Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Saturday, November 29. 2008Doc's Computin' Tips: Double your browsing speed? And, for the most part, it could be argued I was right. Okay, so it would take six minutes to display this page with my new modem — but what's a mere six minutes for a quality product like a Maggie's Farm home page? Of course, waiting half a day to see one of the videos might irk some of its more impetuous readers, so there might be something to this 'faster and faster' thing, after all. And, yes, I eventually bought the lightning-fast 2400 baud modem. I was smokin'! "With this kind of speed, I'll never have to upgrade again!," I proclaimed loudly for all to hear. Sticking tightly to my resolve, I immediately bought a 9600 modem when they came out. Then a 14.4. Then a 19.2. Then a 28.8. Then a 33.6. Then a 56K. Then I combined two 56K's using MultiLink. Then I got one of them fancy new 'experimental' ADSL modems at .768 meg. Then cable at 1 meg. Then 1.5. Then 2. Then 3. Then 5. Then I ended up going wireless. I always was a sucker for fads. Until this rascal drifted along. This is a patch to update Windows XP (and earlier) to meet current broadband standards. Vista already has the updates. To possibly double your browsing speed, please... This is actually a rewrite of an old post. I was reminded the other day how crucial it can be, so thought it deserved a re-mention. I had just installed a fresh Windows and had overlooked the tweak. The next thing I knew, I'm wondering if something had gone wrong with the install because my browsing speed was so sluggish. Then I remembered the tweak and that took care of it. Then I was writing a post on the subject a while back and wanted to mention the file by exact name, so I hoofed it over to SpeedGuide and headed for their Downloads section. While checking over the files, I saw this interesting description:
Very interesting. I ran the tweak and immediately doubled my browsing speed. Here are some quick numbers. If the times seem high, it's because I'm using Verizon Wireless, which is a tad slow. It's the proportion that counts. The cache was cleared between all tests and I did each test three times and took the average:
One more?
So go ahead and give it a shot. I suppose it would be fair to say that the slower your Internet connection rate, the more this will make a difference. If you've already got some sizzling 5- or 10-meg connection rate, everything's probably blazing as it is and you probably wouldn't even notice a tiny improvement. If for some reason it actually degrades your system, there's a tweak file to reset everything back to stock Windows settings. Installation Home site for Speedguide.net is here. At the top of the sidebar, hover over 'Broadband', then select 'Downloads/Patches'. Skip down the page and download "sguide tweak 2k.zip", assuming you're running Windows 2000 or XP. That's the one that resets Windows to meet broadband standards. Now skip down the page to the "Web Patches" section. Grab the second one, the one for Win 2000 and XP. This is the one that'll make a dif, if any. If you'd like to make some before-and-after time tests, do this:
That's known as "clearing the cache". You don't actually see the files on a web site, like the page and text and pictures. The browser downloads them to the Temporary Internet Files folder first and that's what you're actually seeing displayed on the screen. That's what we have to clear out to make sure we're getting a fresh read on the site in the next test. Got your stopwatch handy? Go find a big complicated site that takes a while to load. Start the stopwatch right as you head for the site, and you'll want to make sure everything has actually been downloaded before stopping the stopwatch. The status bar might say "Done" in the lower-left corner long before the site's actually finished loading. Here are a few you can try: And although the page isn't long or complicated, the Microsoft site seems to take much longer to display than it should (on my system). Maggie's would also be a good test, although you can't do it from this page as you've already loaded the site. Get off the site, clear the cache, then get back on, stopwatch in hand. Got your times jotted down? Clear the cache and close the browser, as above, so you'll have a fresh slate to work with. Unzip both downloads and run the two 'tweak' files. Reboot. Go to your test sites again and compare the times.
Posted by Dr. Mercury
in Dr. Mercury's Computer Corner, Our Essays
at
10:17
| Comments (21)
| Trackback (1)
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
This worked on my XP machine . The tip is very much appreciated ....thanks Dr.
Installed. Dint do any rigourus testing, but a couple of slow-loaders on the list seem faster.
Thanks. Got scared off by all the warnings, guess I'll have to learn to back up my registry first.
There's no concern about using them on WinXP -- that's what they're designed for and I haven't heard of any complaints.
As far as Vista goes, the first one is clearly an XP-only tweak, but the second one will either do some good or do nothing -- it depends on whether MSoft incorporated the second tweak into Vista like they did the first one. That, I don't know, but it certainly won't hurt anything. As far as backing up the Registry, you'd be much better off blowing the $35 and buying True Image, the whole-system backup program. That's the best way, by far, to back things up because you're actually backing up every single byte, not just a selected few. Full instructions are here. Then that would make it your "smart" Vista! Okay, thanks for the feedback. I've updated the page to make it "XP only". I knew Vista had incorporated the first patch, but I wasn't sure about the second.
Thanks Doc. Once again, Maggie's Farm comes through.
And yes, I did test the fixes. I timed a 10-25% improvement on a Pentium 4, XP-Home system running at 2 ghz. Normally, I might say, "Every little bit helps." but I think a 10-25 improvement in web page processing is a BIG improvement. Once again, thank you for the advice. Sometimes I wonder if MS knows how much they depend on folks like you to make things right. Outstanding! And good of you to make the tests. Always nice to have proof. BD suggested I bump this up to Monday so more people will see it, so we'll see if we can lasso some more guinea pigs bright enthusiastic computer users then!
If they aren't bright emugh to see what they missed over the weekend, I'm not sure bumping will help, but go ahead.....
And I'm obviously bright enough to notice ALL of the typo's
"emugh"? How about "enuf"? I'm always surprised by the stats, because I've always viewed the weekend as the big time to hit the 'Net, but the numbers don't back it up. The weekday traffic is almost double what the weekend pulls in. I guess people are off having fun, doing things, enjoying real life.
They've sure got their nerve! >"emugh"? How about "enuf"? Any time they want to get rid of that goofy "ough" stuff is fine with me. This is from a page I have on the language: QUOTE: And then there's the whole "-ough" thing: - You learn the word "thorough" and figure it's pronounced like "o". - Then you learn the word "through" and figure it's pronounced like "oo". - Then you learn the word "thought" and figure it's pronounced like "aw". - Then you learn the word "tough" and figure it's pronounced like "uff". - Then you learn the word "though" and you're back to "o"! Geh. I have a good friend who's dating an Equadorian girl who's very bright and determined to learn our language. Here's a conversation we had the other day: "What does 'a fan dish' mean?" "Huh?" "A fan dish." "A fan dish?" "Yes, what does it mean?" "A WHAT?" "A fan dish!" "Spell it for me." O-f-f-h-a-n-d-i-s-h. You know -- a fan dish! "The weekday traffic is almost double what the weekend pulls..."
I wonder is we could see "popular posts at Maggie's Farm" versus "unpopular posts at Maggie's Farm" by looking at the GDP stats..... I'm just saying....
#6.1.1.2.1
Larry Sheldon
on
2008-11-30 13:38
(Reply)
Larry - It doesn't work on a blog site. The site stats show individual posts and their number of hits, but those would only be the 2-part posts, where people click on the 'Continue reading'. The single-page posts are just part of the collective home page and thus can't be counted.
#6.1.1.2.1.1
Dr. Mercury
on
2008-11-30 13:50
(Reply)
I was talking about looking at the Gross Domestic Product stats for evidence of people reading Maggie's farm instead of doing what ever they are supposed to be doing.
#6.1.1.2.1.1.1
Larry Sheldon
on
2008-11-30 13:54
(Reply)
Ah, gotcha.
Well, let's see. According to this site, Americans waste $759 billion (that's 'million' with a 'b') dollars a year on the Internet (and other frivolities) at work. So, $759,000,000,000 divided by 120,000,000 blog sites is roughly $6,365 of the GDP that Maggie's is wasting. Now, regarding your original question about the "most popular" and "least popular" posts, and who's to blame for this blatant theft from our national treasury, I'd say Bird Dog must shoulder the burden of blame. News Junkie's links are just links, nobody's interested in my computer stuff or Barrister's economic stuff, but who can resist Bird Dog's latest "Chipmunk of the Week" post? Nobody, of course, and there goes the national budget. In other words, it's Bird Dog's patriotic duty to post less-interesting articles. I'm sure he'll be just as surprised as we are to find this out. :)
#6.1.1.2.1.1.1.1
Dr. Mercury
on
2008-11-30 14:16
(Reply)
I did the tweak, and it made me fry some eggs & bacon. This has really got my head scratching.
No need for confusion, old friend. It's a simple matter of biology. The blazing speed you obtained triggered a desire in your body for protein, and those eggs & bacon certainly did the trick.
I hear my hard drive tweak triggers a reaction for carbohydrates. BTW, are you still speaking parenthetically? When we last left our riveting tale, you had FAILED to close out a parenthetical remark, and I doubt you have to this day. And why would you? Anything you say, no matter how rude or wrong, can simply be pointed to later with the excuse, "Oh, I was just speaking parenthetically. That wasn't the real me." It's either a really unfair, cheap trick on your part -- or downright brilliant. :) No faster, and perhaps in the case of Target, slower. While your system took 32 seconds before the tweak for Home Depot, mine took 7 seconds before the tweak for Home Depot. Which may indicate why there was no improvement: already OK. (XP Pro my system)
Any idea what it would do re: using a tetherberry for my modem connection? Help, harm, make no difference? I have excellent signal strength where I'm sitting, but it would be nice to tweak the speed up a bit.
Rosalind - I'd say give it a shot. This is a Windows tweak, not a second-party tweak, so it doesn't really matter how you're connected or who with. And if your wireless system responds as well as mine did, you'll be one happy camper.
Just for fun, you might make some before-and-after tests. Time how long it takes to go to a couple of big sites, clear the cache, install the tweak, reboot, then try them again. I'd be very interested in hearing your results. |
Programs AutoSizer — This has two great uses. It'll pop open the browser (or any program) in full-screen mode every time it opens, and for small programs that tend to open wherever they want (like Calculator), it will make them open righ
Tracked: Nov 29, 10:02
Here's an index of my Maggie's Computin' Tips. I can't guarantee all of these will work on every Windows operating system, but most should. Programs AutoSizer — This has two great uses. It'll pop open the browser (or any program) in full-s
Tracked: Jul 10, 11:21
Here's an index of my Maggie's Computin' Tips. I can't guarantee all of these will work on every Windows operating system, but most should. Programs AutoSizer — This has two great uses. It'll pop open the browser (or any program) in full-s
Tracked: Jul 10, 11:25
Here's an index of my Maggie's Computin' Tips. I can't guarantee all of these will work on every Windows operating system, but most should. Programs AutoSizer — This has two great uses. It'll pop open the browser (or any program) in full-scr
Tracked: Jul 22, 19:46
Here's an index of my Maggie's Computin' Tips. I can't guarantee all of these will work on every Windows operating system, but most should. Programs AutoSizer — This has two great uses. It'll pop open the browser (or any program) in full-scr
Tracked: Jul 22, 21:40
Here's an index of my Maggie's Computin' Tips. I can't guarantee all of these will work on every Windows operating system, but most should. Programs AutoSizer — This has two great uses. It'll pop open the browser (or any program) in full-s
Tracked: Jul 23, 13:07
Here's an index of my Maggie's Computin' Tips. I can't guarantee all of these will work on every Windows operating system, but most should. Programs AutoSizer — This has two great uses. It'll pop open the browser (or any program) in full-s
Tracked: Aug 28, 08:30
Here's an index of my Maggie's Computin' Tips. I can't guarantee all of these will work on every Windows operating system, but most should. Programs AutoSizer — This has two great uses. It'll pop open the browser (or any program) in full
Tracked: Jan 08, 20:00