Maggie's Farm

"It's on the political right because it advocates a strict hierarchy,"
Everyone here can see that you're laboring mightily to maintain and advance that lie. But it is transparent nonsense.
For example, whether you're talking about the likes of Kendi to Hanna-Jones or a slew of other LWers, there is an explicit or implicit hierarchy underlying the issue of DIE, race, and ethnicity: black>non-Jewish Middle Eastern>central Asian>Hispanic>east Asian>white. That hierarchy may not be explicitly acknowledged by people like you, but it clearly exist, and is almost never challenged or condemned by anyone on the left.
Or there's the LW gender hierarchy: trans>gays>lesbians>pedos>straight females>straight males. Also an undeniably real LW hierarchy that is rally challenged or condemned by the left.

"authoritarian" Heh. You mean like having brownshirt type groups like antifa and BLM to further your political goals to further your political objectives?
Maybe you're referring to relying on regulation created, implemented and enforced (often with limited recourse for "violators") by unelected bureaucrats rather than made explicit in legislation that requires LW politicians to make risky votes? All you've got to do is come out in favor of a constitutional amendment making all government regulation at every level illegal, abolishing all the existing regulation and immediately terminating the jobs of the vast majority of bureaucrats.

Or maybe you're referring to forcing people to take an experimental vaccine and wear masks or hive their right curtailed?

But do go on about the right having such authoritarian tendencies. Maybe you can come up with something that Trump has done (as opposed to said) that you can reasonably call authoritarian.

"You are conflating description with prescription. Pointing out that whites have more economic and political power is descriptive. Advocating white supremacy is prescriptive."
Hum. No. I am describing what the left's preferred hierarchy is, the one they argue is the legitimate moral hierarchy. IOW, the one that is literally their prescriptive hierarchy. The one they seek to impose via social coercion, government regulation, and judicial fiat. If you're suggesting that the hierarchy I delineated is the one the right prescribes, that is even more mystifying. Since it is intentionally merely the inversion of the hierarchy the left claims the right wants.

"Because traffic without rules is surely best."
Hum. Again, no. Presumably the legislatures could still pass laws. Which is how traffic laws are typically created, as far as I know. But since you're going to pretend not to understand again, I'll be more explicit. The left has made a deliberate choice to primarily use regulations created by unelected appointees or employes and enforced by the same people rather than through legislation. Because much of the left's agenda would never be voted for by people that were periodically held to account by voters. That choice is intrinsically authoritarian. In contemporary America, the left is vastly more authoritarian than the right.

Honestly, its like you're not even trying.