![]() |
Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Saturday, February 8. 2025Saturday morning links
The Sad Saga of Bud Light The Men Who Lost Their Babies Virtucrats on Parade Beware angels in politics by Joseph Epstein USAID Has Its Office Lease Terminated and You Won't Believe the New Tenant Democrats More Panicked About DOGE Accessing Feds’ Computers Than Chinese Hackers WHO LET THE DOGES OUT? Trump’s Federal Buyout Deadline Arrives As Over 40,000 Workers Accept Offer Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
I wonder if sister Dylan was "wounded" during her "makeover".
That beer always sucked. Them going woke was such a blessing to Yuengling and to beer lovers who had never tasted actual beer, good beer that has been part of America's tradition for about 200 years of brewing. Real Bud no longer has that Beechwood aging character about it. Were I in charge at Bud's operations I would reintroduce long neck returnable, reusable bottle and fill them with good beer. QUOTE: Saturday Miscellany: one of the young people manning the computers once said something that was apparently racist. The comments weren't just apparently racist, but patently and admittedly racist.
"You could not pay me to marry outside of my ethnicity." "Normalize Indian hate." QUOTE: “Here’s my view: I obviously disagree with some of Elez’s posts, but I don’t think stupid social media activity should ruin a kid’s life,” Vance tweeted Not letting him work at a highly sensitive job he isn't qualified for is hardly ruining this adult's life. For that matter, giving Musk access to the very payment system he uses to profit from, that pays his competitors, and without oversight, is contrary to all ethical standards. QUOTE: “We shouldn’t reward journalists who try to destroy people. Ever,” the vice president added. Right. So, the inevitable conclusion would be that he should be let go because he wants to propagate hate against ethnic groups. Apply this evenly. AOC would be out of office. Almost every left leaning black would be out of a job. 100% of the anti-discrimination rules our government implements are racist. The published purpose of DEI is racism. Just the statement "black lives matter" is racist.
The entire Democrat party was openly violently racist against blacks from 1865 until about 1965. After this was exposed and rejected they converted to selective and subversive racism after 1965. Their goal and agenda is to use racism to gain and hold power over America forever. Racism is the religion of the left. The left calling others racist is a classic Marxist ploy to accuse others of what you yourself are doing. The left has been captured by Marxist socialist who are unable and unwilling to tell the truth. The Democrats have led us to a crisis where they will bring us to civil war and a purge of independent thinking white patriots. This is their intent and when they do it they will frame it as the right committing an insurrection against "democracy". The Democrat congress members are actively telling the left to bring violence to the street, to bring back the left wing glory days of the 2016-2020 riots and crimes. There is literally no one in the Democrat party who can lead them out of this suicidal agenda. Their most moderate spokesperson is ironically James Carville. Just try to imagine being so far to the left that James Carville becomes the center right spokesman for your party. LOL OneGuy: Apply this evenly. AOC would be out of office.
AOC isn't a bureaucrat in the federal government, but an elected official. Nor did you provide an actual example of her saying something like, "Just for the record, I was racist before it was cool." OneGuy: The entire Democrat party was openly violently racist against blacks from 1865 until about 1965. The entire Democrat party was openly violently racist against blacks from 1865 until about 1965. In the early twentieth century, the Democratic Party was a coalition of labor, liberals, and southern segregationists. During that period, America, including Republicans, largely acquiesced to segregation and the oppression of Blacks. But contrary to your claim, some Democrats fought against segregation, even though it was politically costly, such as Truman who integrated the military, resulting in the southern Democrats forming the third party Dixiecrats. Not sure why you ignore this history. Regardless, this doesn't mean the person who openly claimed to be racist should be given a sensitive government job. Just wondering what qualifies the Quibble-DickZ to decide who is or isn't qualified for a sensitive government job.
Zachriel is tribe, and therefor you must grovel before him!
#3.1.1.1.1
Mark Matis
on
2025-02-08 14:01
(Reply)
Funny thing. Look up Einstein and racism.
Then ask if he was qualified for a sensitive government job.
#3.1.1.1.1.1
Zachinoff
on
2025-02-08 14:33
(Reply)
If any of the government departments practice DEI they are practicing quota racism. Any teaching institution that practices DEI is practicing quota racism. Any part of the military, including its military academies that practice DEI are practicing quota racism. Any and all in these institutions that enable and/or practice DEI should be pushed out of the institutions that taxpayers are required to support either directly or through grants. Today's democratic/progressive/socialist party continues to practice systemic DEI racism. Get over your hollowed out virtue signaling.
Just more character assassination from the Quibble-DickZ signifying nothing.
BTW the guy is highly qualified for the assignment. (See below.) Don't like the message, kill the messenger. A beautiful explanation about why bureaucrats and politicians alike are upset with DOGE and Trump, they traced the money flow.
QUOTE: HOW TRUMP OUT-SMARTED THE DEEP STATE BUREAUCRACY The clock struck 2 AM on Jan 21, 2025. While career bureaucrats prepared orientation packets and welcome memos, DOGE’s team was already deep inside the payment systems. No committees. No approvals. No red tape. Just four coders with unprecedented access and algorithms ready to run. “The beautiful thing about payment systems,” noted a transition official watching their screens, “is that they don’t lie. You can spin policy all day long, but money leaves a trail.” That trail led to staggering discoveries. Programs marked as independent revealed coordinated funding streams. Grants labeled as humanitarian aid showed curious detours through complex networks. Black budgets once shrouded in secrecy began to unravel under algorithmic scrutiny. More fascinating facts revealed at the link. https://eko.substack.com/p/override?r=faen9 "The administrative state runs on two things, a senior advisor explained, watching patterns emerge across DOGE's screens. Control of information and money flows."
For the permanent bureaucracy, this wasn't just change. It was an extinction-level event. Their power came from controlling who got paid, when they got paid, and what they got pad for. How to make Chimichangas
Deep-fried burrito, guaranteed to sit like a lead sinker in your stomach all night long. Beware of any purported Tex-Mex dish that involves frying flour tortillas. re Democrats More Panicked About DOGE Accessing Feds’ Computers Than Chinese Hackers
Unless they are afraid criminal activity will be uncovered, why would they care? |