![]() |
Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Friday, July 25. 2025Friday morning linksA Beatnik Tourist in Ayahuasca Country - William Burroughs and Allen Ginsberg's trip reports form one of the most entertaining books in the Beat canon. Follow Up on that City-Supported Grocery Store in Kansas City Why the Revolution Never Ends - Marxism Trump EPA Looking To Kill Off Climate Cult “Endangerment Finding” " I’d go so far as to suggest that it is likely that the first half of You and I Don't Live in the Same World as NYT Readers ScMatt Taibbi: The Smoking Gun That Indicts Obama Is the December 10, 2016 Story In The NY Times And Washington Post Scott Adams Says Obama's Russia Hoax and the 'Fine People' Lie Ruined His Life and Split America Just When You Thought You Couldn't Hate Media More Than You Do, This Is CNN Epstein Vs. Russiagate Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
So now it's Epstein gate! Epstein made an effort to appear at an Trump event way back in 1993. This is consistent with his underlying agenda as a dual agent for CIA and Mossad. His job was to get "dirt" (or create dirt) on Americans of power so that they could be extorted and controlled. Epstein posed as a wealthy, friendly party animal just enjoying life with a sprinkling of honey pot party favors. And now strangely even though it is well known that there was a very long Epstein client list that included almost everyone the only person that the MSM can find is Trump. Even though Trump is the only person on the planet who quickly and openly disassociated himself from Epstein and refused to be baited that old trick of showing up in the same room with Trump is now being played as a "Trump card". A familiar chant is quietly being heard in the background... Epstein, Epstein, Epstein!!! And CNN boldly before our astonished eyes plays the same dirty tricks it played during the Russia-gate ploy. We are locked into a Jumanji like game intended to divide and conquer the American people. Wake up! This isn't about Democrat vs Republican politics this is about Communism vs freedom. The Democrats have been entirely taken over by the dark side while the Republicans have mostly given in to the stupid side.
Grocery store follow-up... there is not enough money printed to subsidize a third world ghetto to make it appear normal. Cultural values are not equal.
This is the same blue city in which a judge mandated nearly 1&1/2 billion dollars for new schools and amendments. It changed nothing, the outcome was simply more debt. QUOTE: ScMatt Taibbi: The Smoking Gun That Indicts Obama Is the December 10, 2016 Story In The NY Times And Washington Post ... If you remember before the election, there was a story in The New York Times, for instance, on October 31st, saying, "FBI sees no link between Russia and Trump and the election." A check of the article (including an archive from 2016) does not have that quote. Taibbi was speaking extemporaneously, which perhaps excuses the misquote, but his recounting mangles the meaning. While there was no proven link to Trump himself, there were links between Russia and the election, and between Russian agents and the Trump campaign. QUOTE: "We're going to tell them that there really was no significant Russian interference, at least insofar as election apparatus goes." Russia attacked election servers in all 50 states, but did not succeed in changing the results. And that is what was reported at the time. QUOTE: Saying, "Russia interfered." Russia did interfere. And the Trump campaign welcomed that interference. QUOTE: It is also clear that President Obama was a key player in advancing the false narrative of Russian interference. It's not a false narrative. There is substantial evidence of Russian interference. QUOTE: Russia probably did try to interfere in the 2016 election He just said it was a false narrative. QUOTE: that {Russia} purchased a handful of ads on social media, and that they probably hacked into the DNC servers They ran troll farms, which is a felony and an attack on U.S. sovereignty. Hacking into servers then releasing the emails to damage Clinton and help Trump is a felony and an attack on U.S. sovereignty. QUOTE: and that they probably hacked into the DNC servers Uh, yeah. Then timed the release to cause the maximum damage to Clinton while distracting from grab'em-gate. While the Mueller investigation didn't find evidence of criminal conspiracy regarding Trump and Russia, they detailed multiple instances of obstruction that prevented them from reaching a firm conclusion either way. LOL. That will probably go right over its head.
Saving what’s left of the reputations of Obama and Clinton, seems to take precedence over the weather (climate cult). B. Hammer: Saving what’s left of the reputations of Obama and Clinton
Don't care much about "reputation," but what can be shown with evidence. For instance, the claim that the Trump administration's recent document dumps show that Obama committed "treason" or even some criminal act is false. Z: "Russia did interfere. And the Trump campaign welcomed that interference."
Says you. The documents Tulsi released show that until Obummer likely ordered a change in the ICA, that the assessment was that Russia had neither the ability nor the desire to attempt to alter vote counts rather that they attempted to sow distrust. To that end, the Russians had collected information about Hillary's use of tranquilizers and her volatile emotions and they planned on springing that after Hillary won. There was no specific evidence that Trump welcomed the interference. mudbug: Says you.
Says the Mueller report and the Republican-led Senate Intelligence report (including Marco Rubio), based on the collection of voluminous evidence. mudbug: The documents Tulsi released show that until Obummer likely ordered a change in the ICA No. They don't show that. (This is where you might point to a specific document you think supports your claim.) mudbug: that the assessment was that Russia had neither the ability nor the desire to attempt to alter vote counts As already pointed out, Russia probed election servers in all 50 states, but there is no evidence they changed any vote counts. mudbug: rather that they attempted to sow distrust. As already pointed out, Russia worked to interfere in the U.S. election. After Crooked Hillary, unexpectedly lost the election, she and Zero concocted a vicious, seditious conspiracy to undermine the duly elected President. The ‘intelligence’ of Russian involvement was not credible. *If it was credible, why didn’t the Clinton campaign use the information? It would show collusion with the White House, that’s why. The FBI first mentioned something about Russian cyber threats in June. Foreign governments routinely try and influence every presidential election since the invention of the internet, and before, since Ancient Greece.
It wasn’t until after the election, all based on a highly dubious source, Oleg Smolenkov, that the losers of the election, Clinton and the entire deep state apparatus, began their conspiracy. “IF THAT F***ING BASTARD WINS, WE ALL HANG FROM NOOSES!” - Hillary Clinton (reportedly at a private event after Matt Lauer asked unscripted answers at the debate. So, who knows, but it sure fits.) "Il faut punir un exemple pour en prévenir mille." - Voltaire I would be happy to see some charges dropped. And a fair trial - outside of DC. *GPT-mini (me: this is like sourcing Wikipedia, but it is democrat TRUTHS): Clinton campaign did not directly use the intelligence reports regarding Russian interference in the 2016 election during the campaign itself, as the most significant public disclosures about Russian involvement came after the election. However, the campaign was aware of concerns about foreign interference and cybersecurity threats. "As already pointed out, Russia worked to interfere in the U.S. election."
They always do, you gullible twit. You need new material. The information coming out now (which anyone who's been paying attention has known for years) isn't about the Russians interfering (which again we all know about and they've always done)--it's about what the IC, the executive, and the press corps did. Which was unprecedented election interference. A nice narrative that has no substance. See John Durham reference to 'fake interference' plus MORE.
DNI Tulsi Gabbard reacts to former DNI James Clapper hiring lawyers. July 25, 2025 by Sundance from The Last Refuge re Follow Up on that City-Supported Grocery Store in Kansas City
Yep. They set 17 million on fire. Everyone but the progressives could see it coming. Of course no one is held accountable for squandering tax money like this. And . . . If I was to wager, i would say places like Chicago & NYC will try this as well. Progs never learn. They always tell themselves if they just had smarter people running the show the last state owned grocery store would have succeeded. Looks liket HRC is indeed a nut case. Just as we thought.
HILLARY CLINTON: ONE SICK CANDIDATE? QUOTE: The revelation came from a long-classified House Intelligence Committee report made public by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard on Wednesday. The report, dated Sept. 18, 2020, says Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service accessed internal Democratic National Committee communications in 2016 that contained detailed allegations about Clinton’s physical and psychological health, including claims she was on a daily regimen of “heavy tranquilizers” and suffering from a mix of “intensified psycho-emotional problems.” . . . The communications also referenced multiple chronic illnesses, such as type 2 diabetes, ischemic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and deep vein thrombosis, that Clinton, who turned 69 years old that year, was suffering from. Russian intelligence reportedly described her as “obsessed with a thirst for power” and emotionally erratic, according to page 17 of the House Intelligence Committee report. https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2025/07/hillary-clinton-one-sick-candidate.php It's been nine years since Clinton's loss in the presidential election. Regardless of your political views, she appears reasonably healthy for a person her age, and she gives extended interviews where she demonstrates significant knowledge and cognition.
from the link, Hillary:
QUOTE: you know no I think that the um the 4:31 recklessness the cruelty the chaos has exceeded even my um worst um assessments 4:41 It's so painful You know people say to me "Well aren't you just angry?" I said "Yeah of course I am I'm outraged I'm 4:48 angry I'm I'm worried about our country but I'm also so profoundly sad at the 4:55 wrecking ball that's being taken uh to people's lives to the rule of law and 5:02 due process uh to the way that uh our government is supposed to function 5:07 separation of powers checks and balances all of that Um now I want to hasten to 5:13 add because we we have a lot we can talk about with the damage that is being done I do think the tide is beginning to turn 5:19 I think that people are seeing what was very hard to imagine or 5:27 believe So I do think that there is a growing awareness among the American uh 5:34 public uh that uh the economy is being cratered It contracted in this last 5:41 quarter the unpredictability that he has injected into the global economy is 5:48 going to have farreaching impact um on people's standard of living on the cost 5:55 of things Remember the affordability uh issue is so critically important to the election It still is to so many people 6:03 So the realworld consequences are beginning to be seen and felt and I think that's why his you know approval 6:10 rating has fallen you know considerably and people are beginning to you know 6:16 express their deep concerns about the direction he's leading the country Uh 6:21 that that's certainly bearing out in the polling with 52% of Americans who agree with the statement that quote Trump is 6:27 quote a dangerous dictator whose power should be limited before he destroys American democracy But you know Margaret 6:34 if you look at those numbers and I occasionally do you know just to see what's going on Um if you look at those 6:40 numbers I mean obviously they are largely Democrats and independents I mean the Democratic you know disapproval 6:46 is you know in the I guess 90% range independents are also you know in the 6:53 high 50s disapproving but the Republicans are sticking with him And 6:58 it's so having served in the Senate for eight years having been Secretary of 7:04 State and working with so many of the Republican members of Congress 7:09 particularly in the Senate who are still there It just is astonishing to me how 7:15 they are not speaking up how they are not opposing what he's doing And Lisa 7:21 Marowski who is someone that I I count as a a great former colleague who I 7:29 think has enormous courage you know expressed something that I don't think we'd ever thought we would hear in the 7:36 United States Uh why are they not speaking out because they're afraid This is the same claptrap Crooked Hillary has been saying for decades. I’m sure the next 50 minutes is full of the same rambling answers to softball questions. B. Hammer: from the link
None of that contradicts our comment or supports the original claim. Re: Scott Adams.
I had the first family members and friends start cutting me off during the first Clinton primary in NH in 1992, then the Contract With America. What's the psychology behind it AVI?
Why do they feel the need to end friendships over politics? |