Maggie's Farm

Some of us might take the fact that a black woman of such marginal skill, with such an unpleasant disposition and a huge sense of entitlement can make more in a few hours than millions of hardworking white people will make in 30 years is evidence that the country is not the horrible racist hellhole she and you insist it is.
I'm sure you think you know better.
BTW, you have evidence that the hosts weren't just Obama boot lickers wanting an opportunity to worship their idol?

There are guys who insist they're women, and progs who play along. There are Trump boot lickers who insist he's always playing 3D chess. Not only am I neither legally or morally obligated to play along, doing so is harmful both to society and the delusional individuals. Michal is a thoughly mediocre person and people who defend her or lick her boot are fools.
That aside, I'll explain the bind you've put yourself in again. Once one claims to accept as true the premises that the country is systematically racist and that racism is the exclusive or predominate cause of the disparate social and economic outcomes blacks experience in the USA, either you have to acknowledge that the country is a racist hell hole, or implicitly acknowledge a horrible moral defect that renders you unsympathetic to at least some victims of racism.
It doesn't matter how many words of diarrhea you type to try to find a way in which that binary isn't true. All the words of BS and of no consequence to a reasonable person. Much like one can't complain about illegals being bused to NYC and claim they care about illegals.

Its NIH data, Zac. And still overstates the frequency. Probably because it includes young children who disambiguate with age or with puberty and includes some self reporting.

The % of the population with any mutation on the xy chromosome that creates morphological, anatomical, or functional ambiguity or is thus for reasons related to the prenatal environment) is less than .001%. [XXYs are male and don't count] The % of the population claiming to be trans or something other than male or female with such a mutation is probably less than 1%.
Your comment is irrelevant to the conversation because the people mocking people for refusing to use binary gender terms and the people refusing to use binary gender terms are not doing so in reference to that tiny population. The people refusing to use the binary are doing so as propaganda.
Your argument is the same species of fallacy as you linking to a video from Ireland (when the conversation is about the USA), sans context, of the young black girl being denied a medal. The statical anomaly that represents a tiny fraction of a sample is never the basis for a general argument. It is, however, an obvious tell that you don't have a real argument for your claim.

Just to be clear, it doesn't matter if .5% of the population has a discernable XY mutation or .0001% does. If it were only those people involved, the left could have had a near universal consensus with the right on the subject ten years ago. Those people are clearly not who the right objects to accommodating.
The fact that you repeatedly pretend that is the case and inject those people into the conversation is another admission you can't defend your position.
It is also another clear example of bad faith and deception on your part.