Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Sunday, July 19. 2009The Rarest Thing On The Internet
The rarest thing on the Internet is an author thinking deeply and then writing simply and elegantly. So rare as to be practically non-existent. Practically, but not completely. Gerard at American Digest is such a person:
It's three years old and rerun, so you know it's not 20/20 hindsight talking. Clear History at American Digest. Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
I run Clear History regularly, and I'd have to say I'm either an exception to his "rule", or his "rule"" is poorly designed.
Clear History is an indicator of someone who: 1. values his privacy 2. keeps his Bookmarks well tended 3. isn't so much a Utopian, as much as he is someone who realizes that others who think they can divine how he thinks from where he goes WILL attempt to do so at every turn - and WILL use that information against him whenever possible. In short, people who use Clear History are far more concerned about those who create mass graves based on judging who they are. We are well versed in freedom, and choose to exercise it at every turn. I'm sorry to disagree with him, but his thesis is just plain wrong. Rick I am not sure from your writing at which points you are referring to 2D and which to 3D "Clear History." I don't understand what you mean. Try it again from another starting point.
AVI,
I went through Gerard's drool-dripping drivel and picked out some quotations. Can you explain just one of them so that it makes sense? I gave you quite a few for a starting point. Forget the 2D, 3D pap. Just explain clearly any one of the quotations I suffered to choose for your perusal and thoughtful exegesis. “As humans, we prefer that our "things" define us. It is always easier to explain ourselves through things than to explain ourselves outright. If mistakes are made, well, "Things didn't work out." “Standing up happened before the ancestors of who we are were what they were. Standing up was, in that time long before the dream time, the most revolutionary idea life had had since the eye.” “"America" -- by which I do not mean the United States but that greater embodiment of the two most powerful ideas of History, "Christianity & Freedom" -- is to those who stand against it, within and without these states, a terrifying presence. It terrifies them because it is, as once we sang it, "a terrible swift sword." "America" should terrify tyrants of all creeds. "America" means the finish on Earth, once and for all, of all that is not free. Not soon, and perhaps not for some time to come, but in the end the American idea, if not America itself, will prove to be as unstoppable as man standing up on his hind legs.” “The Enlightenment, the American Revolution, the Judeo-Christian tradition, and all the wars that have been fought and all the men that have died to found, sustain, advance and defend them, have many things in common for all the differences that arise around and within them. Chief among these is that they do not ever "Clear History."” “Like Freedom, the release from History is another ancient yearning in the soul of man. “ “ It is a thing of such recent History, one so terrible that it you would think it could not be easily "Cleared" by people who are the pure products of education in the West. “ “And yet we see, in our current political malaise, that there are many among us in these states who "Clear History" on a daily basis in order to keep their dark dream of a perfect world, a single world, a utopian realm, alive in the clear light of day.” “ "Clear History" is a complete and immediate blotting out of history en masse. It is accompanied by a careful retention of a fixed number of "historical facts" in a Curiosity Cabinet of Argument found in a dusty chamber filled with monuments to aged intellect; a go-to place where the only events of history worth keeping are those that buttress a reality that exists nowhere but must surely, in some future perfect day, come to exist everywhere. “ “For when you "Clear History" one of the things that go away in the real world are the books.” “... your Bookmarks tell me who you are and what you believe. “ “...if you have the kind of soul that has run "Clear History" on your life your 'pinions are not likely to have any foundation in the long history of Freedom, but only yearn towards a Utopian tomorrow that never knows.” “One group is determined to deny History expunge the Declaration and shred the Constitution in pursuit of a utopia that's buried in a global network of mass graves...” “... history is paying attention to you."” ~~~ Allow me to add - if any quotation contains a generalization, you won't be able to explain it, of course. ` How about this:
it doesn't matter. I read the article and it was pretty silly, to be honest. The "starting point" is meaningless. If all you do is think of what I wrote in terms of how you handle your browser, then extend the analogy into real life, it still makes sense (I'm assuming that's how he differentiates 2D and 3D). I hit Clear History on my life regularly, in fact we all do. Recent studies show that, aside from "longtime friends", most people rotate their social circle every 7 years or so - we hit Clear History and start anew... This excerpt is badly written, poorly punctuated (actually, unpunctuated), and simply makes no sense at all. Rather in the same vein as this entire blog. That is to say, it's all nonsense.
Aw shucks. You have to understand that we are all brain-damaged and survivors/victims of ADHD.
But thanks for dropping by anyway... BD,
Heard from Buddy - he can't get access MF again. I can't from Safari, and noting Marianne's absence, I'm assuming the same for her. The article on this post is seriously lacking punctuation. With five or six themes all mixed up, it is pretty much nonsense. It is not worthy of this blog. AJ Lenrope has it wrong there. ` AJ , squaredaway, I can't type 'cause you got me tto laffin so hard...you're a funny man.
Hey !..How would you like to have the job at MF of spell checking and making sure the punctuation is correct ? Your service would be appreciated. ;) No opening for a job like that for our hosts, Ron. They don't make such mistakes. Bravo to them!
` Gerard had a couple of drinks and decided that 'corn pones' were the essence of American political life. Somehow.
I mean, Mark Twain was a genius. But that doesn't mean he was always right. "Mark Twain remarked, "You tell me whar a man gits his corn pone, en I'll tell you what his 'pinions is." Most men, back in those days, got there pone from there mama's or their grand-mama's. Was Twain talking of the layabouts in the bars that he frequented. Who was he talking about with that line? An expository essay on political thoughts being determined by the act of clearing history in a browser seems mighty far fetched to me. Oh, I don't want to leave the unlettered Luther (What hopes the parents had when giving that name and what tragic result!) twisting slowly in the wind without a url to hang on...
http://www.paulgraham.com/cornpone.html will take him to Mark Twain's Corn-pone Opinions where he can observe that although Mark Twain may not have always been right, he clearly batted 400 to Luther's 110. Another essay on politics that might seem far-fetched at the beginning but comes round right in the end. I first came upon this during a summer when I read the entire 36 volumes of Twain's collected works. I'd encourage all to do the same. After all, he did write the great American novel, even if he didn't like it himself at the end. I find it humorous that a man who thinks so much of himself that he likely shouts his own name during orgasm would leap to insult one as lowly as I. How manly of you, Gerard. I'm sure your parents clasp their hands over their breasts at the mere thought of their boy.
For the record, Luther went up against those with lofty letters behind their name or titles in front of their names. I've always had a tendency to do the same. And it's pretty funny that you belittle me for grammar mistakes when that post of yours was riddled with them. As for those lettered men, I do have letters behind my name. They were awarded from a small institution that you may not have heard of but whose students and graduates have had manifold impact on the world. The University of Science, Music, and Culture. Class of 1968. Unlike dilettantes who pontificate about the world I decided to go out and directly participate in it. My parents were very proud of me because I 'stood up' for freedom. After graduating from the university, I did my internship in Vietnam. It was there, in a position of leadership, that I came to understand the power of our great nation. It does not lie in 'things' or 'ideas' as you say in your post: It lies in its people - those who love this country and do something about protecting it instead of blaspheming it as you do. I doubt you associate with those types. That is unfortunate, as sitting on the lofty perch of porn's commas, semi-colons, and misspellings, your world view narrowed to self-worship and an inability to acknowledge that you, like all of us, make mistakes. Upon checking I see my link didn't work. Here it is again.
Punctuation is only important to ensure you communicate your message. If you move your ideas to others then you have succeeded in communication regardless of punctuation. These lines seem to speak to me for sure. One of the best things I have seen in a while.
I'm not going to help Meta with everything since life is short and lunch is long, but just a few from the top.
As humans, we prefer that our "things" define us. It is always easier to explain ourselves through things than to explain ourselves outright. If mistakes are made, well, "Things didn't work out." Seems pretty clear to me. The well-known human habit of seeking to place blame anywhere but on the self. See: "My dog ate my homework." “Standing up happened before the ancestors of who we are were what they were. This is pretty basic anthropology/evolution where the ability to stand is presumed to have evolved on the veldt since it gave the animal who accomplished it "a higher ground" from which to spot potential food and also predators. You can see a lot of primates going from four feet to two in most any zoo. They don't do it to stretch their legs. Standing up was, in that time long before the dream time, the most revolutionary idea life had had since the eye.” Again, basic anthropology/evolution theory. From seeing to "I see you first." Whether for fight or flight, this is a distinct survival advantage. The anthropologist Donald Johanson had a bit to say about this in his famous book "Lucy, the Beginnings of Humankind." He had a little bit more to say in a subsequent book that I ghost wrote for him about 15 years ago. That one had pictures so you could see what he was talking about. But it is not hard to imagine if you have an imagination. "The dream time" is an homage to "Australian Aboriginal mythology, The Dreaming or Altjeringa (also called the Dreamtime) is a sacred 'once upon a time' [1] time out of time in which ancestral Totemic Spirit Beings formed The Creation." Not necessary, true, but it adds a good bass note in for those that are erudite enough to catch it. “"America" -- by which I do not mean the United States but that greater embodiment of the two most powerful ideas of History, "Christianity & Freedom" -- is to those who stand against it, within and without these states, a terrifying presence. It terrifies them because it is, as once we sang it, "a terrible swift sword." This, to anyone who actually has a deep grasp of history, keys off of American Exceptionalism and Manifest Destiny. The reference at the end is to the greatest of American War hymns, "The Battle Hymn of the Republic." It's a song of strange origins which, if you read the actual journal of Julia Ward Howe, which I have, seems to have been given/transmitted pretty much whole to her in the early hours of the morning. She wrote it down upon awaking from a dream in the dark without a light. Poets often speak of this feeling of "transference." "America" should terrify tyrants of all creeds. "America" means the finish on Earth, once and for all, of all that is not free. Not soon, and perhaps not for some time to come, but in the end the American idea, if not America itself, will prove to be as unstoppable as man standing up on his hind legs.” Again, this passage hooks back to the standing up metaphor/citation above and connects to the power of an idea. Here the idea is, as I have taken pains to delineate, not America as a series of states and lands with a common border, but a much broader and deeper enacting of a spiritual belief system which is not wedded to or containable within borders. You can find this summed up in a very concise and highly readable document that we call "The Gettysburg Address." And that's as much exegesis as I feel like doing right now. I would suggest the commenter (Meta is it?) spend more time reading more deeply and less time with the copy and paste tool. As for those who seem to have trouble with the concept and uses of metaphor, well, once high school and college have failed in tandem there is little that can be done. As to my, shall we say, strange habits of punctuation, after editing some 250 books and several thousand magazine articles, I became bored with the strictures and these days I tend to use punctuation as a kind of rhetorical notation. I won't go into the theory of "rhetorical shape" in poetics/myoddprose. You can see the clearest most concise example of it in the last lines of Hart Crane's The Bridge, and I refer you to that last couplet. And that's all I have the time or inclination for at present. I hope you'll see that not everything in the piece is without intent. "I meant what I said, and I said what I meant...." I do, however, thank Roger for his kind words. I am deeply grateful for them. Well, Gerard, you aren't AVI, to whom I posed my query, but considering you took the time to cut and copy and spend much time reading your piece more deeply so that you could defend it, I shall address you. Thanks for all the literary references. It shows you in your most officious defense mode. Sad to say it is designed, in this case, to make you look smart and the rest of us dumb. Oh, excuse me... less than erudite. Let me add this while I'm thinking of it: "...for those that are erudite enough to catch it." That would be, "...for those who are erudite enough to catch it." As for your mixed metaphors and allusions and oddly misplaced personifications, "...the most revolutionary idea life had..." Life does not have ideas. People do. "As humans, we prefer that our "things" define us." Gross generalization. As an editor, you know this immediately takes the credibility of the author and dispenses with it. Beyond that, why join ranks with those who gain pleasure slamming Americans to start an essay that attempts to make "America" the world's scimitar? And last because this is so boring, "...this passage hooks back to the standing up metaphor/citation above and connects to the power of an idea." The 'standing up' sequence was too embarrasing. Standing up as it took place in evolution was not an idea.
Your disdain for grammar is rather odd considering you write an entire comment to mock Luther, and his name, no less, because he typed 'there' when it is clear he knows it is 'their'. You mocked his name. That is all you could do? Mock his name? Clearly you know what you wrote is swill. No theme, no order, no sense. I've read you at your best, and I can understand why you felt the need to come back and mock Luther and to imply I am a rather wanton idiot. You cannot defend the work. And to end: "I hope you'll see that not everything in the piece is without intent. I meant what I said, and I said what I meant...." Not everything in the piece is without intent. No, most of it is the maundering of a mind that was not thinking clearly, and as you well know, if you can't think, you can't write. As for saying what you meant, you still don't know what you meant as represented by your snarky, puerile, sententious response to me. ` Meta ... At last! I can read your wry comments and Luther's homespun wisdom and drink in the essence that is maggies, after a whole week's absence due to my bloody-damn computer. My computer guru got back from Jamaica [where he was up to No Good and had a great time] so we're trying to figure out why when I try to access maggies on either mozilla or explorer, I get "connection interrupted" or "never heard of it' from my Internet supplier [comcast]. My guy connected me directly to comcast today, bypassing the router and my husband's computer, and everything is "gas and gaiters" as the vicar said. But my husband needs to have an Internet connection too, so we'll have to try still another new router and see what happens tomorrow.
Anyway, we'll keep trying, and thank you maggies for being in this world. And you too, Meta. Marianne Well, MM, you're missed when you aren't here. Sorry you're having so much trouble. Hope your 'guru' can figure it all out once he works off the haze of Jamaica. As for essence... it's a shallow well, but on occasion offers up a nugget worth chewing on.
|