We are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for.
The answer to your question is, yes, undoubtedly because central banks serve the short term political interests of the wealthy and politically powerful, not the interests of the vast majority of the citizens.
Central banks don't stop the problem. They extend it, and make it worse when it happens.
So yes, the world would be better off without them. Central banks provide the illusion of control that humans enjoy - but the illusion is not reality. That is what Hayek called the Pretence of Knowledge. Or The Fatal Conceit.