Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Wednesday, June 8. 2011'Lie To Me': The tale of a lefty plan thwarted
Out on DVD are the first two seasons of one of the most intriguing TV shows you will ever see, Lie To Me. The Extra Good News: It was cancelled halfway through season three. Here's a scene from the beginning of the pilot which perfectly encapsulates the essence of the show, blending into a later scene when they recruit a new prospect for the team. The younger dude provides the show's comic relief as he practices his philosophy of 'radical honesty'. Okay, so the young dude doesn't provide all of the show's comic relief.
As you saw, there's a great interplay between the boss and his chief partner (he's studied the science for 20 years, she's a master psychologist) and the writers do an excellent job with the 'bright newcomer' to the team over the first two seasons as she goes from 'intuitive rookie jumping to wrong conclusions' to the 'seasoned veteran exercising restraint and impartiality'. As I said, the first two seasons are highly recommended. As for the third season, and why it was cancelled halfway through, it's a story too lurid for the front page of any family-friendly blog, so below the fold we must dip. There, I shall tell the sordid tale of how some liberal scumdog of a producer got his rightful and very deserved comeuppance.
Here's another clip from the pilot episode. It's a marvelous example of how well these two work together and the contrast in their styles. As Lightman suddenly leans forward and raises his voice, watch how the camera catches Foster's slightly shocked look, how she grabs the conversation away from him, and the look on his face as she does. Then watch the master psychologist spring into action and solve the mystery. When it comes to 'begrudging admiration', the last frame of the clip speaks for itself.
One of the background stories is that Lightman has been banned from Las Vegas. Not just banned from a casino or two, mind you, but the entire city. This is because of his ability to read the 'whales' and basically rob them blind at the poker table. The question is, how many people over the past three years have been inspired by the show enough to embark on a real course in deception training, and then hoofed it off to Vegas? Okay, let's say you're a young, liberal Hollywood producer and you wish to educate the hapless masses as to the beauty of liberalism and raise their collective consciousness so that they, like you and your fellow Hollywood producers, can revel in the glory of liberal truths. Such glorious truths as: — All corporations are inherently evil — All men are secretly rapists and/or pedophiles — All women are victims of a cruel and male-dominated society — All blacks are inherently noble and never, ever lie except for a noble cause — All Americans are ragingly Islamophobic but won't admit it — The military is full of warmongers, rapists and baby-killers — Sarah Palin is a liar, doesn't know what newspapers she reads every day, can see Russia from her doorstep and uses her baby as a political prop — Et cetera ad nausium ad infinitum The usual stuff, in other words. So here's your brilliant plan: Step One: Season One — First, devise a clever idea for a TV show. Make it about an expert on lying, then bring in the 'sharp gal figure' to keep him on his toes and have her also be an expert on lying, but from a totally different background so they can dicker over the nuances of their craft and thus, in turn, explain it to the audience. — Next, in another clever move, run two story lines during each show, with the occasional overlap when one of the two main figures butts into the other's case (usually providing an essential clue), all of which keeps the show moving along at a delightful clip. — Right from the outset, prove to the audience that the show has no political bias. "The truth will out" is basically your motto. In the first five minutes of the pilot you show pictures of Bush and Cheney in a bad light, but you also show two pics of Clinton. In the next episode, you'll briefly display both Palin and Pelosi in a bad light, but equally so. Fair is fair is the way we do things around these parts. That's your message. — As word of this clever, bustling, non-partisan show spreads, win over a loyal and appreciative audience. Step Two: Season Two — Keep the same dual-case format, but slowly start introducing your list of glorious liberal truths. Suddenly, a business didn't 1,000% de-ice their parking lot and, thanks to the investigative sleuthing of our heroes, that's why the child fell and broke her arm and the riot started and dozens were injured and two people died. It's all the business' fault for not completely 1,000% de-icing their parking lot, and they've got to pay, pay, pay for their disgraceful conduct in not protecting innocent young children from the ravages of being themselves. Bad, BAD corporations! Step Three: Season Three — Okay, now that you've got people hooked on the show, it's time to get serious. Drop the dual-case format because, after all, if you're going to prove that all women are victims of a cruel and male-dominated society, you'll obviously need the whole hour to do it right. — Preach your liberal dogma for thirteen episodes until suddenly... By the way, did I mention who aired this show? The conservative Fox Broadcasting Corporation. And maybe word started trickling upstairs about the show's sudden swing to the hard left, but halfway through the season when the Powers That Be did their mid-season sweep, they gave it the axe. And not a moment too soon. If it had gone on much longer, someone might have decided it was worth it to release the partial season on DVD but, as it stands now, the cancelled third season will probably be relegated to the dust bin of history and the first two seasons will stand alone as testament to another great show whose flame was extinguished too soon. As I did, people will hear about the show in passing, rent the first two seasons, become absolutely enthralled at the intriguing premise and some of the clever plot twists and surprise endings and wonder "What happened? How could such a great show be cancelled?" And they won't have access to the final season's shows, so they'll never know the real story, and that's perfectly okay with me. Because the movers and shakers in Hollywood will know what happened, and maybe it'll serve as a small warning to other liberal scumbag producers who wish to perpetrate their offensive dogma on America. Lie To Me, you did not die in vain.
Posted by Dr. Mercury
in The Culture, "Culture," Pop Culture and Recreation
at
11:20
| Comments (18)
| Trackbacks (0)
Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Hear, hear Doc.
I too loved the first season and a half of this show. The first season was great! Then somewhere in the middle of the second season I started to notice a slight shift, not just in storylines and characters, but it just wasn't as intreguing as it was before. Lightman's science wasn't necessarily always a forgone conclusion, but it was darn close- one of the great things about the show was always the slight Holmes and Watson thing that Lightman and Foster had going on, but with a twist the Foster was most of the time onto what Lightman was doing and could see most of the things he couldn't see. I stuck with it through the end of season 2 and still found it enjoyable. Then season 3 started and it was...very different. I couldn't put my finger on it. It was if they had abandoned the relationships of the characters that had been building (one of the things I couldn't stand was Lightman and Loker's weird working relationship- he went from insufferable mentor who prodded and pushed Loker around for his own good to being a complete jerk who abused him for no good reason. Then Loker went from admiration to downright trying to be exactly like Lightman in the last episodes) and it was as if they fired the writers from the previous seasons and purchased prewritten scripts from a vending machine somewhere with all the cliches and political hollywood party lines. I thought it was just me - most of the people I turned onto the show couldn't figure out why I was know telling them I stopped watching and it wasn't worth my time anymore. Basically it went from being an intelligent show to a show that was insulting my intelligence. I'm glad to see I wasn't crazy and the only one to see it going down the tubes. FOX pissed me off by doing something similar to one of my favorite new shows, Human Target. First season = Fan-FREAKIN-tastic. Action packed, buddy show, humor, complex yet easy to follow back story, great cast, awesome premise, reminded me of the great 80s action/mystery shows... then somewhere before season 2 some idiot producer couldn't leave well enough alone and let it build an even bigger audience. No, they had to completely screw up the premise, the setup, the humor and add new characters- the chemistry was all wonky and wrong- they claimed they needed to add strong female characters to pull in that demographic. But they weren't strong characters, they were stereotypes and they threw everything off. Season 2 was ok- just ok- and actually it seems as if the writers had begun to figure out how to use one of the new characters and started to downplay the weaker one- then it gets cancelled because of ratings. They didn't fix it, they made it worse. Then FOX really sealed the deal by cancelling The Good Guys. Funny, buddy cop show that had a unique spin- and had one of the best characters to show up on Television in awhile in the form of Dan Stark. Oh wait, we have to cancel that- it's a little toooo "Red State." Oh my god. Then the freak show of coming shows for the 2011-12 season hits the interwebs and it's terrible. Only one show really stands out- and it will probably be canceled. It seems that the only place that good shows that don't fit the "formula" and toe the line can thrive and have a chance to build an audience is on cable. Then the networks are awash in reality shows and wondering why no one is hardly watching any more. Sorry- I had to vent. Among other courses, I teach a "Media in 20th Century American Culture at a local University." In discussing the history and impact of television, we have a fun exercise where I throw up on the screen stills from various shows from the 50s up to about 2000. Mostly classic tv shows- and they do pretty well. Then they are asked to identify a "traditional network" show that started in the 2000-2010 decade that they believe will be an enduring "classic" and what they consider to be great. The answers are pretty telling-more often than not, half the class can't come up with anything, a small percentage names "Lost" or some such, but a decent percentage say that they watch mostly reality television and honestly can't name one that they think people would watch again in 20 years. Some of commented thay today's reality television wouldn't "make sense" to someone 20 years from now. Interesting that they can even see it.... JC - Thanks for the great feedback. I, too, wasn't quite sure if I was reading all this right, so your comment was appreciated.
You're also right about the people both Lightman and Loker became. As it turned out, that cute 'radical honesty' of Loker's in the first season slowly morphed into "Hi, I'm an asshole", like the way he sent that Madoff-type guy (and his daughter) to prison, which only cost about two hundred thousand families their life savings. Screw the people -- as long as we can put one of those evil corporate guys in jail! And his daughter! As for your comments about the other shows, the fact that they got the chemistry right and haven't touched it is what makes NCIS such a continuing great show. You'd think most producers would take the old adage, "Don't mess with success" to heart, but they obviously don't. We posted about this topic way back, when the show was in development. It's based on the work of a brilliant psychologist whose name escapes me right now.
Paul Ekman. The Maggie's post is here. He's their official 'authenticity' guy, works on the set and everything. He's featured in one of the sidebar videos on the DVDs. What was funny was hearing some of the cast mention how nervous they were meeting someone who actually can do what they pretend to do.
PE: So, Brenden, do you like playing the 'Loker' character on the show? Brenden Hines: You bet, sir! I couldn't be happier! PE: Liar! It's written all over your face! You think you're vastly underpaid, don't you? BH: No! PE: Liar! You think you should have top billing, don't you? BH: No! PE: Liar! And you're not cheating the company by filling out false expenditure vouchers, right? BH: Right! PE: Liar! And you're not having an affair with the boss's wife, right? BH: Right! PE: Liar! Hey, you think you should be emperor of the world, don't you? Pretty-much god's gift to humanity, is that it? BH: No! PE: Liar! It wouldn't be pretty. If what he does is possible, then nobody could ever "get away with it" because deception specialists would nail them regularly.
In fact, your question about how many have gone to Vegas kind've makes this point. Though I'd have to say that those who win at poker are better at masking how good a hand they have, rather than how good they are at real bluffing. True poker players rarely bluff with a bad hand. They may have an adequate or very good hand that allows them the chance to play aggressively, believing they have a shot. Many of them eventually fold. I liked this show. Not so sure the "liberal agenda" thing is what happened, though. Fox has plenty of programs that are hardly moderate, let alone conservative. In fact, in some ways, Fox has pushed the envelope when it comes to many conservative agenda points like sex and violence. But it could be. Just saying that I think it's very unusual. "If what he does is possible, then nobody could ever 'get away with it'"
They made it pretty clear on the show that it was hardly a proven science, and when somebody would rag on Lightman's ass, he'd usually respond, "Yeah, I get that all the time." Also, there were a couple of shows where the antagonist was an exceptional liar and the gang couldn't read him. There was one show where the guy was answering with nothing but lies, so they couldn't get a baseline for the instruments, so they eventually tricked him into answering something correctly, and that opened the door. "Not so sure the "liberal agenda" thing is what happened, though." Me, neither, and I agree that Fox Broadcasting is way past the usual conservative bounds when it comes to sex and such. But, as JC noted up above, something really turned sour in season three -- like they brought in a whole new fold of writers -- and it was heading off the deep end quickly. As we noted up above, both Lightman and Loker eseentially became assholes, and I was getting tired of Tores' me-first attitude. As for the Vegas thing, what strikes me is that seasoned players have concentrated for years on not having any tells, but they're still looking at it from a player's perspective, not a scientific one, and there might be nuances that the players, themselves, would never pick up on -- but someone who's studied the science might. It's an intriguing thought. How do you people find time to watch TV?
I watch about three hours a week - "Glee", "Mythbusters" and maybe something on History or Discovery. And now I don't watch "Glee" because its in rerun. Cap'n - Were you the one who recommended 'The Master Mariner' to me? I got a third of the way through it today and it's outstanding. Just wanted to say thanks.
Fox Broadcasting appears to be out-outraging its ABC-NBC-CBS competetors. Criticism of Fox among Conservatives is ongoing.
Perhaps Fox is just weaning audience from the big-3 over-the-air nets and morphing those viewers into viewers of Fox News and Fox Business Channel. If Lefties can slowly morph story lines, why can't Righties? I watched a couple of episodes. I usually like this kind of hook -- the quirky outsider with preternatural powers of perception, basically Sherlock Holmes, House, Monk, even the down-market Mentalist. And I worship at Tim Roth's feet, but something about this show didn't work for me. The things Roth could magically detect weren't convincing.
Paul Ekman is relieved the show is being cancelled. The first two seasons, they stayed close to the science of deceit; after that deviations (and other stuff I wont mention).
About a year and a half. That's the half life of a dramatic show on Fox. When they turn self-referential you know they're tapped out on new ideas.
I thought the show was always liberal. Like Law & Order it was never a surprise whodunnit. It was never the first and most obvious suspect so just look at everyone else introduced before the first commercial and score them +1 point for being each of white, male, military, management, or rich and -1 point for being non-white, female, poor, or blue collar. Highest scorer is guilty every time.
Though sometimes it was enjoyable watching the characters figure out by arcane means what the script writers were telling the audience with a bullhorn. Here's how you win at casino poker.
An awful lot of the players have read all the books. They know the odds backward and forward. They've memorized all the "tells". They've had success in social games and moderate success at the casinos. They're looking for "fish" - players who are playing for the "action" and not the money. The scam. Partners. You, by that I mean both partners, start playing "loose", chasing pots that you lose with obviously "bad" hands. You show fairly obvious "tells". The smart guys then know you and your partners are dummies. That's the bait. Then comes the net. You have a signal, maybe one of the "tells", that let's your partner know when you have a good hand. The partner then helps boost the pot. The smart guys see a big pot with the "dummies" competing for it. Big score for him! You're playing two hands that double you chance of winning. You've got some fish who think you're the fish. At least that's what I was told by a guy who worked casino security for 20 years. The good ones are very hard to spot. The first time you see it you don't know whether the fish just got lucky. But you take a picture and circulate it to the other casinos. They've got a list of suspected scammers and watch these people as they go from casino to casino. They can't prove anything, but they can ban them in Vegas. I watched the first episode and couldn't stand it. It was like magic and completely BS. Real human interaction is not "truth" and "lies" but shadings. You can tell the complete truth and still deceive (I'm in sales and do it for a living, and politicians do it all the time). I also "read" people for a living and things are not always strait forward. For example a person can be telling you the complete truth but have "lie" on his face since his boss has a different opinion.
So reading is a compass, not a map, and a show pretending otherwise is BS. Wow... this is strange scary. I used that very same clip last night as the core for my Movie-TV based English class at our local city hall. (I live in southern Japan.)
There is a lot of material in that first 5 minutes and I was thinking it would provide a nice jumping off point for other discussions about body-language or non-verbal communication. Can anyone recommend any other films or TV episodes that have a good, short clip that involves being able to read body langauge or facial expressions? So you write that "some liberal scumdog of a producer got his rightful and very deserved comeuppance."
Because they canceled the show? NO they did not, because they are still alive so they can still do the damage they want at any time they want. Their comeuppance would be their bodies moving toward room temperature. That would work at a comeuppance. Then they would NEVER interfere with my life or anyone's else s life again. This is the only answer to these people, their death, works every time it is tried. |