Maggie's Farm

I've been to the Met, and I was disappointed. No attempt was made to explain what "art" is supposed to be, or how the various collections at the museum are supposed to fit together. The problem is that all of life is "art'. Can it be categorized in some meaningful way? Yes, it can, if one accepts that the range of art begins with primitive expressions, and goes all the way up to religious fervor. The State doesn't want people to recognize the entire range of art, because the government itself wants to be thought of as God; don't forget Captain America. Explaining Michelangelo's David would expose that men really are heroic, and the expression of truth and beauty are the highest human ideals. The State wants people to recognize only secular ideals; because faith, and the sublime pleasure of sacred union is higher than anything that the State can offer. Patriotism just doesn't compare. God and truth and morality have nothing to do with it. https://www.livescience.com/9090-religion-people-happier-hint-god.html

So the State confuses the issue. It invites blacks to complain about the Museum, because by using politics as a pretext, it can deny truth and beauty. Instead, it can show images of misery, and injustice. That way, the Met can kill two birds with one stone. First, the denial of human greatness satisfies the communists, and it also satisfies the blacks, who want Western Civilization to be denied. In the black world, any future greatness will offered by them. Basketball is greatness. And pornography is greatness. After all, it's erotic.
Music is erotic, too. So, according to the blacks, music will become the new high art. People will find sublime religious meaning in auto-tuned Egyptian operational conditioning. When a girl hears the sounds of heaven, she will be completely satisfied, and she will achieve sacred union with millions of other brainwashed people. That's the Met.