Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Monday, October 30. 2006The "New, improved, fun" EpiscopaliansA new Episcopalian discovers that it's all about defeating "patriarchy," and about LGBT inclusion. Honestly, I had to think for a minute to figure out that LGBT thing; maybe I need to get out more. A quote:
Whole piece at First Things. Sunday, October 15. 2006From today's Lectionary: Prosper the works of our handsPsalm 90 1Lord, you have been our dwelling place in all generations. Image: Rembrandt's David Playing the harp for Saul Sunday, October 8. 2006From today's LectionaryMark 10: 2-13 Some Pharisees came, and to test him they asked, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife?” 3He answered them, “What did Moses command you?” 4They said, “Moses allowed a man to write a certificate of dismissal and to divorce her.” 5But Jesus said to them, “Because of your hardness of heart he wrote this commandment for you. 6But from the beginning of creation, ‘God made them male and female.’ 7‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, 8and the two shall become one flesh.’ So they are no longer two, but one flesh. 9Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.” 10Then in the house the disciples asked him again about this matter. 11He said to them, “Whoever divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery against her; 12and if she divorces her husband and marries another, she commits adultery.” 13People were bringing little children to him in order that he might touch them; and the disciples spoke sternly to them. 14But when Jesus saw this, he was indignant and said to them, “Let the little children come to me; do not stop them; for it is to such as these that the kingdom of God belongs. 15Truly I tell you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God as a little child will never enter it.” 16And he took them up in his arms, laid his hands on them, and blessed them. Monday, October 2. 2006What good am I? Day of AtonementFrom a piece by Homnick at American Spectator:
We'd all go nuts if we did that every day, but is once a year sufficient? Saturday, September 30. 2006Finding GodHow good is this? (our bold print)
Whole thing at One Cosmos. Friday, September 29. 2006Two Christian LinksA dead church? Tod Bolsinger quotes Peterson on "dead institutions." It's the dead bark that protects the living word. He is heavy - he's my brother. Joe has mixed feelings on the Values Voters meeting. And deals with it admirably - as usual. Better than I would. Evang. Outpost Sunday, September 24. 2006From Today's Lectionary: ProverbsProverbs 32:10-31 10A capable wife who can find? She is far more precious than jewels. Tuesday, September 19. 2006Comparative ReligionTwo hat-tips and three generous wags of the dog's tail to Dinocrat, who found this excellent piece by Spengler in Asia Times, entitled Jihad, The Lord's Supper, and Eternal Life. A quote:
Read the whole thing. Image: Botticelli's very late work, Mystic Crucifixion Sunday, September 17. 2006It is an obscenityVia Michelle, via Jihad Watch, an excellent piece by Fr. Raymond de Souza in the National Post. A quote:
Please read the whole thing. Also, read Hugh's piece on the subject. Jesus is a monarchistFrom Joe at Evangelical Outpost:
Saturday, September 16. 2006Not the same godPope Benedict has essentially stated that the god that Jihadists worship is not the Christian God. Duh. That is hardly shocking. I guess Benedict is not a dhimmi. It's about time somebody important said it. I never bought all of that "it's all the same god" stuff. That was always lame. What sap came up with that idea, anyway? Naturally, the "religion of peace" wants to behead the Pope now, and the idiots will set some stuff on fire and kill a few infidels, thus revealing where their true souls reside. The Pope is wrong, I think, when he says that religion is not about hate. Some are, and some are not. He means "true religion." The "Religion of Perpetual Offence" and Hate has taken his words precisely as they wish to take them, while ignoring his message. So much for "reaching out." Now watch the northern European nations say things like "We must be more careful about what we say and how we say it." Indeed, one cannot be too careful around paranoids, for whom mindless seeking of offence and revenge are the favorite hobbies. Perfect example of how people use "feeling offended" as a weapon. No apologies, please, Benedict. Nothing more than "I am sorry if you did not understand me." Sunday, September 3. 2006From today's Lectionary: The armor of GodEphesians 6: 10-20 Finally, be strong in the Lord and in the strength of his power. 11Put on the whole armor of God, so that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. 12For our struggle is not against enemies of blood and flesh, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers of this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places. 13Therefore take up the whole armor of God, so that you may be able to withstand on that evil day, and having done everything, to stand firm. 14Stand therefore, and fasten the belt of truth around your waist, and put on the breastplate of righteousness. 15As shoes for your feet put on whatever will make you ready to proclaim the gospel of peace. 16With all of these, take the shield of faith, with which you will be able to quench all the flaming arrows of the evil one. 17Take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God. 18Pray in the Spirit at all times in every prayer and supplication. To that end keep alert and always persevere in supplication for all the saints. 19Pray also for me, so that when I speak, a message may be given to me to make known with boldness the mystery of the gospel, 20for which I am an ambassador in chains. Pray that I may declare it boldly, as I must speak. Monday, August 21. 2006Heather MacDonald demands an explanationHeather MacDonald, the superb essayist for City Journal, discussed her agnosticism the other day in The American Conservative, and for reasons I do not understand, she caught some flak. From a piece by Michael Novak at NRO:
Whole thing here.?(h/t, Smart Christian) Wednesday, August 16. 2006The Psychoanalyst Speaks: Lusty ChristiansSomehow this link was forwarded to me for comment. It makes the highly newsworthy and earth-shattering point that Christians are a lusty crew. 50% of Christian men are addicted to porn, it says. (What they did not discover is that 99% of Christian men are addicted to sex, and require it on a regular, if not twice-daily, basis.) What bugs me about the piece is that it implies that Christians ought to be pure from sexual desire and interest - or at least from non-marital desire. That very idea is nuts, but I do know from whence it comes: it comes from a thread running through Protestantism (and Roman Catholicism, before that), that our desirous and loving hearts should be fixed on God and His Kingdom, not earthly delights. Of course, fantasy and action are entirely different things. Porn, like art, books, etc., is just assisted fantasy. Adults, Christian or otherwise, are expected by others to regulate their behavior, but whether and how they regulate their fantasy life is their own, personal decision. The use of the word "addiction" is peculiar. I think, for an interest that is so hard-wired. Do guys have an "addiction" to staring at gals' breasts?They do tell me that they can't help it, so I never show cleavage at work. I wrote a piece on internet porn a while ago (porn is the #1 use of the internets). I have looked at a bit of it, and have been struck by the generous anatomy of the fellows who do this, but it's not my cup of tea, and I find it undignified and sleazy as hell, but I think it's fairly harmless. However, when any person's behavior is compulsive - whether it's porn, or blogging, or watching TV, or computer games, or anything - it's usually an escape from something, or from some emotion. Therefore, what is interesting to a shrink is not the object of the compulsion as much as the question of what is being avoided. I am obviously not a pastor, but I say that there is room for both earthly and spiritual delights in this life. As animals with a divine spark, we must pursue both as best we can, while ordering, regulating and directing our life as it is - as it has been given to us - as best we can. Note: That is not me. Our lusty Christian Editor added the charming photo - not for pleasure, of course, but only to get attention.
Posted by Dr. Joy Bliss
in Our Essays, Psychology, and Dr. Bliss, Religion
at
08:18
| Comments (6)
| Trackbacks (0)
Sunday, August 13. 2006From today's Lectionary: Bread of LifeJohn 6:35-51 35Jesus said to them, “I am the bread of life. Whoever comes to me will never be hungry, and whoever believes in me will never be thirsty. 36But I said to you that you have seen me and yet do not believe. 37Everything that the Father gives me will come to me, and anyone who comes to me I will never drive away; 38for I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me. 39And this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up on the last day. 40This is indeed the will of my Father, that all who see the Son and believe in him may have eternal life; and I will raise them up on the last day.” 41Then the Jews began to complain about him because he said, “I am the bread that came down from heaven.” 42They were saying, “Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How can he now say, ‘I have come down from heaven’?” 43Jesus answered them, “Do not complain among yourselves. 44No one can come to me unless drawn by the Father who sent me; and I will raise that person up on the last day. 45It is written in the prophets, ‘And they shall all be taught by God.’ Everyone who has heard and learned from the Father comes to me. 46Not that anyone has seen the Father except the one who is from God; he has seen the Father. 47Very truly, I tell you, whoever believes has eternal life. 48I am the bread of life. 49Your ancestors ate the manna in the wilderness, and they died. 50This is the bread that comes down from heaven, so that one may eat of it and not die. 51I am the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats of this bread will live forever; and the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh.” Wednesday, August 9. 2006Four Christian LinksBilly Graham mellows with age. He looks forward - and back. Very fine piece in Newsweek. h/t, News for Christians Churches that give you what you want, not what you need. A guide for the cineplexed, at Touchstone. Is marketing a church mission? Wish I knew. What does "post-evangelical" mean to you? internetMonk, h/t, Smart Christian Jonathan Edwards' "Blank Bible" for sale. Could be mighty interesting - it contains all of his Bible notes. Sunday, August 6. 2006He breaks usFirst Christ takes us as we are. Fr. Henry Nouwen (h/t for quote from Anchoress) Wednesday, August 2. 2006The UCC strikes againYes, the UCC is one of the bees that is always in my bonnet. Before our most recent post on the mainline churches even disappeared from our front page, we get this nonsense (h/t, Israpundit) - a quote from an exchange with UCC Canada:
I am not ready to claim that the UCC, and their friends, are anti-Semitic, but they sure don't have any sympathy for Israel. And they have more sympathy for Jihadists and the like than they do for our Christian president who took an oath on the Holy Bible to protect us from their attacks. I just think they stick to the Leftist line of the day. As I have said here before, helping individuals with their relationship with God through Christ ought to be a plenty big enough job for preachers. Understanding world affairs is the opposite of what their job is, and they tend to be a wierd combination of naive and innocent while angry and judgemental. As Laura would say, "Shut up and Sing". The whole exchange of letters is posted at Israpundit here. Our church is SO HAPPY to have broken with the UCC. We are Congregationalists, and we make up our own minds, thank you. Sunday, July 30. 2006Photo Essay - All Along the Belltower: Steeple HistoryThe architectural origin of the steeple lies in the belltower, and the origin of the belltower in the watchtower. Medieval watchtowers, like this one in Umbria,
and this one in San Gimignano, the town of towers,
used bells, guns, and fire to signal each other in time of trouble. Church belltowers, at first identical to watchtowers, were often separate from church buildings through the early renaissance. You had to place those bells up high to send out the sound. Here's a famous one, which is the belltower of Pisa's Duomo (c. 1100):
In time, the belltowers were integrated into the architecture of church and cathedral buildings. Without clocks and watches, you couldn't be called to church or prayer - nor would you know what time it was (except for sundials) without the bells sounding across the villages and fields. And they were a regular reminder of Christ's presence during the day. (But how did the bell-ringers know the time? That's another subject.) Canterbury Cathedral (c. 1300) has the Gothic integration of tower. It took 63 men to ring its heavy bells; six men alone to ring the heaviest:
More modest English parish churches had bell towers on the roof (Holy Cross, Greenford Magna, Middlesex - much of the building c. 1500):
Puritan (Congregationalist) Meeting Houses in the US typically had no steeples, as part of their purifying their congregations from papistry, vanity, and other fanciness (no bells, no stained windows, no singing, 6-hour sermons, etc). They didn't even want to call them "churches, " and you went to "meeting", not to church, where the God of Grace played second fiddle to the God of Truth. This is the Rocky Hill Meeting House (c. 1785) in Amesbury, MA:
By the early 1800s, steeple bell towers came back into acceptance in the US, along with singing. I can imagine the debates between the stodgy old-timers and the young folks in their Building Committees. Many old New England churches are meeting houses with steeples (and pillared porticos too) added generations later, leading to steeple engineering problems in later years. Here's an example of an added steeple in Alford, MA (c. 1740): Belfries, containing the bells and their mechanisms (and bats), usually have/had louvers to direct the sound up and away from the church itself. Oftentimes a steeple - the tower which supports the belfry, is roofed by an elegant spire, leading to the stereotypical appearance of the 19th Century New England Congregational church - which has since been copied by all sorts of denominations including Catholics - seemingly unaware of the Puritan, anti-Anglican, anti-hierarchical, and anti-Papist theological origin of the architecture: We always need to be reminded that a "church" is not a building - it's a congregation of people who seek God through Christ ("whenever two or three of you are gathered together"). The building doesn't really matter, but having a special place never hurts. I think the spires are optional. Here's a nice piece on church bells. YouTube of Dylan doing All Along the Watchtower here. (with JJ Jackson, Winston Watson, and Bucky Baxter)
Posted by Bird Dog
in History, Our Essays, Religion, The Culture, "Culture," Pop Culture and Recreation
at
05:00
| Comments (4)
| Trackbacks (0)
Friday, July 28. 2006The Mainline Churches are still crazy: Listened to "Imagine" one too many times while stoned in college or seminaryThe anti-Israel and anti-American trend of the mainline churches continues apace. In a disturbingly lock-step manner support for Hezbollah and the Palestinian terrorists flows out of these churches, as listed here, with their recent statements, in Camera. And let's not forget the loony tendencies of the dying Anglicans. Dr. Bliss wrote about the phenomenon here. The co-opting of the churches (along with all sorts of non-profit orgs) has been going on since the late 60s, but it hasn't run its course yet. (We recently discussed the WCC here.) In the meantime, more people are attending livelier churches with more conservative approaches to life and politics. Why is this a Left-Right issue? Beats me. I've read lots of explanations, but none of them seem to stick. Heck, Israel is basically a socialist country, while the Arab countries are paleo-capitalist and paleo-everything else. The only clue I have is that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend." And America is their enemy, for some reason and, of course, Israel is just an American military outpost. Or it could be that these ministers and priests listened to John Lennon too many times: Imagine there's no heaven Maybe we should broadcast this song to the Palis and the Hezzies and Ahmadinejad and Osama 24 hrs/day - it is a good tune, but the lyrics are those of a wealthy, drug-addled infant. I tried to satirize this song once, but it satirizes itself too well.
Posted by The Chairman
in Our Essays, Religion, The Culture, "Culture," Pop Culture and Recreation
at
06:05
| Comments (0)
| Trackbacks (0)
Wednesday, July 26. 2006Jefferson and the TrilemmaJoe on the Trilemma and Thomas Jefferson:
Whole thing here. Good comments. Sunday, July 2. 2006From today's Lectionary: 2 Samuel: "Tell it not in Gath..."
1After the death of Saul, when David had returned from defeating the Amalekites, David remained two days in Ziklag. 2On the third day, a man came from Saul’s camp, with his clothes torn and dirt on his head. When he came to David, he fell to the ground and did obeisance. 3David said to him, “Where have you come from?” He said to him, “I have escaped from the camp of Israel.” 4David said to him, “How did things go? Tell me!” He answered, “The army fled from the battle, but also many of the army fell and died; and Saul and his son Jonathan also died.” 5Then David asked the young man who was reporting to him, “How do you know that Saul and his son Jonathan died?” 6The young man reporting to him said, “I happened to be on Mount Gilboa; and there was Saul leaning on his spear, while the chariots and the horsemen drew close to him. 7When he looked behind him, he saw me, and called to me. I answered, ‘Here sir.’ 8And he said to me, ‘Who are you?’ I answered him, ‘I am an Amalekite.’ 9He said to me, ‘Come, stand over me and kill me; for convulsions have seized me, and yet my life still lingers.’ 10So I stood over him, and killed him, for I knew that he could not live after he had fallen. I took the crown that was on his head and the armlet that was on his arm, and I have brought them here to my lord.”
11Then David took hold of his clothes and tore them; and all the men who were with him did the same. 12They mourned and wept, and fasted until evening for Saul and for his son Jonathan, and for the army of the Lord and for the house of Israel, because they had fallen by the sword. 13David said to the young man who had reported to him, “Where do you come from?” He answered, “I am the son of a resident alien, an Amalekite.” 14David said to him, “Were you not afraid to lift your hand to destroy the Lord’s anointed?” 15Then David called one of the young men and said, “Come here and strike him down.” So he struck him down and he died. 16David said to him, “Your blood be on your head; for your own mouth has testified against you, saying, ‘I have killed the Lord’s anointed.’” 17David intoned this lamentation over Saul and his son Jonathan. 18(He ordered that The Song of the Bow be taught to the people of Judah; it is written in the Book of Jashar.) He said: 19Your glory, O Israel, lies slain upon your high places! How the mighty have fallen! 20Tell it not in Gath, proclaim it not in the streets of Ashkelon; or the daughters of the Philistines will rejoice, the daughters of the uncircumcised will exult. 21You mountains of Gilboa, let there be no dew or rain upon you, nor bounteous fields! For there the shield of the mighty was defiled, the shield of Saul, anointed with oil no more. 22From the blood of the slain, from the fat of the mighty, the bow of Jonathan did not turn back, nor the sword of Saul return empty. 23Saul and Jonathan, beloved and lovely! In life and in death they were not divided; they were swifter than eagles, they were stronger than lions. 24O daughters of Israel, weep over Saul, who clothed you with crimson, in luxury, who put ornaments of gold on your apparel. 25How the mighty have fallen in the midst of the battle! Jonathan lies slain upon your high places. 26I am distressed for you, my brother Jonathan; greatly beloved were you to me; your love to me was wonderful, passing the love of women. 27How the mighty have fallen, and the weapons of war perished! Wednesday, June 21. 2006A Story of Grace
Vanderleun tells the story of how Grace returned him to sanity. "He wasn't in his right mind." American Digest. Would I recommend it if I didn't think it were good?
Tuesday, June 20. 2006Back to SheolFrom Psalm 116, posted on Sunday: "The snares of death encompassed me; the pangs of Sheol laid hold on me; I suffered distress and anguish." FYI, A brief history of Hell, Sheol, and Gehenna, here. Sunday, June 18. 2006From Today's Lectionary: Psalm 1161I love the Lord, because he has heard my voice and my supplications. Image: Rembrandt, David singing for King Saul
« previous page
(Page 24 of 28, totaling 680 entries)
» next page
|