Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Thursday, April 25. 2019IrredeemableWhen I was working for Roger Ailes, he'd tell us stories about what it was like to be working with Nixon. One story he told was the advice he gave to Nixon when the Watergate story broke, which was (remember, it was his story and I'm telling it second-hand) "Tell the truth, you had nothing to do with this, it was overzealous campaign members going overboard. The American people have a great capacity for forgiveness." That story was one I heard about 23 years ago, and I can't confirm it ever happened, but based on the (limited) interactions I had with Ailes it was probably fairly accurate. I was raised to believe most people have a great capacity for forgiveness if you're sincere, if you're honest, and you're willing to make amends. I no longer think that's as true as it once was, and it certainly is not true with Progressives (unless, of course, you are a Progressive and they need to protect you). This is why Confederate statues are coming down, history is being rewritten to suit their feelings, people are castigated for views they had, behaviors they employed, and words they used which no longer are 'acceptable' in this overly PC environment today. This is why social media outlets like Facebook or Twitter are employing questionable means and methods to block speech. Recently, my favorite hockey team, the Philadelphia Flyers, removed Kate Smith's statue because it suddenly came to light that she sang a few song with racist lyrics in them. Kate's dead, and can't defend herself, let alone apologize. So what option do we have to deal with this? Expunge history. Make her disappear. She is a horrible person who is irredeemably terrible and nobody should know about her. Kate played a large, if indirect, role in the Flyers' winning the Stanley Cup in 1974 and 1975. But today she's persona non grata for doing things which, in her time, were deemed perfectly acceptable. From my perspective, it's a learning moment. Keep her history alive, and do teaching sessions around who she was, what she did, and why she's still an important part of the team's history regardless of whether we find a few of her song off-putting. Today's America is about forgetting our past - pushing it aside, and not allowing for any forgiveness whatsoever. That is, in what is Progressive America. You know, the urban elitists and academics who have a good portion of the political upper class in their sway. Naturally, if THEY do something wrong, they'll find a way to apologize, expunge or set aside the misbehavior - maybe even vote one of their own into power, despite having done something 'wrong'. Generally speaking, however, the goal is to completely eliminate and never forgive. Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
I find myself wondering, Is Kate Smith being judged by today's standards for something that was not considered wrong in her time?
Did the Black people of her time consider her song racist? Or was it played in Black clubs and sang by Black performers? Kate Smith would not be judged a racist even by today's standards. To quote Jeff Jacoby of the Boston Globe, "In 1951, Smith invited Josephine Baker to appear on her popular TV program, the first time the controversial black entertainer was seen on American television." The "racist" songs she was supposed to have sung were satirical. If listening to them doesn't disabuse anybody of the notion that they are racist, the fact that the black singer Paul Robeson, whose father had been a slave, sang at least one of the same songs ("That's Why Darkies Were Born").
This is just more virtue signaling by people who don't have a clue. Chances are, they are in the group who would ban Huckleberry Finn, and Tom Sawyer because of the use of the N-word. Samuel Clemens was not a racist and his books were, in part, against racism. This whole movement is just the 21st century version of past book burners. "This is just more virtue signaling by..." people who are using others' lack of education to fraction our society into little nasty bites that easily can be devoured by their own hate.
Kate Smith had (still has) more value than all of them combined. We at MF must stand strong as it appears, as more layers of hypocrisy are peeled away, the more determined they are becoming. I don't see those controlling the media or academia dismayed by the nasty lyrics defiling women and other races that are created by the rap industry. Exactly, it's like banning "My Fair Lady" for the song "Why Can't a Woman Be Just Like a Man," because you're too clueless to see that the song is poking fun at the singer.
And how will our ever-so-enlightened social scolds be thought of in fifty years?
Exemplars of moral virtue? Or meddlesome busybodies who were totally and selectively intolerant? If Judgment Day does not come before fifty or a hundred years, my hope is that people living in that future time, after picking up the pieces and reestablishing the best of our society, will view our us as utterly mad. We (society as a whole, at least those of the left and their sycophants) have completely gone off the rails, bonkers. Western culture was molded and massaged into a society that should have been the envy of the ages. Yes we had our problems, racism being at the fore front. But even that would have been conquered by now if it wasn’t for the constant drumbeat of the race hustlers.
There was a collection of noble men and women who founded this country, established a government, that was just and liberty loving. It took men and women of noble character to run and live in it, and we had them by the millions. At some point we lost the will to instill those values into our youth, and that is the tragedy of the ages. May the good Lord help us in reasserting those values. Human history is dependent upon us that are left, to fight the good fight and prevail. Mat 18:21-22 21Then Peter came to Jesus and asked, “Lord, how many times shall I forgive my brother who sins against me? Up to seven times?” 22Jesus answered, “I tell you, not seven times, but seventy-seven times.” Well put.
"Generally speaking, however, the goal is to completely eliminate and never forgive." God's goal is forgiveness and restoration, even if that takes sacrificing Himself. Eliminate and never forgive is anti-Christ by definition. To paraphrase the Instant-man, "1984" was not written as a how-to manual but some people are using that way.
QUOTE: Today's America is about forgetting our past - pushing it aside, and not allowing for any forgiveness whatsoever. That is, in what is Progressive America. You know, the urban elitists and academics who have a good portion of the political upper class in their sway. Naturally, if THEY do something wrong, they'll find a way to apologize, expunge or set aside the misbehavior - maybe even vote one of their own into power, despite having done something 'wrong'. Well said, Bulldog. In the same vein, the following has regrettably aged very well: The Drumbeat The Left doesn't give a damn about blacks, women, or anybody or anything else - it's all about accumulating and maintaining power for them, and the ever-shifting and infinitely malleable rules - for others - that they come up with by the minute fully support those goals. Kurt Schlichter addresses the Left's selective application of rules far better than I ever could. And this is why we have Donald Trump, and why the Left treats him as the existential threat to them that he is. It's strange, he actually seems to have left over resentment that people were using his own screen name to satirize him. In any case, it's a relief, though I was beginning to enjoy the satirical posts.
It is strange. The factual/logical beatings he regularly took didn't seem to phase him much, but sustained (and well-earned) ridicule certainly did.
They got deactivated for cause once the unfavorable Mueller report came out. They spent too much time arguing about Global Warming rather than focusing on the contract assignment, which was convincing us that Trump was colluding with the Russians. They are now busy in Vladivostok reprogramming them to argue Joe Biden is the best choice for president.
Any reprogramming capable of making Joe Biden appear even a smidgen less the gropey grifter dullard he's always been will tank the gaslighting budget.
#6.1.1.1.1
Bill Carson
on
2019-04-26 06:49
(Reply)
I'm waiting for all of Mel Brooks' movies to be banned.
Blazing Saddles -- Outrageously racist. The Producers -- Pro Nazi Young Frankenstein -- Makes fun of differently-abled people, including those with sight disabilities and speech impediments. That's because Mel Brooks always worked according to a great truth: You don't fear what you laugh at. However, when you go through life refusing to laugh a anything, you have no choice but to live a life of fear.
Which is why I say that the whole Social Justice movement is nothing more than 19th century Calvinism with god carefully and completely removed. When someone is revealed to be not of the Elect, they must be cast out and shunned, forever marked with the scarlet letter "R" for Racist or "H" for homophobe.
The Dimwits never had to forgive Bill Clinton because in their moral swamp he never did anything wrong with Monica or any of his accusers. Immoral momzers...the lot of them.
Why not just quietly drop the song you regard as uncomfortable now but sing all the rest? Or is that too easy for virtue signallers?
I believe all of these types of erasures would be much better if used in an educational and historical way. Why not preserve the history and play the songs in classroom settings to show why it was okay then, but today it is viewed much differently. Children should be made aware of the distinctions in history and how we have evolved. This sort of temper tantrum only serves to stunt our young people emotionally, and, we have seen the result of that. Kate Smith from all I have read was a very good and decent person. I think less of the Flyers establishment after this decision, and will no longer be supporting them with my dollars. I cannot imagine that this decision is going to be very popular with the Philly crowd. I lived in the Philadelphia area for thirty years. What is viewed as evolving, (woke) culture, is truly spiraling into the dark ages of censorship. The old saying about doomed to repeat it must be true because it is playing out before our very eyes.
THIS.
Yes, I agree. This is what I try to do with my kids. Not too long ago, my fraternity was kicked off (by our national office) for hazing. I was never hazed, I oppose hazing, and I was disappointed. HOWEVER, my son was a member at the time, and I knew what was going on. It wasn't hazing. Well, let's put it this way. The laws are designed in such a way that it WAS 'criminal hazing' but when you realize that they were giving kids nicknames (hazing), having them arrive at the house at 5am to do calisthenics (hazing) had forced study hours (hazing), were asked to run errands and paid for it (hazing), they were being 'hazed'. My argument, in a letter to the national office, was to only eject the 2-3 who led the process, but keep the house and have alumni spend weekends there doing 'teaching sessions' - in other words, using it as a learning moment. Wow, you'd think I'd set a bomb off. People claimed I didn't understand the depth of what happened. Nah, I did, I know more about what went on than they do, from my son. It wasn't that bad. But it was 'criminal'. Point is, you use moments like this not to EXPUNGE, but to TEACH. We learn best from what we do wrong. We gain hubris from what we do properly. Yes, why destroy something that is well worth salvaging (and learning from) because it isn't perfect?
“... use moments like this not to expunge but to teach”
100% correct. The only culturally sane choice - healthy cultures retain the past AND teach it to the young. Otherwise it isn’t much of a culture. What they’re demanding is nihilism. |