We are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for.
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Monday, April 28. 2008
From Manly. It begins:
Read the whole thing.
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)
The article failed to mention the growing number of Marxist Obama advisers.
[b]Another Obama Marxist[b]
Good statement -- i'd sign it, as is. Esp the thanks for ridding us of the Clintons (blessed be the thought). Something about this race debate has been bothering me -- i hate to call it 'too much honesty' but you know there ARE things best left unsaid. Just think of a large family reunion featuring 'too much honesty' -- it could make that reunion the last one. VDH is on this case this very morning:
good vdh writing.
he ends with Orwellian times.
it's more like Kafka or Lewis Carroll
ha -- right you are -- the logical end of the current direction is the barbaric yawp -- "i hate you" as the only thing worth saying.
it will be interesting to see if hard core civil unrest begins in the USA after the November election. should mccain win the left, after seething with bds for eight years will not be able to control the fringe groups and abort violence.
on the right, they are waiting for a reason to kill some leftests.
i do believe civil war is possible no matter who wins. we've been headed that way since mcgovern.
code pink, easily identifiable will need to change into brown slacks to avoid the obvious voiding.
Code pink could donate pink jackets to yall and whailbaugh, too.
Geographical considerations are sub-prime for a civil war... perhaps you mean anarchy instead. You know... like giving up on the present system and having might versus right, decide the fight. Great idea.
Your expectations overwhelm reality. I can see a few food fights in tony restaurants that allow entry to both sides of the political enclave because money has no opinion, but civil war? Over what?
And that's what it almost seems anyway... food fights. At least that appears to be the level of discourse at times. Though the issues are in themselves serious.
I have 4 extra tickets for the Robbie Knievel event at the State Fair Grounds next weekend if anybody wants them. He's going to attempt to jump 500 Democrats with a bull dozer.
For Obama, a Voice of Doom?
The Rev. Jeremiah Wright, explaining this morning why he had waited so long before breaking his silence about his incendiary sermons, offered a paraphrase from Proverbs: "It is better to be quiet and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."
Barack Obama's pastor would have been wise to continue to heed that wisdom.
Should it become necessary in the months from now to identify the moment that doomed Obama's presidential aspirations, attention is likely to focus on the hour between nine and ten this morning at the National Press Club. It was then that Wright, Obama's longtime pastor, reignited a controversy about race from which Obama had only recently recovered - and added lighter fuel.
Speaking before an audience that included Marion Barry, Cornel West, Malik Zulu Shabazz of the New Black Panther Party and Nation of Islam official Jamil Muhammad, Wright praised Louis Farrakhan, defended the view that Zionism is racism, accused the United States of terrorism, repeated his view that the government created the AIDS virus to cause the genocide of racial minorities, stood by other past remarks ("God damn America") and held himself out as a spokesman for the black church in America.
In front of 30 television cameras, Wright's audience cheered him on as the minister mocked the media and, at one point, did a little victory dance on the podium. It seemed as if Wright, jokingly offering himself as Obama's vice president, was actually trying to doom Obama; a member of the head table, American Urban Radio's April Ryan, confirmed that Wright's security was provided by bodyguards from Farrakhan's Nation of Islam.
Wright suggested that Obama was insincere in distancing himself from his pastor. "He didn't distance himself," Wright announced. "He had to distance himself, because he's a politician, from what the media was saying I had said, which was anti-American."
Explaining further, Wright said friends had written to him and said, "We both know that if Senator Obama did not say what he said, he would never get elected." The minister continued: "Politicians say what they say and do what they do based on electability, based on sound bites, based on polls."
Wright also argued, at least four times over the course of the hour, that he was speaking not for himself but for the black church.
"This is not an attack on Jeremiah Wright," the minister said. "It is an attack on the black church." He positioned himself as a mainstream voice of African American religious traditions. "Why am I speaking out now?" he asked. "If you think I'm going to let you talk about my mama and her religious tradition, and my daddy and his religious tradition and my grandma, you got another thing coming."
That significantly complicates Obama's job as he contemplates how to extinguish Wright's latest incendiary device. Now, he needs to do more than express disagreement with his former pastor's view; he needs to refute his former pastor's suggestion that Obama privately agrees with him.
Wright seemed aggrieved that his inflammatory quotations were out of the full "context" of his sermons -- yet he repeated many of the same accusations in the context of a half-hour Q&A session this morning.
His claim that the September 11 attacks mean "America's chickens are coming home to roost"?
Wright defended it: "Jesus said, 'Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.' You cannot do terrorism on other people and expect it never to come back on you. Those are biblical principles, not Jeremiah Wright bombastic divisive principles."
His views on Farrakhan and Israel? "Louis said 20 years ago that Zionism, not Judaism, was a gutter religion. He was talking about the same thing United Nations resolutions say, the same thing now that President Carter's being vilified for and Bishop Tutu's being vilified for. And everybody wants to paint me as if I'm anti-Semitic because of what Louis Farrakhan said 20 years ago. He is one of the most important voices in the 20th and 21st century; that's what I think about him. . . . Louis Farrakhan is not my enemy. He did not put me in chains, he did not put me in slavery, and he didn't make me this color."
He denounced those who "can worship God on Sunday morning, wearing a black clergy robe, and kill others on Sunday evening, wearing a white Klan robe." He praised the communist Sandinista regime of Nicaragua. He renewed his belief that the government created AIDS as a means of genocide against people of color ("I believe our government is capable of doing anything").
And he vigorously renewed demands for an apology for slavery: "Britain has apologized to Africans. But this country's leaders have refused to apologize. So until that apology comes, I'm not going to keep stepping on your foot and asking you, does this hurt, do you forgive me for stepping on your foot, if I'm still stepping on your foot. Understand that? Capisce?"
Capisce, reverend. All too well.
By Eric Pianin | April 28, 2008; 12:55 PM ET
Today was a special day folks. It is not often we get to witness an old pro handing off the ball to the kid. Not only did he hand off the ball--he cleared the field for him. You may not like it, but between the two of them they have accomplished something magnificent to see--the art of rhetoric at it's best. Let's hope the kid has heart because I have a feeling he can make it into the end zone from here. God Bless us all!
I'm slow AP. Who are you talking about? Wright and Obama? The 'art of rhetoric' fits in with that. But BO having a heart? I can't see that that makes much difference one way or the other.
We have to believe--all of us--that the individual we choose to lead--either by ballot,or bullet--that individual will have the balls, and the heart to lead with integrity: with a focus on truth and an understanding of systemic impact. We cannot ask for more--nor should we expect less. We--you and I and everyone at Maggie's need to asses the character of the man. We must know that before we can cast our ballot. Our ballot--such a precious moment, such a powerful gift. We must not give it away on an overnight fling. We must be certain that the man we choose has personal, individual courage, as well as intelligence informed by the best education, as well as the ethics we beleive to be the correct guidelines.
I am not sure what you do not understand--this guy is gonna be the lone guy in the end zone. We had better be certain we are prepared to live with that for four years.
Sorry Luther, the words are too beautiful; the timming too exquisite; the moment too perfect. We are at a place in history that has arrived whether we want it to or not!
Surely you are not talking about Obama. ?? ..... the lone guy in the end zone?