Maggie's Farm

No expert in the field but oft left for dead in the street, in Response to Part 1;

The fault divorce much better served the individuals, plaintiff and respondent, me thinks, than the disasters foisted upon the innocent with the BEST interests of the children in the new law, currently.

In fact, the new law leaves none innocent, especially the children.

Who, me thinks, become those monsters, wards of the state, who stumble about trying to miss the bullet from the sovereign (a-constitutional) court and conjuring a means to retrograde.

Hopefully, such cohorts of social disasters stumble to enlightenement before they rightfully arm.

Sad that, individual rights distained as the cause of a dysfunctional culture, have been circumvented by the interests of the child aka the interests of the aberrant state.

That state is the dysfunction activated by persons hellbent on stealing the rights of their children before the latter know what one is.

Majority of divorcees-ers might well take heed to Joan B. Kelly, settle the important issues of access and custody without reliance upon adversarial processes.