Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Saturday, October 30. 2021Saturday Stuff and Junk
Architect Resigns in Protest over UCSB Mega-Dorm
A crypt-keeper pal of vulture capitalist Warren Buffet came up with the plan, and the money to build it -- as long as you don't change his plan. From the photos, the rooms would be illegal as prison cells. A dorm room on the oceanfront with no windows. It's genius, I tells ya.
The Friends of Eddie Coyle is a great movie, based on a book from a guy who knew Boston criminals inside and out. It's also the first place I heard this quote: "This life's hard man, but it's harder if you're stupid!"
A four-year-old with a badge and gun would be the perfect detective. Just keep asking "Why?"
The ZMan is a lively writer and an interesting thinker. North and West Africa: INTERPOL report highlights human trafficking for organ removal
See, that's why I drink plenty of whiskey. That way, no one will want my liver or kidneys. Western Maryland lawmakers ask West Virginia officials to ‘consider adding us’ to their state
Many states could use a reshuffle. Rhode Island shouldn't even be a state. Delaware shouldn't be a state. Vermont should be folded into New Hampshire and stapled to Maine. California should be -- sawn off and pushed out to sea. The 37-Year-Olds Are Afraid of the 23-Year-Olds Who Work for Them
We went over this yesterday. Zoomers don't like Millennials much. Never mind that. Try to wrap your head around this New Yoik Toims writer who thinks Millennials have an "obsession with work." That must be why they were all able to pay off their student loans early, huh? Why AC won the Electricity Wars
The Current War is a terrific movie about this topic, despite being badly written and chaotically directed. Westinghouse was the shizzle.
I'm always worried I'll run out of things to worry about. Thank heavens for social media. Microsoft Becomes World’s Most Valuable Stock as Apple Slumps Doesn't matter. Next year is the year for Linux on the desktop. Just like last year was. Zillow’s Zeal to Outbid for Homes Backfires in Flipping Fumble
I remember when fixing dilapidated homes was a job for regular people and first time home buyers, not page thirteen on some arsehole's slidedeck pitch to venture capitalists for a javascript empire. I hope Zillow chokes on it.
Enjoy your weekend, folks!
Posted by Roger de Hauteville
in Hot News & Misc. Short Subjects
at
06:01
| Comments (49)
| Trackback (1)
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Re UCSB Megadorm: What an unlivable monstrosity. The best chance of stopping this thing is probably an ADA lawsuit. Not clear how a person in a wheelchair could live there.
How soon they forget the lessons of the Mega-low income projects of the fifties and sixties. Eight people per bathroom? How does that work? Does that conform to occupancy standards? Your ADA point is well taken. Accommodation does not appear to be considered. Designed to be one great big HIVE for conformity and control.
That dorm concept is an absolutely hideous concept and makes me wonder about the mental condition, let alone moral compass, of the guy that designed it. It looks like the academic version of a concentration camp. Image a covid-19 lockdown in a structure like that. Have these people lost their minds?
I don't care what you say, that "monstrosity" is a masterpiece! When you're judging architecture, as with any work of art, you have to take into account its surroundings and how well the piece fits within those surroundings. Given that this is a dorm for a university, how perfectly on point is it that this building resembles a prison or a mental institution? Genius!
Don't forget, Charlie Munger is Warren Buffet's long-time partner and this is the future they both envision for the 99% of humanity that make up the peasantry - you'll have nothing and you'll like it. Meantime, the elites such as themselves shall have everything and their lives won't be affected at all. IDK. Personally, as a person who started out modestly, I'd take an affordable place to stay w. a modicum of private space over "views" any day of the week and twice on Sundays.
As an anecdote, I recently visited my alma matter for the first time in about 15 years - a large, public land grand university. It was shocking; new buildings everywhere, and uniformly so nicer than I remember e.g., climbing walls, fancy coffee bars, enormous empty atriums, padded chairs, etc. IMHO, it was clear why the place was so expensive nowadays. The school had lost its way. The old "provide a high quality education for the state's children" ideal was no more. I lived in a dorm my freshman year. The corridor I lived on had 10 rooms with 2 students per room. There was plenty of opportunity for interaction with my roommate in our room and shooting the breeze in the corridor with other students.
It was utilitarian in design, with linoleum floors and cinderblock walls painted puke pink, but the design also was good for interaction. The Untold Truth Of The Ark Of The Covenant
https://www.grunge.com/163047/the-untold-truth-of-the-ark-of-the-covenant/?utm_campaign=clip Let's put a stop to the horrible idea mentioned above right now before some dumbass actually tries to act on it.
We, the hard working, God-fearing folks of New Hampshire want nothing to to with the hippity dippity state of Vermont, espicially if Bernie Sanders is part of the deal. We have no sales tax and no income tax. Vermont is laden with both. Nice ski areas but full of transplanted New Yorkers who have turned a one time Republican bastion into the land of make believe and oppressive ideas. We might tolerate Maine if you lop off the southern counties. My weekend is now a bit shorter since I spent so much time on each of these fascinating rabbit holes!
Thank you for such a delightful post! At heart, the perceived threat from China is a fear that central planning is more efficient than free market capitalism. As Bernie Sanders put it, "who needs 23 different kinds of deodorant?" without considering that without the threat of competition, there's no need to be efficient in delivering your product. Of course Bernie, along with most of the politicians and bureaucrats in government, has never run a business, never faced competition, and never paid a price for being wrong. It's easy enough for him to think he's one of the ones who are smart enough to be entrusted with the God-like powers to run the world, because he's a moron. Any problems that arise (and there will be many of them) will be "unexpected" and "unforeseeable" and in no way diminish their status as "experts". None of us is as smart as all of us and while free market capitalism may have its faults, it's the best way we've ever found to run things. The Chinese government believes in the efficiency of central planning, like ten million Bernie Sanderses. How's that going to work out for them, do you suppose?
Jerryskids: At heart, the perceived threat from China is a fear that central planning is more efficient than free market capitalism.
There are advantages to top-down and to bottom-up structures. That's the question that bedeviled the last century. An authoritarian model can respond to emergencies more effectively, such as seen during the pandemic. The fasces was the symbol of fascism, representing the belief that the people were stronger when bound to a common goal, and that liberal democracy could never unite even against an existential threat. WWII demonstrated that the fascists could be beaten. A liberal model allows for more complex and efficient arrangements to evolve. Markets and political structures innovate constantly. However, liberal systems face the problem of disunity and dysfunction, often being unable to respond to crises or to enact rational industrial policies. The most successful countries are mixed systems. Both the U.S. and China have mixed systems. China allows some degree of market freedom, highly regulated, but maintains authoritarian control over politics. The U.S. allows much more market and political freedom, albeit the political system remains in disarray and undirected. Jerryskids: At heart, the perceived threat from China is a fear that central planning is more efficient than free market capitalism. To respond more directly, central planning can be effective for setting industrial policy, and for military expansion. "central planning can be effective for setting industrial policy, and for military expansion."
Look how well it worked out for the USSR and Venezuela! OneGuy: Look how well it worked out for the USSR and Venezuela!
Or for Nazi Germany, as already noted. However, a great deal of mischief can be made. And the damage can be vast. The problem with top-down has to do with inputs to the decision-making process. In a democratic society, there is substantial flow of decision-making from below, but coordination at the top. In authoritarian societies, there is much less input from below. In China, the Communist Party still exerts a great deal of influence over the leadership, but the power is not as distributed as it is in liberal democracies. Regardless, no successful society exists without a top-level decision making process. Zachriel wrote:
"An authoritarian model can respond to emergencies more effectively, such as seen during the pandemic. " Effectively?? Authoritarians and dictators certainly respond more forcefully, but the past two years have shown that this type of highly concentrated power is completely ineffective in creating workable solutions that people will support. nunnya bidnez jr: Authoritarians and dictators certainly respond more forcefully, but the past two years have shown that this type of highly concentrated power is completely ineffective in creating workable solutions that people will support.
That's rather the point of authoritarianism. It doesn't require the support of the people. Legal Analysis: Alec Baldwin Situation Beginning to Look a Lot Like Manslaughter
https://legalinsurrection.com/2021/10/legal-analysis-alec-baldwin-situation-beginning-to-look-a-lot-like-manslaughter/ Instead of combining states, dividing them up into rural and urban could produce a conservative majority in the Senate because of the relation between population density and red/blue orientation. My friends and relatives in the northern ends of both Maine and New Hampshire would love to have a real Republican Senator once again.
NH4kx3: Instead of combining states, dividing them up into rural and urban could produce a conservative majority in the Senate because of the relation between population density and red/blue orientation.
The Senate is already weighted towards rural, Republican areas. Senate elections are staggered. To include all 100 Senators, here is the total popular vote of the last three Senate election cycles: Democratic: 141,552,752, 55% Republican: 115,364,239, 45% Yet, the split in the Senate is 50-50. For instance, a voter for Senate in Wyoming has 68 times the influence on the Senate as a voter from California. To a rough approximation, the same ratio holds for Vermont and California but oddly enough nobody seems to ever make that comparison.
maybe .. U.S. Senate Vermont Patrick Leahy Democratic U.S. Senate Vermont Bernie Sanders Independent U.S. Senate Wyoming John Barrasso Republican U.S. Senate Wyoming Cynthia Lummis Republican Christopher B: To a rough approximation, the same ratio holds for Vermont and California but oddly enough nobody seems to ever make that comparison.
The reason is that California to Wyoming represents the largest disparity. California to Wyoming is 68:1 California to Vermont is 63:1 NH4kx3 suggested changes that would increase the partisan disparity. "a voter for Senate in Wyoming has 68 times the influence on the Senate as a voter from California."
Illustrating the brilliance of the constitution. I do question those Democrat turnouts considering how much cheating the Democrats are prone to. OneGuy: I do question those Democrat turnouts considering how much cheating the Democrats are prone to.
It was the same "brilliance" that led to the 3/5 compromise. Why do you think Wyoming voters should have 68 times the influence in the Senate as voters from California? I don't like the Constitution either, but, deal with it. For some reason, people smarter than you didn't want the State of California to run over the State of Wyoming so that's why we have a bicameral legislature, you authoritarian wad. Did you miss that day in 8th grade civics?
Helen the Labradoodle: I don't like the Constitution either
Actually, the U.S. Constitution is an important advance in human freedom. Dispensing with the U.S. Constitution would be a grave error. But idolizing the Constitution and ignoring its history and problems is also a grave error. Helen the Labradoodle: For some reason, people smarter than you didn't want the State of California to run over the State of Wyoming so that's why we have a bicameral legislature, The slave states insisted upon it to protect their "peculiar institution." Did you miss that day in 8th grade history? You got your ass burned, you douchebag commie.
#8.1.1.1.1
Helen the Labradoodle
on
2021-10-31 12:07
(Reply)
Helen the Labradoodle: I don't like the Constitution either
You said you didn't like the Constitution. We noted that the Constitution was an important advance in human freedom. Perhaps your argument is with human freedom then?
#8.1.1.1.1.1
Zachriel
on
2021-10-31 12:33
(Reply)
An ignorance of basic civics seems to be a hallmark of modern societies.
Here in Canada, people are frequently prone to getting whiny about little old Prince Edward Island (PEI) which has a population of 150,000 all up. Meanwhile, Toronto in the province of Ontario has a population of 2.73 million. But Toronto is just a city, and PEI is a province with all the constitutional powers of a province. So the whiners always think the provinces should be somehow "reorganized" - you know, we'll just amalgamate the smaller ones in the Maritimes, no problem. It doesn't occur to these dimwits that Canada is a federation, not a unitary state; the Federal government has neither the constitutional power nor the authority to reorganize or amalgamate provinces. I believe this is also true of the US, which is a federation too of course. Little old Rhode Island is a state. So too bad, so sad, all you whiners in New York, Los Angeles and - for that matter - Toronto. JJM: I believe this is also true of the US, which is a federation too of course.
QUOTE: U.S. Constitution, Article IV, Section 3, Clause 1: New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.
#8.1.1.2.1
Zachriel
on
2021-10-31 09:22
(Reply)
Do you really understand the 3/5 compromise? Do you understand what the alternative was?
Montana voters actually don't have 68 times the influence in the Senate as voters from California. Sadly it is big business that has the influence. Do you really think that the voters in California are served well by their senators? I know big business is served well by them and the senators themselves do pretty damn good too. But the voters, not so much. Guess Zach doesn't understand the 3/5 compromise. Surprise. Or should I say, oh gee wiz? The left only brings it up to try an further the ignorant notion that America was founded as a racist slave country. Without the compromise, one of several compromises that tried to limit the expansion and power of slave holding states, the South would have completely dominated the Union. The results of that dominance would have been even worse for humanity.
The Left wants to enslave all of us. OneGuy: Do you really understand the 3/5 compromise? Do you understand what the alternative was?
Sure. The northern states wanted to not count slaves for representation, as slaves obviously wouldn't have real representation. The southern states wanted to count slaves for representation to increase their relative power compared to the northern states. The compromise was to count each slave as 3/5 of a person. Without the compromise the constitution probably wouldn't have been ratified. The result was that the problem was kicked down the road, and the constitution failed three score and thirteen years after ratification. QUOTE: When a broad table is to be made, and the edges of planks do not fit, the artist takes a little from both, and makes a good joint. In like manner, here, both sides must part from some of their demands, in order that they may join in some accommodating proposition. - Benjamin Franklin, Constitutional Convention B. Hammer: The left only brings it up to try an further the ignorant notion that America was founded as a racist slave country. As the history of the U.S. Constitution shows, racism was built into America's foundation. The rot led to civil war. You would have a better argument that America was re-founded on better ground from the ashes of the Civil War. But, it turns out, southern white representation actually increased in the aftermath of Reconstruction, as blacks were now counted as full citizens, but were largely denied the right to vote. "As the history of the U.S. Constitution shows, racism was built into America's foundation."
Simply not true. It had nothing to do with racism. Slavery was a normal social construct at the time and all races were enslaved and all races had slaves. There were more white slaves in Africa than there ever was in the U.S. Many of the lower class people who immigrated to the U.S. from Europe were indentured servants to varying degrees. The Northern states and most people in the U.S. in all states opposed slavery. But the Southern leaders wanted to use race (ghee that sounds like the Democrats today) for political advantage. The compromise was a good one for all. It assured that slaves were citizens and it left open an avenue to freedom in the future. Sad that the left intentionally misconstrues the intent. "and the constitution failed three score and thirteen years after ratification." Hardly "failed". Yes it was true that the Democrats in the South wanted to keep slavery in place. But the constitution allowed the North to end slavery and enforce that decision. The Democrats countered by creating the KKK but the Republicans over time were able to end that as well. In a strange irony the assassination of Lincoln caused far more damage to the South and the many innocent people in the South than would have been the case if Lincoln was allowed to finish his second term. Andrew Johnson choose a much harsher reconstruction of the South and it was more like destruction than reconstruction.
#8.1.2.2.1
OneGuy
on
2021-10-31 11:02
(Reply)
OneGuy: It had nothing to do with racism. Slavery was a normal social construct at the time and all races were enslaved and all races had slaves.
The U.S. slave system was based on race. See the Supreme Court decision Dred Scott v. Sandford, which represented the law of the land. QUOTE: {Blacks} had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order ... and so far inferior, that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit. Or consider the Texas Causes of Secession: QUOTE: We hold as undeniable truths that the governments of the various States, and of the confederacy itself, were established exclusively by the white race, for themselves and their posterity; that the African race had no agency in their establishment; that they were rightfully held and regarded as an inferior and dependent race, and in that condition only could their existence in this country be rendered beneficial or tolerable. OneGuy: Many of the lower class people who immigrated to the U.S. from Europe were indentured servants to varying degrees. Indentured servitude is not the same as chattel slavery. OneGuy: It assured that slaves were citizens and it left open an avenue to freedom in the future. No. Slaves didn't become citizens until enactment of the 14th Amendment. OneGuy: Hardly "failed". A constitution is a means to resolve differences peacefully. The Constitution clearly failed when the country collapsed into a bloody civil war.
#8.1.2.2.1.1
Zachriel
on
2021-10-31 11:28
(Reply)
"The U.S. slave system was based on race."
Simply not true. Ask the Irish and poor English who came here as "slaves". The slave "system" in the U.S. simply happened to be "black" because that is what the Dutch and other nations ships were buying and bringing here. The tiny number of Americans who purchased these slaves didn't do so out of racism they did it because that was what was available. Had the slaves been blue eyed and blond it would have made no difference. DUH! Which brings me to another point. The U.S. didn't choose to be a slave owning nation these slaves were brought here before there was a U.S. and they were brought here almost entirely by people who lived in a different country. Our slave trade then is like our drug trade today; almost entirely run by citizens of other countries and foisted on us against our will. "Indentured servitude is not the same as chattel slavery." Yes, and I'm sure that made them feel great too! But you missed the point (shocked). All forms of slavery (which includes indentured servitude) were banned by the 13th amendment. "Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction." "The Constitution clearly failed when the country collapsed into a bloody civil war." Had the Democrats in the South won THEN that would be true. But the constitution and the Republicans prevailed.
#8.1.2.2.1.1.1
OneGuy
on
2021-10-31 15:02
(Reply)
OneGuy: The slave "system" in the U.S. simply happened to be "black" because that is what the Dutch and other nations ships were buying and bringing here.
We provided two citations that show otherwise. Here's another: QUOTE: Alexander Stephens, Vice President of the Confederacy: Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; its foundations are laid, its corner-stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition. American slavery was a racist institution. Zachriel: Indentured servitude is not the same as chattel slavery. OneGuy: Yes, and I'm sure that made them feel great too! Indentured servants were not chattel slaves. Indentured servants worked for a fixed period of time, often due to criminal conviction. Chattel slaves were not only slaves for life, but their children were slaves, and their children's children.
#8.1.2.2.1.1.1.1
Zachriel
on
2021-10-31 15:25
(Reply)
Here's some information about indentured servitude:
QUOTE: As demands for labor grew, so did the cost of indentured servants. Many landowners also felt threatened by newly freed servants demand for land. The colonial elite realized the problems of indentured servitude. Landowners turned to African slaves as a more profitable and ever-renewable source of labor and the shift from indentured servants to racial slavery had begun. https://www.pbs.org/opb/historydetectives/feature/indentured-servants-in-the-us/
#8.1.2.2.1.1.1.1.1
Zachriel
on
2021-10-31 15:31
(Reply)
This is Biden's America. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/10/30/an-alarming-letter-from-january-6-protester-nathan-degrave-from-his-jail-cell-in-washington-dc/ He is trying to make communist gulags look good.
OneGuy: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/10/30/an-alarming-letter-from-january-6-protester-nathan-degrave-from-his-jail-cell-in-washington-dc/
Welcome to jail in the U.S. of A. Nathan DeGrave is lying to you. He claimed he was a “non violent participant” in the J6 riot. But he's on video beating up police. So you are in agreement with months and months of pretrial confinement in what is billed as the worst jail in the country for a misdemeanor? This is non-judicial (unconstitutional) punishment sometimes called "LAWFARE" commonly practiced by the Democrats. The Democrats have become a real threat to our country and our freedoms. This is just the tip of the iceberg on how the communists/Democrats are using legal chicanery to rob us of our constitutional rights. Right now the Democrat party is more dangerous to our republic than China, Russia or the terrorists.
OneGuy: So you are in agreement with months and months of pretrial confinement in what is billed as the worst jail in the country for a misdemeanor?
A grand jury found probable cause that DeGraves committed felonies, including assaulting federal police officers during a planned conspiracy to commit civil disorder. He is being held, after a pretrial hearing, because the court found "a serious risk that in the future Mr. DeGrave may again engage in violence." OneGuy: This is non-judicial (unconstitutional) punishment sometimes called "LAWFARE" As noted in the opinion, pretrial release is governed by the Bail Reform Act of 1984. The Bail Reform Act only allows limited exceptions to the presumption of release before trial. The exceptions include a continuing risk of violence to the community. You might want to read the opinion. It is sad that under Biden and Garland that we have sunk to this unconstitutional gulag state without due process. IF (I can't capitalize that enough) our government was right and proud of what they are doing to these mostly innocent people they would be hiding it and keeping these political prisoners incommunicado and punishing their families. IF they were right in what they were doing it would be held up as the correct way to deal with activists violence. It is such an obvious contradiction from what is right and how we deal with activist violence that they MUST keep it secret. I can guarantee you that right now the letter writer is suffering torture for his indiscretion exposing Garland as the little Eichmann that he is. This is a disgusting thing that our Democrats and our DOJ is doing and needs to be investigated and Garland and Pelosi need to go to jail for it.
#9.1.1.1.1
OneGuy
on
2021-10-31 15:10
(Reply)
OneGuy: It is sad that under Biden and Garland that we have sunk to this unconstitutional gulag state without due process.
Actually, we just pointed to due process; a grand jury finding of probable cause, and a court opinion that DeGrave is not eligible for pretrial release under the law, though the opinion is subject to appeal. Furthermore, Nathan DeGrave is not a reliable witness, as we have also shown. Ignoring the evidence doesn't make it go away.
#9.1.1.1.1.1
Zachriel
on
2021-10-31 15:28
(Reply)
Garland's Gulag's will be a sad piece of American history. The good news for Garland is that the Biden administration is outdoing itself at being the worst/sadist administration in history and Garlands escapades into Russian Gulag'ery will not be the worst thing done to Americans by this fake president.
#9.1.1.1.1.1.1
OneGuy
on
2021-11-01 15:10
(Reply)
OneGuy: Garland's Gulag's will be a sad piece of American history.
You haven't explained why you think it is a "gulag." You indicated there was lack of due process, but we showed that that is incorrect. The vast majority of those charged in the J6 riots have been released awaiting trial.
#9.1.1.1.1.1.1.1
Zachriel
on
2021-11-01 15:42
(Reply)
You are a fool as are all of the Democrats. The lid on this LAWFARE is lifting, putting people in a terrible jail under terrible restrictions for months without a swift and fair trial was wrong. I just hope that a full investigation takes place and anyone who denied these people their civil rights goes to jail themselves. This is a terrible thing that Garland and his brown shirts have done. You can make excuses all you want to but this will go down in history as a terrible injustice.
#9.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1
OneGuy
on
2021-11-01 19:12
(Reply)
OneGuy: putting people in a terrible jail under terrible restrictions for months without a swift and fair trial was wrong.
The presumption under federal law is for pretrial release. The exceptions include a continuing threat to the public. There's a process involved, under the law, to determine pretrial release. The one example you provided, Nathan DeGrave, is seen on video assaulting a police officer, and then he publicly lied about it. The court found he represents a continuing threat to the public. He has the right to appeal this court's opinion. That's called due process. How else did you think it worked? How else do you think it should it work?
#9.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1
Zachriel
on
2021-11-02 10:43
(Reply)
In Edison/Tesla's era the bugaboo was dealing with the really high voltages needed for multi-megawatt transmission lines, AC voltage changes are easy with transformers but no such tech for DC in Edison's era. Now ultra-high voltages in DC are easy to do with solid state converters and as such are favored for ultra high
power transmission where cable and tower costs are lower for DC than AC in long distance interconnectors. The Biden administration has told us we need to lower our expectations. Well of course what they mean is Make America a shit hole country. Covid and the demeaning and unconstitutional government restrictions and mandates are going to go on forever. Your country is being overrun with people who hate you and will slash your throat or beat your wife and daughter for not covering their face. Your job is either being given to illegal aliens or being offshored. Inflation and the cost of everything is going up while at the same time the stores are running out of goods and food. Your police forces are being emasculated while thieves and punks are being rewarded and given a pass on their crimes. Our leaders are selling us out and giving away our wealth under the guise of global warming. This is just the beginning. They are getting you accustomed to the next phase of the New World Order. FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE EVERYTHING IS GOING TO GET WORSE!
‘The Friends of Eddie Coyle’ is a good movie. Surprised we'd never heard of it. Wife and I enjoyed. Thank you.
|
Tracked: Oct 31, 09:32