Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Sunday, December 20. 2020Giving BackLast week I spent some time working as a volunteer at the local Food Bank. I figure I'll put my time to good use and help others, and so I've been signing up to volunteer there. I was amazed at what I did, and how it was set up. What struck me are how priniciples of good business and manufacture can be utilized for more than just businesses and provide great value. The gains and innovations that come from free enterprise are useful and widespread - and it's not just about making a profit, it's about being efficient. Efficiency - that's where the value is. Adam Smith noted this in his writings over 250 years ago, as he talked about the division of labor and how valuable it was (his pin factory description comes to mind). When modern Wokesters discuss the gains of our economy they diminish and degrade all aspects of capitalism, right down to free enterprise and division of labor. The division of labor is at times described as 'mind-numbing' and 'unfulfilling'. They love to talk about the 'dignity of labor', and yes working is dignified. But from their perspective the 'dignity' is in doing ALL the tasks required to reach an end result. Yet here I was at the Food Bank utilizing this division to help people in a big way, and feeling very fulfilled in doing my small, 'mind-numbing' role. We have boxes of food stacked behind an assembly line - cans of tuna, boxes of mac and cheese mix, cans of fruit, pancake mix, etc. As our team arrived, we positioned ourselves between the boxes and the assembly line. First person in line took an empty box, put some food items in, passed it on to the next person who put in one or two items, all the way to the end where the last person put in a flyer with information on SNAP, taped it shut, and stacked it on a pallet that was then lifted and loaded to a truck when it was filled. I personally handled putting 3 items into each box, and noticed that others struggled to open the food boxes. I saw some box cutters nearby, grabbed them and during down moments ran from stack to stack ripping them open so the process wouldn't slow too much. After 3 hours our team of 6 had assembled almost 700 boxes of food - a week's worth of food for 700 families. 3 hours of work doing, basically, one thing - loading 3 cans/boxes of food out of one box into another box. If I had to do this on my own, I calculated that maybe it would have produced about 20 boxes an hour or 60 total per person. We'd have had to open all the boxes ourselves, shift the food, make sure the right quantities of each were added, put in a flyer and then tape it shut. Maybe 30 per hour or 90 boxes over 3 hours. At what may have been our extreme best efforts alone, we'd have completed 540 boxes. As a team, as an assembly line doing 'mind-numbing' and 'unfulfilling' work, we may have fed almost 160 more families. Leftists would claim their worldview applied 'properly' would eliminate the need for Food Banks. Of course, history has proved them wrong many times and they are simply ignorant of this fact. My experience says that the surpluses of capitalism and free enterprise - donated to the Food Bank, which we were repacking (some of it was name brand foods!) - more than supplements the presumed shortcomings of the free enterprise system. Could we do more? Certainly we always can do more. But for me it was a lesson in good business practice and economics, and one I truly enjoyed. As a side note, the woman working next to me was a younger Hispanic woman who was very chatty. She obviously volunteered often, as she knew many of the full time workers on the forklifts. She told them she'd lost 150 pounds. I looked at her with surprise. She replied "I'm 5'4" and have 3 kids and I'm a single mother. The weight was killing me, so I chose to lose it. And I did." I congratulated her and asked what she did for a living. She replied "I run my own trucking company out of my house, I have 5 trucks and if I need to drive I will, but I've got full time workers now. I also help others in my neighborhood sell their crafts online." I was surprised and said "You still have time to volunteer here?" She said "I'm a workaholic, what can I say? I have to keep moving." I was very impressed with her motivation and generosity. People like her make our nation great. They are the best of us. I don't see anyone in Washington who could match her in terms of tenacity, willpower, desire and a generally good nature. An inspiring story as I prepare for the new year. Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Thanks for sharing, Bulldog.
My wife played an online ad earlier today that consisted of a litany of negative events and political slogans from 2020, interspersed with extensive use of the Anglo-Saxon term for sexual relations. People will remember from 2020 what they want to, I suppose. Well said. Thanks for sharing. I have had similar life and volunteer experiences.
> Leftists would claim their worldview applied 'properly'
> would eliminate the need for Food Banks. Of course, > history has proved them wrong many times To be factual, they are correct. Remember that there are two theories on why Stalin was killed, or at least medical help was withheld to make sure he died. Production in the USSR--food and other essentials--was not able to meet demand, so it is suspected that Stalin was either going to purge another one or two million people, or was going to start another "great patriotic war" because you can get even communist serfs to work hard if you make them think that they're under attack. To a leftist "the people" matter, "people" do not. So if there's not enough food to go around, simply get rid of the excess people. From another perspective they're wrong--leftist redistributionist policies fully implemented would require facilities like food banks, since we wouldn't have any sort of "free" markets allocating food (can't have people going into grocery stores and making choices, they might make the WRONG choices, which would lead to some people doing better than others.). This would mean that you would have a similar facility that would package up food for people to come get. You'd fill a box with food for a person, you'd have adult boxes, child boxes and infant boxes. Because under a full implementation of leftist ideas the family would be eliminated and to even talk about it would be badthink. You wouldn't want to badthink, now would you? Sounds like worthwhile work Bulldog, but I have always wondered where the food comes from for foodbanks . . . . I mean, it's a never ending need. How do they procure enough supply?
It just looks like the same donors would be hit up over and over and over, but then, I know little about foodbanks. I looked at the boxes we were emptying, and it comes from several places.
Unsold food from supermarkets, and undistributed foods from large box food prep companies. These companies donate food that isn't distributed and get a write off. The food was a mix of recognizable names and unknown names. For example, I noticed cans of "Sketty-Os", but had no idea who made them. The mac and cheese boxes were a subdivision of Kraft (though not their name brand boxes, probably generic versions they make for supermarkets). Other food, I suppose, is purchased via donations (we donate every year), and still more is donated by individuals (there is a huge container out front that is monitored and emptied regularly). Catholic Charities of Tulsa gets a tremendous amount of food from Sam's, Walmart, local grocery stores, and other local and chain food-industries.
Anecdote: On my first mission trip to Romania in 1998, there just weren't that many products on the shelves to sell - not in the grocery, not in the hardware store. People wandered around inefficiently, but it didn't much matter. When i came back in 2000 there were goods, finally, and you could tell it confused the workers. There was one cashiers line at the grocery that stretched back down two full aisles (of five). I looked at this and thought "American fifth-graders would figure out in an hour or so that they needed more registers open and move people from stocking to register." But Romanians couldn't conceive of that. You did what you were hired to do, nothing more.
When I was back in 2001 that was already changing in Bucharest but not in the provinces. And by 2005 things were clipping along nicely even in the smaller cities. A new group was growing up which was able to look around and ask themselves "What needs to be done here? Where are the bottlenecks? Is there a way to do this better?" My brother in law has done a lot of work in Eastern Europe over the last 30 years. When we visited 3 years ago he told us how the primary resource of Eastern Europe is labor. Just brute force, even today. There is still tons of it available, and the shortage has always been managerial.
Oddly enough, he said the 2 areas with decent managerial talent were Czech Republic (Slovakia was too agricultural) and the Balkans/rump Yugoslavia, as they had closer ties to the West over the years and developed a little more like the West than the rest of the East. His main complaint was the Balkans were very corrupt. Most of Eastern Europe had started out very corrupt, but that has slowly washed out as proper business and management have developed, and laws upheld. But ultimately he said the fun thing was watching Western companies which already had a foothold develop. McDonald's, for example, opened their first service center in Budapest long before the Iron Curtain fell. I actually had a Big Mac and Fries there just to say I was at the first McDonald's behind the Iron Curtain (even though I was visiting long after it fell). He said that originally McDonald's had all kinds of sourcing and management issues because they had to deal with the same bureaucracy and regulations that all other people and companies did. While they could institute their own training and management practices, they didn't have a lot to work with. But they did improve quickly and they became a source for good management after everything changed. There is still a lot to learn, even today, from the former communist East. But Democrats don't consider those old communist nations their ideological partners. They are. The Democrats think it's Scandinavia. It's not. Even Scandanavian nations know they're capitalists. Had offspring studying in eastern Slovakia, so off we flew on September 10, 2001 (which is a story in itself). Got to Prague and then took the night train east to Kosice. Remember waking up and seeing a horse and plough working the countryside. The local Tesco (and this - we discovered - was upmarket) had a vegetable section reminiscent of my childhood - potatoes, onions, root veggies. The only difference was that it had peppers. In those days, they weren't that far from Communism and what kept them going was U S Steel who had taken over the rather dilapidated steel mill south of the city, much to the relief of the locals.
Through the years of offspring's studies, we were fortunate to visit several times. Okay, sending one suitcase full of necessities via any form of freight was almost equal to the round-trip airfare, so it was obviously cost-effective to send someone over (usually moi) with two suitcases (about 3/4 of one personal) and bring the same back. Those were good times, and I was able to watch the change as the city became more self-confident. I would imagine that getting out of the cerebral world, and into a more physical environment that does so much good for people, would be quite rewarding. I have worked food banks for several years in the serving of meals. I find it to be quite humbling seeing how some must survive. Thank you again for sharing.
Nice post. Hopefully even the "busy" can devote some time to giving back. Don't wait for hard times, friends. One way food banks are supported is by people who buy one or two items for the foodbank every time they shop. It's amazing how quickly that small effort becomes, well, larger. In addition to the corporate contributors...
I had a fun exercise a couple of months ago about the value of donated food. The spam catcher won't let me put in a link, but if you go to my site and search for "donated" it pops right up.
Do the "customers" at these food banks really need the food?...or are they just milking the system? Food is so inexpensive these days that it's hard for me to imagine anyone going without.
Money not spent on food can be spent on clothing, fuel, rent, etc.
Volunteer at one and tell me what you think after a few months, You won't, of course. We've seen this before. You need your opinion of them to be true, so you won't risk seeing anything that challenges you. Dear Mr. Idiot: The wife and I used to glean food from the dumpster behind the supermarket. Like the song says, "We ain't askin' for nuthin' if we can't get it on our own."
If this is true, then #1: you know perfectly well that people can be poor enough that they can't afford to buy enough food to live on, since you yourself were in that situation; and #2: you have zero right to look down on people who are eating the food donated by businesses and community members, which would otherwise end up rotting in a dumpster-- since, again, you yourself were in that situation.
This, this, this! I work for a small Catholic parish and we get many calls for assistance, particularly this time of year. We work with the Catholic Charities in our city, filling the shelves of their food bank. Our little parish (a rarity in the 'burbs) is responsible for 90% of the food on their shelves, because we keep a donation box constantly visible in our entryway to the church.
That said, one of the big requests is for gas money. Our town has extremely limited public transportation. Cars are important here. If you can give people their food, they have more wiggle room for other things - the black pants they need for a work uniform, a gas card to get to work, a prepaid cell phone to have a job contact number. All true needs in this day and time. I can imagine a few people do 'milk' the system. But if 95% of them don't - and I'd say that's a fairly accurate figure - then does that undermine the goal of the work?
I worked at one church feeding people on Sunday mornings and a few people would sneak 'extra' food into their clothes to take with them. We knew it. One fellow had an elaborate system of 'drinking' far more kool-aid than any normal person I'd seen - but we knew he was putting it in a container hidden on his person. We put limits on people and what they could have and did our best to maintain those limits so all could have something. That said - I DO NOT see middle or upper class people sneaking and 'milking' the system. First of all it's below most people to do such a thing, and they wouldn't even deign being seen walking in. Secondly, what's the gain? A mediocre meal to save $5? Really? Asking a question like yours shouldn't require an answer but it does because people really are either so cynical, or so stupid, that they can't imagine these things are desperately needed. When I was a kid working a grocery cash register in the NE, food stamps looked a lot like monopoly money. I think it made people feel a lot of shame and/or pity, and I think the visual connection with phoney monopoly money didn't help.
Nowadays it's a plain white card with a mag-strip on it. You don't even really notice the transaction unless you're looking for it - it's very fast. The cashier keeps the receipt though, if I recall correctly (that's what keyed me to note it in the first place). When you see people in fairly nice cars, complete with cell phones, lining up around the block for the Food Bank to open, you might at first beleive these are people grifting free food, who don't really need it. If you think that, try this: Go without your car and phone for a week. Go ahead, be brave. The truth is, these are modern necessities of navigating basic life in American society. Without them, in most locations you will not be capable of any kind of meaningful function. What you are seeing is people who have these things - today. They may well not have them, tomorrow. They do not have reliable income, today. They might have been put out of work last week. They may not have the rent for next week. If their car blows a tire, they'll be buying a used one to replace it. They are living on their bank balance, and sometimes, a Payday loan. Nobody waits in line, in their car, for food that doesn't need it. Everybody is capable of feeling shame. Everybody should work at the Food Bank for a few weeks if they are dreaming that it's an easy mark for grifters. You're out of touch and need to ground yourself. ...Also meant to add Bulldog, good on you for both volunteering at a highly worthy cause while working on your societal situation awareness. When dug into the career day-to-day it's often impossible to take a change of scenery such as this one. But as you've found, it can often be both humbling and uplifting. Thank you!
Good rundown, Aggie.
The first time I saw all the BMWs in the drive-up queue for our local food bank, I was gobsmacked. Then I remembered that most American households are one paycheck away from homelessness and how many folks get suckered into being superficial materialists. Lots of folks have learned Home Ec 101 the hard way this year. A story my wife tells is about two young go-workers who hooked up, each thinking the other was well-heeled because each was driving a shiny new BMW. Of course both cars were leased, with those balloon-payment sucker leases that BMW slaps on billboards everywhere. The Gift of the Magi, indeed. I don't need a whole heck of a lot, myself, and tended to spend my money on experiences. We loved eating out at a few favorite restaurants, driving sixty miles for a great doughnut, that sort of thing. All of that is out because of the Covid restrictions, so there's not much to spend on.
We have been giving a lot of spare cash to a regional food bank, and each week shopping a full SUV load of groceries from the supermarket for delivery to the local food bank. It has become a challenge to find the best bargains, use of coupons, and every smart shopper trick we can think of, while meeting the food bank's specifications of what they can distribute and what they currently need. They are grateful when we show up with the weekly load, sometimes two full vehicles, but they groan about the sheer volume. We have asked how we can pre-package for them, but they have volunteers who look forward to racing each other in the assembly process. We have also convinced them to not rely entirely on packaged food, and the farmers markets here have lots of excess root vegetables this time of year, and excess greens too, so the recipients can get some fresh healthy foods as well. I don't think that Hispanics should be in the United States under any circumstances. Yes, we can always say that there are some "good" Hispanics, and that's true. But the cumulative effect of Hispanic immigration has been a disaster for our country. These people are not European, they are inheritors of a Spanish Mestizo culture. If you want to see hatred of white people, believe me, the Hispanics are just as good as the blacks. There is La Raza, but more than that, there's a deliberate and organized Hispanic effort to take-over. They engage in public demonstrations to demand free housing, they take advantage of our welfare and healthcare systems, they flood our schools with their children, and they assault white people. Hispanics don't want to assimilate. They want to get rid of Americans, and turn America into Mexico. The only solution is to expunge 100% of the hispanics. Send all of them back to the country from which they came, and put up a real wall. The Hispanics aren't interested in a "multi-cultural" world. They want their own culture and political system to replace democracy. And they will soak up every penny of welfare-money that they can, in order to raise a generation of Anti-American revolutionaries in L.A. and Chicago and New York. So White America is supposed to pay for the creation of a hispanic communist army, who will fight to eliminate white people.
Normally I'd ignore statements like this.
You're welcome to your opinion but please don't share such shallow thoughts on any of my posts in the future. I have many Hispanic friends - none of whom take advantage of anything, none of whom protest, none of who are even remotely like what you describe. I have far more white European friends who are like that. Often trust fund babies who 'feel bad' for others and severe 'guilt' at their well-being. Racist BS like this has no place in a conversation about providing help or assistance to anyone. I know a good writer never puts down his audience - but racism - and what you wrote is truly disturbing and racist - has no place here. Please take crap like this and leave it at the trash heap. BD - We all know lots of true Americans from the groups Liebermann savages & I imagine he does, too. I believe he's just pushing buttons, looking for reaction. I used to cringe at his screeds but he works so hard at the insults its funny! BTW, have we ever seen him and Zachriel together?
Bulldog, I really don't understand why you would be upset. You claim that my post was "racist" but what does that mean? I didn't call for any violence, or use bad words. I was just stating an obvious fact: that we are experiencing a demographic replacement, and in my opinion, that's not a good thing. So am I a bad guy for saying that we're in danger? Or for wanting to preserve America as an Anglo Saxon Christian country? To me, that's Patriotism.
I spent enough years wearing an American military uniform to see that "American" is not a skin color, not a religion, not a race or an ethnicity.
Hispanics aren't the problem. People like you are. You'd think someone with a Jewish surname would have a little more empathy and understanding. Ron, I asked recently whether another "non Anglo-Saxons" - your term - in general were still eligible to be Americans. Like the Swedes, the Irish, the Czechs, the Italians, the Jews. You didn't answer, though I notice you have switched to "European" now. You have been caught out. It should cause you to reflect rather than attack. All that is required is a simple first-level honesty, not any advanced or new morality. So I ask again: Are you in? Are you going to man up and just be an honest man? Or do you have some further cave to hide in?
So this is hint at the gorilla in the room. When we (I need an adjective here) people talk about the incentives, they the rulesy controlling types just stare by us. They know that the workers will just keep on working. Until they won’t and by then it won’t matter because it will be Cuba or China or ... We work because we need to and they know it. This really Marxist class awareness.
Good for you Bulldog.
During the Great Depression my mother-in-law volunteered at the Saint Vincent De Paul in Long Beach, CA at their food bank. She spoke fondly of that time for what it taught her. Family after family would accept their box of food and then look through the contents. Then they would give back what they did not need "for those less fortunate". Even in extreme poverty, the recipients were thinking of others. Thank you for sharing your experience. It was a wonderful Christmas gift to unfold.
https://www.cny.org/stories/fordham-prep-grad-added-funding-school-spirit-to-ignatian-challenge,21647
The above story is in the same vein. What is evident is that applying business philosophies to social problems generates better outcomes than utilizing methods that lack a foundational soundness. In this case, bringing competition and self-interest to those involved has benefited tens of thousands, who are in need of food. May God bless you for being of service. I believe in charity but often most of those needing charity are self made failures. Many years ago in LA my wife worked as a dental assistant. The dentist would one day a week give free or at cost dental care to people who were poor or in need. She said it was common for a couple of woman to show up for care and when their turn came they would hand their friend a roll of money to hold for them. They had money, couldn't use a bank because welfare would find out that they had money and cut them off. So they had a roll stuck in their bra and still came for "charity" dental care.
Another angle on the "poor but driving a BMW" phenom - often the working poor will put money in purchased goods rather than savings in a bank. Goods are easily liquidated in the informal economy but not easily traced or seized to cover debt.
Final note: There are of course people who try to abuse the free charity food system - including some of the volunteers! We see people doubling back in line for a second box. We see people cutting in - shoving aside women holding babies and trying to balance a box. We do what we can to keep the resources focused on those who need it most.
I have also seen, in the affluent suburb next to us, people who have expensive cars and big houses that don't have much furniture in them, because they are fools with poor judgement. They are not usually evil or trying to take advantage. They get taken advantage of, they fall for get-rich-in-sales schemes, they have husbands abandon them and want their children to not be embarrassed. I think such people are also eligible for pity and charity, and sneaking into the city to stand in line in sunglasses and a hat to get food is hard enough on them. I don't want the snopercods of the world making them more miserable. There are definitely people who abuse the system, and as you point out, they are easy to spot. In my youth, there were the 'Welfare Queens'. Very well dressed, and us grocery sackers could not help but notice we were loading groceries into pretty nice cars, and the kids were dressed better than we were. And they were buying nice food - steaks, high-end processed foods - nothing generic, no store brands.
But these were the exceptions in a scheme that is easy to game. Most lower-income people get trapped in having higher immediate expenses because they don't know how to budget, don't know how to bank and save, and don't have the resources to be able to live economically. For example, buying things in quantity when they're on sale is great - if you have a secure place to keep them, or a chest freezer. If your fridge is the size of a footlocker, you can't buy milk by the gallon, though, you have to buy it by the quart every few days. For low income people, every bad decision has a downside implication, a new hole to dig out from. But I know plenty of people who were smart enough to raise even smarter kids who are now professionals and very successful. That is the other side of the equation. Had the honour to know a woman who was left a widow with four young'uns. She had grown up "hardscrabble" and could pinch a penny till it squeaked but circumstances were such that she had to go on welfare.
When I met her, all the children were grown and it was her proud boast that they'd never gone hungry nor gone to school in patched clothes (did I mention she was a skilled seamstress?). My thought then was that the local welfare authorities were being middle-class stupid: instead of keeping her on welfare and patronizing her with "advice", they should have hired her to teach practical courses in survival to younger (mainly) women on welfare. |