We are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for.
The caterwauling in the comments was amusing, too.
I've been observing politics for 10 Presidental elections, and I don't think I've ever seen a 'safari' piece written to explain why a Democrat like Barak Obama won Iowa, for instance. It's taken as a given everyone voted for him for the same reason urban liberals did. Only when a Republican wins are liberals shocked to learn that maybe people who live outside their bubble have different opinions.
Some of the comments abuse the writer for not essentially trying to persuade Trump voters that they were wrong. Most are just generally abusive, period. I've read these explainers for Reagan twice and Bush three times, as a Republican. This was an excellent satire on the genre, illustrating how they are not written to increase understanding but as cliche-driven balm to assure liberals that their prejudices and misconceptions about voters in fly-over country are accurate.