Maggie's Farm

the god of the test's author(s)
is embodied by reason and logical consistency.


i had several objections to the method of questioning
(T/F) and the extreme interpretations and literal extrapolations of the answers....(despite some of these very same objections being addressed in the author's FAQ.)
..in other words...literal adherence to "principle" with little or no allowance for judgement or intelligence to enter in..
brute "logic".

one Hit i received,conflating "inner convictions"
and a rapist/murderer's "inner convictions",
was one of the more egregious.

as usual,you cannot exhange ideas on
the reality of an interior world
with people who have convinced themselves
such a thing does not,cannot,
and should not exist.

if religion is a growth of conciousness,
one cannot obtain truth of its reality
without the growth of one's own conciousness.

to deny religious conciouness from the outset
by demanding proof of its claims,
cuts off the process before it begins...

much like having an hypothesis and no expermental data.

and the extreme rationalists count that as beneficial to themselves and insist it would be best if all others
similarly submitted themselves.

sounds like a cult to me.