Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Monday, December 26. 2011Are schools obsolete?Miniter envisions a world without schoolteachers. Tutors or parents, plus a Kindle, may be all that is necessary:
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
This is hardly an example of "a world without teachers"!!!
This is an example of extreme investment in teaching, one-on-one. Uh, did you actually read the little blurb? The kid came in after years of "special education" unable to read every 4th or 5th word. In a short time, he progressed to working on his own. That says a small investment of 1 on 1 time paid very rich dividends.
It would appear the "extreme investment" is in special education which, demonstrably, was inadequate. Children under about 12 are programmed to learn language. That is why ESL is so harmful. Kids who learn English later, as teenagers, will always have an accent. When I was in first of second grade two brothers arrived not speaking a word of English. Their parents were refugees from Peron and all they spoke was Spanish. The nuns put them in class and made no special arrangement for them. By the end of the school year, they were fluent English speakers.
When I was an infant and very small child my mother would read to me while holding me in her lap where I could see the book she was reading. By the time I was 3 I could read billboards and "Dick and Jane" - which was a complete surprise to my parents, as I first demonstrated this ability to a couple of friends of theirs while they weren't around.
Same here -- kids soak it up. I still remember the thrill when a neighbor explained that the impossible-looking combination of letters "i-n-g" sounded like the musical "ing" I already was familiar with from speech. So THAT's how you spell it!
I also remember the considerable shock I got when I first learned you could read silently and alone. There seemed something wrong with the idea, though I quickly warmed to its convenience, which almost made up for the lack of sociability. School is going to change radically in the coming years. There will be plenty of teachers though. The job will look different, but there will always be teachers. The biggest difference will be that the teachers and students won't have to be in the same room. They also won't have to work at the same time.
I think the future of education will be wonderful for students. Schools are obsolete now in our home. We've been homeschooling since kindergarten. One in H.S., the other in middle school. It takes some creative thinking, a few other great families to co-op with, and readily available information online and in books. Biology with a dozen dissections. Chemistry with long labs every week. All at considerably less expense than the schools would have you believe is necessary.
And this is with one kiddo who is extremely dyslexic. [She adores her Kindle, which lets her convert to big type, and she reads a lot until she gets tired midday.] I taught her what her strengths are, how to learn, how to persevere, and how to find creative solutions to tricky problems. [Or perhaps she taught me...] Public school would have taught her how to be a victim of her 'disability'. We're happy to be in a state that is homeschool friendly. This may not be a world without teachers but it is a return to proven teaching techniques and away from the useless "research" all those teaching PhDs pretend to conduct.
That has been the worst of the teaching degree inflation, you get a PhD you are suppose to do research. Not a problem in the humanities as no one reads it anyway. Of use in STEM as it advances mankind. But the "education" PhD feels compelled to experiment on children. They abandon proven techniques that trained generations for their "new idea" sentencing thousands of kids to ignorance or at the very least, a tough road to overcome the experimentation, if they can. This may not be a world without teachers but it is a return to proven teaching techniques and away from the useless "research" all those teaching PhDs pretend to conduct.
I am a former teacher who couldn't agree with you more. There is a need for pedagogy, as it is not intuitively obvious to many prospective teachers what is the best way to present a given subject matter to a given group. Instead of teaching prospective teachers what has worked in over two thousand years of classroom instruction, Ed Schools present political correctness coupled with the next great teaching "innovation," which actually hasn't been adequately researched. Ten years later the research says that the next great teaching "innovation" that the prospective teacher learned in ed school actually doesn't work. Ed Schools routinely present conjectures as established fact. I have had respect for my professors, who have known more than I about the subject. The exception to that is in the Ed School. Only in the Ed School have I encountered professors whom even a student such as I could see were damned fools. We've seen that with our kids - all adopted and all "special needs".
Yep - special needs - thirty years and some later two doctors (oncologist and one resident in surgery), one fighter jock and one state trooper. Special needs my ass. I'm a supporter of public education - I think it is necessary. However I also think that parental involvement is also important and as you might be able to guess, we were involved in our kids educations as much as possible. What is killing education as somebody mentioned is PhD level educators with nothing better to do than come up with new ways to educate our children - none of which can replace good old rote leaning for math and reading. The grammar in green is enough to debunk anything about the value of learning without teachers.
Things that can help our public schools:
1. In college, teachers-to-be major in the subject to be taught with a minor in classroom managment. 2. Cease to award masters and doctorates in education. The recipients have too often become fountains of stupid. 3. Abandon the concept of everyone having a right to an education, replacing it with the concept that education is a service, provided by the state at no cost to the cooperative parents of cooperative students. Removing a disruptive student should be no more difficult than removing a wart. 4. All restrictions on home schooling should be scrapped, and all parental requests to excuse a child from a particular lesson should be honored. 5. Abolish the requirement that teachers be members of any collective bargaining unit. On a related note, there is this excellent TED talk by Sugata Mitra about education in communities in India without teachers.
http://www.ted.com/talks/sugata_mitra_the_child_driven_education.html |
Tracked: Dec 27, 16:31
Tracked: Dec 27, 16:36