|
Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Thursday, May 21. 2026Thursday morning links I've read that truffle oil, like vanilla, is often fake SpaceX Has Picked a Date for Its IPO. Here's Everything Investors Need to Know Before What Could be the Biggest IPO Ever Prepare for an Earth-Shattering Kaboom As Starship V3 Finally Takes Flight Babylon Bee Goes on Rampage Mocking Anti-Gun Media, Politicians The “Pipeline” Problem That Medical Schools Don’t Want to Discuss. Demographic disparities in medical and scientific knowledge show up long before admissions time. DEI manipulation at the end of the process doesn’t solve the problem. South African Farming Crisis May Trigger Food Shortages Across The Continent Is Europe Ending Up as One Big No-Go Zone? Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Unanticipated side effects of greed, theft and mismanagement.
Gee. Darn shame nobody could have seen all this coming... QUOTE: South African Farming Crisis May Trigger Food Shortages Across The Continent South African food production tracks with weather, but has doubled since the end of apartheid, with a record export value in 2025. However, South African agriculture is dependent on fertilizer, especially for maize. Fertilizer shortages are just another unintended consequence of the U.S. attack on Iran. It's an odd claim. First, Feb. 28 is late summer when the large majority of the fertilizing has already been done. With whatever inventories South Africa had on hand plus whatever was in transit it is doubtful the closing of the Strait of Hormuz has created any problem at all for southern hemisphere agriculture.
Nitrogen fertilizer, the only fertilizer exported in any significant amount by Gulf countries, is the fertilizer with the most excess global production capacity, and that both Saudia Arabia and Oman have work arounds available to the closing of the straits. James: First, Feb. 28 is late summer when the large majority of the fertilizing has already been done.
The 2025-2026 season is expected to be above average. James: With whatever inventories South Africa had on hand plus whatever was in transit it is doubtful the closing of the Strait of Hormuz has created any problem at all for southern hemisphere agriculture. That's not the way it works. People are already planning for the next planting season, which means contracts for fertilizers, the cost of which is spiking. James: Nitrogen fertilizer, the only fertilizer exported in any significant amount by Gulf countries, is the fertilizer with the most excess global production capacity It's called supply and demand. If supply is reduced, and demand stays the same (or rises), then the price increases. According to BL statistics Nitrogen fertilizer is up 9% MOM from Feb. '26 April '26. Annual peek is typically April or May. Still under 75% of the peek from the beginning of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. How did SA ag. fare on that occasion? Notable that Russia was a major nitrogen fertilizer exporter and that Europeans used Russian NG imports for fertilizer manufacturing, but the global market recovered very quickly from what was a much larger shock. Furthermore, Russia was also a major exported of other fertilizers at that point.
BTW, your economic illiteracy is showing. Your characterization of the impact of supply and demand is a gross oversimplification. Beyond that, my point is that the impacts you're mentioning are projected impacts, not actual ones. Which may or may not turn out to be accurate. I also love how you just ignore that point that there is excess capacity now. US nitrogen fertilizer plants can increase production quickly. Other than that, really solid points. James: According to BL statistics Nitrogen fertilizer is up 9% MOM from Feb. '26 April '26.
BLS averages or smooths out pricing. Markets are showing the price jumping by half. Fertilizer is a major input price for much of agriculture. The long-term effect will depend on whether the crisis continues. James: Your characterization of the impact of supply and demand is a gross oversimplification. While nothing in the world is ever simple, the supply-demand model is one of the most robust relationships in all of economics. And indeed, supply disruptions have led to price increases. None of that relates to the original false claim that South African agricultural policies have led to a collapse in production. We were given two bottles of truffle oil for Christmas. They remain unopened. I would give them to someone else, but no one is interested. The food bank said not to bother.
'South African Farming Crisis May Trigger Food Shortages Across The Continent'
They didn't learn from Rhodesia -White flight today, chaos and starvation tomorrow. The “Pipeline” Problem That Medical Schools Don’t Want to Discuss. Demographic disparities in medical and scientific knowledge show up long before admissions time. DEI manipulation at the end of the process doesn’t solve the problem.
I am reminded of a NYT article about Math professors at top 50 schools. It said that 6% of Med school graduates are black, but only 0.7 % of tenured Math professors at top 50 Math universities are black. Disparities, unconscious bias and bigotry, etc. But it turns out this appears to be more of a pipeline problem. It's a fair bet that most math professors scored 750 or above on the Math SAT. In 2005, blacks comprised 0.7% of those getting 750 or above on the Math SAT. The proportion of tenured Math professors who are black tracks pretty well with the proportion of blacks who get 750 or above on the Math SAT---0.7% in both cases. QUOTE: Is Europe Ending Up as One Big No-Go Zone? More people visit France or Spain than the United States, even though they are much smaller countries. Per capital, France gets seven times the number of tourists, while Spain gets ten times the number. So, a lot of people do go to France and Spain. No mention if the North Africans are considered 'tourists.'
Are you implying that since " a lot of people do go to France and Spain" these so called "no-go" zones are much ado about nothing, perhaps a form of paranoid nativism?
I for one, appreciate a timely gadfly, but eventually resent the annoying mosquito. Ulithi: Are you implying that since " a lot of people do go to France and Spain" these so called "no-go" zones are much ado about nothing
The Betteridge headline was "Is Europe Ending Up as One Big No-Go Zone?" We're saying that "go" contradicts "no go". People "go" to France. Fewer people "go" to the United States (which has a much higher violent crime rate). If you were to say that there are some areas that people avoid, well there are certain sections of New York, Major, that I wouldn't advise you to try to invade. Another odd claim. There is no claim in the article that the whole of any European country was a no-go zone, or that any would become such overnight. But it would seem difficult to deny that the problem is much worse now than it was 10 years ago. And that it was worse 10 years ago than it was 20 years ago. And worse 20 years ago than it was 30 years ago. Which would seem to indicate a trend.
James: There is no claim in the article that the whole of any European country was a no-go zone, or that any would become such overnight.
"Is Europe Ending Up as One Big No-Go Zone?" By Betteridge, the answer is no. James: But it would seem difficult to deny that the problem is much worse now than it was 10 years ago. And that it was worse 10 years ago than it was 20 years ago. And worse 20 years ago than it was 30 years ago. The homicide rate in France is lower than 30 years ago. And it is much lower than in the United States. What with political instability, xenophobia, and high rates of violent crime: "Is the United States Ending Up as One Big No-Go Zone?" Feel free to give Rick Blaine's answer. Notice how the satanic freak lies with statistics. He uses homocide statistics when talking about France, but compares that to violent crime stats making it seem like the US is actually more dangerous.
But let’s be truthful for a change, because truth is good. We can use New York City vs Paris as a quick comparison. While New York has a higher homicide rate, Paris has a much higher rate of violent crime, robbery, burglary and rape. In brief, you are much more likely to become a crime victim in Paris than in New York. You can find similar stats all over western Europe. This is well known. My question is “why?” Why would you lie about something that is so easily verified? Because the father of lies demands it. Also see how he lies by omission as he mentions France’s homicide rate has dropped over the last 30 years. Does he also mention that the US homicide rate has also drastically fallen over the last 30 years? Does he mention that the US homicide rate is currently at it’s LOWEST LEVEL ON RECORD?
Well no. The satanic freak would never mention that. His job is to lie. His father demands it of him. 68% of the U.S. homicides were committed by illegal aliens. Most homicides in the U.S. are gang/drug related, i.e. if you don't buy or sell drugs or are part of a gang the U.S. is one of the safest countries in the world. In a dozen or so large Democrat run cities you should stay away from 7-11 after 10PM and stay away from certain parts of town too. Also avoid any gathering of "teens" in those Democrat run cities. There are no go areas and there are demographics to avoid, most people know this.
Rusty: He uses homocide statistics when talking about France, but compares that to violent crime stats making it seem like the US is actually more dangerous.
Definitions of violent crime vary (for instance, France include crimes of neglect in their statistics), so homicides make a good proxy for determining levels of violence. Rusty: We can use New York City vs Paris as a quick comparison. While New York City has made great strides against crime, their homicide rate is still several times that of Paris. In 2024, the number of homicides "explosé" in Paris to 34, still a far lower homicide rate than New York City. (Now do Oklahoma, not just the city, but the entire state.) Rusty: the US homicide rate has also drastically fallen over the last 30 years It has indeed. However, the US still has a much higher homicide rate. (The drop implies a common cause, such as demographic changes.) Regardless, it is evidence that France is not "Ending Up as One Big No-Go Zone", or at least less so than New York City or even the entire United States. LA Dave: 68% of the U.S. homicides were committed by illegal aliens. Huh? We are always open to new information, so please provide a reliable source for your claim. You may want to look at the homicide rate in Cabot Cove, Maine, reportedly 150 (per 100,000). Some have speculated that a local and beloved amateur sleuth (or someone close to her) must be a serial murderer. But the local sleuth has never been charged, much less convicted of any crime.
hat is evidence for the theory that murder mysteries are more popular in places with low murder rates.
A very few neighborhoods account for most of the homicides in America. Increased police presence would help, but as many (not all) are minority, that solution is unpopular. Not so much with the residents, who are relieved, but with the minorities who live in better places and feel diminished by the knowledge. NH, VT, and ME have had the lowest homicide rates since colonial times despite being high gun-owning states. Oh. Well there you go. That bit of barely relevant data settles it and proves your point. Never mind the accounts of Europeans about how unsafe they feel in certain areas, or how common assaults and property crime are or how much sexual assault and rape have increased in some places in Europe over the last 30 years.
If only it had occurred to me to make a longitudinal comparison of murder rates in Europe, I might not have made accurate, relevant points about the issue. It is impossible to have reasonable conversations with leftists because they constantly resort to nonsensical positions like you did. It would be nice, and beneficial to, but leftist will never acknowledge a point no matter how obvious it is. James: Never mind the accounts of Europeans about how unsafe they feel in certain areas
Precisely the point, the conflation of “certain areas” with “Europe Ending Up as One Big No-Go Zone”. You got it now. One reason for that might be that somewhere around 400 million people outside of France live close enough to Paris that they can get there in under two hours via airplane. Makes for an easy spur of the moment long weekend in France.
Z: "homicides make a good proxy for determining levels of violence."
Only a liar would look for a proxy when a direct comparison is readily available. The Truth is, you focused on the one statistic that makes the US compare unfavorably and used that to deflect criticism of the islamification of Europe, which is a real observable trend. Z: "the US still has a much higher homicide rate...it is evidence that France is not "Ending Up as One Big No-Go Zone"" The word 'homicide' does not appear anywhere in the article, nor is it the way the study defines "no-go-zone." It is now apparent that you haven't even read the article. Which means your knee jerk instinct was to lie about something you didn't even read, to run interference for the ongoing destruction of Western Civilization. Why? Because you are a satanic degenerate. Begone, filthy demon. Rusty: Only a liar would look for a proxy when a direct comparison is readily available.
But you don't actually provide what you say is "readily available". You might try a citation to a primary source. If the Betteridge claim is that "Europe Ending Up as One Big No-Go Zone", then we offered two lines of contradictory evidence. The most direct evidence is that people "go" to France in very large numbers. That directly contradicts the claim. We also provided evidence that violent crime is lower in France than in other countries such as the United States. If violent crime is a determinant of no-go countries, then the United States would have to be included. Assistant Village Idiot hit on the fundamental point, "A very few neighborhoods account for most of the homicides in America." The same is true in France. If you were make Rick Blaine's claim, then it would be supportable. There are some places in New York City and some places in Paris you probably don't want to go. The article does not describe a “no-go-zone” as a place where people do not go. Neither do they define it exclusively by violent crime.
It is painfully apparent that you haven’t even read the article. Rusty: The article does not describe a “no-go-zone” as a place where people do not go.
Hahaha. Retreating into the semantics of redefinition. Good luck with that. No-Go Area : an area that is dangerous or where people are not allowed to go. The same article you criticized provides a rigorous definition.
It is you who are playing semantics. You didn't even use the same term for God's sake. Apparently the kiddieZ don't have many acquaintances and have little to nothing worthwhile to do.
#6.1.2.1.1
Zachinoff
on
2026-05-22 14:37
(Reply)
Yes instead of going to a barbecue he decided to just let us roast him.
#6.1.2.1.1.1
Rusty
on
2026-05-22 18:55
(Reply)
Rusty: The same article you criticized provides a rigorous definition.
The report, put out by a conservative think tank, notes the problematic nature of the term 'no-go', but they use it anyway. The report does provide a more rigorous definition along a number of axes, including homicide, gangs, and unemployment. They also include aspects of state withdrawal and a parallel society. This is not unusual in new immigrant populations. Furthermore, some of their metrics are subjective, and they blur the line between areas of criminal activity and ethnic separatism. Again, if the claim were that there are dangerous and culturally isolated areas in major European cities, then sure. But that's not the claim at issue. The claim is that all of Europe is becoming a no-go area, which is a gross overstatement. There was no claim. Just a question.
The trend has gone from 0 to nearly 1000 no-go-zones in about 50 years. Given the current birthrate demographics it is not an unreasonable question to ask.
#6.1.2.2.1
Rusty
on
2026-05-22 15:39
(Reply)
Rusty: The trend has gone from 0 to nearly 1000 no-go-zones in about 50 years.
Immigrant enclaves are nothing new. Think of the Italians in New York City, the Irish in Boston, or other such Catholic enclaves, Jews on the Lower East Side, San Francisco’s Chinatown, Poles in Avondale, African Americans in Harlem or many major cities during the Great Migration, Mexican Americans in East Los Angeles, Cuban refugees in Little Havana. Nor is xenophobic reaction new.
#6.1.2.2.2
Zachriel
on
2026-05-22 16:08
(Reply)
Z: "Immigrant enclaves are nothing new. Think of the Italians in New York City, the Irish in Boston..."
Islamification is nothing new. Think of Damascus, Carthage, Constantinople, Jerusalem, Alexandria, Toledo, Sicily, Barcelona... But Rusty - don’t forget … those were mostly peaceful islamizations with free haircuts for all who objected!
But Rusty - don’t forget … those were mostly peaceful visitors providing free haircuts for all who objected!
|
Tracked: May 24, 08:58
Tracked: May 24, 10:14