Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Saturday, July 2. 2022Saturday morning links“The Act of Mourning Itself is a Final, Destitute Version of Love.” A Reading List For the Grieving How the Higgs Boson Ruined Peter Higgs’s Life Twitter suspends Jordan Peterson: why? These are the words colleges don't want you to say The Insufferable Arrogance of the Constantly Wrong "Take that restorative justice bull**** and shove it up your ***es" Fun news summary: TGIF: Temps Are Up, Stocks Are Down, Plus: Suitcases of cash for the Prince of Wales; defunding the police for West Hollywood. What If People Actually Controlled The Government? Smart Democrats understand the big reasons behind the Supreme Court’s decisions Supreme Court Reins In The Regulatory Beast Biden: Americans Will Stomach High Gas Prices “As Long As It Takes” Dutch Farmers Livid Over EU's 'Green' Nitrogen Rule Block Border Between Holland And Germany After Destroying Individual Rights, China’s President Xi Arrives at 25th Anniversary of Handover to Claim “Beginning of True Democracy in Hong Kong” Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
It looks like the recession may have started now. Our economy, as measured by the GDP, shrank by -1.6% in Q1, and although the first official estimate for Q2 won't be released until July 28th, it appears to be in the negative as well, according to the Atlanta Fed:
https://www.atlantafed.org/cqer/research/gdpnow Latest estimate: -2.1 percent — July 1, 2022 Are the signs quietly starting to make themselves apparent? https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/campus-texas-am-housing-resort-style-rooftop-pool-defaults-debt-payment Historically, the economy around the Bryan/College Station region is remarkably stable because of the proportionally large student body to overall population; Business is steady, unemployment rates are always low, and growth is positive almost without exception. But the pre-COVID building boom years have come to an end. I wonder if the higher education industry is going to be one of the bellwethers of the coming recession? Aggie,
The retail parking lots, especially for restaurants, are still mostly full all day, and with more than 70,000 students now in a community of 225,000, this likely will continue. But like you, I wonder what’s ahead. Eventually, the wheels have to fall off. The newish apartment complex near me is at less than 80 percent capacity, yet The city just approved the building of another complex next to it. Regardless, one result has been the transformation of University Drive across from campus into a brutal canyon of high-rise monstrosities like the one discussed at Zero Hedge. QUOTE: There is not a country or region in the world where its citizens would allow those who are not patriotic, or even traitors to get hold of political power Chinese President Xi JinpingAmerican democrats say, hold my beer. "Ravens linebacker Jaylon Ferguson's death caused by fentanyl and cocaine, official says"
If he had been restrained by the police we would have a Summer of riots and an innocent policeman would be sentenced to life in prison. George Floyd died from an overdose not from a knee. Derek Chauvin was merely restraining him after he became violent. Free Derek Chauvin The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step, and the Supreme Court has taken only the first step toward reining in the regulatory state. It will take many steps to cut the bureaucracy down to size.
The admin state needs to be neutered and fitted with a shock collar. If Congresscritters will not step up and be accountable for regulations, then they need immediate replacement. Anyone who regulates needs to stand for election.
I think I may have suffered permanent brain damage by reading about the Higgs Field and Higgs Boson. That stuff is just incomprehensible to me.
Twitter suspends Jordan Peterson: why? Because they can! And they can't STAND the gaff!
These are the words colleges don't want you to say: Scaredy cats!! The Insufferable Arrogance of the Constantly Wrong: I just ignore them. Biden: Americans Will Stomach High Gas Prices “As Long As It Takes”: I'm sure Kamala will kick him out {palace coup) snopercod, we're all immersed in the BoZone cloud, now... The list of books for grief is aggressively secular. The best interpretation is that it is merely obliviously secular.
I think most lists put CS Lewis's A Grief Observed on, even if only for politeness sake to the Christians. No longer needed, I suppose. It is a complicated and painful book, but solid. Many of Emily Dickinson's poems also deal with grieving, some of them highly distilled.
Dutch Farmers:
Good for them. Unfortunately, nothing will happen and ultimately, we will be having a worldwide famine. They're destroying agriculture in places with good, effectively agricultural practices. In the US, California's destroying agriculture and the mismanagement of water in western reservoirs in the name of ecology will kill off what left. Fertilizer, even before the recent recession, was reaching astronomical prices in the US. Why the h**l BILL GATES is one of the largest owners of agricultural land in the US is concerning. I don't see him as a former state president of FFA from his high school days. The push in Sri Lanka towards total organic farming sent them into a tail spin -- but that hasn't given pause to the idiots in the IS and the EU who know nothing about actual farming from making asinine regulations on agriculture. We screwed. Their going to bring back mask and vaccine mandates before the election. What do you want to bet that all the same people protesting now demanding >my body my choice" will also demand mask and vaccine mandates?
QUOTE: What If People Actually Controlled The Government? QUOTE: a fourth branch of government gradually came into existence. It is what we now call the administrative state. It consists of millions of employees with maximum power who answer to absolutely no one. That is incorrect. The president, while constrained by law, appoints the heads of agencies, and regulations are subject to judicial review. Furthermore, the legislature can change the system in whole or in part. QUOTE: This system was created with one piece of legislation in 1883 called the Pendleton Act. The civil service preceded the Pendleton Act. What the Pendleton Act did was require that civil servants earn their position based on merit, not political favor. Heads of departments are still political offices that serve at the pleasure of the President. QUOTE: The administrative state even got its own constitution in 1946 called the Administrative Procedures Act. Which requires public input into rulemaking, and enshrined judicial review. QUOTE: Two weeks before the election, the Trump administration innovated a solution. It was Executive Order 13957 that created a new category of federal employment called Schedule F. Any employee involved at any level in policy making would be subject to presidential oversight. . . This order was immediately reversed by Biden when he took office, So, the president does have the power of oversight. QUOTE: The Insufferable Arrogance of the Constantly Wrong . . . While there is a mountain of medical literature available demonstrating quite clearly the failure of these vaccines to prevent infection and transmission So, we checked the first citation: QUOTE: The dramatic change in vaccine effectiveness from June to July is likely to be due to both the emergence of the delta variant and waning immunity over time, compounded by the end of masking requirements in California and the resulting greater risk of exposure in the community. So, the vaccines did work to prevent infection, but the facts changed. They conclude: QUOTE: Our findings underline the importance of rapidly reinstating nonpharmaceutical interventions, such as indoor masking and intensive testing strategies, in addition to continued efforts to increase vaccinations, as strategies to prevent avoidable illness and deaths and to avoid mass disruptions to society during the spread of this formidable variant. Furthermore, if our findings on waning immunity are verified in other settings, booster doses may be indicated. "the importance of rapidly reinstating nonpharmaceutical interventions, such as indoor masking"
Even though the science says masking does not work. BUT, masking does work for political agendas! and intensive testing strategies Why?? Why test everyone why not only test those who are sick and go to a health care facility? The testing should be for sick people in order to determine the correct treatment. "in addition to continued efforts to increase vaccinations" The government lied to us, they hid the facts and covered up the deaths and side effects of the vaccine. Why would any sane and informed person continue to believe the government on this. The CDC needs a complete house cleaning and we need to disassociate ourselves from WHO. "and to avoid mass disruptions to society during the spread of this formidable variant." Nothing we did stopped the virus. We locked down for 2 years when it was supposed to be two weeks to slow thew spread and it didn't do diddly squat. Everyone (just about everyone) got the virus and everyone with very poor health died from the virus. The ONLY thing that the lockdowns did was allow the Dems to steal an election and destroyed millions of small businesses. The federal government literally has no authority to lock us down! Science does not say that masking does not work. If you only read those sites that agree with you, they will find the studies to make you think so. I will remind the other readers that OneGuy is the person who argued that if vaccines don't work 100% of the time, then they aren't real vaccines.
It doesn't seem to occur to you that those people also have an agenda, usually even worse. tsk tsk! You told a lie. I never said "if vaccines don't work 100% of the time, then they aren't real vaccines." I am a believer in vaccines and have on occasion said that vaccines have saved a billion or two lives. The covid vaccine is different from all previous vaccines and the CDC and the pharmaceuticals have themselves (finally) agreed that the vaccine does not prevent you from getting covid. So is it a "vaccine" or an experiment with deadly side effects? Time will tell.
"IF" masks worked they would be a deadly biological hazard that would require proper disposal. But walk around any city and you will see masks littering the street and no one cares. If you put a mask on it must be carefully fitted and even taped to your face to prevent it from leaking around the edges. 99.999% of mask wearers do not do this so their mask blissfully expels all their breath (and any viruses) out the sides. By definition that means they do not work. Prove me wrong! Where the wild ass claims come in is that masks catch droplets and perhaps 8% more or less of the virus and germs you expel with each breath. By any definition that means they don't work!! But by the fairy unicorn definition you are using that means they are somewhat effective. IMHO you are welcome to continue to delude yourself and use your delusion to try to prove others to be wrong. It's kinda fun to watch. If the mask says "Not a medical device" on the 50-pack you just bought - then it's ability to stop the virus is likely negligible.
OneGuy: Even though the science says . . .
The author was making a faulty argument, and apparently didn't even read his own citation which contradicted his position. OneGuy: So is it a "vaccine" . . . Yes, it's a vaccine. OneGuy: Where the wild ass claims come in is that masks catch droplets and perhaps 8% more or less of the virus and germs you expel with each breath. Nearly all the viruses are expelled in aerosols or larger droplets. Masks can be very effective in some situations, but not in others. Masks are largely effective at stopping both the inhalation and exhalation of larger droplets. Their effectiveness with aerosols depends on the level of saturation. "Masks can be very effective in some situations, but not in others."
Weasel words. You can see this lie coming a mile off. Either they work, which means it prevents the transmission of the disease or it doesn't. Would a health care professional in Africa treating ebola patients "just use a paper or cloth mask??? Of course not! Why? Because they do not prevent the transmission of communicable diseases. So why does our government and other governments want to mandate masks? Why wouldn't they take some positive steps to save lives in a pandemic and avoid things like masks and lockdowns??? The answer is simple; control! If they control you they get power over you. That is why before the politics fully took over the convenient covid pandemic crisis they were telling you what all health care professionals knew which is mask don't work (again working means absolute protection from contracting the disease). Masks, lockdowns 6 feet of separation and all the mandates are political not medical. In 1st world Western countries with decent health care we have a lot of people, older people, people with serious health problems, etc. who were sitting ducks for covid. In most of the 3rd world the vast majority of the population is younger and healthy and they could generally contract covid and survive it. Masks weren't going to protect them. Isolation or six feet of separation wasn't going to protect them. They were weak in in the end stages of their life and covid was too much for them. But covid was like a gift from god for the left. It was a crisis and had to be exploited and it was. Now, the exploiters, have to keep telling you that those things they used to exploit you were for your own good. Partly to keep you from seeing through the past scam and also because they are getting ready to use it again. Don't trust them, they lied, they caused death and serious injuries with full knowledge of what they were doing and they intend to do it again. It saddens me to realize our government/the Democrats have become the enemy within and they have just begun destroying the country it will get worse. JustMe: Either they work, which means it prevents the transmission of the disease or it doesn't.
Either seat belts save all lives or they don't work at all. Not a good comparison. It would be more appropriate if you used an example of seat belts that weren't attached. But that is what you must do when you have a losing hand but your job is to spread lies about it.
On the package that manufacturer packages their medical masks in it says not effective against viruses. But I wish it did work. Wouldn't that be great. You could just put on a mask and never get sick. But alas that is pure bullshit brought to you by an oppressive government. And then they hire fools like you to post your crap online to scare the Kulaks. Obey or else. All your freedoms belong to me!
#12.2.1.1.1
JustMe
on
2022-07-03 21:20
(Reply)
JustMe: Not a good comparison.
It was pointing to your fallacious reasoning. Your reasoning doesn't become sound even if your conclusion is correct. (It's not.)
#12.2.1.1.1.1
Zachriel
on
2022-07-03 21:29
(Reply)
"Your reasoning doesn't become sound even if your conclusion is correct. (It's not.)"
Clearly you didn't take science or math in school. A seat belt is not a mask (talk about fallacious reasoning). When you have covid and you exhale, cough or sneeze you expel millions of virus. If your mask (at best) prevented 8% of that virus from becoming airborne that leaves a mere millions of times more virus released into the air than is needed to infect someone. That means that a mask doesn't work, cannot work and scientists and politicians know it doesn't work. There is a known and accepted standard for the desired and necessary reduction in pathogens to make something (air, water, food) safe and that standard is 99.9999% reduction in those pathogens. At best a cloth or paper face mask reduces pathogens by 8%. That means it allows 92% of those pathogens to become airborne. Again; that means it does NOT work. It cannot work, we have always known it cannot work BUT what masking does is confuse the uninformed (like yourself) and coalesces around the belief that the government is doing something. AND masks become a visual and constant reinforcement of the fear and your need to support the politicians who are protecting you and the proof of that is they are making other people wear masks in your presence. It is PERFECT for controlling the hoi polloi but useless for controlling disease.
#12.2.1.1.1.1.1
JustMe
on
2022-07-04 11:17
(Reply)
JustMe: Clearly you didn't take science or math in school. A seat belt is not a mask (talk about fallacious reasoning).
Your reasoning was of the form: "Either they work, which means it prevents the {all} transmission of the disease or it doesn't." If you meant that if it works, it prevents {some} transmission of the disease or it doesn't, then your statement wouldn't be fallacious, but you clearly suggested the former. The following is an actual argument, but based on a faulty understanding of the mechanisms involved. JustMe: When you have covid and you exhale, cough or sneeze you expel millions of virus. Nearly all the virus particles are contained in droplets or aerosols. JustMe: If your mask (at best) prevented 8% of that virus from becoming airborne that leaves a mere millions of times more virus released into the air than is needed to infect someone. Not sure where you got the 8% from, but even given that, it reduces the concentration of virus in the atmosphere. Depending on the overall concentration, that may be sufficient to reduce the probability of infection. In a closed space, such as a crowded bar or medical ward for COVID patients, that would not be sufficient to prevent infection; but in many public places that are reasonably ventilated and offering sufficient social distance, it can significantly reduce the risk of infection. See Cheng et al., Face masks effectively limit the probability of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, Science 2021.
#12.2.1.1.1.1.1.1
Zachriel
on
2022-07-04 11:27
(Reply)
You either don't get it or are comfortable lying in the face of the facts.
Either it works, which means you don't contract or transmit the disease or it does not. There is no second place. You cannot proudly proclaim masks are good and acknowledge that people who wear masks still get or transmit the disease while wearing them. At best, the mask catches 8% of the virus and allows 92% to pass. This is not good no matter how much lipstick you put on it. Knowing this and knowing that the government little Eichmans knew it too tells you that it is all politics and not about preventing the transmission of the virus. Which in turn also explains why you are being told to defend it. It is a powerful control mechanism for the state almost as powerful as the Burka. That is why the Democrats are trying to bring it back before this November. Mandates is an excellent example of misuse of power and an effective way to divide the people. It's like a national HOA run by Karens with unlimited power.
#12.2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1
JustMe
on
2022-07-04 14:40
(Reply)
JustMe: Either it works, which means you don't contract or transmit the disease or it does not. There is no second place.
That is incorrect. There is a probability of infection, with one factor being the viral load received. A citation was provided above.
#12.2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1
Zachriel
on
2022-07-04 14:43
(Reply)
Asadi et al., Efficacy of masks and face coverings in controlling outward aerosol particle emission from expiratory activities, Nature Scientific Reports 2020: "surgical masks and unvented KN95 respirators, even without fit-testing, reduce the outward particle emission rates by 90% and 74% on average during speaking and coughing, respectively, compared to wearing no mask, corroborating their effectiveness at reducing outward emission."
#12.2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.2
Zachriel
on
2022-07-04 14:53
(Reply)
Surgical masks and KN95 are totally different BUT neither is prescribed for level 4 diseases. Why?!? Because even those will not protect you from infection.
BUT also they must be sealed to your face AND disposed of as medical bio-hazard AND if you touch them they must be replaced immediately with a fresh mask. So, seriously, are you just deflecting here or do you really think the general population can abide by all those requirements. NO! We were talking about the cloth or paper masks that the government made us all wear in preparation to making us all wear Burkas. Those masks DO NOT WORK. You can cite who ever you like it won't change the fact that those masks will not prevent infection. Not 8%, not any % they simply do not work.
#12.2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.2.1
JustMe
on
2022-07-04 19:15
(Reply)
JustMe: BUT neither is prescribed for level 4 diseases. Why?!?
Your question is answered in the papers you haven't bother to read. When the level of infected aerosols in the air are high, then most masks will not offer enough protection. However, wearing masks in public places where there is sufficient ventilation and enough room to maintain social distance can significantly reduce the probability of infection. QUOTE: Cheng et al: The probability of infection changes nonlinearly with the amount of respiratory matter to which a person is exposed. If most people in the wider community wear even simple surgical masks, then the probability of an encounter with a virus particle is even further limited. In indoor settings, it is impossible to avoid breathing in air that someone else has exhaled, and in hospital situations where the virus concentration is the highest, even the best-performing masks used without other protective gear such as hazmat suits will not provide adequate protection. JustMe: You can cite who ever you like . . . In other words, you grant that your opinions are impervious to evidence.
#12.2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.2.1.1
Zachriel
on
2022-07-04 21:26
(Reply)
"In other words, you grant that your opinions are impervious to evidence."
Citations are asked for on the internet for two reasons. To stifle opinions and to be used to trash the citation. Your citations are simply you practicing a fantasy that is you find someone who agrees with you and you cite them therefore you must be right. I'm not going to do your homework for you. If you actually researched this issue then you would indeed know that there is considerable research that support the simple and logical conclusion that masks (cloth and paper) do not prevent the transmission of disease; not a little and not at all. You can cite whoever you like and common sense proves you wrong.
#12.2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.2.1.1.1
JustMe
on
2022-07-05 17:01
(Reply)
"wearing masks in public places where there is sufficient ventilation and enough room to maintain social distance can significantly reduce the probability of infection."
Which is exactly the mandated situation we had during the pandemic and a million or so died and 200 million got covid. So, what, exactly do you mean by " reduce the probability of infection"? If masks worked there would have been no pandemic.
#12.2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.2.1.1.2
JustMe
on
2022-07-05 17:06
(Reply)
JustMe: So, what, exactly do you mean by " reduce the probability of infection"?
Asked and answered. JustMe: If masks worked there would have been no pandemic. Black and white thinking.
#12.2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.2.1.1.2.1
Zachriel
on
2022-07-05 21:07
(Reply)
re Dutch Farmers Livid Over EU's 'Green' Nitrogen Rule Block Border Between Holland And Germany
Because they want you to eat bugs. |