Thursday morning links

"Why the Durham Report Matters/It is a damning account of the corruption of the FBI and its accomplices"

It hardly matters when there is no accounting for the activities, no corrective or punitive actions. Nice report, though.

#3 Aggie on 2023-05-18 10:03 (Reply)

Aggie: It hardly matters when there is no accounting for the activities, no corrective or punitive actions. Nice report, though.

Nice report! Just look at all the jury verdicts of guilty! It's only a matter of time before they "Lock her up!" and "Hang Mike Pence!"

#3.1 Zachriel on 2023-05-18 11:09 (Reply)

It's truly glorious watching the left reveal who they really are by supporting the Federal law enforcement and intelligence communities interfering in elections.

#3.1.1 SK on 2023-05-18 11:21 (Reply)

The 51 intelligence officers who knowingly signed onto the false statement on Hunters laptop, Obama and Biden who knew of Hillary's Russia, Russia, Russia plan, along with Hillary herself, ALL interfered in the election per 18 U.S. Code 595-Interference by administrative employees of Federal, State, or Territorial Governments.
In concert, they created the charges and prosecuted the charges under the color of law knowing they were false.

#3.1.1.1 indyjonesouthere on 2023-05-18 11:46 (Reply)

indyjonesouthere: The 51 intelligence officers who knowingly signed onto the false statement on Hunters laptop

They were former intelligence officers, so they were not in government. Nor did they claim they had specific knowledge as to the source of the laptop. In addition, there were adulterated copies of the data in circulation, while the New York Post refused to share what it claimed was the original, so it couldn't be verified by others.

indyjonesouthere: Obama and Biden who knew of Hillary's Russia, Russia, Russia plan,

Even if true, so? There was substantial evidence of connections between Trump and Russia, and between the Trump campaign and Russian agents. Meanwhile, Russia released hacked emails from the DNC with the encouragement of Trump.

indyjonesouthere: along with Hillary herself, ALL interfered in the election per 18 U.S. Code 595-Interference by administrative employees of Federal, State, or Territorial Governments.

Great! Let us see the prosecutor's statement of offense.

#3.1.1.2 Zachriel on 2023-05-18 11:53 (Reply)

There was no evidence of Trump and Russia. It was created. There was evidence of FBI agents and Russia and of Hillary connections to Russia. And the DOJ dropped charges against Wolff on the leak to media so as not to drag Warner into the fray. Add Warner to the list of the election interference gang.

The conservative treehouse blog 5/17/2023 The purposeful silos of Horowitz, Mueller, and Durham

#3.1.1.2.1 indyjonesouthere on 2023-05-18 12:16 (Reply)

indyjonesouthere: There was no evidence of Trump and Russia.

Trump's campaign manager, Paul Manafort, spent years working for Russia-aligned oligarchs. Manafort then gave Russian agents top-secret insider campaign data which allowed them to target voter precincts in battleground states with an army of social media trolls. Trump welcomed Russian election interference, including the hack of the DNC. Then the Mueller investigation detailed obstruction by Trump and his allies. Michael Flynn pleaded guilty of lying about his contacts with Russian agents. Both were pardoned by Trump.

#3.1.1.2.2 Zachriel on 2023-05-18 12:49 (Reply)

That is all a very nice narrative. After years of investigations there is no sign of reality in the narrative. But nice deflection.

#3.1.1.2.2.1 indyjonesouthere on 2023-05-18 13:56 (Reply)

indyjonesouthere: After years of investigations there is no sign of reality in the narrative.

Do you want to start with the first claim? Manafort was Trump's campaign manager. Work your way through each of the statements. Stop when you find one that is incorrect.

#3.1.1.2.2.2 Zachriel on 2023-05-18 14:11 (Reply)

And, what was Manafort found guilty of and when did the offense occur of which he was found guilty?

#3.1.1.2.2.2.1 indyjonesouthere on 2023-05-18 15:31 (Reply)

indyjonesouthere: And, what was Manafort found guilty of and when did the offense occur of which he was found guilty?

Hmm. That wasn't one of the statements. However, among other crimes, Manafort was convicted of money laundering and illegal foreign lobbying associated with Kremlin-aligned oligarchs in Ukraine. Manafort worked in Ukraine for over a decade, ending his involvement there in about 2015. He became Trump's campaign manager in 2016.

#3.1.1.2.2.2.2 Zachriel on 2023-05-18 15:53 (Reply)

So...no conviction for anything related to his time in the Trump campaign.

You're really making a fool of yourself on this.

#3.1.1.2.2.2.2.1 SK on 2023-05-18 16:22 (Reply)

SK: So...no conviction for anything related to his time in the Trump campaign.

We didn't claim there was, nor did we base our argument on Manafort's convictions. Manafort still represents a close connection between the Kremlin and Trump's campaign.

#3.1.1.2.2.2.2.2 Zachriel on 2023-05-18 16:24 (Reply)

I bet he met up with Hunter Biden and the gang. Now you now as well as I do that all that activity occurred before he was going to support Trump. And yes, you brought that up. It was a typical Z deflection.

#3.1.1.2.2.2.3 indyjonesouthere on 2023-05-18 16:09 (Reply)

indyjonesouthere: And yes, you brought that up.

Huh? We noted that Manafort "spent years working for Russia-aligned oligarchs." We didn't bring up his criminal convictions. However, it relates to his work with Kremlin-aligned oligarchs.

indyjonesouthere: I bet he met up with Hunter Biden and the gang.

That's very unlikely. Biden's involvement in Ukraine only began in 2014, after the Maidan Revolution which removed Manafort's Kremlin-aligned oligarchs from power.

indyjonesouthere: It was a typical Z deflection.

The topic was connections between the Trump campaign and Russia. That Manafort spent years working in a criminal enterprise with Kremlin-aligned oligarchs in Ukraine is certainly evidence of such a connection. That Manafort met with Russian agents and provided them secret and proprietary polling data that was used to target trolling attacks on American voters is also pertinent.

#3.1.1.2.2.2.4 Zachriel on 2023-05-18 16:22 (Reply)

The "russian" characters of the Hillary purchased dossier had no connection to Trump. Their connection is to Hillary and her dossier handlers.

conservative tree house blog may 17 2023

Durham finds the importance of Nellie Ohr. It is an endless line of grifters looking for MONEY and positions in a Hillary admin that pulled fake Russians out of thin air to aid and abate the ongoing dossier. Narrative creations and money grifters drove the dossier.
Hillary is connected to Russian corruption and Biden is connected to Ukraine corruption. No wonder they are multi-millionaires after a few years of grift and buyouts.

#3.1.1.2.2.2.4.1 indyjonesouthere on 2023-05-18 17:27 (Reply)

indyjonesouthere: The "russian" characters of the Hillary purchased dossier had no connection to Trump. Their connection is to Hillary and her dossier handlers.

Whether true or not, that doesn't refute the actual connections between the Trump campaign and Russian agents.

#3.1.1.2.2.2.4.2 Zachriel on 2023-05-18 17:34 (Reply)

What actual connections? The connections to Russian agents was from the Hillary campaign through Nellie Ohr. Her previous connections were with Victoria Nuland who was a first class diplomatic bomb in Ukraine and anywhere else she showed up. And Nuland helped keep the Biden Ukraine grift covered and personally picked leaders for the Ukraine.

#3.1.1.2.2.2.4.2.1 indyjonesouthere on 2023-05-18 17:49 (Reply)

indyjonesouthere: What actual connections?

We can—and have in direct reply to you—posted the information. We can’t make you look.

#3.1.1.2.2.2.4.2.2 Zachriel on 2023-05-18 18:07 (Reply)

The only thing you have posted is the circular BS passed along from the Ohrs, Millian, Steele, Danchenko, Glenn Simpson and Fusion GPS which is nothing more gibberish generated for distribution to the MSM and hoping voters buy that crap.

I suspect the only reason dem socialists dump on Russia is because Russia dumped Marxism before it got all of the Russians killed. But keep your chin up, you still have CCP, Cuba, and Venezuela to cheer and lead the dem/socialist team on.

#3.1.1.2.2.2.4.2.2.1 indyjonesouthere on 2023-05-18 18:20 (Reply)

AND MORE ...
FBI's Peter Strzok concealed CIA memo that Hillary was trying to "frame" Trump.

At bizpacreviewdotcom 2023-05-17

"and don't put anything in writing" FBI deputy assist director for counterintelligence Dina Corsi told team about the fake dossier.

She still have a job? Any charges filed? nothing? par for course?

#3.1.1.2.2.2.4.2.2.1.1 indyjonesouthere on 2023-05-18 19:23 (Reply)

indyjonesouthere: The only thing you have posted . . .

Among other things, we posted that Trump’s campaign manager had long time connections to Kremlin-linked oligarchs, as detailed in his corruption trial.

#3.1.1.2.2.2.4.2.2.2 Zachriel on 2023-05-18 22:33 (Reply)

Biden, Hillary, and Bill had long time connections to Oligarchs in Russia and Ukraine. Were any of these for business or for espionage and political payoffs? See Biden, Nuland, Powers, Bill, and Hillary, or the Clinton Foundation.

#3.1.1.2.2.2.4.2.2.2.1 indyjonesouthere on 2023-05-19 12:10 (Reply)

indyjonesouthere: Biden, Hillary, and Bill had long time connections to Oligarchs in Russia and Ukraine.

Look over there!

Even if true, that doesn't support your claim that "There was no evidence of Trump and Russia."

#3.1.1.2.2.2.4.2.2.2.2 Zachriel on 2023-05-19 14:47 (Reply)

SK: It's truly glorious watching the left reveal who they really are by supporting the Federal law enforcement and intelligence communities interfering in elections.

That would be a crime, yet Durham didn't bring any charges.

#3.1.2 Zachriel on 2023-05-18 11:37 (Reply)

After years of knowing Hunter Biden illegally purchased a handgun, no one in will step up and prosecute the case. It appears different laws for different people. It's like having a Soros funded prosecutor and judge. They only need know who you voted for.

#3.1.2.1 indyjonesouthere on 2023-05-18 12:33 (Reply)

Keep at it. You're doing beautifully.

Now explain why the criminal referrals DOJ IG Horwitz made on Comey and McCabe were never pursued.

It's easy, Zach. Just say, "What happened was wrong, it reflected the rule of man rather than the rule of law; what can we do to make sure this doesn't happen to someone I support?"

Maybe use one of your favorite responses--the rich and powerful get away with things ordinary citizens can't.

Of course that would require a level of honesty you don't seem to possess, but it would go some way to establishing a bit of credibility.

#3.1.2.2 SK on 2023-05-18 12:35 (Reply)

"Honesty" from the Quibble-DickZ?
Really now?

They prefer word salads topped with irrelevant deflections and a pinch of innuendo.

#3.1.2.2.1 Zachinoff on 2023-05-18 13:01 (Reply)

indyjonesouthere: After years of knowing Hunter Biden illegally purchased a handgun, no one in will step up and prosecute the case.

That case is still open. It would not be unexpected if Hunter Biden was charged in the near future. He should work towards a plea deal.

SK: Now explain why the criminal referrals DOJ IG Horwitz made on Comey and McCabe were never pursued.

Horowitz was an Inspector General and could only make a referral. Durham was a Special Counsel, and while prosecution would have to be approved by the Justice Department, he would presumably handle the prosecution himself.

Notably, Horowitz made criminal referrals, while Durham did not. A criminal referral is not a guilty verdict or even an indictment. Comey wasn't prosecuted because they didn't believe they could show he intended to violate the law. McCabe wasn't prosecuted because such cases are almost always handled administratively; and the court suggested that the investigation would probably had been dropped sooner absent pressure from Trump.

SK: "What happened was wrong, it reflected the rule of man rather than the rule of law; what can we do to make sure this doesn't happen to someone I support?"

Perhaps you are confusing unethical behavior with criminality. We haven't addressed the former because the latter is being argued.

SK: Maybe use one of your favorite responses--the rich and powerful get away with things ordinary citizens can't.

There is no doubt of that. However, Durham had the full power of the U.S. Justice Department he could bring to bear on any perpetrators. It was his job—it was his duty—to do so if he found prosecutable offenses.

#3.1.2.3 Zachriel on 2023-05-18 13:06 (Reply)

The case is still open. Riiight. It is an open and shut case and they have sat on it for years. The prosecution and judges want nothing to do with the case. Just like Durham. A can of worms.

#3.1.2.3.1 indyjonesouthere on 2023-05-18 13:36 (Reply)

indyjonesouthere: The case is still open.

Prosecutors near charging decision in Hunter Biden case

#3.1.2.3.2 Zachriel on 2023-05-18 14:15 (Reply)

Yeah, two weeks ago those "prosecutors" were oh so close to um... a "charging decision" until they found out the statute of limitations was still in effect.
Of course then, they had a show of hands of those present on who would like to prosecute the President's son.
"Don't be shy now it won't possibly affect your career here at all".

Sometimes you kiddieZ just kill me.
BWAHA!!! Lolgf !

#3.1.2.3.2.1 Zachinoff on 2023-05-18 14:51 (Reply)

Those prosecutors are as timely as the Soros prosecutors are with charging Dem voters.

#3.1.2.3.2.2 indyjonesouthere on 2023-05-18 15:35 (Reply)

Ὀψὲ θεῶν ἀλέουσι μύλοι, ἀλέουσι δὲ λεπτά

"The millstones of the gods grind late, but they grind fine." — Sextus Empiricus

#3.1.2.3.2.3 Zachriel on 2023-05-18 15:56 (Reply)

There are no gods or millstones in the democratic/socialist party. Only dead weight grifting on the taxpayer.

#3.1.2.3.2.3.1 indyjonesouthere on 2023-05-18 16:12 (Reply)

indyjonesouthere: There are no gods or millstones in the democratic/socialist party.

Not sure you understand the concept. Sun Tzu said, "The wheels of justice grind slow but grind fine." Or, if you prefer, Dr. King said, "The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.”

#3.1.2.3.2.3.2 Zachriel on 2023-05-18 16:27 (Reply)

You are talking a standard of justice for the quote but there are no standards for the gods of social justice in the democratic socialist party.

#3.1.2.3.2.3.2.1 indyjonesouthere on 2023-05-18 17:15 (Reply)

indyjonesouthere: You are talking a standard of justice for the quote but there are no standards for the gods of social justice in the democratic socialist party.

“Until the day when God will deign to reveal the future to man, all human wisdom is contained in these two words,—‘Wait and hope.’” — Alexandre Dumas, "Count of Monte Cristo"

#3.1.2.3.2.3.2.2 Zachriel on 2023-05-18 17:20 (Reply)

Human wisdom is contained in "God we Trust". All dem/socialists will require their turn in the courtroom.

#3.1.2.3.2.3.2.2.1 indyjonesouthere on 2023-05-18 17:32 (Reply)

And here is another example of FBI and DOJ arrogance in failure to respond to Congressional subpoenas. Drag feet, drag feet by the political drag queens.

sharylattkissondotcom 2023-05-18
FBI fails to comply with subpoenas seeking FBI generated FD 1023 form involving bribery scheme involving VP Joe Biden and a foreign national.

#3.1.2.3.2.3.2.2.2 indyjonesouthere on 2023-05-18 18:47 (Reply)

indyjonesouthere: Human wisdom is contained in "God we Trust".

That wasn’t so difficult, after all.

#3.1.2.3.2.3.2.2.3 Zachriel on 2023-05-18 22:35 (Reply)

It's extremely difficult for Marxists. The rest of us have no problem with it.

#3.1.2.3.2.3.2.2.3.1 indyjonesouthere on 2023-05-19 12:13 (Reply)

Notably, you're defending interference in a presidential campaign by FBI and CIA, and like I said before, it's just glorious.

"Comey wasn't prosecuted because they didn't believe they could show he intended to violate the law. McCabe wasn't prosecuted because such cases are almost always handled administratively; and the court suggested that the investigation would probably had been dropped sooner absent pressure from Trump."

You made a funny! Are those the standards again?

By the way, it was Barr who declined to pursue the unprecedented criminal referral of a former director and former acting director of FBI. Note the word "criminal" differs from the word "unethical", little buddy.

You should really stop. You're becoming more shamefully defensive about this than Keith Olberman.

On second thought, keep going, it's great to see you making an ass of yourself.

#3.1.2.3.3 SK on 2023-05-18 16:35 (Reply)

SK: Are those the standards again?

Intent is a required showing for criminal prosecution concerning classified information.

SK: By the way, it was Barr who declined to pursue the unprecedented criminal referral of a former director and former acting director of FBI.

Yes, so a Trump-appointee.

#3.1.2.3.3.1 Zachriel on 2023-05-18 16:46 (Reply)

Not sure you understand you're getting your ass handed to you over every ChatGPT comment you post!.
Cry harder, kiddieZ.

#3.1.2.3.3.1.1 Zachinoff on 2023-05-18 17:08 (Reply)

The Durham report should matter but it won't. The left is going after anyone who was in DC on Jan 6th and even many who were not there. They are crucifying them, torturing them, denying them thir rights of a defense and a fair trial. While the Durham report shows extensive criminal acts, real crimes, that will never be punished, ever! So tell me again how the Durham report changes anything.

#4 OneGuy on 2023-05-18 10:35 (Reply)

OneGuy: They are crucifying them, torturing them, denying them thir rights of a defense and a fair trial.

Please, provide at least one specific of someone denied their rights under the law.

#4.1 Zachriel on 2023-05-18 11:10 (Reply)

Did they hide 11,000 hours of video from the defense?

#4.1.1 OneGuy on 2023-05-18 11:57 (Reply)

OneGuy: Did they hide 11,000 hours of video from the defense?

That's not specific. Which defendant requested the court for access?

For instance, in United States v Sara Carpenter, Carpenter requested access to additional Capitol surveillance tapes. The judge denied the request because Carpenter failed to explain how the footage would be helpful to her case, and the prosecutors had already turned over footage that included Carpenter. Carpenter was found guilty. Carpenter does have the right to appeal this ruling, but it is unlikely to succeed. She did what she did.

QUOTE:

“The breach was made."

“Congress needs to come out. They need to certify Trump as president. This is our house."

#4.1.2 Zachriel on 2023-05-18 12:16 (Reply)

Notice the non-answer deflection to the question raised, then "Squirrel "!

Cry harder, kiddieZ.

#4.1.2.1 Zachinoff on 2023-05-18 13:08 (Reply)

Around 42% of those arrested—420 individuals—have received criminal sentences, while the rest (680 people) are waiting for their trials or haven’t yet reached plea agreements.
Per Time magazine as of 8 Mar 23.
It's been 26 months.

#4.1.3 Mark on 2023-05-18 21:49 (Reply)

Mark: Around 42% of those arrested—420 individuals—have received criminal sentences, while the rest (680 people) are waiting for their trials or haven’t yet reached plea agreements.

So? (You might want to point to a specific case for discussion.)

#4.1.3.1 Zachriel on 2023-05-18 22:38 (Reply)

More Z panic.

#5 Texan99 on 2023-05-18 11:12 (Reply)

It's called a factual argument. That Durham insinuates but doesn't prosecute undermines his report. One can't honestly claim that "extensive criminal acts, real crimes" occurred if the Special Counsel doesn't bring charges.

#5.1 Zachriel on 2023-05-18 11:16 (Reply)

Perfect crime. Durham knows he cannot win in DC courts because the entire DC court system AND the DOJ is corrupt. He filed two perfect cases just to prove that to us all. THAT is the one thing Durham did effectively; proved the corruption in DC.

#5.1.1 OneGuy on 2023-05-18 11:59 (Reply)

Factual argument?

"That Durham insinuates but doesn't prosecute undermines his report"

Opinion. No it doesn't.

"One can't honestly claim that "extensive criminal acts, real crimes" occurred if the Special Counsel doesn't bring charges."

Opinion. Yes you can.

#5.1.2 eeyore on 2023-05-18 12:07 (Reply)

OneGuy: Durham knows he cannot win in DC courts because the entire DC court system AND the DOJ is corrupt.

Durham's job was to "investigate whether any federal official, employee, or any other person or entity violated the law in connection with the intelligence, counter-intelligence, or law-enforcement activities directed at the 2016 presidential campaigns" and to "to prosecute federal crimes arising from his investigation". That was his job.

eeyore: No it doesn't.

Of course it does. As noted above, Durham's job was to investigate for crimes, and, if found, prosecute those crimes. If he didn't do that, that means he either didn't do his job, or he did his job and did not find any prosecutable offenses, but huffs and puffs anyway. Regardless of which, it undermines his report.

You can certainly reach your own conclusions; however, Durham investigated and found no chargeable offenses, so he would not be authoritative support for your position.

#5.1.3 Zachriel on 2023-05-18 12:25 (Reply)

CRT has a scholarship program. Get your PHD is Marxist theology.

#6 indyjonesouthere on 2023-05-18 11:19 (Reply)

CRT has a scholarship problem only if you think of scholarship in racist, privileged, patriarchal heteronormative terms, you Nazi. There are other ways of knowing, you know, and not every scholar is literate or capable of abstract thought. And there's nothing wrong with being a drooling idiot. Drooling idiots are just as capable of being brain surgeons and rocket scientists as anybody.

#6.1 Jerryskids on 2023-05-18 11:38 (Reply)

Here are the basic elements of dysfunctional studies in CRT and the new Marxism.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lc0684V2ej8

#6.1.1 indyjonesouthere on 2023-05-18 11:57 (Reply)

If CPUSA (D) cities look like a WWII German city after a 1000 bomber firestorm raid, that is not my problem.
Enjoy your Fundamental Transformation.
In third grade we learned that if you don't have enough free candy for everyone than leave it at home and the comrades will learn the hard way as they live the Bane Gotham workers utopia dream.
CRT is Cultural Marxism and Intersectionality is Great Leap Potato Maoism meant for the intellectually dull craving a scapegoat for their own spiteful mutant mediocrity.
In the Great Leap Forward the drooling idiot was promoted to brain surgeon while the scalpel master was demoted to janitor, all in the name of egalitarian equity.
The poems of hardcore Satanist Marx said that his everlasting curses would burn down the world.
Just read a Russian (thoughtcrime/wrongthink) blog page about so you want to start a revolution while revealing that Putin has 80% approval rating and the Metro is so clean you could see your reflection on the tile on the way to the Sarmat rated civil defense bunkers.
This lame Jacobin Mao's Red Guards LARP will pass in the FUSA but it will only get worse for awhile under Brandon and the Rainbow Potato regime.

#7 Abby Normal Fears No AI on 2023-05-18 13:42 (Reply)

FOUND FOOTAGE: Bud Light Parent AB InBev Commits to Purging White, Male Employees.

https://thenationalpulse.com/2023/05/18/found-footage-bud-light-parent-ab-inbev-commits-to-purging-white-male-employees/

#8 feeblemind on 2023-05-18 14:25 (Reply)

I don't think these companies and these people understand what they are saying and doing. Simply turn it around and see how it sounds and looks; that is, put white men in these videos and sound bites whining about there not being enough white men and how they want to stand up for their rights as white men, yada, yada, yada and see how it plays. OMG that's racist! Yes!

So I as a white male can't really do much about Budweiser's choice to embrace racism. I can't stop them, I can't make them understand, the world we live in has intentionally made my opinion irrelevant. All I can do is not buy their product. So that is what I will do. And it makes me feel good, fighting racism and misandry.

I literally do not watch the alphabet TV channels at all anymore exactly for this reason. The racism and misandry is blatant. Our world has devolved into tribes all demanding attention and special treatment while at the same time insisting that white males be denied and punished. The POC supremacy is out of hand and getting worse. I may check back on the alphabet channels from time to time just to see if they have resorted to public assassinations of white males for past thought crimes of people long dead. But pretty much they can keep their beer and their football and hate studies I will just go on with my life and only patronize businesses that don't hate me.

#8.1 OneGuy on 2023-05-18 16:34 (Reply)

My local store was out of bottled Yingling, but had Bud light on sale. I settled for Yingling in cans.

I've bought Bud Light perhaps twice in the last 5 years. They won't miss me, but they're missing others.

#8.1.1 Mark on 2023-05-18 21:55 (Reply)

Don't know about the US, but here in Canada it's been known for a long time that the vet school have tilted seriously in favour of marks as an easy way of picking students. The result has been that there has been an overabundance of highly academic women, usually from the cities where they had access to advanced academic programs in high school, who have no concept of the realities of a vet's life and how often flame out after a few years in practice. Meanwhile, other students - still academically strong but not high-flyers and often having to take heavier courses because living away from home and don't have the luxury of taking an extra year for a degree - get bypassed even though they are temperamentally and otherwise more suited to be vets. The result has been too many city vets and not enough rural vets, as well as a high attrition rate.
Attempts are being made to solve this but in the meantime aspiring vets who can't get into one of Canada's five schools (was four but University of Calgary opened a vet school with the emphasis on large animal care) go abroad. Know one who ended up in Slovakia and discovered that the European model of teaching was right up his/her alley. Did extremely well, topped the class, and returned home to Canada to pursue the career had always dreamed of.
As for not wanting a "vet of colour", I'm looking for competence when I visit any professional. My current vet happens to be white, but that's the least of my concerns. Vet and staff being able to cope with cranky cat is much more of an issue; that they can do it with humour and competence is wonderful.

#9 Frances on 2023-05-18 23:33 (Reply)

Add Comment

Name
Email	(Your e-mail will not show in your comment)
Homepage
In reply to
Comment	By commenting on this site you agree to the site rules listed here. Email addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for email notifications. Quick reference guide: [i] italics [/i], [b] bold [/b], [u] underline [/u], [url] (web address) [/url]. More tips here. Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (word), underscore are made via _word_. E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications. To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly. Enter the string from the spam-prevention image above: BBCode format allowed
	Remember Information? Subscribe to this entry

Maggie's Farm

Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page

Categories

Quicksearch

Links

Blog Administration

RSS Readers

Thursday, May 18. 2023

Thursday morning links