![]() |
Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Saturday, September 13. 2025Saturday links They’re Killing the Humanities On Purpose. The crisis is not one of resources but of values. Astonishing Climate Change Predictions! It's the end of the world. Again. A new study found that there is no evidence that climate change has contributed to rising sea levels. Tim Kaine’s Constitutional blasphemy Transgenderism and Magical Thinking A Mini Scorecard For President Trump's First Seven Months of Term Two Trump Astride at Seven Months Shellenberger: Mandatory care for the mentally ill Dehumanization: How the Left Justifies Killing Conservatives Assassination of Charlie Kirk prompts flood of false and misleading claims online Left Cancels Ezra Klein for Claiming 'Charlie Kirk Was Practicing Politics the Right Way' Oxford Union condemns president 'celebrating' Kirk's death From Bluesky To Reddit, Democrats Celebrate Charlie Kirk's Assassination After Charlie Kirk Wrote David Horowitz’s Eulogy, Now We Have to Write His Charlie Kirk, my friend, my sparring partner, fought for the freedom to debate Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Climate... it's the end of the world and I feel fine. All the news that's fit to print by the gatekeepers of record espoused by the experts and science grifters... or is that the grifting scientists all knighted as experts by government funded NGO's.
Is mass transit safe... well, not if you have to use it.
If I read the post correctly, he said the subway is safe as long as you know you are prey and keep your head on a swivel to watch for predators. If you have to do that, I would not consider that mode of transportation all that safe.
He doesn't give advice for what to do if a flash mob comes through. Apparently flash mobs must be a rare event on trains. The only mass transit I would consider is a self-driving vehicle with only well known associates in the vehicle. Any other kind I would require standing room with an Uzi on a sling and my back to a wall. Many transit riders, of the questionable kind, do not buy tickets and are there only to harass, steal, rob or kill time. No thanks, not for me. Long ago I served a 3 year hitch at little pay and not a bit interested in an extension.
feeblemind: If I read the post correctly, he said the subway is safe as long as you know you are prey and keep your head on a swivel to watch for predators.
NYC Subway Crime Drops to Historic Lows. New York City is much safer than many other USA cities, and New York State has a lower homicide rate than most other states, including Florida and Texas. We are quite familiar with how they are re-categorizing crime statistics.
Where is Bernie Goetz when America so truly needs him???
QUOTE: Dehumanization: How the Left Justifies Killing Conservatives Sorta like how Charlie Kirk painted his political adversaries as not just wrong, but genocidal: “The same way that Joseph Stalin went after the kulaks, they wanna go after you... they won't stop until you and your children and your children's children are eliminated.” And he was shot and killed so...
And Trump was shot at twice and hit once so... And Andy Ngo was pummeled so... (And yeah I know about Paul Pelosi, and the Hortmans and the Hoffmans) And Scalise was shot and numerous other Republicans were shot at so... And there's ample video of Congress Members and state level givernment leaders suggesting physical attacks should be considered against Republicans and those who consider themselves conservative so... Maybe he wasn't just completely off base by saying some of who appear to be your fellow travelers (and in positions of real power) really want to do to Republicans and Conservatives what Stalin did to the kulaks. BornSouthern: (And yeah I know about Paul Pelosi, and the Hortmans and the Hoffmans)
So, what you seem to be granting is that there is extremist violence on both sides of the political spectrum. And there are plenty of people on the political right who suggest violence, including Trump who has even used eliminationist rhetoric. Studies have shown that there is more political violence coming from the political right. For instance, see Jasco et al., A comparison of political violence by left-wing, right-wing, and Islamist extremists in the United States and the world, PNAS 2022. There is a difference between saying someone has communist or fascist views, without claiming they also support the holodomor or the holocaust. Kirk was exhibiting the very rhetoric at issue in the article. But there is always Nancy Pelosi and her 'sisters' setting the fires.
https://ncrenegade.com/dementia-or-arrogance/ Nancy Pelosi says Democrats can't take "responsibility" for their rhetoric against conservatives, because it wasn't their "intention" for violence to ensue. "We can't take responsibility for the minds that are out there and how they hear it" Your violence studies are coming from the academy, the source of all things communistic. Your views come straight out of the academy Borg. The studies you refer to are only propaganda created by leftists. The actual violence in the world is no abstract thesis. It is real, in the form of bombings in just about every country in range by Zionist genociders, particularly on helpless Gazans. Kirk's last communications were expressions of fear that Israel would kill him for beginning to relent in his defence of their genocide. Jewish influence on American culture via Hollywood, mainstream media and their control of pornography (a rabbi owns the biggest internet porn site) and abortion/feminism has almost destroyed America and the rest of the West with it, but people are waking up.
You were caught in an error, perhaps even a lie, about leftists being genocidal.
So you changed the subject. You are very good, and not always inaccurate, about forcing accountability on other people, but artfully, automatically, effortlessly avoid it yourself. Charlie Kirk claimed that his opponents - our opponents - want us dead. Born Southern gave you examples, including Kirk himself. You danced away. Winning is more important to you than honor. Assistant Village Idiot: Charlie Kirk claimed that his opponents - our opponents - want us dead.
Which is false. While there are certainly extremists on the political left, the left as a whole isn’t violent much less genocidal. And while there are certainly extremists on the political right, the right as a whole isn’t violent much less genocidal. The falsehood follows from a faulty generalization. Taking the example of Kirk, he used a nebulous “they” and “the left” to smear his opponents as not just wanting to commit a holomodor, but to be actually effecting it—which is absurd. Perhaps you picture effete liberals wanting to import cheap labor to tend their lawns while they drink lattes by the pool, but that’s hardly a holomodor. Meanwhile, Brian Kilmeade of Fox News just publicly called for the murder of homeless people. Literally.
#3.1.1.3.1
Zachriel
on
2025-09-15 21:03
(Reply)
No, he literally did not call for the murder of homeless people. Why are you always so dishonest?
#3.1.1.3.1.1
Anon
on
2025-09-16 02:14
(Reply)
“Just kill them.”
QUOTE: JONES: Billions of dollars to mental health and the homeless population. A lot of them don't want to take the programs. A lot of them don't want to get the help that is necessary. You can't give them a choice. Either you take the resources that we're going to give you, or you decide that you're going to be locked up in jail. That's the way it has to be now. KILMEADE: Or, uh, involuntary lethal injection, or something. Just kill them. EARHARDT: Yeah, Brian, why did it have to get to this point? KILMEADE: I would say this: We're not voting for the right people. In North Carolina, wake up.
#3.1.1.3.1.2
Zachriel
on
2025-09-16 07:17
(Reply)
Except, because you’re dishonest, you left out the part where it shows he was specifically talking about DeCarlos Brown, Jr. and similar situations, not the homeless in general. Not the most artfully phrased, obviously, but also not meaning what you so desperately want it to mean.
#3.1.1.3.1.2.1
Anon
on
2025-09-16 10:12
(Reply)
Anon: Except, because you’re dishonest, you left out the part where it shows he was specifically talking about DeCarlos Brown, Jr. and similar situations, not the homeless in general.
No. He wasn't speaking about Brown specifically. The pronoun was plural, "them", repeated several times in the conversation, and referred to the mentally ill and the homeless. Even your own false formulation is heinous, to execute someone because of what they might do in the future—in the judgment of the government. Notably, the co-hosts didn't take exception.
#3.1.1.3.1.2.2
Zachriel
on
2025-09-16 13:12
(Reply)
The “they” in “they’re killing the humanities” are the humanities professors themselves, intent on killing most of the values of western civilization. It’s a form of cult mass suicide.
|
Tracked: Sep 14, 12:55