Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Wednesday, December 1. 2010Capitalism is not a theory - it's just what people naturally doUnlike Leninism, Socialism, Marxism, Keynesianism, capitalism is not a theory. I may be naive to think that this is an important point. Capitalism is just what humans naturally and practically do to survive, to exchange things, and to try to thrive, when they are left in peace by Power. It's win-win transactions in which people get what they want without killing or otherwise using force against eachother. That's all it is - a benign and highly productive aspect of human nature. Those Wyoming obsidians found on Long Island, NY, a few years ago in a buried Indian cache tell it all. I try to imagine the capitalist transactions involved, from wampum to beaver pelts to who knows what other currencies, all the way across the USA. Whether the item is obsidian chips or Italian credit-default swaps, it's all the same: if you want it, compensate the owner. Adam Smith did not invent capitalism (or even use the term - yes, it was Marx who made it an "ism") - he just tried to explain what energetic and creative people do when they can do it peacefully, and by free choice. Unless our kids take some real economics courses, or open a lemonade stand and figure out how the lemons got to them, or discuss real life with their parents, they won't get it at all. They are too insulated from reality nowadays, due to the prosperity of trade and capitalism. At Wkly Std, More Adam Smith, Please . . .and less Barbara Ehrenreich. In Socialist fantasies, I sometimes think they imagine that money and wealth come from Daddy. That's probably why the college kids like it. Editor note: Re obsidian arrowheads, just Google the topic to find out how many people are knapping arrowheads, knife blades, and spearheads these days - for fun and profit. That's called capitalism, hard at work on the obsidian trade even today. Even real Indians are doing it to get into the game. Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
I first learned about Adam Smith and Wealth of Nations in my economics class -- in a Southern California high school in 1975. Our economics teacher would be considered a free-marketer; I recall his face but not his name. At that time, though, Orange County was a conservatie bastion.
The exchange of goods and services for mutual benefit turns out to be what humans do. I hesitate to call it "free market" because it happens even under systems that are determined to wipe it out. I'm hesitant to use the word capitalism. Adam Smith did not, the free exchange concept doesn't automatically require the accumulation of wealth or goods but it does seem to foster the accumulation of wealth and goods in order to make production more efficient. Also, the word "capitalist" appears to stem from Marx's work, in other words it is our enemy's term for us. I'd like the term "economic liberalism" except for what has happened to liberalism. In any event, mutual exchange for mutual benefit is far more of a human practice than it is a theory. It turns out that this method is vastly more effective at producing goods and services which meet people's needs than any other system imagined by humans and imposed by them on each other. I dunno -- maybe we can use the term "free exchange" to describe the principle. It results in a hugely uneven distribution of resources, but it also means the low end of the scale is higher than the middle of the scale in "command" economies. You're lucky to have been taught that. That sort of heresy would never be taught now!
It doesn't matter what you call it, but I know what you mean about the term "liberalism". My mother used to use the word "gay" to mean happy and joyful. She was not happy that it got a new meaning. Liberalism is the more accurate word for it. The left hijacked it too and gave it a VERY different meaning. Besides Wealth of Nations, another book that has been ignored is 1984. We are poorer because of that. Howdy mudbug
I read both Nineteen Eighty-four (Orwell's preferred version) and Animal Farm in high school. Animal Farm was in English class but I read Nineteen Eighty-four on my own. As some of us have been saying, they were meant as warnings, not as guidebooks. The term "gay" did get hijacked. I am in sympathy with homosexual people who would like to be accepted as they are, but we do have a terminology problem. Heh - I've always wondered how male homosexuals are called gay and yet the term gay is really an umbrella term that also covers lesbians, bi-sexuals and transgender as in the LGBT Community.
I think we've reached the point where identity politics has gotten so confused that anybody can be anything at any time. Howdy Geoff!
It turns out that "gay" is not quite as new as we might have thought: http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=gay&searchmode=none On the original topic of "capitalism", I don't think that many people understand that economists really study human nature as much as money - probably more. That's why they often study other fields like gun control for example. The economic system that fits best with human nature will be more successful. Obviously, that isn't to imply that no regulation is needed - Smith did not argue for no regulation. Capitalism just "is" it exists like gravity. Even monkeys practice capitalism. But "man" discovered it when the first capitalist practiced the worlds oldest profession.
I've learned knapping from a friend, recently. A very useful skill. You can do it with most hard rock.
Your mistake is in only thinking they believe that money comes from daddy sometimes. It is all the time. And it's not just college students, it is government employees, especially those in DC. Even if they aren't socialists, they love the idea that when they need money, they just ask for it without any concern for where it comes from. Unless, of course, they are the well-managed office that is having their budget raided to cover the overages of others.
The problem is we live in an employee world with very few people actually dealing with the cash flows of the market, even in corporations. When an employee gets a request for more budget or pay refused, they see it as the mean old boss being stingy not because their is barely enough cash available to not default on the payroll. Does anyone know of a criminal organization (governments excluded) that operates on socialist principles? Seems to me that those activities outside the government's control always operate on very raw, unfettered market principles. Yes, JKB. Even under governments that have used the most severe methods to impose command economies, people continue to try for free exchange. That's a strong sign that this is the "natural" order.
|
Tracked: Dec 02, 23:32
We mentioned the cross country prehistoric obsidian trade last week in Capitalism is not a theory. Here's a piece on the West Coast obsidian trade of the Paiute. Parts 2 and 3 below the fold -
Tracked: Dec 07, 14:55