|
Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Tuesday, August 15. 2006The Blob of the Week: Slime MoldWe may be the only blog in the world who finds slime molds (good photos there of different varieties, including photo below) interesting. The first time you see one on the forest floor, the garden, or the edge of the lawn, you tend to think somebody spilled some poisonous orange glop from a bucket. They are difficult to categorize: not exactly fungi, and not exactly protista, but probably more like protista - eg animals. Their colony creeps around slowly, munching on bacteria, and when they run out of food, they creep into the sun and form spores, and wait. There is new science on how this thing adjusts to changing conditions.
Posted by Bird Dog
in Gardens, Plants, etc., Natural History and Conservation, Our Essays
at
06:07
| Comments (4)
| Trackbacks (0)
Monday, August 14. 2006You don't have to be Jewish to love Levy's
That old sign was up there for 15 years or more. As a kid, it seemed exotic: I never had met a Jewish person. Later, they ran ads like the one on the right, in the newspapers. A sort-of precursor of Benetton. You do not have to be Jewish to find Nathan's Aliyah Diary interesting. Check it out, if you haven't. Israel is serious about citizenship: it is not a right - it is a hard-earned privilege. Requiring a Jewish doctor/professor from America to work in the persimmon orchards, and to clean the horse stalls, says it all. Would your doctor do that? What would you or I be willing to do to become an American citizen? It just happens that Maggie's Farm has no Jewish staff (except for our guest author Nathan, who posts willy-nilly from various points in Israel). However, we support Israel - not as a US puppet - but as a democratic, free, civilized, peace-loving state which has become the scapegoat of the Middle East, and their favorite hate-object with which they maintain power.
Posted by Bird Dog
in Hot News & Misc. Short Subjects, Our Essays
at
14:01
| Comments (3)
| Trackbacks (0)
Flying Machines: Summer Aeronautical Fun with no Moslem Terrorists allowedRe-posted from June 7, 2006
For regular airplanes, the Nikko Windjammer has a long glide path. The Defender has twin engines. The RC Mini is a fine starter airplane. The Z Planes are cheap and good, and if they crash in the water, it's no big loss (I have lots of these in the barn). This year, the flying saucers are hot items, but I still prefer propellers. Lots of other remote-controlled planes here. Never permit any Jihadists on board these things. They seem to enjoy blowing things up: nasty little devils, full of hatred and with an odd attraction to flying things: airplanes, rockets, etc.
Posted by The Barrister
in Our Essays, The Culture, "Culture," Pop Culture and Recreation
at
13:40
| Comments (3)
| Trackbacks (0)
PacifismRe-posted from May, 2005
The wonderful Kentucky author Wendell Berry wrote this piece a couple of years ago. There is much in it with which to disagree, but it is a point of view shared by many good people, presented by a fine fellow. I met him one time, and I have to say that I think he's the kind of rugged guy who'd be happy to shoot you if you came onto his farm and messed with his family. But he says not...I think. The view is not far from that of the RC Church, for which Life is the high sacred value, trumping all others. There is a conflict with other sacred values, such as human dignity and freedom. Remember the Brits in the 60's marching and carrying signs reading "Better Red than Dead"? It all comes down to the question of whether anything is worth dying for. The Pacifist might ask a different question: "Is there anything worth killing for?"
How come it's easy for me to think of things worth killing for? Hating war makes sense to me, but renouncing war does not. Read entire: Click here: The Failure of War -- Wendell Berry Addendum: Another view, from a piece in One Cosmos:
Friday, August 11. 2006Aliyah Diary: A poet, a physicist, and a psychoanalyst at the edge of JeninWritten 8/8/06 On Thursday a.m., before the harrowing trip into Katyusha land of Kiryat Shemona, I visited my friend Eliaz Cohen, a poet and a delightful human. He is called up for emergency reserves during this northern war, replacing some of the younger boys who have been sent up north. Eliaz insists on giving phone directions in Hebrew. He thinks this will improve my language skills, as directions by phone are more difficult. Directions to his outpost at the edge of Jenin, go something like this; Go towards Afula, but stop short after Junction Megiddo (that place where the last battle of the Apocalypse will take place between the children of light and of darkness) to Junction Sargel. Turn right on Sargel road (“Ruler road, as it is supposedly straight as a .....). When I get to this village (an Arab name), DON’T TURN THERE, when I get to that village, (another arab name DON’T TURN THERE, ibid. for the next few villages. When I get to a sign saying Msof M’atnim (which I later learn means, “collection place for cargo”), BUT DON’T GO TO THE END!
Continue reading "Aliyah Diary: A poet, a physicist, and a psychoanalyst at the edge of Jenin" Wednesday, August 9. 2006RedskinsRe-posted from August, 2005
In a piece by Tucker at Town Hall: "The federal Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has already ruled that the word Redskins is racially derogatory and offensive." My reaction to such nonsense: I am Iroquois, by partial but adequate blood. You can see it in my face if you look carefully, but it mainly comes through in my eyes - I can see stuff outdoors that the Paleface cannot. Baby snakes and quiet birds and a rustling leaf and a turtle just thinking and a canvasback hidden in a snowstorm and a red-tail in a cloud. I love the name Redskins. Or Chiefs, or Indians, or anything that reminds us of our ancestry here in the New World. I do not know why almost any reference to Indians is racist. And I hate the undignified racial and ethnic whining and victim talk from Indians or from anyone else. Everyone should be thanking their God or gods that they are in America. And every human should grant themselves the dignity to not be a complainer. It is childish and reflects poorly on the complainer. In fact, I don't even mind "filthy savage," which Mrs. Bird Dog has been known to endearingly (?) label me after an unbathed and unshaven weekend clearing brush and drinking Ballantine Ale and covered with sweat and bloody scratches from prickers and branches. It's sort of a badge of pride - our Indian ancestors were not exactly emerged from the Stone Age and we did not bathe and did not change our clothes, and probably smelled terrible, and, compared to Samuel Pepys, we were savages for sure. We were happy to burn people, cut off their genitals and eat them, scalp them, and torture them, and we were always fighting with our neighboring tribes for fun, for glory, for land, or for no reason at all. Our people looked red because of the red-tinted bear fat we anointed ourselves with in the winter to keep warm. We didn't have central heating, or down parkas. Stone Age, although there was a culture worthy of anthropological study, if pre-literate barbarian culture is your bag. So I say quit it with the hyper-sensitive PC BS in our name - I would prefer that the Indian past be remembered rather than erased, stone axes and all. So Hello Atlanta, Hello Dartmouth - quit erasing us - we were tough deer-hunting, enemy-slaying, stoic, happy-to-die and short-lived braves, and hard-working squash and corn-planting and oyster-picking squaws. Our old ones crawled off into the woods to die when they felt they couldn't keep up. We had a concept of dignity. We learned to handle pain and a difficult life was what we expected. In the Northeast, our greatest discoveries were maple syrup, corn, squash, and tobacco. Good things. We got here first. Probably by mistake, while chasing a herd of Musk Ox across the Bering land bridge and getting lost in a snowstorm, and losing our GPS in the snow, so we deserve no credit for adventurous exploration. So call us whatever you want, (I prefer being called "Chief") but just don't forget us. We are part of the American heritage, but we were on the wrong side of history. It happens, and we died, mostly from new diseases like colds and flu introduced by the earliest fishermen and explorers long before the Pilgrims, but alcohol didn't do us much good either: Indian Brave like firewater too much. Not your fault, white man - you had your own problems and your own views, and we had no idea what was happening, and in a sense, we are lucky that you English saw us as even human, with souls, thanks to your Christian educations. True Indian braves, like cowboys, never complain. (Photo: An Ogalala Chief, 1907)
Posted by Bird Dog
in Our Essays, Politics, The Culture, "Culture," Pop Culture and Recreation
at
06:01
| Comments (4)
| Trackbacks (0)
Oedipus Ned
Oedipus Ned accomplished this by cleverly creating the illusion that he was running against Bush rather than against a fellow Left-wing Dem. Indeed, there is much illusion involved in this event. The movement Dems are doubtless thrilled: it must feel like Gene McCarthy all over again. But as the News Junkie noted yesterday, what kind of victory, really, is a victory over your own family, so to speak? This was a family battle, which damaged their family - the Dem family. Another illusion: Lieberman, I have no doubt, assumed he had his job for life, and that his prominence and popularity made him unassailable. That is understandable, but it was unwise. He is not a shoe-in as an independent, because he will be up against the CT Dem machine, and everyone is sick of Iraq, and weary of with dealing with the entire Jihad disease. And Lieberman is far too liberal for most Repubs and Independents to get excited about. On the other hand, people like him anyway, and he's on the right side of the major issue of the time. Another illusion: Ned may be the Oedipal hero of this story, thus far, but he bought this election with his own cash, and has not yet been subjected to serious scrutiny. Nobody knows who he is, yet, because thus far it has been internecine war. Lieberman will play hardball this time. Another illusion: This Dem primary was driven by Bush-hatred primarily, and by anti-Iraq feelings secondarily. But it's the anti-Iraq aspect that will carry some weight. However, the anti-Iraq piece will have more trouble bearing political fruit if it is part of an overall appeasement and anti-Israel policy. Most Americans recognize that there is a Jihadist threat, that evil and danger do exist in the world. The magnitude of that threat becomes more apparent daily. Ned and his supporters are in serious denial if they believe these people just need to be treated better. So - what do the results say? 1. About half of CT Dems are really tired of Iraq on the news. 2. About half of CT Dems are fond of Lieberman, and/or see the war as a necessary evil. None of that is very surprising, but it is a bit sad to see so little party loyalty to one of their party's decent guys. One final thought: Many, I believe, are ready to throw Israel overboard if it will appease the Jihadists. In my opinion, anything you give these folks just makes them hungry for more. The Denial Dems are foolish - and do not love their country enough to want to defend it vigorously. Image: Ned and Friends: Ned with noted race-hustler and con-artist (on left), and noted race pimp, race extortionist, and anti-Semitic adulterer (on right). Photo from last night, in Ned's hometown paper, this morning: Tuesday, August 8. 2006Aliyah Diary: Shrapnel8-6-06 Shrapnel The car I saw on Eilat Street looked like a sieve, hit by shrapnel. Continue reading "Aliyah Diary: Shrapnel" "Stuck on 1968"Re-posted from January, 2006
Kling proceeds to discuss a series of political views, assumptions and biases which were prevalent thirty-five years ago, but which persist in many quarters, despite the facts which have emerged over these years. It's a theme to which we often refer on Maggie's Farm, whether the subject is war, race, economics, freedom, education and academia, etc. Some of us must be of Kling's generation, and, like neo-neocon, went through it but grew past it by responding to overwhelming facts. The comfortable brain is a stubborn thing. The piece is here. (Image is the famous 1967 Pentagon Flower Child taken by the wonderful photographer Marc Riboud.) Monday, August 7. 2006Words Mean Things Too: Fake Photos and Fake WordsThere's an awful lot of ink and pixels being spilled over the Reuters use of obviously photoshopped images, as well there should be. We've taken a crack at the absurd angle of it here as well. But... It is interesting to read all the thousands of column inches appearing magically to eviscerate Reuters, and to see the unanimity of the analysis. I feel as though I am standing in a herd of elephants, and the blogosphere is asking me if I've seen a mouse. The photoshopped image of Beirut burning, and the Israeli jet plane with the phony ordnance dubbed in, are not "made up." That is to say, Beirut was burning a bit, and that was an Israeli plane doing something. So what are we looking at? Hyperbole, at the least; exaggeration for effect. As you know, this can be a sort of benign tumor - a simple lust for attention, a digital tall story more suited to the barroom than the newsroom. Or it can be yoked to a hidden purpose -the malignant cancer-propaganda. Since Mr Hajj, and Reuters, don't seem to be in the market for airbrushing things out of their pictures, I imagine that their shenanigans mesh nicely with their worldview, and so their efforts are more to the Joe Goebbels end of the spectrum than the Paris Hilton. It's not: "look at me," it's:"will you look at that." So what's the eight hundred pound gorilla in the room? It's not: "I'll never trust the pictures in the paper again." Why did you trust them before, exactly? That's not the problem. This is: WHAT ABOUT THE WORDS?You remember words don't you? They are those things that have been acoompanying those misleading pictures since before there were pictures to accompany, and the words had to try to give you the wrong impression all by themselves. The obvious folderol with the images in question only shows that the suppliers are getting brazen. They have reported barefaced falsehoods and misrepresentation with such impunity for so long they don't feel the need to simply choose the angle they wish to portray anymore. They're not picking cherries, they're chopping down the media cherry trees now. The "reporting" in the media --what is said and what is written -- is every bit as "photoshopped" for effect as those pictures. Events are seen only through the prism of the desired effect. And the words are carefully chosen to achieve a desired result at the la-di-da outlets like the New York Times, and hamfistedly filigreed at the other end of the media dial, the internet. But the idea is the same: What used to be "news" is replaced with editorial. What used to be "editorial" is now the journalistic equivalent of a streetcorner rant from a deranged lunatic. And the streetcorner lunatic? He's not talking anymore. He's got an entry level job for Reuters, and AP, and the New York Times, and the Washington Post, and CBS, and TruthOut! and all the others caught red-handed every day either making stuff up and reporting it as news, or convoluting the reportage so profoundly that it no longer should qualify as even vaguely factual. And you're dreaming if you think that getting caught is going to change their outlook. They are not very very sorry they did it. They are very very sorry they got caught. The method will improve. The approach will stand. I've been reading the news for a long time, trying to parse what the hell might have actually happened out of the subtle and not so subtle shinola. I stopped paying attention to the TV news a long time ago altogether, because my intelligence can be insulted in print faster than having the wrong pages of a bad newspaper read to me slowly by hair farmers. Nice to see the digital age is catching up with me. Everything About ConcreteRe-posted from August, 2005
The immediate issue is whether you know enough about cement and concrete. Here are some facts, with some links to read more. Cement is the glue of concrete, which is a sort of man-made sedimentary rock. When an "aggregate" or "filler" such as sand, gravel, etc is added to cement, plus water, it's called concrete, or mortar when the aggregate is fine sand. Cement is produced by heating - burning - limestone and clay. The addition of a little gypsum at the end makes "Portland Cement," which is what all cement is nowadays. The trace of gypsum slows the curing, so it can be worked with more easily. Water is a critical ingredient of the final product, not just to make a usable mix, but as an actual ingredient of the chemistry of solid concrete, which is a (non-organic) hydrate. Thus, during curing, concrete likes some splashes of water from hose or rain to gain maximum durability. (Thus cement doesn't "dry", it "cures".) Concrete takes 28 days to mostly cure, but it continues to slowly cure for months thereafter by integrating water molecules into its structure. Various versions of cement were around long before the Romans, but they were masters of its use, producing theirs with lime and burnt brick or ash. When they wanted to make light-weight structures, as for the roof of the Pantheon, they put empty clay jars amongst the concrete. They didn't think of reinforced concrete. The art of cement production was lost after the fall of the Roman Empire, and its use only resumed in Europe in the mid-18th C. Reinforced concrete was patented in 1849 by a French gardener who used wire mesh around which to build concrete flowerpots. A brief history here. Story of Roman concrete here. The chemistry of cement here. Photo of new partially-completed front path leading to a local wigwam, demonstrating a nice foundation of reinforced gravel concrete, with the stones being mortared on top.
Posted by Bird Dog
in Our Essays, The Culture, "Culture," Pop Culture and Recreation
at
07:15
| Comments (4)
| Trackbacks (0)
Sunday, August 6. 2006Aliyah Diary: Kiryat ShemonaWhat is this Aliyah Diary all about? Click the category on the left and find out. 8-3-0 Arriving in Kiryat Shemona with my Hyundai Getz, a reformulated Yugo, I both feel the car shudder and hear the dull thud; I think briefly that I have hit a small animal I did not see -- a horse perhaps, or a gazelle. By the third boom, I recognize rockets. Within the hour, I learn the difference in sounds between incoming (bad) and outgoing (better, maybe even good). Incoming, first the whoosh, then the boom as it hits; Outgoing, boom, and maybe a whoosh. Later, I realize that I really don't hear whooshes before. Also, with incoming we are supposed to get a warning twenty seconds before, to get into shelter. The warning sounds have been debated in Kiryat Shemona (It's a Jewish town after all; how could they just agree on one warning?). The standard viuuu-viuuu is loud, discrete, recognizable; some argue that it causes more panic than needed. Therefore this morning, we hear the alternative, a kind of bling-blong, followed by a polite, announcer-like baritone requesting that we descend to shelter. I finished my coffee. Such a polite voice, does not raise urgency in me; more like an announcement before the symphony to please turn off your cellphones (which some still ignore). All street lights blink yellow, streets are abandoned by pedestrians, save for the building for soldiers called up: joyfully painted tour buses await them. Inside, the windows are hung with drying towels, shirts on hangers, like guys off for a college trip. Out of uniform, most wear flip-flops, shorts, T's. Only the M16 slung diagonally over shoulder, rifle usually on the back, occassionally pointing downwards off the left hip,identifies that they are not off to camp. How they all top 5 foot 11 inches still amazes me, these Jewish soldiers. Chana Mann, the chief psychologist for Safed Hospital lives in Kiryat Shemona, the largest, most northern town in Israel. (Metulla, abutting Lebanon, is the village futher north.) She's invited me to help out with trauma cases. Continue reading "Aliyah Diary: Kiryat Shemona" Wednesday, August 2. 2006The UCC strikes again
Before our most recent post on the mainline churches even disappeared from our front page, we get this nonsense (h/t, Israpundit) - a quote from an exchange with UCC Canada:
I am not ready to claim that the UCC, and their friends, are anti-Semitic, but they sure don't have any sympathy for Israel. And they have more sympathy for Jihadists and the like than they do for our Christian president who took an oath on the Holy Bible to protect us from their attacks. I just think they stick to the Leftist line of the day. As I have said here before, helping individuals with their relationship with God through Christ ought to be a plenty big enough job for preachers. Understanding world affairs is the opposite of what their job is, and they tend to be a wierd combination of naive and innocent while angry and judgemental. As Laura would say, "Shut up and Sing". The whole exchange of letters is posted at Israpundit here. Our church is SO HAPPY to have broken with the UCC. We are Congregationalists, and we make up our own minds, thank you. Fatties
Frances Cornford wrote that - the charming form is called a triolet. Our editor asked me to comment on Dr. Helen's piece on fat people. As a doctor, I tend to be a "Do as I say, not as I do" sort of guy. I smoke cigars and I am pleasantly, or some might say prosperously, or some might say, grandfatherly, well-fed. When patients of mine are seriously overweight, I tell them straight out. The word fat does not bother me. I have a model in the waiting room of five pounds of adipose tissue designed to get a reaction. It is disgusting. As someone who did my share of general surgery earlier in my career, I can tell you that fishing through gallons of yellow adiposity, getting your gloves so greasy you cannot hold the scalpel, is no damn fun. If you are fat, and saw what you look like under the skin, you would be horrified. Another complication recently published is that obesity makes it more difficult to make a diagnosis. It's called "study or exam limited by body habitus." However, I also understand that the flesh is weak, and that staying in youthful shape after 45 is no mean feat. It takes work and discipline, and the evidence that it leads to longevity or health is minimal. However, being in good shape adds a lot to quality of life. On the other hand, being obsessed with health is for the crazies. Plus there is the vanity factor: few guys will look at a fat girl, and no gals will look at a fat guy - unless he is rich or powerful. But, at some point, unless we are narcissists, we accept reality and don't care all that much. Final word: If you are too fat, I will say that. And, if you care, I will tell you how to deal with it. But your life choices are not my problem, beyond that: your doctor is not your Momma, nor is he/she responsible for your health. Your health is in your hands, and God's, and nature's. My only responsibility is to give you advice as your friend, and to try to help you when you get sick.
Posted by The Old Doc
in Medical, Our Essays, The Culture, "Culture," Pop Culture and Recreation
at
06:15
| Comments (15)
| Trackbacks (2)
Tuesday, August 1. 2006Public Education: Let's Fix Everything Today!Let's fix everything today. It should be easy. First, we'll tell the Israelis and the Palestinians and Hezbullah and Syria and Iran and all those stans to knock it off. Lebanon has nice beaches if they're not mined. Now,let's move on to the domestic front. Let's fix everything right away. Difficult? For some yes, but I'm exceptional. Make me emperor for a day. I promise to change only one thing. Then I'll turn it back over to the knucklehea...I mean our elected representatives. Hmm. Change one thing, fix everything. I've got it. Here's my edict: No one is allowed to teach school of any kind until they are 65 years old and retired from a career, the military, or childrearing. Period. Let's see. First of all, the quality of all instruction will improve dramatically. Teachers will no longer just parrot some Chomsky rant they learned two summers ago. They would have had to make a living for forty odd years first, and the only person that can make a living talking like that is Chomsky. Discipline will improve with crabby old people heading the classes. They're frailer, but mean as hell. Life does that to a person. We'll end the icky sex between the teachers and the students. Even if the viagra spam gets through the AOL filters to the elderly teachers, they'll be 30 years past getting anybody of schoolage interested. More problems solved. Children will actually learn things again. When your next bed will be one with a lid, you have a sense of urgency about your approach. Old coots will bang those facts into those dense heads as fast as they can so as not to interrupt their afternoon naps with dolts hanging around after school. They'll all be smart by noon-time. We'll be able to go back to paying our teachers crappy again. They'll be retired already, hopefully set for life, but in any case they won't have to worry about their Social Security checks bouncing, because the tens of millions of former teachers will be out doing something productive and paying taxes, instead of touring Europe each summer. Or else. Pay those old farts like top shelf Wal*Mart greeters, and let them clout the kids on the ear if they act up--they'll line up in droves to get the job. Continue reading "Public Education: Let's Fix Everything Today!" Guest Reporter: Aliyah Diatry - The Brats at the Front7-31 But, this is another tale, not for today. Today, we go to the front line, Bratislaver-reinforced. The Brats believe in Reb Nachman of Bratslav, that he will return perhaps. They arrive frontly, so to speak, in high style. No battered, multicolored rattling Lubavitcher van, with Booming speaker held in place with guy lines. No. The Bratzmobile is like an American RV with reinforced top, metal rails and a logo of "NA, NA, NACH, NACHM, NACHMAN, M'UMAN!" This translates to : "NA, NA, NACH, NACHM, NACHMAN, IS BELIEVED IN!" Their booming box atop competes with the rockets overhead. A reinforced top is necessary, as Bratz stand atop, some dancing as the RV rolls up. Before the sliding van door opens, like Lubies and circus clowns, Bratz plunge through windows, side locks and tzitzit flying. These Bratz wear oversized white knit kippot with a spitz atop and, of course the logo circumscribing the brow. White shirts are untucked, boots or Teva sandals are de rigeur. Some are ex-IDF, one from Lebanon in 1990. But, enough visual details; it's the action that counts. They descend upon the reporter first, upon the paratroopers (next), the artillery men (later), the tankists (finally). The reporter, much to his initial protests, they cap with a spitzy kippah, then paste stickers with -- well you know: "NA, NA, ETCETERA" -- one on each of his cheeks, like Pierrot's tears, around his forehead, on his shirt. The paratroopers are hugged, and firmly kissed on at least one cheek. The dancing starts before the Bratz leave the van, gets vigorous with arms on paratrooper shoulders. In the mass, one has trouble discerning bodies, as legs kick haphazardly. One Bratz grabs his side locks, holds it stretched out to nine and three O'clock, then begins spinning, as if he were a helicopter about to ascend. (The scene ends before his ascent.) Yes, a few tefillin are unwrapped and wrapped on soldiers' arms, but the dance is the thing. And the singing. One loudspeaker-enhanced singer starts: "YAHLA, YAHLA, NASRALLAH, DAFOK LECHA!" Which translates to something like "YAHLA, YAHLA NASRALLAH, F...K YOU!" From a Hasid, such words. Such Bratz! Continue reading "Guest Reporter: Aliyah Diatry - The Brats at the Front" Monday, July 31. 2006Zulu Time, and Nate BowditchRe-posted from Aug 29, 2005
In the NOAA and other hurricane and weather reports, they commonly notate Greenwich Mean Time with a suffix Z (or sometimes GMT), and spoken as "Zulu". The military, aviation, and commercial shipping commonly operate on Zulu time. Why "Zulu"? The story goes back to the great navigator, mathematician, and Salem, MA sea captain Nathaniel Bowditch (1773-1838), author of The American Practical Navigator - also known as "The Sailor's Bible" - which remains in use today. He divided up the world's time zones, one hour per 15 degrees of longitude, assigning each one a letter of the alphabet. Longitude 0, running through Greenwich, England received the Z. That story is here. Jean Lee Latham wrote the classic Carry On, Mr. Bowditch, which I remember fondly from 6th Grade, and which, along with Richard Henry Dana's Two Years Before the Mast, nurtured my love and respect for the sea and ships. For weather bloggers, we like Weather Underground, and Stormtrack for big storms.
Posted by Bird Dog
in History, Our Essays, The Culture, "Culture," Pop Culture and Recreation
at
07:00
| Comment (1)
| Trackbacks (0)
Sunday, July 30. 2006Another note from Nathan in Israel: Clowns of GodJuly 30, 2006 (yesterday, for us in the US) Shabbat News at the frontHere’s what happens at a Jewish front. A unit returns from Lebanon, all alive (on a day before nine others are killed). As their tanks, bulldozers, armored carriers cross into Israel, a “mitzvah mobile,” a Lubavitch version of Ken Kesey’s Kandy-Kolored Kontraption of the 60’s, greets them. The Lubie-mobile is blaring songs from an oversized speaker that strains against its metal stays, as if it might collapse backwards at any moment -- from its blasting volume, rather than from driving speed. Hairy faced Lubies leap out of this van, many more emerge than seems feasible to fit into this contraption. An Orthodox version of circus clowns piling out of a VW welcomes these worn soldiers. Tzitzit fly as Lubies twirl (like Dervishes), leap like gazelles, bear tefillin and extra talletim (fringed prayer shawls). They fling talletim on soldiers, grab arms, yank up sleeves, wrap the tefillin seven times around the left forearm, followed by the mysterious wrapping of knuckles that write “Shadai” on the fist ... and begin to pray. Soldiers appear stunned, or pleased, and mostly exhausted. The bearded, black-hatted, black-suited, fringed clowns of God are dancing about the soldiers, leaping on tanks, singing the praises of God for returning these men alive and well. The Lubies believe that such performances influence God well. A Jewish front. And another:
Continue reading "Another note from Nathan in Israel: Clowns of God" Photo Essay - All Along the Belltower: Steeple HistoryThe architectural origin of the steeple lies in the belltower, and the origin of the belltower in the watchtower. Medieval watchtowers, like this one in Umbria, and this one in San Gimignano, the town of towers,
used bells, guns, and fire to signal each other in time of trouble. Church belltowers, at first identical to watchtowers, were often separate from church buildings through the early renaissance. You had to place those bells up high to send out the sound. Here's a famous one, which is the belltower of Pisa's Duomo (c. 1100):
In time, the belltowers were integrated into the architecture of church and cathedral buildings. Without clocks and watches, you couldn't be called to church or prayer - nor would you know what time it was (except for sundials) without the bells sounding across the villages and fields. And they were a regular reminder of Christ's presence during the day. (But how did the bell-ringers know the time? That's another subject.) Canterbury Cathedral (c. 1300) has the Gothic integration of tower. It took 63 men to ring its heavy bells; six men alone to ring the heaviest: More modest English parish churches had bell towers on the roof (Holy Cross, Greenford Magna, Middlesex - much of the building c. 1500): Puritan (Congregationalist) Meeting Houses in the US typically had no steeples, as part of their purifying their congregations from papistry, vanity, and other fanciness (no bells, no stained windows, no singing, 6-hour sermons, etc). They didn't even want to call them "churches, " and you went to "meeting", not to church, where the God of Grace played second fiddle to the God of Truth. This is the Rocky Hill Meeting House (c. 1785) in Amesbury, MA: By the early 1800s, steeple bell towers came back into acceptance in the US, along with singing. I can imagine the debates between the stodgy old-timers and the young folks in their Building Committees. Many old New England churches are meeting houses with steeples (and pillared porticos too) added generations later, leading to steeple engineering problems in later years. Here's an example of an added steeple in Alford, MA (c. 1740): Belfries, containing the bells and their mechanisms (and bats), usually have/had louvers to direct the sound up and away from the church itself. Oftentimes a steeple - the tower which supports the belfry, is roofed by an elegant spire, leading to the stereotypical appearance of the 19th Century New England Congregational church - which has since been copied by all sorts of denominations including Catholics - seemingly unaware of the Puritan, anti-Anglican, anti-hierarchical, and anti-Papist theological origin of the architecture:
We always need to be reminded that a "church" is not a building - it's a congregation of people who seek God through Christ ("whenever two or three of you are gathered together"). The building doesn't really matter, but having a special place never hurts. I think the spires are optional. Here's a nice piece on church bells. YouTube of Dylan doing All Along the Watchtower here. (with JJ Jackson, Winston Watson, and Bucky Baxter)
Posted by Bird Dog
in History, Our Essays, Religion, The Culture, "Culture," Pop Culture and Recreation
at
05:00
| Comments (4)
| Trackbacks (0)
Saturday, July 29. 2006Hosta City
They need to be massed, and in the shade - minimal to no direct sun, and humusy soil. The variety available these days is remarkable. Some people (not us) remove the blooms, preferring them only for the simple and understated foliage. Once known as the Plantain Lily, their origins are in Northeast Asia. One of their virtues is that they shade out all weeds. Another is that they now come in all sizes, from miniature to giant. Here's the Hostamania site. Here's the Hosta Forum at Garden Web. Another good one - My Hostas. Some very cool Hostas at this nursery. Image is of their Bright Lights. Wayside has a good selection too. Every type of garden plant has its fans and afficionados. As hobbies go, it's as pleasant and harmless as gun collecting...but cheaper. And guns, alas, do not reproduce. Friday, July 28. 2006The Mainline Churches are still crazy: Listened to "Imagine" one too many times while stoned in college or seminary
Dr. Bliss wrote about the phenomenon here. The co-opting of the churches (along with all sorts of non-profit orgs) has been going on since the late 60s, but it hasn't run its course yet. (We recently discussed the WCC here.) In the meantime, more people are attending livelier churches with more conservative approaches to life and politics. Why is this a Left-Right issue? Beats me. I've read lots of explanations, but none of them seem to stick. Heck, Israel is basically a socialist country, while the Arab countries are paleo-capitalist and paleo-everything else. The only clue I have is that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend." And America is their enemy, for some reason and, of course, Israel is just an American military outpost. Or it could be that these ministers and priests listened to John Lennon too many times: Imagine there's no heaven Maybe we should broadcast this song to the Palis and the Hezzies and Ahmadinejad and Osama 24 hrs/day - it is a good tune, but the lyrics are those of a wealthy, drug-addled infant. I tried to satirize this song once, but it satirizes itself too well.
Posted by The Chairman
in Our Essays, Religion, The Culture, "Culture," Pop Culture and Recreation
at
06:05
| Comments (0)
| Trackbacks (0)
Thursday, July 27. 2006NEWS FLASH: Hunger Strike Threatened at Maggie's Farm. Developing...The dog days of July and Our threat is this: If other bloggers don't blogroll us, and throw us a pity-link once in a while, and if our readers don't forward our blog with a hearty recommendation to all of their friends and colleagues and relatives and enemies, we will go on a Hunger Strike until Labor Day, limiting our diets solely to beer and pizza. That includes breakfast. We do make make such threats lightly - so be forewarned. Maggie's Farm is our name, and passive-aggressive is our game. No negotiating: Do what we demand - or else we will damage our health! Look - I know we aren't the best blog in the world, but we are all proud to be listed in Harmons' World Weblog Review (Copyright 2006) as:
If we find this hunger strike to be effective, we just might decide to continue it until war is eliminated from the earth, and all people find happiness. (Hope you enjoyed the Elevator piece - interesting basic info.)
Posted by Bird Dog
in Our Essays, The Culture, "Culture," Pop Culture and Recreation
at
06:05
| Comments (6)
| Trackbacks (0)
Note From Israel
7-27-06 Two weeks fighting Continue reading "Note From Israel" Monday, July 24. 2006Enviros seek to run the world for The Good of AllThis quote in Ecological Economics reinforces what people like Rush have been saying for years: The radical enviros - unlike the rational conservationists like all of us at Maggie's Farm - want to run the world, just like the Jihadists. We hate people who want to run the world. Indeed, we hate anyone who wants to run our lives. Does that make us permanent rebellious adolescents? Dreams of power always wear benevolent masks these days: it's the fashion. In the good old days of Atilla, such window-dressing wasn't necessary.
Their solution to these crises? Let them run the world. Saturday, July 22. 2006Aliyah Diary: A Burial July 20,2006 Burial For certain events there should not be a first time. Today, it happened, my first military burial. A twenty-seven year old boy from Ra’anana, killed yesterday in Lebanon, Major Benjy Hillman, married three weeks ago, is buried by 1245 pm. Jewish burials are fast: within 24 hours, unless Shabbat intervenes. Benjy was of Egoz unit, “Walnut,” perhaps a variation of the idea of Sabra: tough on the outside, sweet and tender within. Some years ago, the Egoz boys were considered knuckle-draggers: tough and not too bright. Now, they are tough and bright. We crossed into Southern Lebanon, finding hidden bunkers filled with munitions that cannot be seen by air. After several thousand rockets shot into Israel, some 30 dead and many more injured in the last week, after aerial bombings preceded by leaflets warning civilians to leave certain areas, after minimal let-up in rockets, we sent in troops. Benjy led his men. After his wedding, he was given two months leave with his bride. But his unit was called up, he said he had to go with his men. The Pirke Avot (I believe) says that a newly wedded man should not be called up for military duty --- unless it is for the sake fo the people of Israel. When the Biblical General Barak was selecting men to fight against the charioteers of Sysra, he asked anyone who had any reason not to fight, to step back. Benjy Hillman stepped forward. Here is what I saw and heard. The military cemetary of Ra’anana is on the main back road, abutting the neighboring moshav. It is not evident at first. Today, the train of people and cars made it evident. At 9 am my neighbor, whose son is in another crack unit, Nachshon, told me that he had heard the funeral was set; the family had just been told; the announcement would soon be public. I asked if this were someonne I knew -- I felt an internal tug against going. Ira simply suggested I should go if I had never seen a military burial. Thousands were there on a day brilliantly clear, with birds singing (their form of territorial battle). On this hot day, two breezes came through, the first warm, the second refreshing and noisome; trees are moved. 1230 it was to start and by 1235 the cemetary was packed, the flag-draped simple casket being pulled out of the military jeep by buddies from Egoz, brown-bereted, a red emblem on its brim; a walnut tree epaulet.
Continue reading "Aliyah Diary: A Burial"
« previous page
(Page 187 of 191, totaling 4769 entries)
» next page
|