can they not be, of the past refusals by Palestinian leaders to accept offerings, to obstruct negotiations, to foment violence, to foster corruption, to be divided between the violently hostile and the very violently hostile, and that repeated and continuous Israeli concessions and withdrawals have encouraged more of the same from the Palestinians.
Third, there’s every reason to believe that Obama and his advisors are aware of Iran’s impending nuclear status (even the IAEA has finally publicly woken up) and that other MidEast nations are accommodating themselves to Iran, they seeing little likelihood that the US will push for severe enough sanctions in the face of Russian and Chinese opposition and European profits or the US striking Iran’s nuclear installations.
Fourth, there’s every reason to believe that the US has more influence upon Israel, given that Israel has heavily depended upon the US as a bulwark of support, than upon the Palestinians, MidEast nations, Russia, China or even Europe.
Fifth, there’s every reason to believe that President Obama and advisors, some of whom are Jewish, depend upon the Democrat’s base supporters, some of whom are Jewish, to at worst weakly react to the Obama administration undermining Israel. (See this post.)
Sixth, there’s a big difference between occasional ignorance or mistakes and a consistent pattern of such, particularly when the facts and errors are so well known.
Secret Plan:
Yesterday, I had a brief conversation with a very liberal, very smart friend who visits Israel several times a year to study. I shared my conjecture in an email to another very knowledgeable MSM friend:
My theory is that the O master plan, if there is one, is to force Israel to bomb Iran, then disavow Israel and further isolate it, and maybe even let it be overwhelmed.
It very well may not be true, but it does explain a lot.
This morning, Glenn Reynolds similarly conjectured:
WHY HAS BARACK OBAMA TREATED NETANYAHU SO RUDELY? “Obama would never treat the president of Equatorial Guinea that way.”
Possibly Obama just hates Israel and hates Jews. That’s plausible — certainly nothing in his actions suggests otherwise, really.
But it’s also possible — I’d say likely — that there’s something else going on. I think Obama expects Israel to strike Iran, and wants to put distance between the United States and Israel in advance of that happening. (Perhaps he even thinks that treating Israel rudely will provoke such a response, saving him the trouble of doing anything about Iran himself, and avoiding the risk that things might go wrong if he does). On the most optimistic level, maybe this whole thing is a sham, and the U.S. is really helping Israel strike Iran, with this as distraction. The question for readers is which of these — not necessarily mutually exclusive — explanations is most plausible.
I’d add to the above that President Obama may also, not mutually exclusive, be currying favor with the Moslem states in continuation of his seeming belief that rewarding enemies will somehow make them less hostile, particularly in a new world order in which the US is no longer and doesn’t act to be preeminent in its power or actions, regardless of the consequences domestically or abroad.
Name at least one thing you think is right about the Dem healthcare-insurance bill which, I remind you, is far less radical than it could have been. (Yes, I do know that the Dems regard it as one step towards complete nationalization.)
 Well, it finally happened.
I was impressed with a video program.
And, let me assure you, for me to be impressed with a video program takes a lot. I have in my tool bag all of the latest, hottest goodies, and I know all the video tricks. Hell, I invented half the tricks. I've been a leader in the field of digital video for a decade.
Nevertheless, I'm impressed with AVS Video Converter. And the $59 they're asking is fairly cheap for a quality conversion program. To keep it in perspective, Adobe Premiere lists for $799. The whys and wherefores will only be of interest to us videophiles (budding and otherwise), so I'll lay it all out below the fold. This is truly a remarkable program in at least three ways.
Continue reading "Doc's Computin' Tips: The Amazing AVS Video Converter"
Our pal Sipp is moving to Maine. All of us at Maggie's wish him and his wonderful family an enjoyable "moving experience."
But who moves to Maine? Maybe Texas, but Maine? I recall that Abe Lincoln's dad always believed that you should move on whenever you could see the smoke from another settler's fireplace. (Not sure I believe that story about Thomas Lincoln, however.)
Speaking of presidents, Who's U.S. Grant minus John Quincy Adams?
 Photo of a Cuban hospital from SDA's Fidel praises Obama's healthcare.
Dr. Sanity: THE PROGRESSIVE LEFT GOOSE STEPS INTO HISTORY
Frum's fall from grace. I tend to agree with Rick on this.
Gov. Christie: Saving NJ from its government. h/t, Insty.
Welcome to the Machine: Cultural Marxism in Education
Krauthammer: Watch out for the coming VAT
Timeline of the major provisions of the Dem healthcare bill
Krugman needs to get out more. The guy is a sneaky, dishonest putz in my opinion. And that is not because I often disagree - it's because he is. I'm sure he knows it, too.
Pelosi in Neverland:
The bill, she said, would lead to "healthier lives, more liberty to pursue hopes and dreams and happiness."
Is that a promise? Oh Boy! Sign me up! as a member of FCA (Future Curmudgeons of America), I want that free happiness.
Now It Can Be Told: Health Care Is About Wealth Redistribution
In totalitarian North Korea, every hour is Earth Hour
Jeff Goldstein tried to talk to one of his old writing profs. One quote:
It is an Orwellian world in which we live when fucking novelists want to distance themselves from those who criticize the government.
Yeah, we thought dissent was a high form of patriotism...oh, never mind. It's just not worth the effort.
Bottled Piety from VDH. Good term. Almost as good as "bully state."
Culture matters. Check out the link to the photos of Labrador.
The coming black market in medical care
Hutzpah of the day, via Surber:
COMPOSED DURING A STORM (1819)
Written in Rydal Woods, by the side of a torrent.
One who was suffering tumult in his soul,
Yet failed to seek the sure relief of prayer,
Went forth - his course surrendering to the care
Of the fierce wind, while mid-day lightnings prowl
Insidiously, untimely thunders growl;
While trees, dim-seen, in frenzied numbers, tear
The lingering remnant of their yellow hair,
And shivering wolves, surprised with darkness, howl
As if the sun were not. He raised his eye
Soul-smitten; for, that instant, did appear
Large space ('mid dreadful clouds) of purest sky,
An azure disc-shield of Tranquillity;
Invisible, unlooked-for, minister
Of providential goodness ever nigh!
Friday, March 26. 2010
On medical care (I refuse to term it "health" care. Health requires no care.), from AVI:
Health care costs are rising, not because of inefficiency or heartless business practices or stunning malpractice claims – though these all deserve significant attention – but because the products and services provided simply are very expensive. And they are going to get more expensive - much, much more expensive – for the foreseeable future. We can do magical things we were never able to do. We can keep people alive (such as a family friend with CF) far longer than we could. We can save people who simply died not very long ago. And it costs a fortune.
The first comment there is good, too, about how government interventions increase costs.
Cell phone photos: A pal visited NASDAQ HQ yesterday:
As VDH observed on the John Bachelor show the other night, the O administration offers succor and submission to our enemies and enmity and insults to our friends. Obama Refuses to Dine With Jewish Leader.
According to this plan, we end up with emboldened, unrespectful enemies - and no friends. Brilliant...if you dislike America.
VDH, via Vandy: (link fixed)
Some people screw up or are unlucky. We're here to ensure they end up the same as you who don't screw up or are luckier. We can't say they are in any way culpable, so we blame either the system or you who are better off. The best way to level the playing field is to tax all we can, take our percentage, and redistribute the rest. Lots get hired to administer to even more. The rules don't apply to ourselves, who are wealthy but not the targeted culpable. We know privately all this is not sustainable, but assume the better off will find a way to save themselves and thus us, before we bankrupt ourselves - after we are gone. And we don't care really whether this is always legal, or fair, or workable, because we know it is moral and we are far more moral people than you.
|
Is
The brave escape of Curious George