Maggie's Farm

This was classic left wing/communist propaganda for a set up false flag event. The Democrats planned this. There are videos of busses full of BLM and Antifa activists dressed as Trump supporters but wearing black masks so they couldn't be identified. Other video of two busloads of FBI and police instigators dressed as Trump supporters who were there to cause trouble. The plan was to create an event that would distract attention from the massive and obvious stolen election. Thanks to the media and corrupt DC swamp it was all blown up into far more than they could hope for. But it was never an insurrection and would have been 100% peaceful without the BLM, Antifa and government instigators. This was a disgraceful act by the Fascist Democrats very similar to the Nazi's burning the Reichstag. It has set up the nation for civil war especially since the Fascist Democrats have decided to accelerate the great replacement. The next move by the Democrats will be war! It must be big and it must be before the election. They will find some way to put our military at risk like what happened at Pearl Harbor. OR another 9/11 attack on the homeland. Be ready, it's coming. Their (Obama and his minions) treachery knows no bounds. He intends to destroy America and he is succeeding.

"Others had firearms nearby, including on the Capitol grounds."

A blatant lie. Show me a single example of a Trump supporter there at the capitol with a gun who broke a gun law. There isn't even one example of this and that is why you are forced to doublespeak and outright lie about it.

He was a protestor. He was legally armed. He was arrested outside the capitol as he was leaving the protest. He never brandished his weapon. The arresting officer was forced to change his statement since his original statement made his search and seizure illegal. He was convicted in a DC court where any innocent white person will also be convicted. He did not attend the Trump rally. He lived nearby and went there on a whim and never thought he needed to leave his licensed gun at home. It's not as though he shot someone illegally like Michael Byrd did.

"that contradicts Lord Heathen's comment about "An American 'insurrection' where nobody even thought to bring along a gun"

So is it your position that he and he alone was an insurrectionist? And he had a legal gun but had no intent to use it??

"Shall not be infringed" Means that the federal and state government cannot prevent you from bearing arms!! You are indeed responsible for what you do with a gun under law but it is 100% constitutional to carry it openly or concealed. But of course if the government exceeds their authority and makes an unconstitutional law it is literally impossible for the common man to fight it and prevail in court because of the expense and bureaucracy. IMHO when a congress person or a legislator votes for an unconstitutional law they themselves should be charged with a crime and go to jail. The common man should not be forced to endure unconstitutional infringements on their rights.

"No rights are without limitations." Said the fascist. The limitations are that you are responsible for your actions. You have absolute freedom of speech, absolute! But if you yell fire in a crowded theater THEN you will pay a price for your actions. But your right of free speech remains unlimited.

You have a right to keep and bear arms. It was intended that this right not be infringed by government. They didn't mean it could be infringed if we got a majority in congress or the Supreme Court. They meant it could not be infringed. YES! It IS infringed because they got a majority in congress AND because they stacked the courts.

The correct interpretation of the 2nd amendment is simply that the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed by politicians or courts!! If you abuse this right and do something wrong then you suffer the consequences. YOUR government has indeed infringed on your rights AND they full intend to keep infringing on them until you are nothing but a slave to a fascist state. To do this they MUST take away all 2nd amendment rights and that and only that is what this infringement is all about. Because they cannot constitutionally take the rest of your rights if you are armed. Simple as that.

"If government can punish you for falsely yelling fire in a crowded theater, then that is, by definition, a restriction on speech."

Wrong again. The government can't constitutionally punish you for it. But anyone harmed by it could choose to sue you. The government isn't and shouldn't be Prosecutor, judge and jury.


"So, the government can’t stop a dozen or a hundred or a thousand people armed with semi-automatic weapons from approaching the president"

It happens every time the president goes out in public. BUT they are concealed. So yes if the president goes out into the public and walks around more than likely there are armed civilians around him. But if they act in an aggressive way with open display then they can be confronted.

The bottom line is the government cannot legally/constitutionally infringe upon the citizens right to keep and bear arms.

Is this a great constitution or what??