|
Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Tuesday, July 21. 2026Tuesday morning links
Cyclospora parasite not found in any Taylor Farm lettuce samples after product recall, FDA says A Climate Coup at the National Academies of Science - A report on C02 and extreme weather is a trial-lawyer operation Trial Lawyers Lobby Against Autonomous Vehicles Staples, former retail giant, closes more stores Too Much Happiness Sent A Woman To The Emergency Room In an Incredibly Rare Case Kathy Hochul Got Grilled on Why Everyone Is Leaving NY "I'm Not Living In Communist America": Bill Maher Blasts Marxist DSA Democrats, Says He May Vote For JD Vance On the Iran War, NATO Chief Agrees With Trump -- The Media Buried the Lede Three-Quarters Of Refugee-Linked Households In Vienna Rely On Taxpayer Handouts Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
QUOTE: On the Iran War, NATO Chief Agrees With Trump -- The Media Buried the Lede... If Iran was nowhere near a bomb, President Donald Trump's decision to use military force looks unnecessary, even reckless. But if Iran was close, as Trump claims, the debate changes dramatically. Iran has been close to a nuclear weapon for twenty years or more. They did the hard part, which was producing HEU (highly-enriched uranium). But they never developed an actual weapon., even though they are much more industrially developed than North Korea. Conservatives, including those in the military, wanted a nuclear weapon for deterrence. The clerical leadership considered the use of nuclear weapons non-Islamic. The compromise was what is known as break-out capability, how long it would take to actually produce a nuclear weapon. With HEU, breakout time is weeks. Without HEU, breakout time is a year or so. So, they produced HEU under the guise of civilian usage. What the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) did was have Iran give up their HEU. (Their HEU was shipped to Russia.) That moved the breakout time from weeks to a year or so, and entailed international inspections. If Iran then moved to produce a weapon, that would have given time for the West to take action. It also, gave (or so they thought) Iran a sufficient deterrent to attack. What changed is the nature of warfare. The United States could strike at Iran's nuclear facilities before Iran could breakout. Iran's reliance on breakout deterrent failed. The hardliners were proven correct:
Iran has NOT been close for twenty years. The actual hard part is the design of the detonator. That is their missing link.
re Kathy Hochul Got Grilled on Why Everyone Is Leaving NY
LOL What happened to the friendly media coverage? I remember a few years ago when she was telling Republicans to GTFO of NY, and take their money with them. She should have been reminded of that. re On the Iran War, NATO Chief Agrees With Trump -- The Media Buried the Lede
How close was Iran to building a bomb? That's the $64 question. Rutte was even more direct. "We know they were close," he said, while commending the United States "for making sure that the world stays safe from Iran with a nuclear capability." What's the timeline on "close"? 6 mos? A year? 5 years? Silly me, I thought we were told a year ago that we had pretty much destroyed Iran's ability to build bombs with those bunker buster attacks. Were we lied to? Again? In the 90s the CIA said Iran was about 5-10 years away from a bomb. During W. Bush's reign, we were told it was 12-18 months. This is getting to be like moving back the dates for apocalyptic global warming. Iran obtaining a weapon is always the boogy man lurking just over the horizon, and that has been so for at least 40 years. Meanwhile, I am paying $1.50 more for gas ($150 more per month) than I was in February and it looks like it could get much worse. Global Oil Inventories Are “Close to Nothing” as We Plunge Into the Most Severe Oil Crisis in History https://thelibertydaily.com/we-are-being-warned-that-global-oil-inventories/ feeblemind: How close was Iran to building a bomb?
As close as they wanted to be. feeblemind: I thought we were told a year ago that we had pretty much destroyed Iran's ability to build bombs with those bunker buster attacks. It's not a difficult technology. The key is the HEU (highly-enriched uranium). With that on hand, breakout time to produce a nuclear device is only a few weeks. They could have done so already. feeblemind: During W. Bush's reign, we were told it was 12-18 months. When Iran had HEU, Iran was only weeks away from producing a nuclear device. They stayed weeks away for years. The Iranians (read: the ayatollah-led regime) are quite determined to have nuclear weapons - they always have been.
No amount of "deal-making" can change that. A more bloody-minded US would have chosen to topple that regime. But your country has now gone from the use of deadly force against Iran to the use of deadly farce. JJM: he Iranians (read: the ayatollah-led regime) are quite determined to have nuclear weapons - they always have been.
Then why didn't Iran produce a nuclear device already? Once they had HEU, there are almost no significant technical hurdles. Even North Korea managed to do it, and they are far less developed and far more isolated than Iran. You are still pretending. North Korea is still working on an efficient detonator. Which is why they were conducting so many nuke tests at their mountain test site until the site became unstable. Iran hasn't yet a design that they have been able to test. Keep it that way.
End welfare as we know it. Require work for welfare, 40 hours a week. Put a limit on total welfare not to exceed what Walmart pays for 40 hours a week. End all welfare for non-citizens. Stop any aid of any kind to non-citizens. Offer them remigration and if they are here illegally forcible remigration. Double down on efforts to find and deport illegals. Deny them all services; jobs, banks, housing, health care, school, everything. Make it illegal for any non-citizen to own property in the U.S. Make it illegal for any non-citizen to work in government or run for an election. Require all non-citizens to spend no more than 180 day in the U.S. in a 365 day period. Get serious about U.S. sovereignty. Place a 20 year moratorium on all immigration. End all hiring of non-citizens like the H1b programs and require all current hires to be remigrated within 30 days. End college visas.
"Note the United States has not attacked North Korea even though North Korea has nuclear weapons and has conducted ballistic missile tests showing significant capability of delivering such a weapon."
Young Kim might be many things but he is not an apocalypse-obsessed Twelver Shiite. JJM: Young Kim might be many things but he is not an apocalypse-obsessed Twelver Shiite.
It's very difficult to read the mind of the leader within the highly-isolated and tightly-controlled inner circles of North Korean power. There appear to be no constraints on Kim's power, so his whims, misunderstandings of threats, or even his mental stability can be critical. We do know North Korea has nuclear weapons and that they have launched ballistic missiles over Japan and deep into the Pacific. That's hardly pacifistic. But he does have a nuclear deterrent. Trial lawyers lobby... Grifting closely related to political grifting of the democrat/progressive/communist party. See money, power, and control freaks.
|