Maggie's Farm

Citing a cherry-picked group of "expert's" ranking based on nebulous, subjective, unstated criteria of X is not the flex you seem to think it is. Particularly when they are likely a self-selecting, highly partisan group engaged in disseminating propaganda.

Amazing that you're able to submerge that obvious fact deeply enough in your self-conscious that you can even submit such an absurd comment.

I'll give you this: you're consistent. All you're pointing out is that my characterization of the group as self-selecting and biased is correct. The "conservative" members are either pro establishment or are surrendering to perceived social desirability, which is especially powerful among high status white collar professions like college professors. Keep in mind, a large majority of the professors surveyed would have insisted that Joe Biden was just fine cognitively two months ago. Or, at least refuse to admit that he wasn't. That's the level of credibility their, and your opinion on the subject should be given.

And your fondness for alleged experts is consistent. A much better measure for someone that was fond of freedom, civil rights, and representative government would be public approval ratings adjusted to the extent the media attempted to either undermine or support the president. Given the historically unprecedented level of lying the media did to prop up Biden and to undermine Trump, the fact that Biden has horrible approval ratings is a hint that he's a large failure.