Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Friday, August 10. 2007Two ParentsAaron Hansom via Pajamas:
Read the whole thing. Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
...single parent households are the single biggest cause of poverty. If you want to win the war on poverty, you have to fight the war on children born out of wedlock and other disfunctions that create single parent households. The reason leftists scream so loud when Bush wants to champion programs that re-inforce marriage is that they know this will reduce single parent households which will reduce poverty which will reduce dependancy on liberals in government...and that is one of the saddest things.
You're right, Phil --accumulation of private property runs counter to 'progressive' accumulation of power. I think it applies to Hollywood, too. The more people need distraction, the more they spend on entertainment (the cheap affordable luxury, when all else is out of reach). Witness the Golden Age of Hollywood during the Depression.
I mentioned this stuff about a month ago..cited the same studies.....
This is another "war" we're not going to win. The slide can be traced to Brown Vs. Board of Education and school integration...don't jump up all outraged just look at the stats. The black family breakdown, fully nurtured, funded , and kept robust by the US Government is the reponsible party. That broken and meretricious black culture got bussed into nice white neighborhoods and just like any baseless, irresponsible hoodlum began to rot the decorum of the entire school system..we're now experimenting with Chicanos to see if we can bake the cake down to cinders. Home school or if you can afford it get your kid into a private school. Black and hispanic culture isn't going to get any better anytime in the next 50-100 years, five generations is what most sociologists peg the rate of change at...that's 100 years. Part of the imperative is Freudian. The white girls gravitate to the strongest flashiest males who happen to be the black footballers and net guys. They've been setting the clothing and cultural trends in the school systems heavily now for about 20 years, perhaps 30. The usually eschew academics since they're all going for the pros. The girls follow the strength and the brightly tailed peacock display we call bling. The only way you will save your kid is to get then out of that environment....yeah yeah SOME do make it..but very very few. Segregation was better, just like homogeneity beats muticulturalism...which I posted the new Harvard study about this week in ten diffferent spots and got zero comments about. But it's all good , right? Yeah. Harvard study.
THE DOWNSIDE OF DIVERSITY A Harvard political scientist finds that diversity hurts civic life. What happens when a liberal scholar unearths an inconvenient truth? By Michael Jonas | August 5, 2007 IT HAS BECOME increasingly popular to speak of racial and ethnic diversity as a civic strength. From multicultural festivals to pronouncements from political leaders, the message is the same: our differences make us stronger. But a massive new study, based on detailed interviews of nearly 30,000 people across America, has concluded just the opposite. Harvard political scientist Robert Putnam -- famous for "Bowling Alone," his 2000 book on declining civic engagement -- has found that the greater the diversity in a community, the fewer people vote and the less they volunteer, the less they give to charity and work on community projects. In the most diverse communities, neighbors trust one another about half as much as they do in the most homogenous settings. The study, the largest ever on civic engagement in America, found that virtually all measures of civic health are lower in more diverse settings "The extent of the effect is shocking," says Scott Page, a University of Michigan political scientist. more: http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/04/the_downside_of_diversity?mode=PF IT HAS BECOME increasingly popular to speak of racial and ethnic diversity as a civic strength
But a massive new study, based on detailed interviews of nearly 30,000 people across America, has concluded just the opposite But a massive new study, based on detailed interviews of nearly 30,000 people across America, has concluded just the opposite http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/04/the_downside_of_diversity?mode=PF The extent of the effect is shocking says Scott Page, a University of Michigan political scientist.
The extent of the effect is shocking says Scott Page, a University of Michigan political scientist. I read it --it was out some weeks ago, and I'd already read it elsewhere. Or I would've commented. I read it somewhere framed as part of a discussion on "trust" societies vs "fear" societies. The new research being that multiculturalism actually breaks societies into paranoid enclaves --the exact opposite of what has been sold by the PC crowd.
Well, was I behind the curve on the publication of this study or what? It appears to have been published in October 2006
No wonder no one reponded. I'm probably the last guy to have "discovered" this new study. True to the "A" type side of me I kept on pushing ...how boorish ..gotta work on using what should be a strength but sometimes is a weakness into a full time strength I guess, the reason the study doesn't much excite folks, is that there is nothing new here, nothing that people don't already know. People aren't going to cease blending--heck, we've been blending since Australopithecus or Homo Habilis or whoever first wandered out of Africa. the thing such studies CAN do is, let people off the hook about pretending that they're not more comfy with--and trusting of--their own kind.
As a single mom in the 1970's (no child support) I worked two jobs to keep her in private school. It can be done. You just have to really feel the obligation to make sure they get a good education. I did whatever I could to keep her in private schools. I applied for discounted tuition, I borrowed money, I sold my car. I did what it took . . .
In 1976 in SFO, you had to walk passed an armed guard, who would let you into the locked office of the school counselor--that was for kids in the seventh grade. Things went really bad very quickly--from 1964-1976. From Blackboard Jungle to ???? Anyway, it has been very bad for the last 30 years. This mess hasn't just happened. HOme school or private school. |