Maggie's Farm

We are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for.

Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page

Much Sorry with Delays
Birth, Death and All That Stuff in Between
How to Honor Labor Day, Every Day
My Yom Kippur Miracle (Repost from 2010)
Good intro to fly casting
Peach update, with pie
NYC update
Easy for you to say: To the elites on mass immigration
For NYC on 9/11, Sailors' Snug Harbor
Pickled Peaches
Water Shoes
Labor Costs in U.S.
Your "identity"
Good news about The Great Courses
Uses of Hot Pepper Jelly/Sauce, Chutneys, and Jams
A Saturday Drive to Litchfield County, CT
How to Pick a Kayak
Civilized: Fruit forks and knives
Loads of kayaking on Cape Cod
Psychology Experiments' Questionable Results

Categories


All categories

Quicksearch

Links

Blog Administration

Open login screen

RSS Readers

Add to Google

Subscribe with Bloglines

Sunday, March 9. 2008

A failed presidency?

Jeffrey Bell at Weekly Standard wonders how the Repubs might�deal with the aftermath of a "failed presidency."

It's a worthwhile piece, but I am far from�sure that Bush has been a failure -�unless the measure of failure is the popularity poll of the week. Few presidents remain popular towards the end of 8 years, because everything�they�have done�annoyed somebody.

Posted by The Barrister in Politics at 10:56 | Comments (8) | Trackbacks (0)

Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

The success of presidencies is always relative to the conditions of the times making them difficult to judge. And when times are unexpectedly challenging it becomes more about that individual�s style (and their help) than it is about the horse they rode in on.
#1 commander clopfelter on 2008-03-09 11:44 (Reply)
�You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.�
-Winston Churchill
#2 Rob on 2008-03-09 12:27 (Reply)
this housing bubble and attendant credit squeeze sure is a weak third act -- but the first two acts -- no more 9-11s and a booming economy -- are solid achievements in the big-picture way.
#3 buddy larsen on 2008-03-09 12:51 (Reply)
Bush had nothing to do with the housing bubble.
#3.1 BD on 2008-03-09 13:29 (Reply)
The truth of the matter, and the politics of the matter, are two different things, for sure.
#3.1.1 buddy larsen on 2008-03-09 13:45 (Reply)
The politics of the matter are, unfortunately, more damaging than the truth of the matter, as in Viet Nam.

http://tinyurl.com/36holg
#3.1.1.1 Irish Cicero (Link) on 2008-03-09 15:32 (Reply)
I know. Truth is rarely a factor in politics. Politics is about power.
#3.1.1.1.1 BD on 2008-03-09 15:40 (Reply)
truth has a leg up on gaining the power if and when the politics is in good faith ("the art of compromise").

But the ''good faith'' rises and falls on that ''likeability'' factor.

My mom used to say --unapprovingly-- that "if you like somebody they can do no wrong, if you don't, they can do no right''.

So the circle comes round to good faith again, because a person of good faith 'can't' like a scoundrel.

I guess that's why Bill Clinton is so unsettling ('corrupting') -- it's not so much him as it is what their affection for him says about our fellow citizens, toward whom we want--or should want-- to have good will.
#3.1.1.1.1.1 buddy larsen on 2008-03-09 16:41 (Reply)

Add Comment
(Your e-mail will not show in your comment)

By commenting on this site you agree to the site rules listed here. Email
addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for email notifications.

Quick reference guide: [i] italics [/i], [b] bold [/b], [u] underline [/u],
[url] (web address) [/url]. More tips here.

Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

BBCode format allowed
 
 
A Chris Southern Consulting website.