We are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for.
It's a Marxist-Alinsky thing. They intend to rule. We are in the early (some might say middle) stage of a coup to take over our country. Imagine if they succeed in intimidating and shaming us into silence. Think of the rich irony that some would say that Trumps outing of the left wing press is a serious constitutional crisis but the press and TPTB ignore this far left effort to shut down free speech.
Another Guy named Dan
"Social Justice" is a stolen concept and I wish conservatives would stop using the terminology of the enemy. Just as there is no such thing as a collective mind, there can be no such thing as "Social Justice". A stolen concept is the fallacy of using a concept while denying the validity of its roots, i.e., of an earlier concept(s) on which it logically depends. The term "Justice" only applies to individuals and it means judging their character and actions on the basis of factual information. The underlying concept that is erased from term "Social Justice" is morality. Before you can judge whether a person or his actions are good or evil, you must be able to tell good from evil. That is the province of Ethics (or Morality). Without a moral code, there can be no justice. This is what the idea that left wants to erase. As near as I can tell, they use the term "Social Justice" to mean "Just do what we want."
When seeking legal help in Seattle I spoke with 23 (+/-)attorneys over the course of 10 years. NOT ONE would accept our case. Some put their head in their hands and cried, some openly acknowledged that they were afraid "they'll destroy me if I take your case". THEY being the extremely wealthy females who are the "designers" of ever new social movement--they ease their conscience by being the most liberal. By tearing down the protestant churches, by destroying academic freedom, by forcing homosexuality on elementary school children, by loving Alinsky, by making deals with the unions that rule their companies,etc. Mostly by destroying attorneys who challenge them directly. Of those 23 some even proved to me what had been done to threaten them. There was no legal system for us in the state of WA--that is the most terrifying part of what we experienced. Why are you now surprised at what is happening to the "free speech" part of our inheritance?