Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Sunday, July 15. 2018The tragedy of Bastille DaySolzhenitsyn Mourned Bastille Day. So Should All Christians. The French Revolution invented radical nationalism and socialism, and launched the first modern genocide, aimed at Christians.
Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
What the author doesn't mention is that it took Bastille Day to end the Catholic Inquisition.
The Catholic Inquisition was relatively bloodless compared to the new and improved Socialist Inquisition that is ongoing.
"The French Revolution invented radical nationalism and socialism, and launched the first modern genocide, aimed at Christians."
However, if we're playing the stream of events and consequences angle of history it could just as easily be argued that the success of your own revolution precipitated the French one. So perhaps the "blame" could be placed at the door of the Continental Congress? What was it Jefferson wrote again? Ah yes: "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure." That's not easily argued at all. Many of the American Framers quickly recognized the flaws in the French Revolution. Paine was swept away in the movement and nearly lost his head over it. Washington gave him so many warnings and eventually washed his hands of Paine's involvement.
Mao, Lenin, Hitler all used the French Revolution as a case study. From their perspectives, the American Revolution was more of an example of what not to do. I agree. The American revolution was dressed in nationalism while the French revolution degenerated into national socialism which it still engages in today. Two periods of which the French do not speak of is the Vendee massacre and the Vichy French of WWII.
Well, not so much. The church at that time was vying for power with the elite to the detriment of the common people. The revolution was not an attack on Christians it was an attack on the abuses of the church. One could even argue that the church attacked and harmed more Christians than any other ruling entity did. The church needed a swift kick in the ass. It got it. I say good, let them eat cake.
I believe you are guilty of conflating Reformation with Revolution here.
In any event, the worst excesses of the Christian Church in all its permutations hardly match the routine excesses of revolutionaries in all of theirs. I think I touched nerve. That was not my intent. simply stating what i believe is clear in history. The church was a political organ throughout most of it's 2000 years. Sometimes they did more harm, sometimes they did less. But they always did harm. Did they do good? Sure!
I'd say that the church's intent was always to save souls, and at times, perhaps wrongly, via a somewhat secular power. When religion and state were intermingled, separating the two was difficult. I just have to disagree that the church "always" did harm.
In Europe the church was a spy organization favoring one country and sabotaging another. It destroyed kings and leaders and promoted those who were favorable to them. All of this controlled out of Rome and rife with intrigue and mystery. They sat beside kings, they conspired behind kings and they stole whatever wasn't nailed down. They caused wars and would often play both sides against each other. They were the elite and pampered in an age when everyone suffered. They discouraged the common man from learning Latin so they could better keep their secrets and their knowledge from them. And all the while they acted as a friend and father to the people.
But yet it is all there in history for all to see who are not blind.
You are declaring the conventional wisdom, which all of us who have been to college (and now even high school), or read widely in the popular press, have heard. Unfortunately, it is less than half true. Beware of what "all the best people know" about anything.
Zachriel has this one right. Looking at only one side of the balance pan tends to mislead. The Catholic (and Protestant) Church did terrible things, but was also the foundation for everything we currently understand of morality, kindness, generosity, etc - and its opponents were, amazingly - much worse. https://assistantvillageidiot.blogspot.com/2006/01/big-bad-three.html Different things really are different. Understand I am not simply trying to denigrate the church. And I do not hold the people alive today responsible for acts they did not commit decades and even centuries ago. The simple fact is that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely and it did at every level on all church's and all political entities (not just religions). Just as I do not think the FBI should be destroyed for what a handful of left wing activists did under Obama I am not calling for any hate or anger at the church. BUT, it is what it is. "Mistakes were made."
A good example would be the subject of Ireland's famine. The church did some good as did England. But they could have done so much more. They had the money and they had the assets. They could have gotten the Irish through that tough time.
#5.1.1.1.1
OneGuy
on
2018-07-16 17:33
(Reply)
True enough. Yet through all that they kept alive the idea that Ceasar wasn't a god, and that there was a higher force for good in the universe.
And the Church also knitted Europe together, when it was still politically fractured.
QUOTE: The tragedy of Bastille Day There is a fundamental difference between the French and American revolutions. The French monarchy had centered all power on itself, including the Church. When the monarchy fell, there were no institutions left untainted by association with the king. Everything was torn down. In the American experience, there were working legislatures before, during, and after the Revolution. The monarchy was removed, but most of the rest of the social and political institutions were left intact. Nonetheless, while the French recognize the faults of the Revolution, they still celebrate it for its aspiration of liberté, égalité, fraternité. QUOTE: The French Revolution invented radical nationalism and socialism, and launched the first modern genocide, aimed at Christians. Most scholars don't consider the War in the Vendée as genocide. There were religious overtones because the Church was politically associated with the monarchists. Brutal though it was — on both sides, once the war ended, there was no effort to eliminate the Vendéen people as a whole, some of whom were Bonapartists. The French Revolution invented radical nationalism and socialism, and launched the first modern genocide, aimed at Christians.
------------------------------------------------------------------ The Huguenots would differ. Why there are no Protestants in France. Additionally, the Church was not a political organ throughout most of its 2000 years without squinting and calling everything "political."
You have been sold history by people who have an agenda, far more than those they attack. To use CS Lewis's metaphor, you will unfortunately have to go back a long ways to get to the right path. |