We are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for.
A few weeks ago, Eric Holder saw nothing wrong with Black Panthers using billy clubs to intimidate voters. Today, he thinks intimidating terrorists with cigars is a crime. Holder is the one who should be answering tough questions under oath.
Eric Holder was in the Justice Department under Clinton, which should put him under a cloud automatically. He was selected for Attorney General by a Constitutional "scholar" who either knows nothing of the Constitution and/or cares nothing for the Constitution.
The information I've read indicates that these charges are old news and weren't considered worth prosecuting several years ago. It will be difficult or impossible to make real "courtoom" cases out of them now, but Holder can force the targets to spend a fortune on legal help and can humiliate them, a la Nifong.
I'll say this: I don't think Holder was selected for his skin color. I think he was selected for his blind loyalty, his anti-American beliefs, and his slimy lack of true ethics.
Michael Savage has a link on his site which relates a story that the Scots will release transcripts of Holder approving the release of the Libyan bomber...Let's hope it is not buried by the AP as I'm sure Obama's goon squads are on this like a cheap suit...Let's hope we will get the truth of what Holder and Obama knew of the release of this mass murderer!