Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Monday, April 9. 2007Letter from a Marine
Whole letter at Powerline. Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Thank God for the United States Marine Corps. Watched "Flags of Our Fathers" (Clint Eastwood's recent Iwo Jima film) recently. Jeez, how does the Corps build those folks--continuing mystery.
I second the sentiment BL. And they build them in a scant 12 weeks. Duty, honor, Country. Alien principals to so many nowadays. Sgt. Brooks has a handle on the 'big picture.'
"Between The Monsters And The Weak"
The sun beat like a hammer, not a cloud was in the sky. The mid-day air ran thick with dust; my throat was parched and dry. With microphone clutched tight in hand and cameraman in tow, I ducked beneath a fallen roof, surprised to hear "Stay low." My eyes blinked several times before in shadow I could see, The figure stretched across the rubble, several steps away from me. He wore a cloak of burlap strips, all shades of gray and brown, That hung in tatters till he seemed to melt into the ground. He never turned his head or took his eye from off the scope, But pointed through the broken wall and down the rocky slope. "About eight hundred yards," he said, his whispered words concise, Beneath the baggy jacket he is wearing a device. A chill ran up my spine despite the swelter of the heat, "You think he's going to set if off along the crowded street?" The sniper gave a weary sigh and said "I wouldn't doubt it, Unless there's something this old gun and I can do about it." A thunder clap, a tongue of flame, the still abruptly shattered: While citizens that walked the street were just as quickly scattered. Till only one remained, a body crumpled on the ground, The threat to oh so many ended by a single round. And yet the sniper had no cheer, no hint of any gloat, Instead he took a logbook out and quietly he wrote. "Hey I could put you on TV, that shot was quite a story!" But he surprised me once again- "I got no wish for glory." "Are you for real?" I asked in awe, "You don't want fame or credit?" He looked at me with saddened eyes and said "You just don't get it. "You see that shot-up length of wall, the one without a door? Before a mortar hit it, it was a grocery store." "But don't go thinking that to Bomb a store is all that cruel, The rubble just across the street -it used to be a school. The little kids played soccer in the field out by the road," His head hung low, they never ever thought a car would just explode. "As bad as all this is though, it could be a whole lot worse," He swallowed hard; the words came from his mouth just like a curse. "Today the fights on foreign land, on streets that aren't my own," "I'm here today 'cause if I fail, the next fights back at home." "And I won't let my Safeway burn, my neighbors dead inside, Don't want to get a call from school that says my daughter died; I pray that not a one of them will know the things I see, Nor have the work of terrorists etched in their memory." "So you can keep your trophies and your fleeting bit of fame, I don't care if I make the news, or if they speak my name." He glanced toward the camera and his brow began to knot, "If you're looking for a story, why not give this one a shot." "Just tell the truth of what you see, without the slant or spin: That most of us are OK and we're coming home again. And why not tell our folks back home about the good we've done, How when they see Americans, the kids come at a run." You tell 'em what it means to folks here just to speak their mind, Without the fear that tyranny is just a step behind: Describe the desert miles they walk in their first chance to vote, Or ask a soldier if he's proud, I'm sure you'll get a quote." He turned and slid the rifle in a drag bag thickly padded, Then looked again with eyes of steel as quietly he added: "And maybe just remind the few, if ill of us they speak, That we are all that stands between the monsters and the weak." AWESOME, & BLESS ALL OF YOU WHO HAVE BEEN AND ARE, STILL OVER THERE FIGHTING THE WAR THAT NEEDS TO BE FOUGHT... AND 'BIRD DOG', I SEND THANKS TO YOU TOO, FOR SO MANY GREAT LINKS I GET FROM A FRIEND WHO SENDS THEM OFTEN....... USUALLY WITH YOUR NAME ATTATCHED. ;- ) ~SARAH IN NASHVILLE
Well, that's a piece of work if i ever saw one. words fail. just excellent.
No matter how you dress it up this is still jingoism. The soldier's argument starts from the supposition that the only choices are armies or nothing: not true. Worse this false dichotomy, being the same one Dick Cheney rides, is seductive in its simplicity.
It is painfully obvious from many experiments that sufficient violence applied either indiscriminately or with detailed precision will quiet a populace for a time. But there is not evidence I can recall that any form of violence will bring about a political solution/resolution in a complex environment. This soldier, then, has applied a far too simple and self-justifying rationale to his actions. The outcome of that is almost too terrible to contemplate: he will feel justified in doing whatever is necessary with his ready weapons and those at the effective end of his instruments will feel, if alive, misunderstood, manipulated, and rejected--a perfect soup of motivations for years of revolution. Violence is so satisfying in the short term that it is a wonder society has managed to restrict its use as much as it has. But millenia of human testimony show that the orderly application of vilence creates heros and medal winners but does not create peace. And this on the day after Easter which recognizes the application of state sanctioned violence to the innocent. BB:
It is true that humans have a love-hate relationship with violence. However, if you value anything at all, there is no excuse for failing to defend yourself and what is important to you. As they say, we'd be speaking German or Japanese if America didn't have the guts. There are "bad people" out there - and always have been. Fortunately, we are usually the Good Guys. If you are discussing Iraq, consider this: They had a state which was ruled by pure violence. Most of them want a different sort of state. Got a suggestion? BB, your utopia lacks only one condition: The bad guys (you know, the tyrants, slavemasters, dictators, history's many varied homicidal maniacs with armies) have to renounce violence at the same time as the anti-bad guys.
Otherwise, there will be far more violence. And in the end a graveyard and gallows peace where none will dare voice noble sentiment. Is this sort of peace preferable to what we have now? The following letter is making the rounds again because it's needed, given all our war fatigue. Rec'd this copy from a friend at the Pentagon today, but first saw it last year:
Two weeks ago, as I was starting my sixth month of duty in Iraq, I was forced to return to the USA for surgery for an injury I sustained prior to my deployment. With luck, I'll return to Iraq in January to finish my tour. I left Baghdad and a war that has every indication that we are winning, to return to a demoralized country much like the one I returned to in 1971 after my tour in Vietnam. Maybe it's because I'll turn 60 years old in just four months, but I'm tired: I'm tired of spineless politicians, both Democrat and Republican who lack the courage, fortitude, and character to see these difficult tasks through. I'm tired of the hypocrisy of politicians who want to rewrite history when the going gets tough. Two weeks ago, as I was starting my sixth month of duty in Iraq, I was forced to return to the USA for surgery for an injury I sustained prior to my deployment. With luck, I'll return to Iraq in January to finish my tour. I left Baghdad and a war that has every indication that we are winning, to return to a demoralized country much like the one I returned to in 1971 after my tour in Vietnam. Maybe it's because I'll turn 60 years old in just four months, but I'm tired: I'm tired of spineless politicians, both Democrat and Republican who lack the courage, fortitude, and character to see these difficult tasks through. I'm tired of the hypocrisy of politicians who want to rewrite history when the going gets tough. I'm tired of the disingenuous clamor from those that claim they "Support the Troops" by wanting them to "Cut and Run" before victory is achieved. I'm tired of a mainstream media that can only focus on car bombs and casualty reports because they are too afraid to leave the safety of their hotels to report on the courage and success our brave men and women are having on the battlefield. I'm tired that so many American's think you can rebuild a dictatorship into a democracy over night. I'm tired that so many ignore the bravery of the Iraqi people to go to the voting booth and freely elect a Constitution and soon a permanent Parliament. I'm tired of the so called "Elite Left" that prolongs this war by giving aid and comfort to our enemy, just as they did during the Vietnam War. I'm tired of anti-war protesters showing up at the funerals of our fallen in a just and noble cause, only to be cruelly tormented on the funeral day by cowardly protesters is beyond shameful. I'm tired that my generation, the Baby Boom - Vietnam generation, who have such a weak backbone that they can't stomach seeing the difficult tasks through to victory. I'm tired that some are more concerned about the treatment of captives then they are the slaughter and beheading of our citizens and allies. I'm tired that when we find mass graves it is seldom reported by the press, but mistreat a prisoner and it is front page news. Mostly, I'm tired that the people of this great nation didn't learn from history that there is no substitute for Victory. Sincerely, Joe Repya Lieutenant Colonel U. S. Army 101st Airborne Division For naught I expect, as Mr. BB likely dropped and ran, and excuse my personal reverie. But BB, I abhor violence. Always have. In my younger days always attempted to use logic and rationality to avoid same. Felt it was an illogical, and frankly, stupid way to settle a disagreement. At heart still do. But that is a dream world, a world that has never been and I suspect, will never be. There will always be those who think force makes right. Most times, in those younger days, I ended up challenging that assumption, with the use of violence, given no other choice. We face that today. But its not the playground anymore.
I would just ask, what rational words would you use, to persuade the man with his sword on your throat, to lift it away?. Do you feel lucky? Thank you for the responses. Each is its own self-justifying paean to the cleansing effect of violence. That last writer, Luther McLeod, proposes as the defining act--the one that justifies his murder of others--a situation which has not and in unlikely to occur. Fear, of which this is sufficient evidence, is the worst deciding factor in attacking another. The next is exemplified by the other writers--that the conditions we observe are intolerable to people in the country and to us. Are we suitable to judge this clearly? I doubt it.
Obviously this leaves me in a difficult position as to exactly when to emply the dogs of war. But that is as it should be. Such and act should never be undertaken in the fantasy that it is without risk of being wrong or of not achieving its lofty goals. This war, Iraq, has been so mismanaged, lied about, and manipulated that none of us can see clearly either conditions or goals. You misunderstand me BB. Once all rational response has failed there is not fear. Just resignation that violence must be entered into and engaged with tenacity.
"situation which has not and in unlikely to occur" And just how else would you classify those three thousand dead on 9/11. That was the metaphorical sword I was speaking of. The insane perpetrators of that deed had hoped for fifty thousand dead. You infer that justifies no response. And please do not drag out the 'capture Bin Laden' canard. I did request your suggestions on what would you do. I fail too see any. I also take personal offense at your flippant 'murder' remark. You know not of what you speak. The only impossible lofty goal we should be wary of is pacifism or bloody peace passivity. The ugly, vicious dogs of war just are, always have been, and always will be unleashed until human nature is changed first. Avoiding armed conflict doesn't make people and their tyranny, imperialism, genocides and jihads go away; it gives license to increased violence against flesh and (constructive) belief.
Not pushing back, not shaping the landscape for liberty and not holding territory for higher civilization are the greater of the evils because more people suffer and suffer worse in the long run. We have always lived in a violent world with some periods and places of peace and beauty. Our potential for even more peace and beauty is ironically tagged to our willingness to engage in controlled violence in certain situations to try to defend against hideous oppression and aggression and establish better conditions for the humans we think we care so much about. But we don’t often care as much as we believe we do, or the world would unite more often in soft and hard power projections against inhumane regimes. Sloth, indecision, personal and sovereign self-interest, corruption, and maybe even an attraction to naked power most often prevail in our world discussions over “what to do about…” When key discussants aren’t denying or excusing the threats posed by evil regimes, they and the rest of us are costuming our reticence to act against their ongoing inhumanity with moral high-handedness- we are anti-war! War is murder! We’d rather others murder millions or arm such that they can murder millions upon millions as they threaten to do, and allow us to pose as moral savants with clean hands... until the day we’re bloodied by a suicide bomber on our bus or irradiated by a bomb detonated in our city and our unclean hands are finally noticed by us. BB, you ARE smarter than the rest of us--you've figured out how to occupy your own moral mountaintop, well-protected--by your inferiors far below--from the dragons in the world.
BB, one last point before getting back to the business of the day on my moral mountaintop, looking up at others on their very own jagged high peaks, because we ARE all "smart":
Those who question Why Iraq have the benefit today of not having to defend or excuse any of Saddam’s ongoing lies, threats to the region/ Israel or us, support for terrorism and Pali killers, atrocities against Iraqis he would’ve committed these past four years, and the reconstitution of his weapons program after UN sanctions were lifted, which they were on track to be. Had we not militarily intervened after diplomacy failed, Libya’s weapons program would be intact today, as well as a raft of other problems that have been resolved or mitigated somewhat as a result of our going into Iraq, not the least of which has been the securing of the region’s oil supply from monopoly or threat (so far). There are new issues to be sure, but to discount the serious threats that have been abated or avoided because we made a show of force against Saddam to make good on UN resolutions and demonstrate US resolve by putting good warrior boots on enemy ground is a disingenuous accounting. What alternatives did and do we have? Sometimes war and intervention is an appropriate choice when cease-fire agreements are violated and sanctions corrupted. And even Allah knows that diplomacy, inducements and empty threats weren’t working in this sick culture region of dictatorship, death cultism and religious fanaticism bent on attacking us. Air-dropping copies of the Bible and “Common Sense” in Arabic and Farsi wouldn’t be such a bad idea, but only after an intervention or aerial slap-down gets the locals’ attention. Bombing them with “The Village Voice”, “Feminine Mystique” and condoms might be usefully subversive, too, come to think about it. But to deny threats, to harbor the illusion of safe isolationism, or to hail failed talk and weak sanctions is obscene folly. At any rate, we’re in Iraq now and face different enemies and obstacles we need to surmount. From some insiders’ accounts, the surge is working but more than a year will be needed to consolidate gains and to muster Iraqi will and leadership to be as one nation. The military’s fear is that not only do the Dems want our defeat and for us to abandon Iraq ASAP, but that Repubs will find a reason to declare success prematurely and draw down forces substantially just in time for the ’08 election. IOW, US domestic politics are the biggest enemy we face in the Middle East and our world-class military just isn’t sufficiently prepared to outmaneuver it. char is dead right.
The one single factor that has hurt us most, is that the one single factor that we need to win, that is the support of the ordinary opinion-makers, in their bourgeois several millions, have needed from the get-go to know if we're in it for the long haul, or if we're not. If we're not, which the Dems have been turning themselves inside to aver that we aren't, then siding with Uncle Sam is stupid, all risk and no reward--and maybe suicidal. What a SNAFU to dump on our military! Especially in that it was all so utterly avoidable, merely by the Dem party acting like adults--or at least avoiding self-induced insanity. Just imagine yourself as a possible terrorist recruit--what will sway you, a unified, confident Uncle Sam putting his foot down on terrorist ideology, or a halfy-halfy country at constant war with its own self? Ah, but the Dem's seizure of power over the Vietnam War is just too much sugar-memory for them, and everybody on the planet is having to pay and pay and pay for it. Will enough of the BBoots wake up in the eleventh hour and repudiate the evil? Only the Shadow knows. Fave phrase- Vietnam as “sugar-memory” for Dems.
But since there probably isn't life after dead right, I'll pass on that and admit error on several unspecified points, OK? Ha--clever gal--yep, even the old Greeks could only worship Apollo three of four seasons--he was so perfect there was no way to improve on him--he was "dead right".
Ergo, they let old Dionysus have that fourth season--so everyone could re-start fresh, albeit with "error on several unspecified points" no doubt. LOL-- Maybe that "dead right' expression comes from 'dead reckoning' --which i think is ocean navigation without any help but the eye and the heavenly bodies. Probably arose from someone accidentally dropping the astrolabe overboard, and then announcing "well, we're dead, i reckon."
All right, that's funny. A glass of wine to celebrate Dionysian times and a swig of ale for getting lost at sea. Life happens- why worry?
(esp. when Buddy can explain ANYTHING with a little needed humor) reminds me of the town in Arizona, where all the natives have a great sense of yuma--
(groan) |