Maggie's Farm

"complicated feelings about Trump"
"Today, a RINO is a Republican who doesn’t believe Rudy Giuliani’s fever dreams about a stolen election."

The evidence that Trump won by a landslide is overwhelming. The author must know this, they cannot be that ignorant. If they insist on believing Biden won they would be wise to keep it to themselves since it makes them look stupid or biased.

The steal of the 2020 election was the crime of the century and may well lead to the downfall of our country. Many people haven't grasped the gravity of what the far left did Nov 4th

It's kinda personal for you now isn't it?

You can try to keep up the fantasy that Biden won, I don't care. But you know and I know that on Nov 4th there was massive voter fraud and in half a dozen states elected and appointed politicians and judges colluded with the far left who stole the election. The Democrats have made a policy of stealing elections and the Republicans for decades have just accepted it. But this one was different for many reasons. Mostly because the steal was so blatant. But also because unlike past stolen local or state elections this one disenfranchised about 80 million Trump voters and they won't forget. The repercussions of the big steal are not over, there are 81 million voters who are still pissed.

You don't get better confirmation that you are right than having Zach try to discredit you.

Zach is the exact opposite of Diogenes. He carries a gas light and roams the internet searching for someone who speaks the truth so he can try to dissuade others from believing it.

It all begs the question; If 81 million people believe that the election was stolen the government has the obligation to have a bi-partisan investigation and a complete release of the information gathered. Instead what you get, as Zach pointed out, is partisan judges denying justice and covering up the facts.

There is a great opportunity thanks to the documentary 2000 mules where they documented 45,000 people, numerous NGOs and politicians involved in a massive election fraud (although small percentage of the total extensive steal) Prosecute them and get them to turn states evidence to turn over the names of people up the chain who committed these crimes. Make these names and criminal acts known to everyone.

"Drop boxes are meant to be convenient. So, if you are on your way to work, or someone making deliveries, you may pass the same boxdrop multiple times. Furthermore, people can, in most cases, legally drop off ballots for other people, such as family members."

OOPS! You screwed up! I can only assume you have not seen 2000 Mules. If you had seen it you would know a few important facts that illustrate your stupidity.

First, it is called 2000 mules even though there were about 45,000 mules because they chose such a high bar to accuse these mules of crimes. They wanted to make sure it was an open and shut case against them so fools like you couldn't just make those stupid excuses you just made. These 2000 mules visted (not drove by) 5 or more drop boxes AND dropped of 9 or more ballots at each one AND took pictures of each drop (so they could prove it to get paid) AND visited at least two NGOs each time they drove the route to pick up ballots AND called the NGOs (and in a few cases the well known politicians like Stacy Abrhams).

Second; they have video. Most of the drop boxes had video cameras. The know who they were, how many ballots they stuffed, what car they drove, how often they did it, saw them take pictures with their cell phones like an Amazon delivery guy...

Third; they have extensive cell phone tracking (i.e. where they were, where they stopped, etc. AND extensive cell phone activity (i.e. who they coordinated these crimes with, namesm date and time, etc.)

The documentary was perfect! A DA could simply use the evidence that they found and prosecute.

An added gem from the movie. During the extended elections an incident happened that inadvertently confirmed that they were knowingly and intentionally breaking laws. A mule (unrelated to what the documentary showed) was prosecuted for ballot stuffing and the evidence against him was his fingerprints on the ballot envelopes. The next day the mules started wearing gloves to stuff the ballots!!!

Boom!!! (mic drop).

They actually have the evidence. They have the names, phone numbers, video, their travel as they committed, these crimes, who they colluded with by phone and who that person colluded with, the NGO's where they picked up the fake ballots, how many ballots were stuffed in these drop off sites, and more.

Why weren't any of these people arrested and brought to trial? That is the question of the century that follows the crime of the century. Why indeed? My best guess is that in those "Trumpiest of states" that coercion and intimidation is being employed by the DOJ and perhaps even a little payola to boot. It is like asking why since we know all the names weren't any of Jeffrey Epstein's wealthy and powerful clients and guests been at least named and perhaps investigated? But we know why, because our FBI is corrupt and our justice system is dysfunctional.

"Each ballot is assigned to a specific registered voter"
I have to admit I didn't expect something that stupid from you. Under "normal" circumstances the signature on mail in ballots is "attempted" to be verified. Under the rules put in place during the pandemic every ballot got counted even if they couldn't verify the signature. In Pennsylvania they got back 140,000 more mail in ballots than they printed and mailed out and they were all counted.

I have to tell you that you are at a real disadvantage here since you apparently didn't see the documentary. You literally don't know what you are talking about.