Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Saturday, November 11. 2006Radical Kids: It's about getting chicksRe this little Pledge of Allegiance story in California, I think it's a tempest in a teapot. Why? Because these are kids. Like many (non-Asian) kids, they try to find their own way to stand out and be noticed, and being a young rebel is one way. (Of course, being good at something, achieving something, and getting decent grades in challenging courses, might be a bit more mature.) On the other hand, getting your name in the paper about the Pledge could be the best way for an otherwise-undistinguished white boy with average grades to get into the University of Michigan Law School. In my experience, campus radicals are the guys who secretly, or even unwittingly, wish they could have been on a team - preferably the ultra-hip Lacrosse team. Name me one guy who didn't want to be on the Lacrosse team. Or at least the football... or any sports team. I know - I wasn't. The "radical" girls were just dogs with an attitude, as I recall. Hated their mothers, or something like that. Nice. Wonder what they are doing today? Probably on play dates with other moms, or, at worse, valiant single mothers by guys who just wanted to get laid... or maybe working at Vogue. But there was a basic lesson for guys: don't get involved with gals who hate their mothers, because they will hate you, too, in time. There was a line somewhere in The Strawberry Statement where someone - maybe the author James Kunin - confessed that he was attracted to radicalism to get dates, which he had trouble getting. That "statement" stood out as one truly human and humane statement in that book about that silly period. Kunin was nobody's fool and. like most Lefties, a closet capitalist - he sold a ton of books, and got a movie deal. The Che t-shirts? Means no more than James Dean t-shirts used to mean. Which is: "I wish I were a tough SOB with an edgy, pointless mission in life instead of Mom and Dad's pampered college student with a BMW and a C+ in Rocks for Jocks, in comfy, decadent, free America." Someday, these kids' kids will look at these old photos say laugh and say "Dad - I can't believe that was you!" For some kids, being obnoxiously irreverent is good sport, and can turn a nobody into a somebody. It's tough, as a young person, to accept that we are all nobodys. Does irreverence towards the things that I hold most dear piss me off? Of course. But I knew such kids in college: it is designed to have that effect. Let's not react like Moslems to foolish kids, or like our parents - or grandparents - did to the great Elvis! Or, God forbid, the Beatles. "Turn that crap down!" The thing that cracks me up most about such stories is when the grown-ups admire them. That is a sure sign of arrested development, but many college faculty never fully grow up, due to insulation from hard knocks and ordinary reality in the ivory towers. Not that I do not, in some ways, envy those who can devote their life to the world of ideas... Nice gig, but too political for me. Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
I was briefly "radical" at an infamous institution in Cambridge, but I was most definitely not a dog with attitude. Testing my conservative, British, Christian roots and education, I briefly expressed "radical" views on the viciousness of apartheid, the human rights abuses of Latin American dictators (whose torturers were trained in the good old US of A's School of the Americas up here), on the dangerousness of nuclear power given the corporate corruption and sloppy construction standards here in God's country. I was also briefly pissed off when I interviewed for entry level jobs after college and guys who had got Ds in the Rocks for Jocks that I had got As in got offered the exectutive training program and I got offered the secretarial pool. But I got over it. When you could have a different date every night of the week (but prefer your one true love) it is hard to succumb to radical feminism. You just say "Their loss" about sexist employers and do something else. As I grew up I became disenchanted with the loose personal morals of the Left and their inability to tolerate independent thought. But I continued with my "radical" romantic love of nature and perverse fond desire to protect the environment. Nothing very consistent, as we humans are sinful and imperfect. I love all the creature comforts, but I did breastfeed all my kids two years apiece, and garden organically, and do all that frugal New England reuse, make do, do without...Our family has always been attired by that most economical of couturiers, the Thrift Shop. Like that sensible Gandhian reminder about how we should become the change we wish to see in the world.
As I have got older I have got more conservative, and I would say that now I am a dog with attitude! Beautiful in youth, homely in middle age. Popular and easy going then, eccentric and prickly now. This does not especially trouble me. My God, my family, my friends (male and female) love me as I am. I come from a long line of New England women who bury their men at 70 or so and continue at least another twenty years happily busy with their studies, their charities, their gardens, their church, their grandchildren and greatchildren, their books, their projects to preserve wilderness areas, grow libraries, cherish museums, and enjoy most of all helping out total strangers who need it. Get them jobs, give them Thanksgiving dinner, find a scholarship for their deserving kid, stand up to a person beating their dog or their child...No, we are not rich, all of us work for a living... We dogs with attitude are good friends and neighbors, loyal citizens, and know that our good and true nation need never be afraid of our criticism. But we do have teeth and we use them on rude young whippersnappers... These kids (who voted to ban the Pledge) are clueless. If they had tried such a stunt with their hero Che, they would have been shot. It's the very fact that they are Americans that gives them this privilege.
Were we all that clueless? I don't think so. I had a pretty good idea that the US was a great place to live by the time I was in college. I did have the advantage of having lived in two countries with dictatorships by then. My dad was in the air force and we lived in Spain when Franco was in power and in Panama when Torrijos was in power. I wasn't particularly politcally aware yet, but I had a great disdain for the draft-card burning, ant-military hippie types. (I broke up with a guy when I found out he'd burned his draft card.) My dad was the one who had spent a year at war away from me and the rest of the family just so these guys could do such stupid things.
Why do you need kids to recite the pledge in order to assure order, peace, and harmony?
Sounds like insecruity talking to me. Class-factotum: was the Vietnam war necessary to protect US territory? Sounds like internalized propaganda in my book. It is good to have young people challenge the dogmas that some are too frightened and old to think about. Freedom is never protected when you use the state to shove it down the peoples' throat. Good for them. I hope more people decide to get rid of it. The 'under god' part is offensive to many, not that such a thing means it shouldnt be said but it also has no place there.
We dont need to force people to recite the pledge, or at least I would hope that we do not. What good does it do? Those who disagree can still say it, those who are offended are forced to say it or stand around while others do. If someone doesnt like your religion they dont go to your church/gathering/whatever but people are not afforded the same choice when it comes to the pledge. It is possible to have a pledge to the country without needing to bring religion into it. It is possible to have proper times and places to have it said, if one wants to. Being forced to say it is wrong but I have no problem with a group getting together that wants to say it. Other than that though this article and the one that it is linked to seem to have almost nothing in common. Lots of vitriol but not focused on the supposed discussion point. Very interesting. Responding to the above, I realize that I entirely disagree. A pledge is a serious matter. If you cannot pledge to your fellow citizens, then you are not really a member of the team.
|
Radical Kids: It's about getting chicksInterview tips for college seniorsThe Americans with No Abilities Act of 2006WheelbarrowsIQ
Tracked: Mar 24, 07:02