Monday, July 27. 2009
 If there's a more loathsome person in the news right now than Henry Louis Gates Junior, I've missed them. It's amazing the amount of attention you can get playing your one-note piano with your foot on all the pedals for the media and academia these days.
Listen to him for a minute and a half, and you can see he's a second-rate intellect with a third-rate sense of respect for his fellow man. Perfect for Hahvahd, now that I think of it. Just like the Widener-shunning alum Teddy Kennedy, only teaching instead of sleeping in class, and driving the affirmative action bus over a cliff instead of an Oldsmobile off a bridge. I can't advise riding with either of them. But then again, a policeman responding to a burglary call isn't in a position to skip talking to Skip. Being wrong at the top of your voice, and a jerk in the bargain, is the sum total of the prestige the Harvard nameplate offers, I guess.
Just when you think you've heard all the drivel you could imagine coming out of the guy's mouth or pen, you hear another topper. According to the AP, on his application to attend Yale, he wrote:
"As always, whitey now sits in judgment of me, preparing to cast my fate. It is your decision either to let me blow with the wind as a nonentity or to encourage the development of self. Allow me to prove myself."
It's really hard to be incoherent, obsequious, and imperious and insulting at the same time, but it appears he's been managing it his whole life. That approach is not without its charms, after all. It's the official foreign policy of the United States right now, for instance.
At about the same time Gates was playing passive aggressive with a Yale admissions office likely bending over backwards to let him in anyway, another man, a much more pleasant and charming man, and a snappier dresser, uttered the same sort of line, but without any malice. Hoping to burst the tension in the words by uttering them along with his fellow man, and he didn't discriminate about who his fellow man was. Viewing the words as an obstacle to get past, not a cow to be milked.
You can only utter half the line now. It's a testament to what Skip Gates and his ilk have accomplished in the intervening years. Everyone used to be able to say both words with impunity, but generally didn't, if for no other reason than it was the mark of bad manners. Now only the pallid portion of the words can be uttered with malice, and often are, thanks to the tireless efforts of Skip Gates et.al. It's still not enough. There will never be enough for the Convent of the Sisters of the Perpetually Afflicted they're running over at Harvard, and in many other, big, important white buildings all over this marvelous country.
Don't call me whitey... Skippy.
A brief Mankiw explanation of his view on government power, in the context of medical care, which echos my views but is more concisely expressed. A quote:
(My) philosophical inclination most likely influences my views of the healthcare debate. The more power a centralized government authority asserts, the more worried I am that the power will be misused either purposefully or, more likely, because of some well-intentioned but mistaken social theory. I prefer reforms that set up rules of the game but end up with power over key decisions as decentralized as possible.
and:
What puzzles me is that Paul (Krugman) seems so ready to trust solutions that give a large role to the federal government. (In the past, for instance, he has advocated a single payer for healthcare.) I understand that trust of centralized authority is common among liberals. But here is the part that puzzles me: Over the past eight years, Paul has tried to convince his readers that Republicans are stupid and venal. History suggests that Republicans will run the government about half the time. Does he really want to turn control of healthcare half the time over to a group that he considers stupid and venal?
Read the whole short piece. Then I saw this interview with Princeton's Utilitarian Philosophy Prof Peter Singer. One exchange in that interview:
Do you really think the government can make choices regarding care fairly and efficiently?
Mr Singer: Since my New York Times article appeared I've had many people write to me with their heart-breaking stories of being denied care, or being unable to afford care, for themselves or for their families .No human system is going to be error-free, but I'm convinced that the government can set up a process that will make choices that lead us to obtain better value for our health-care dollars than the completely uncontrolled system that exists now.
Utilitarians always give me the creeps. It's always about having "experts" in "control" of our lives - preferably them. Speaking of power and control, Kaus makes a comparison with the proposed IMAC with base-closing commissions, with this wise comments:
Why isn't a base-closing style commission the solution to every one of our problems? After all, it's logical that the problems our peculiar system of government--featuring a Congress that gives powerful voice to regional and local interests--hasn't yet solved will be precisely the problems that our peculiar system of government is almost incapable of solving. Otherwise they would have been solved already!
and
The Constitution created an unwieldy system--requiring that every law pass two houses and get approved by the President--that we long ago concluded was incapable of generating the quantity of binding laws a modern society needs. The response was the creation of the administrative state--the "unelected fourth branch of government" that writes enforceable rules subject to nobody's veto (except the lawyers and the courts). At least the base-closing solution grounds the outcome in the consent of elected officials.
The "administrative state." That's the word for it. Like Versailles.
We have often said that American medical costs are a measure of our prosperity, our inventiveness, and expecially our remarkable pharmaceutical and biotech industries which are the envy of the world (and upon which the rest of the world depends).
I hope our friend Coyote doesn't mind our borrowing this from his post:
 Good summary of the legislative stumbles re health care, at Hennessey
World's fastest home internet connection (fixed)
Brit gummint keeps their climate data secret. Why? Related: Some reality about Greenland's ice
Obama care is worse than you think. Wkly Standard
Ben Stein: We've figured him out
What's up with New Jersey? NYT
Shoot the messenger. WH attacks the CBO. I thought the CBO was sacred.
I know adults who could probably use this book too, which Insty mentioned: You Don't Have to Learn the Hard Way: Making It in the Real World: A Guide for Graduates
Is it a crime to have a fat kid? I don't think so. How do you control what a 14 year-old eats? The world has always had fat people. Some people like to be fat, like Pres. Grover Cleveland who admitted to only a prosperous 307 lbs but was probably well over that.
Why the Ricci case complicates - but doesn't kill - affirmative action. Related: Prof. Gates says he's 57% white. Lucianne comments "Guess there's no money in White Studies."
Sunday, July 26. 2009
Via Gateway, re WH medical care advisor Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel (Rahm's brother)
Savings, he writes, will require changing how doctors think about their patients: Doctors take the Hippocratic Oath too seriously, "as an imperative to do everything for the patient regardless of the cost or effects on others" (Journal of the American Medical Association, June 18, 2008).
Yes, that's what patients want their doctors to do. But Emanuel wants doctors to look beyond the needs of their patients and consider social justice, such as whether the money could be better spent on somebody else.
That's why they want Docs to be government employees instead of your privately-hired professional.
Synthstuff saw the above and expanded on the topic.
From a Theo piece:
It took Obama six months to pick a dog, but he wants a Health Care Bill by next week?
Who's he kidding?
Does medical insurance represent a market failure? Robin Hanson
Related: When politics replaces market forces.
 The importance of good conversation. AVI
Nostalgia for racism.
Liberals should be fighting white stereotyping. Driscoll
Review the darn checklist before landing
Victory was not a dirty word in the election. So why now?
The coming middle-class tax hikes. Related: The freedom you would lose under Obamacare.
Some good news from Africa. Front Page
This recession has more government policies that discourage work. I have heard this, around. Take a sabbatical and stretch out that unemployment. Or find some disability if you can.
Hypocrite du Jour: Thomas Friedman. Glib and sanctimonious, like so many at the NYT.
Forcing people to get medical insurance who don't want it.
Iraq Powerpoint in the US Army. PowerPoint is lethal, in a way: it's mind-numbing. Powerpoint and meetings are the reasons Coyote quit corporate America to become an entrepreneur.
Saturday, July 25. 2009
Michelle:
Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius tried to reassure citizens in New Orleans this week that Obamacare bureaucrats will make sound medical decisions for all Americans. She failed. Under the government-run plan, she promised, a team of health care experts will recommend what should be covered: “I think it would be wise to let science guide what the best health care package is.”
I guess it didn't occur to her that doctors know some science - and they also know something else: they know their patient. No two patients are alike. People do not want an "approved treatment protocol" - they want to work it out with a doc who is working for them, and is not a de facto civil servant. I think what Sebelius means is not "science": she means a board of cost-containing medical efficiency experts.
However, I do not think anybody wants a government to have that sort of power. Governments create omnipotent monopolies.
It's one thing for a private medical insuror to tell you they don't cover in vitro fertilization, and another for the government to tell you that you cannot have it because "science says" that it's not cost-effective. In the former case, it's a freely-entered association, as Milton Friedman would say, and if you want the in vitro badly enough, you can save your pennies and get one. Furthermore, I'd much rather make an appeal to a private biz than to the government.
We suspect that the government wants two things: 1. To get more folks on the Government Plantation and, 2. To control Medicare costs. Re the latter, the O might be right that it may have been unwise for his Grandma to have a hip or knee replacement when she was dying from cancer - but he is correct that 80% of medical costs occur in the final year of life. However, unless somebody has terminal cancer or something comparable, how do you know it's somebody's final year of life in advance?
Another related issue is the equating of "health care" (a dumb term) with medical insurance. I suppose with the high costs of medical technology and hospital treatments, those costs are out of reach for the average person (which is why we buy cheap catastrophic, ie high-deductible medical insurance) but, for most purposes in life, a regular office visit for a bad sore throat or a camp physical doesn't cost very much at all, while an ER visit for your bad sore throat can set you back $750.
We agree that it is foolhardy for anybody who is not wealthy - especially for a family - to carry no catastrophic major medical insurance, because bankruptcy sucks. We also think it is foolish for people to expect insurance to cover every office visit: the whole point of insurance is supposed to be that you hope you never need it.
However, years of Medicaid (for the poor), Medicare (which pays for everything, at low rates), union-driven medical benefits and work-related medical benefits have produced a sense of entitlement and, we would argue, have driven up the cost - and the quality - of medical treatment in the US.
What is the right role for government in medical care? We don't know, and we don't trust anybody who says they know. Fact is, government already controls much of it via Medicare, Medicaid, and now SCHIP. It has been incrementalism at work, with the long socialist view. One thing we do know is that fewer and fewer Docs want to accept Medicare, and few ever accepted Medicaid except for charity clinics and inner city Medicaid mills staffed by foreign medical graduates.
Why do so many Docs opt out of Medicare? Because of the paperwork requirements and the unsustainable rates of reimbursement. When people get a doctor's bill, they often forget that it's not a bill for his time: it's a bill for his rent, his machines, his two nurses, his insurance coder, his bookkeeper, his receptionist, his staff's benefits, his malpractice insurance, etc. Your local Internist and Pediatrician is not getting rich on $65 office visits these days. In fact, they are struggling.
No, the big costs are tests, some medicines, hospitalizations, cancer treatments, dialysis, the ICU, etc. The big ticket items - and those costs are not compressible. They can only be rationed if costs are to be cut. We do not think those costs should be cut, because we believe that such decisions are a matter of personal choice and freedom and, as they always say, "All you have is your health." Or your disease, as the case may be.
We wish we knew the right answers to all of these issues but, despite the problems, we will say one thing: With the best, most innovative and most available medical care in the world, one must be extremely careful about messing with it. Freedom is always messy. We re-link Cardinal at Tigerhawk's defence of American medicine.
From another point of view, a quote from an annoyed Vanderleun's Who, Whom?, which reiterates our Roger's thoughts about The Plunder Economy:
Who—whom?" Who shall be forced to give up the health care that they like (most Americans), and whom shall receive health care they (supposedly) ain't got -- for free -- at a cost to everyone else of trillions in dollars and immeasurable quantities of freedom and privacy and security.
Who (shall give)? You and hundreds of millions of others. Anyone who has a job, or makes things, or owns things that can be taxed. And then have a fee for this or that levied (for the common good). And then taxed again.
Whom (shall receive)? The poor shall be marched to the front of the line; their ragamuffin children with protruding bellies on their shoulders for the photo-op. But right behind them will come.... the slackers, the lazy, the whacked-out, the grifters, the hustlers, the useless, the career recipients of endless government hand-jobs, the hard-core unemployable, the 17% of crack whores that do not work for the government, and a few million others that form the hard, adamantine core of Obama's and the Democrats' aptly named "base."
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs," is what's going on here. Except this time the add-on is "Even if you don't need it or want it, because little Susie the crack whore does. P.S. We're gonna slip in some language to pay for her abortion too, just because it will piss you off."
That is a bit cold, Mr. V.
Written by The B and BD together.
Friday, July 24. 2009
Away this weekend, but here are a few links I want to get out there first:
It's better to be tall. I always wanted to be 6'3, and now I see why. I blame my parents.
Academic Groupthink.
I'm bipolar. Cut me a break.
Missed this: The Pope on Love in Truth.
The O's fate depends on Perot voters
Why should our tax dollars be going for stuff like this?
Civil war: Black Caucus vs. Blue Dogs. Where does the Irish Caucus stand?
Gov. Pawlenty: This was a joke on the American people
If Bush made this sort of factual error. What a phoney, as Holden Caulfield would say.
Gov. Perry of Texas, standing up to The Man. That is an American thing to do.
The Krautman on why Obamacare is sinking. One quote:
...the greatest waste is the hidden cost of defensive medicine: tests and procedures that doctors order for no good reason other than to protect themselves from lawsuits. Every doctor knows, as I did when I practiced years ago, how much unnecessary medical cost is incurred with an eye not on medicine but on the law.
Tort reform would yield tens of billions in savings. Yet you cannot find it in the Democratic bills. And Obama breathed not a word about it in the full hour of his health-care news conference. Why? No mystery. The Democrats are parasitically dependent on huge donations from trial lawyers.
Related: How the O stumbled. WSJ
Related: Medical care? Few care all that much.
Just for laughs, I want to hear these tapes. Related: If he's so smart, how come the Prof doesn't know these basic facts?.
Related, from Rush: "The only racial profiling in Cambridge Massachusetts is in the Admissions Office of Harvard University."
Watch for the OFA to come knockin' on your door
VDH on how the O could have done things right.
The O's problem: Glibness. Powerline:
(he) continues to overestimate his verbal skills. All his life, he has been rewarded for assuming a certain pose and offering up platitudes in a reasonably glib fashion. These are minor talents at best, but they got Obama elected President, notwithstanding his lack of original insight into any issue of public policy. Now that he is President, however, these limitations are starting to haunt him. Obama's foolish and entirely needless assertion that Cambridge policeman James Crowley "acted stupidly" when he arrested Harvard professor Henry Gates is beginning to turn into a political issue that will hurt Obama with broad sectors of the electorate.
Driscoll reported this, and it sounds right to me:
Carol Platt Liebau (Harvard Law Review), February 20th – “[Tom Pirelli] did most of the day to day work. Barack Obama was nowhere to be seen. Occasionally he would drop in he would talk to people, and then he’d leave again as though his very arrival had been a benediction in and of itself, but not very much got done.”
The guy likes to slide over the surface. That is a character trait.
How to pay for the O's plans? It is beyond parody. Related, from Willisms, below:
 The Little Sisters of the Poor
Upping the ante again: Climate change a threat to national defence. Gimme a break. Another new study blames everything on the Pacific Oscillation. I doubt mankind can control that thing.
Leszek Kolakowski died.
Stunning photo of Mt. Everest (h/t, Miller)
Brits considering school vouchers. Good on 'em. I guess they don't have teachers' unions.
A movement to make hot dogs politically incorrect. Nice try. Loonies and cranks are trying to run the world.
Rove:
Team Obama was rushing to pass health care before the August recess out of fear that allowing members to go home for an extended spell before voting on the bill would give them an opportunity to hear from their constituents. They fear that the 300 protestors who showed up at a town hall meeting in Panama City, Fla. held June 30 by Democrat Rep. Allen Boyd shortly after he voted for the cap and trade energy tax) are only the start of a larger backlash.
A good defence of American medicine by Cardinal at Tiger. One quote:
That's why the debate about the uninsured is BS. Universal healthcare is intended to stop the spending - and that in turn will stop innovation and development. We will underproduce healthcare products and services, and while more people will have "coverage", they will queue for these underproduced services which in turn will also be denied far more regularly than is the case with insurance. Count on it. Americans don't go to the UK and Canada to get healthcare; it's the other way around. Now they may go to Canada to get certain products available in both places more cheaply. But I promise you that product is only available in the first place because it was developed here. The rate of healthcare innovation in the UK and Canada is dwarfed by that of the US. And furthermore, if the US market didn't exist, the rate of innovation around the world would collapse.
We have a great healthcare system. It works for most of our 300 million people, and works pretty well by any sensible historical measure. Yes, it's expensive. ..
From The Unbearable Whiteness of Maureen Dowd, at Am Spectator:
At the core of the beating intellectual heart of the left-wing establishment where such things are studied with the detail of Talmudic scholars, the New Haven fire department is doing more than three times better on race than the very liberal elites who have set themselves up as its sniffy critics. Perhaps instead of seething about "Firefighters and Race" the Times would have been better served by pondering "Editorial Writers and Race." Or perhaps: "Too Black to Write; New York Times Column Writing and Race."
Thursday, July 23. 2009
The medical insurance mess has been put on hold for the summer, at least. I guess it's not really all that urgent after all. The O did his cause no favors last night, as Betsy summarizes.
And after Carnahan and Sibelius got laughed at in Town Hall meetings this week, it must have been clear that nobody was buying the government line. Remarkably, and in contrast with the rest of the fawning press, the AP saw fit to point out the O's lies.
I repeat: Isn't lying supposed to be a bad thing?
Can I go on blog vacation now?
I agree with Vanderleun that the "press conference" last night was a fellatio fest of seemingly prepared and rehearsed questions with lying responses (lying is back in fashion), but the O missed an amazing opportunity. Among the softballs and adulation was the question about Prof. Gates' arrest for disorderly conduct with police officers.
The correct answer was this: "Our American police officers respond to calls of all sorts, never knowing what sort of situation they are walking into. Their job is to protect the honest and the innocent, and our job as citizens is to give them the respect and gratitude they deserve for doing that."
In my view, Gates should have thanked the officers for wanting to protect his house. Most people know that it is never wise to give shit to police officers, regardless of the situation. Cops are always a bit edgy on the job - and rightly so.
And the "Don't you know who I am?" approach only works for Kennedys: they own the copyright.
Update: The O didn't mean to call the cops "stupid." Of course not.
Update: The cop comes across as more professional than the O:
"Mister Gates was given plenty of opportunities to stop what he was doing. He didn't. He acted very irrational, he controlled the outcome of that event."
"There was a lot of yelling, there was references to my mother, something you wouldn't expect from anybody that should be grateful that you were there investigating a report of a crime in progress, let alone a Harvard University professor."
According to the police report, Crowley asked Gates to talk outside, to which he responded "Yeah, I'll speak with your mama outside."
Dick Morris on the polls
Layers of bureacracy at UNC-CH. Your tuition dollars at work.
The US immigration Diversity Lottery. No Brits need apply.
Dems go after the Career Colleges. I happen to think that Career Colleges are a great innovation.
What is Russia up to? Nyquist
From a Rasmussen medical care report:
Another factor that may be playing a role is underlying public skepticism about the legislative process. Americans, by a two-to-one margin, believe that no matter how bad things are, Congress can always make it worse.
Americans aren't stupid. Only the terminally naive think otherwise.
The Blue State Meltdown. The American
Smart political advice via NRO
Abortion and assisted suicide would not be rationed!
Honduras throws out Venez diplomats. Good idea
A Republican! At my cocktail party?
The government has spent 79 billion on climate studies
The press conference fellatio fest. And why try to demonize Docs? People trust their Docs far more than their pols. If Docs are the enemy, we're in big trouble. I want my Docs working for me, not for the government.
Viking:
There goes your health insurance - Betsy has a long post detailing how a public option plan will crowd out private insurance because it doesn't play by the same rules: the government-run will be subsidized by taxpayers and will dictate payment terms to doctors and hospitals, just like Medicare does now.
Here's the nightmare scenario: companies drop private insurance for the government plan, the program becomes huge and thus hugely expensive, while hospitals go bankrupt due to reduced reimbursement rates.
What's not to love?
Wednesday, July 22. 2009
That was the O's comment in a meeting of balking Dems. Why the desperation?
I am following this story closely because I think these folks are freaking insane. They are in over their heads with no clue of what they are doing, no clue about what hospitals and my Doc friends do or how they do it to produce the treatment that the entire world envies. Some of the Dems seem to know it. And the rush makes no sense at all. Dems baffled by President's stance.
I think I said it yesterday: This is getting stranger and stranger.
Driving that train, high on cocaine,
Casey Jones is ready, watch your speed.
Trouble ahead, trouble behind,
And you know that notion just crossed my mind.
Says Powerline's Paul:
It is shocking that Obama would attempt to overhaul our health care system -- this vast and critical portion of our economy -- on such a short timetable and in such a haphazard fashion. The public senses the absurdity of his approach. It expects Obama to act like the careful, studious leader it voted for.
I trust my doctors. I do not trust the wisdom of my politicians. I want the pols kept away from my Docs: the same distance as from my pastors. I do not want Dear Leader deciding whether Gramps lives or dies. I will be Gramps, someday - God willing.
I will give the last word for today to NRO:
Obviously the Obamacare proposal is an abomination and Congress needs to throw it out and start from scratch. But whatever they come up with, the lesson for immigration is unchanged — in an era when we have massive transfers of taxpayer funds to the poor, whether through Medicaid or food stamps or public-education funding or whatever, you just can't keep importing more and more poor people. The libertarians will say the answer is to abolish all of these taxpayer-funded programs; but even if that's true, until we do abolish them, ongoing mass immigration is simply unjustifiable.
 A good point about arrogance from Stossel:
They intend, as the New York Times puts it, "to reinvent the nation's health care system".
 Let that sink in. A handful of people who probably never even ran a small business actually think they can reinvent the health care system.
Politicians and bureaucrats clearly have no idea how complicated markets are. Every day people make countless tradeoffs, in all areas of life, based on subjective value judgments and personal information as they delicately balance their interests, needs and wants. Who is in a better position than they to tailor those choices to best serve their purposes? Yet the politicians believe they can plan the medical market the way you plan a birthday party.
As Lowry says, these guys are reckless. Recklessness is always a bad thing, and few good things happen in pubs after midnight.
Am Thinker: Obamacare is a sick joke. A quote:
The World Health Organization ranked the United States No. 1 out of 191 countries for being responsive to patients' needs, including providing timely treatments and a choice of doctors. Among those currently insured, 84% are satisfied with their healthcare.
And here's something actually constructive: How to make health care reform bipartisan
And as Althouse says:
The Democrats have dumped a drastic, complicated health care bill on us and they are ramming it through before we can even figure it out. That's what matters, not the fact that the party out of power is squawking about it.
And at NRO:
Trying to impose Government Controlled Healthcare on a nation that doesn’t want it is significantly harder than running against a candidate for president who gets the nomination from the incumbent party whose leader had approval ratings in the mid to upper 20’s (and who’s base didn’t really like him).
And a repeat: How is abortion "healthcare'? It's about killing, isn't it? Not on my nickel. I refuse to pay for your abortion, or your tummy-tuck.
Why the heck do we have to spend so much energy trying to stop the government from doing stuff for us? We can tie our own shoes. As Sissy says, "Just leave us alone." We would rather figure it out for ourselves. We aren't morons.
Photo: I'll bet young readers do not know who that is
The world values survey, Could spend lots of time perusing it. Darned interesting. h/t, Gene Expressions
Just like they changed "Global Warming" to "Climate Change." It's now "Underrepresented Groups" instead of "minorities." Right out of Orwell's handbook. The darn Asians and Pakistanis and Indians messed it all up by being so successful, and opted out of the "rainbow coalition."
Public laughs out loud re Obamacare. Video at Michelle. Sheesh.That's bad.
Two kinds of moonwalks
Sissy: Why can't they just leave us alone?
The new Depression begins to bite. Good grief. Must be NYC workers.
Are there linguistic tells for narcissism? Dr X considers
Everybody I know has stopped spending on useless crap too. Relationships are all that matters...except guns and guy toys and new camo and stuff.
The governors hate Obamacare. I think ObamaCare is in the ICU, dying on life support. But it's a scorched earth approach, says Wiz.
More: 100 million citizens would get screwed by ObamaCare.
More: The O taps into the useful idiots
Tuesday, July 21. 2009
Tiger quotes Brooks on the Dem overreach on spending. It's freaking people out, and it is why the O is sinking fast in approval. People voted for Hope. That's pretty vague, and easily undone.
Not that the Repubs were much better. This from Willisms:
Not sustainable, dudes. We the people can only work so hard and, at some point, we will not want to bother. The only reason we work is for our families - and sometimes for the fun of it too.
The O admits he is not familiar with the House health care bill he is selling.
It all just gets stranger and stranger. And desperate. This stuff is too important to people to rush through.
Image above from Iowahawk, of course
I heard on the radio news today "The US is the only of the advanced industrial nations without government medicine." I wondered "What's wrong with that?" No NHS, Please. We're Americans.
The O's Green Jobs Czar: We stole stuff. Another honest fellow in DC.
Statistics on the sun and sunspots.
I'm not dead yet. Via Insty:
ANOTHER HEALTHCARE BILL NUGGET: “The section, titled ‘Advanced Care Planning Consultation’ requires senior citizens to meet at least every 5 years with a doctor or nurse practitioner to discuss dying with dignity.”
Does dying of a heart attack on the tennis court qualify as "dignified"? I think it should, but it does rudely inconvenience the remaining three - assuming it's doubles.
The demographic death of Japan
The Great Uniter. (h/t, Driscoll)
Wilkinson on Peter Singer on medical care rationing
The AMA betrays its profession. Civil servants cannot be professionals because a key part of being a "professional" is being beholden to your own conscience and judgement, not outisde forces.
Another Sen. Dodd update. Just the usual sleazy, lying, greedy pol.
WSJ: The Obama Agenda Bogs Down. Democrats got what they wanted in the stimulus bill. The public knows it.
Good example of why Conservatism sucks right now.
George Will on why it ain't smart to soak the rich
The O is slipping faster on key issues. Duh. Guy is an amateur, and his issues are nuts.
Corzine is gonna lose the election. He is dead meat, but nobody can fix NJ's mess.
The WH hides the budget mess. Wait 'til everybody's on vacation.
From Front Page:
If priorities are to be believed, the priority the Obama administration has placed at the top could become a flop. Political pollster Daniel Yankelovich says that Americans are slowly leaving the “wishful stage” of the health care debate, when polling data showed broad support for a larger government role in medicine. Yankelovich predicts “in the next few weeks, when voters discover what national health care will cost and how it could affect their own care, romance will give way to reality.” Studies already show the legislation's eroding popularity, as citizens find out the problems inherent in socialized medicine, the tax increases necessary to finance it, and the deception politicians use to inflate the number of uninsured Americans.
Watch out, NYH-Presbyterian, Mass General, and Mayo Clinic. Via Viking:
Large urban teaching hospitals - including hospitals that are the biggest engines of the Boston economy - are facing the loss of hundreds of millions of dollars under national health care reform as rural lawmakers on Capitol Hill wage a fight to win more federal cash for their local institutions.
Monday, July 20. 2009
She read the draft bill so you won't have to. Medical policy wonk Betsy McCaughey weighs in on ObamaCare.
John at Powerline speculates that journalists are dumber than the average bear. I think John overestimates the brains, curiosity, and skepticism of the average bear (tho maybe not of the average Powerline reader), but I do get the point: professional journalists are supposed to convey useful and accurate info for the rest of us, with enough of the inside baseball to help us understand the game that is being played.
Statistics, math and science tend to be among their weak points. It is easy to be a half-competent writer without understanding in depth what you are writing about. We prove that here, daily. However, we do try to link to those who might have a clue.
What worries me more is the power, ignorance, perfidy, and manipulativeness of politicians.
Via Drudge:
RECOVERY.GOV // AWARDED: $2,531,600 FOR 'HAM, WATER ADDED, COOKED, FROZEN, SLICED, 2-LB'...
RECOVERY.GOV // AWARDED: $1,191,200 FOR '2 POUND FROZEN HAM SLICED'...
RECOVERY.GOV // AWARDED: $351,807 FOR 'REPLACE AND UPGRADE THE DUMBWAITER'...
RECOVERY.GOV // AWARDED: $1,562,568 FOR 'MOZZARELLA CHEESE'...
RECOVERY.GOV // AWARDED: $5,708,260 FOR 'PROCESS CHEESE'...
RECOVERY.GOV // AWARDED: $16,784,272 FOR 'CANNED PORK'...
RECOVERY.GOV // AWARDED: $1,444,100 FOR 'REPAIR DOOR BLDG 5112'...
RECOVERY.GOV // AWARDED: $541,119 FOR 'INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL'...
I would happily repair that door for half the price.
Neal Cavuto on Imus right now discusses the car salesman trick of "rushing a deal." "Don't let them leave the salesroom without signing." "Now or never," "A one-day-only deal" - all the tricks.
He discusses car sales tricks, and says that is what the O administration does with legislation. I tend to agree.
|
