Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Saturday, July 27. 2024Saturday morning links
Baby talk - When babies are born, they cry in the accent of their mother tongue: how does language begin in the womb This weightlifting workout in your 60s can preserve strength for years. Older people had stronger leg muscles years after a 12-month weightlifting program than those who did moderate strength training Does Disney's Dramatic Decline Reflect Growing Public Opposition To Woke Activism? Stuart's Saturday Miscellany Racism And Sexism: The Campaign Theme Of The Harris-Whoever Ticket A country that picks its leader on DEI grounds is doomed To prove fealty to Kamala Harris, the media gaslights voters by rewriting her past Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
The whole HIT/weightlifting long term health benefit versus moderate activity level debate is consistently weighed down by confounding. People have to have maintained a certain level of health and fitness are the only ones that will engage in HIT/weightlifting in their later years. No one (or almost no one) who experiences chronic bad health in or before middle age is going to adopt a HIT/weightlifting routine ever.
Additionally, the benefit to a 65-year-old being able to squat 300 lbs. versus being able to squat 200 lbs. is not obvious in most cases. Seems likely that the wear and tear of HIT/weightlifting on anyone, and especially on older people far outweighs the benefits and increased immediate. And that doesn't even take the nutricial and caloric demands that such workouts would make on bodies whose ability to absord and matolize nutrients. This guy is right https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Pk2Tvk2FlRU
James, see my links in my post below for more thoughts on that.
It's true, you can't make someone who doesn't want to improve their lot in life go out and do the work needed. But getting the word out as much as possible doesn't hurt. And, done correctly, the benefits of barbell training for strength as we age far outweigh the negatives, not even close. QUOTE: To prove fealty to Kamala Harris, the media gaslights voters by rewriting her past . . . That’s why many in the news media started referring to Harris’ big task as “border czar,” including me, even though that technically wasn’t her official title. Harris did not have authority over the border, so she wasn't the border czar. QUOTE: A supposedly nonpartisan organization that tracks congressional voting records, GovTrack, has simply waved its wand and made a 2019 page on its site dedicated to Harris’ voting record go “poof.” Just use the search that GovTrack conveniently provides. They have created a new page for Vice President Kamala Harris, which still shows her as one of the most left-leaning members of the Senate. QUOTE: "Harris did not have authority over the border, so she wasn't the border czar." The Ministry of Truth at work. Biden stated on her border responsibilities "When she speaks she speaks for me." She was delegated that authority, so she WAS the border czar. https://apnews.com/general-news-3400f56255e000547d1ca3ce1aa6b8e9 She was supposed to 'lead the response on border challenges', but that doesn't make her responsible? QUOTE: "Just use the search that GovTrack conveniently provides." Since it's THAT easy, one wonders why the media is unable or unwilling to accurately portray her voting record. Notice the weasel words, “did not have authority over the border”?
You lie as often as you breath. The reporting on Harris' responsibility for illegal immigration and border security is vast and unambiguous. And saying she wasn't "literally the border czar" as a means of drawing attention away from her failures as "border czar" is a lie.
B. Hammer: Notice the weasel words, “did not have authority over the border”?
A czar is someone with authority. In politics, a czar has broad authority over a specific area of policy. James4HJ: The reporting on Harris' responsibility for illegal immigration and border security is vast and unambiguous. Here's the actual authority (though we'd be happy to consider actual evidence that Harris had authority over border security): FACT SHEET: Strategy to Address the Root Causes of Migration in Central America: "Since March, Vice President Kamala Harris has been leading the Administration’s diplomatic efforts to address the root causes of migration from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras." See also, Biden's executive order under the Immigration and Nationality Act. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas (2021): “Vice President Harris is not the border czar. Vice President Harris has been asked by the president of the United States to focus on root causes.”
Alright then. The principal 'root cause' of mass immigration according to Harris is basically the WEATHER. Apparently it gets hot south of the equator or something. They have jungles and stuff down there. Who knew?
https://www.eenews.net/articles/climate-change-drives-migrants-to-u-s-border-harris-says/ And it's worked so very well, hasn't it?
It's almost like they're going where the money is, and they know the border patrol won't turn them back. Jlawson: It's almost like they're going where the money is, and they know the border patrol won't turn them back.
Quite so: There is a market incentive for people to migrate to the United States to find work and for employers to hire additional workers as the economy expands. Most migrants have mixed motives, but many have legitimate asylum claims under U.S. and international law. If someone makes an asylum claim, then it has to be adjudicated under U.S. law. (During COVID, they could be kept out under Title 42 emergency health authority.) Hum. What explains all of the opposition to the illegal immigration in very blue northern cities when a few of them got bused there?
We could call it the 'My life sucks. Therefore you owe me asylum' policy. Thanks for the insight Zachbot. I'm going to take a wild guess that you are extremely qualified for such an idiotic claim. On second thoughts I'll bet you are extremely comfortable materially although actual happiness eludes you. That's why you've set out to make everyone else equally unhappy. Misery loves company after all.
Lord Heathen: My life sucks. Therefore you owe me asylum' policy
That is not correct. Under U.S. law, 8 U.S. Code § 1158, “To establish that the applicant is a refugee within the meaning of such section, the applicant must establish that race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion was or will be at least one central reason for persecuting the applicant.” So border czar Harris' justification for weather induced asylum claims is legally bogus? Well it's nice that we agree for once.
#2.3.3.3.1
Lord Heathen
on
2024-07-27 20:54
(Reply)
Lord Heathen: So border czar Harris' justification for weather induced asylum claims is legally bogus?
Climate refugees are not accorded refugee status under U.S. law. However, climate change causes economic disruption, which can bring about social and political instability.
#2.3.3.3.2
Zachriel
on
2024-07-28 10:54
(Reply)
She was tasked with addressing illegal immigration. implicitly suggesting Biden would have implemented her recommendations.
You're welcome to demonstrate that she ever did anything substantively to address the situation. Held meetings, developed policies, or made recommendations, anything. How about real leadership, like expanding her purview on her own to make suggestions regarding other border security issues. The entirety of the media, including MSNBC and CNN repeatedly called her the border czar in previous years with no one, including you, objecting. Since it was a completely reasonable description. Now, since it is helpful to her political campaign to avoid responsibility for her own and her administration's incompetence, you're crying about word choice instead of addressing the issue. Because you and almost all progressives are habitual liars. James4HJ: She was tasked with addressing illegal immigration
Specifically, Harris was tasked with addressing the root causes of immigration from Central America. The share of immigration from Central America has decreased, despite ongoing political instability. Gaslighting and directing to GovTrack after it’s been conveniently scrubbed. The American left would leave Orwell feeling completely vindicated.
Hoss: Gaslighting and directing to GovTrack after it’s been conveniently scrubbed.
Huh? Harris's liberal voting record isn't "scrubbed". It's right there. Idiot. Find the words “Ranked most liberal compared to All Senators” on the newly scrubbed page. They are there on the archived page linked to in the article. In fact, the July 9, 2024 image has the phrase “Ranked most politically left compared to All Senators”.
Anonymous: Find the words “Ranked most liberal compared to All Senators” on the newly scrubbed page
The claim was that Harris’ voting record was made to go “poof”. They still provide details of her voting record, as well as a chart showing her ideological position relative to other members of the U.S. Senate. No, idiot, the claim was “In 2019, Harris was the 'most liberal senator.' Not anymore.” Those words were indeed removed. Your desire for accuracy is highly selective. And, in any case, it’s the modification of the website and the removal of those words that’s the real issue.
#2.4.1.2.1
Anonymous
on
2024-07-29 20:34
(Reply)
Anonymous: Those words were indeed removed.
Seriously? The exact wording was changed. That’s the whole argument? In any case, the new, more comprehensive methodology uses multiple years, and still shows she is on the far left of Senate members based on their ideological scoring. Calling that “Orwellian”, as the author does, is just silly.
#2.4.1.2.2
Zachriel
on
2024-07-29 22:02
(Reply)
Weren’t you the one who was just crying about how words matter? Now they don’t? You’re such a hypocritical idiot.
First, this is a supposedly non-partisan group, so that’s an issue. Second, words were not changed, they were removed. Third, no note was made of the change, meaning they wanted to hide the change, another issue. Fourth, it was done for nakedly partisan reasons, yet another big issue. The fact that other information is there is irrelevant.
#2.4.1.2.2.1
Anonymous
on
2024-07-29 22:41
(Reply)
Anonymous: Weren’t you the one who was just crying about how words matter?
Words matter. In this case, a private organization replaced their original post (words) concerning a single year with a much more comprehensive analysis over her entire Senate record (better words), while providing a handy chart showing her ideological position compared to other members of the Senate. Just like Big Brother.
#2.4.1.2.2.2
Zachriel
on
2024-07-30 08:40
(Reply)
You are never too old to start strength training.
https://vimeo.com/channels/startingstrength/118560258 Search "mark rippetoe starting strength" True dat and really groundbreaking reporting there, Washington Post. :-)
Also go to The Barbell Prescription - Fitness After 50 and YouTube: Greysteel: Fitness After Fifty for even more focused material for the 'athlete of aging'. And of course the associated book (that BD refuses to look at for some reason), the bible for us older trainees: The Barbell Prescription: Strength Training for Life After 40. (Not sure when they changed from "40" tp "50" :-)) Dr. Sullivan is strongly (pun fully intended) associated with Rippetoe and Starting Strength. Now published in the peer-reviewed scientific literature: "The mRNA vaccines are neither safe nor effective, but outright dangerous"
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/now-published-in-the-peer-reviewed ... and Moderna confirms it.
https://expose-news.com/2024/07/26/moderna-confirms-link-between-covid-mrna-vaccines-and-cancer/ Now the progressives will have to 'disappear' the "safe and effective" narrative just as they are trying to disappear "most liberal senator" and "immigration czar" titles. What Happened When Amazon Got Caught Selling T-Shirts That Call for Donald Trump's Death?
Imagine if the T-shirt had been calling for the death of a Democrat? https://pjmedia.com/chris-queen/2024/07/26/why-is-amazon-selling-t-shirt-that-call-for-donald-trumps-death-n4931083 Now imagine that somebody had thrown a milkshake on Obama. There would be a brand new date to remember on everyone's 2025 calendar. Amazon is Bezos. End of line.
Social Media Users Point to Revelation 6:8 After Paris Olympics Open Up With Rider on Pale Horse
QUOTE: As The Gateway Pundit previously reported, during the Olympic Games opening ceremony, a group of provocatively dressed drag queens stood behind a long table, appearing to recreate the Lord’s Supper. During another part of the opening ceremony, a pale horse raced at full speed with a rider donning an Olympic cape. The appearance of the pale horse resulted in hundreds of social media users stating that it symbolized the pale horse spoken of in the Book of Revelation in the Bible. Revelation 6:8 reads, “And I looked, and behold, a pale horse! And its rider’s name was Death, and Hades followed him. And they were given authority over a fourth of the earth, to kill twith sword and with famine and with pestilence and by wild beasts of the earth.” . . . The 2024 Olympics has the Occult Anti-Christ symbolism on full display Even the pale horse walking on water is a clear symbol of the Anti-Christ counterfeiting Jesus Christ walking on water https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/07/social-media-users-point-revelation-68-after-paris/ The tranny behind the little girl actually had one of his testicles hanging out of his shorts. When they panned back to him he went for the 'full Monty'. They're not even hiding it at this point. Why would they? We spend an entire month celebrating their depravity. I guess they won although I don't recall any actual war...
I love the smell of a conspiracy theory in the morning. The latest one is that Joe Biden has had some kind of medical issue making it impossible for him to appear in public or perform his duties and that the government is hiding this. One indicator the conspiracy theorists are pointing to is that Joe is now about 2 inches taller then he was 10 days ago. The theory is they have a stand-in for Joe who looks enough like him to fool you but he is unfortunately a little taller so please don't notice. I think something suspicious is happening and our government is not being transparent.
|