Maggie's Farm

Are you really this much of a liar? The law you cite is a misdemeanor, on which the statute of limitations has expired. Bragg tortured it into a felony by trying to tie a documents charge to a violation of Fed campaign law. Big problem--the Feds never considered it a violation, no charge, no fine. Most likely because the money would certainly have been paid to Daniels regardless of whether or not Trump ran for office, therefore not directly related to the campaign.

Here's the law you cited:

"Any two or more persons who conspire to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means and which conspiracy is acted upon by one or more of the parties thereto, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor."

Only someone of your level of dishonesty could one day defend the Clinton campaign buying disinfo from Russian intelligence assets (which was then used more than once by her supporters in FBI to bolster falsified FISA warrant apps to spy on her opponent) and the next defend a clearly political prosecution that would not be happening to any other citizen under the same exact circumstances. And yes, Clinton intentionally ran the money thru Perkins Coie and knowingly mischaracterized it, and she was caught by the Feds and fined, unlike Trump in the Daniels case.

But keep it up--it's lovely watching you twist yourself all up justifying the inequality of citizens before the law of justice.

Your turn in 3, 2, 1--change the subject!

Buy the way, VDH really has your number, don't he?

This is weak even for you. You attempted to refute what Dershowitz said by citing a misdemeanor on which the statue of limitations has expired. Once more, it's a misdemeanor, not a felony (see below--I've provided definitions!). You ignore the point he made about the lack of an underlying crime to tie the felony charge to.

Christopher Steele was a British intelligence asset---his source Igor Danchenko was believed by both FBI and CIA to be a Russian asset. At best he played both ends against the middle.

I might have been a little strong in calling you a liar. Apparently you're just ignorant of the basics of the law (and apparently history). I can't do any more to help you understand what Dershowitz said--it's quite plain. The facts about Danchenko are easily found.

However, I can help with some terms you're confused about. These are definitions written for grade school kids--even you should be able to understand.

Misdemeanor--A criminal offense that is less serious than a felony and generally punishable by a fine, a jail term of up to a year, or both.


Felony--A felony is traditionally considered a crime of high seriousness, whereas a misdemeanor is regarded as less serious.

Statute of Limitations (on this one there are a couple of words you might need to look up, little buddy)--A statute of limitations, known in civil law systems as a prescriptive period, is a law passed by a legislative body to set the maximum time after an event within which legal proceedings may be initiated.


You're welcome!

"New York Executive Law § 63-12"

Seriously? Letitia James suing him for overvaluing his property on a loan app is the basis you're gonna use to torture this into to a felony? Far as I can tell that's not even in Bragg's indictment. But it read like a 3rd grader wrote it and my eyes were glazing over.

And you support this?

Sad, but not surprising.

Don't worry, you hypocritical piece of trash. Bragg'll almost certainly get his win, just like James did. They both ran on platforms of taking him out, and take him out they will.
Stalinizing the justice system seems to suit you.

Besides, if they don't take him out this way, they'll have to assassinate him--this is much cleaner.