Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Wednesday, November 21. 2007Read much?From a NYT piece on the NEA report on reading that we linked yesterday:
and
I guess this is new news: kids who have parents who like to learn also like to learn, but it's a crisis now. I blame global warming. As a solution to the Reading Crisis, I suggest a $1 billion Federal education program called "Books Are Fun!," a fun-filled, interactive, fast-moving multi-media curriculum-enhancement module ("MMCEM"), to be designed by leading expert reading consultants from teaching colleges and then introduced into every Middle School "curriculum" by Federal law. Approximately 40,000 new union-certified "Books are Fun!" specialists will be hired to guide schools through the application of this exciting new kid-friendly program through every course of study. Crisis solved!
Posted by Bird Dog
in Education, Our Essays, The Culture, "Culture," Pop Culture and Recreation
at
09:29
| Comments (15)
| Trackbacks (0)
Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
I grew up with books and looked foward to getting them also as birthday and Christmas gifts. My godmother was a representative for a major book publisher and so she always gave me book gifts for these types of events; and we had a fairly large library by my teen years. The question isn't so much the amount of books but rather the quality of them. Give me ten classics as opposed to what is now sold in the New Age section of Borders or the latest piece of tenth rate contemporary fiction and I will learn, delight, and thrive.
As a dad, I read to both my daughter and to my son when they were children. The former enjoyed listening and reading; the latter does not although, strangely, he writes quite well. Remove visual stimuli like televisions and computer monitors and we will once again have more of a reading public. That first NEA quotation befuddles me. I might have failed their report. Both Mummy and Daddy have numerous advanced degrees, and my house has over 2,000 books, but I cannot do algebra for the life of me.
What should I do? It just came to me!
If I take my pants off, I can do the equations! Maybe now I'll get off restriction. :) Goody. For one, I think you got it backward. Clearly the drop-off in reading PRECEDES the rise in temperature, therefore lack of reading and subsequent illiteracy causes global warming.
My kids' elementary has budget troubles. We were appalled by the crap on the shelves of the library. 5 years ago my wife and I started a "Used Book Sale". We gather donations from the families at school for a month, and then hold a 2 day sale during conferences. The parents can come shop for $0.50 paperbacks and $1.00 hard cover books for all ages. This guarantees three things: everyone can donate and feel good donating books rather than dollars, everyone can participate since the prices are lower than Powell's City of Books (biggest used book concern on the planet and local), and also that the library gets dedicated funds strictly for the purchase of new materials. (without putting the money thru the PTA filter of snobby yuppies desires) The other major fundraisers raise a lot more for the PTA but are limited to the rich yuppies sect- things like the auction and the art sale where $$$ is king. This brings the written word down to street level and participation is broad. It ended yesterday with a total take of about $1850.00. That's a lot of new stuff to read for the kids. We can finally take down the gymnastics book with Mary Lou Retton on the cover. Just wanted to share this. Start your own if you have kids, it's easy and satisfying and encourages reading. Last year we found a Jack Kerouac first pressing worth much more than 50 cents. Lots of gems in the scree. it didn't make no mention a'toll 'bout the number ov classic comic booksbut I reckon that a few old Wild Trkey boxes full of' em would even up thangs a might.
Why i can remember my uncle R. "Bull" Bullard read'n us kids all about The Birth of a Nation, and thangs like dat. We even once had us a hard bound book, I thunk ir were "Gunsmith'n for Professinols" but we never read it. Now learned yur sums, well heck once i done hurd that there be odd numbers and even'uns,I figure thar weren't no use learn odd stuff so I just picked up on the even ones. That way I done later discover's dat I had done taught myself division since I cut da amount of numbers I done needed to learn in half ..pretty smart. To be fair, even high school kids who love to read have to choose at times between doing all the homework for 5 AP courses including calculus and physics, and reading for pleasure...Tho my brats find a way anyway: instead of witty repartee with their exciting Mama during the endless suburban chauffeuring, they read. Waiting for the bus they read. WHen on the playground in elementary school, they read. Instead of starting yukky Physics problems they read, so one frequently hears loud maternal bellows "PUT AWAY THAT !@#$ed BOOK!"
I think we have about 40,000 books in the two houses...nevertheless, the brats still loathsomely sigh "there's nothing good to read here....I NEED to go to the French bookstore near Grand Central/the Japanese manga place/Borders/the library..." I'm not convinved that reading a lot of books has anything to do with success or intelligence, nor does it have an affect on one's own children. My brother graduated with honors in Electrical Engineering at Purdue, and has never read a novel in his life. His kids also seem to be doing above average in school.
Agree, Dave. Our family are the proverbial Dumb Bunnies about the outside world, social skills, etc. One can use books as an escape into a fantasy world as unhealthy as any delusions...
But few pleasures so sweet as sharing a beloved book with a friend or relative and watching the slow smile across their face as they read it and get why you love it so...or the laugh out loud...or them staying up all night to finish it, as caught up as you were... And the pleasures of book-hunting, and collecting, and dragon hoards of them, and gloating over a particularly luscious edition or gorgeous typeface and illustrations, and the agonies of decision as one buys a special book for a new love...or just says damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead, and gives them an armful of things one wants them to have...the geekish mating customs of the bookish New Englander...probably laughable to movers and shakers in the "real world." I don't know, Dave. Clearly, Retriever's children are utter geniuses. Just look...they've gone through 'about 40,000 books' and demand more. Amazing. Simply amazing. And astounding, too. Ach, and now they want foreign books. Amazing....
Oh, my. Retriever, do go on about the geekish mating customs of the bookish New Englander. I am very interested. Are any of them female?
Meta, what I meant was that they are really spoiled and capricious about reading. Personally, I think there's something wrong when someone would rather buy New Age fantasy rubbish than read Plato or Walker Percy. The puppies have awful taste at times...
But, anyway, re: whether any of us are female, I guess that's a matter of opinion...not female like the one in the picture...in fact it's a wonder we ever reproduce, given our figures (better suited to working the back forty than modelling), our cranky personalities, and our eccentricity...I'm typical in that I would rather talk to my dog than my relatives. I think it would not be an exagerration to call us repressed, wacko, and homely, but good-hearted beneath our non-augmented, non-botoxed, aging exteriors...we lack charm, we don't give a damn about making money beyond enough for some tech toys, books, and stuff to keep the woods at bay, but we are faithful and true. Love God, family and country, pay our taxes and vote despite the rascals we have to choose between. Grumble about the minister but love our congregation. The Age of Innocence describes our romantic tangles better than I can. But it seems now that when we fall in love, it is whole heartedly, foolishly, often inappropriately, forever. We were all raised on the tales of chivalry and would rather sigh and die over a long lost or out of reach beloved than have an actual affair with somebody who actually wants us. We live in our own world, even when not quite mad as hatters. well, I've been reading you for a good while now, R, and find you ever charming.
Thank you kindly, BL. Hope you have a Happy Thanksgiving.
its that girl again. how are you going to take her. up the arse? roll her over? share it with us!
|