Maggie's Farm

Everyone keeps getting it wrong. It isn't "anti-,askers". They do not care if you choose to wear a mask or not. They are in that way pro-mask and pro-civil rights. Wear two masks if you want to, wear three, we don't care. Do not try to use force to make me wear a mask ESPECIALLY since we know they don't work they are merely a psychotic 'tic' and an opportunity to be a 'Karen'. Don't involve me in your psychosis. Wear your mask, feel safe, whistle past graveyards, just leave us normal people alone.

"Partial strategy" Meaning... what?
Cloth masks at best will filter out 8% of germs and virus you exhale. At worst they filter out zero but become deadly themselves. It takes about 7-15 virus to infect you. The head of a pin can hold millions of virus as they are quite small. An infected person can exhale, cough or sneeze millions of virus. Now quick math tells you that 8% of millions far exceeds the 7-15 virus necessary to infect you. SO HOW do cloth masks "protect" you??? Not do they work a little! Not do they offer "some" protection! BUT, how do cloth masks protect you??? If you still get sick while wearing them isn't that the definition of "they don't work"??? Almost everyone of the 100 million plus who got covid and the over 600,000 who died from covid were abiding by the mask and distance mandates. Did the cloth masks "protect" them??? Of course not, but the ironic answer is that they may have prevented 8% of the virus that killed them from entering their body while allowing 92% in.

The greater risk from communicable viruses may be in what you touch and entering your body through your eyes, These two access routes are probably more dangerous than merely breathing in normal social circumstances. Where is the government mandated eye protection and gloves???

The mask obsession is a mental disorder. The science isn't there all that exists to support mask mandates is superstition. Most of those who want mask mandates are merely psychotic Karens. They should either be roundly ignored as stupid fools OR required to abide by their own obsession. Require them to wear a mask 24/7 even while eating or alone in their home. Failing to abide by these rules should be met with 24 hours in jail for each infraction. Take the "fun" out of being a Karen.

It would be awesome if masks worked, Wear a mask and never get a communicable disease. It would be AWESOME, but they don't. The ONLY value to masks is to make it look like the politicians are doing something.

There is a very simple and constitutional solution to this problem. If you like masks or believe in them wear them. If you choose not to wear them that is your right. Problem solved.

I could show you a study that hanging garlic around your neck will prevent infection. I would hope you don't simply pick studies that agree with your preconceptions and assume you are really smart. Masks do not work. You can make all the argument you want to but IF they WORKED you could replace those expensive hazmat suits they were to treat ebola.

They don't work! Maybe they work8% BUT in order to protect you they must work 100% (actually 99,9999%, I rounded up).

Go to your local sewer treatment plant and take a glass of effluent as it arrives to be treated and filter it through you mask and drink it. Please hang a sign around your neck saying that you filtered the crap 8% SO... it must be safe. You will need the sign because you will probably never be able to tell anyone.

Masks DON'T WORK! I wish to god they did. And the supposed 8% that the DO work drops to zero after you wear them for mere minutes and they become bio-hazards after that. Masks not only don't work but they are a really stupid idea.

That is laughable from someone who has demonstrated that they don't understand science or how so-called "studies" are actually done. You wallow in your ignorance and Become a Karen to others.

"They don't work well when the amount of virus in the air is very high, such as COVID wards."

I am flummoxed by who stupid that statement is and how you think it proves you right. It absolutely proves that MASKS DON'T WORK.


"A basic cloth mask works well in areas where the amount of virus in the air is low, such as in not overly crowded public spaces."

Again and incredible level of stupidity. Cloth masks work well in areas where there a low ampounts of virus BUT they work about as "well" as no mask.

MOST everyone who contracted covid did so while abiding by the mask and distance rules. IF the masks worked NO ONE wearing a mask would have contracted covid. But the KEY to your wishy washy language is the word "well". How well do masks work? Cloth masks worn worn correctly will stop about 8% of exhaled virus. Is that "WELL" enough??? You would have to be incredibly stupid to believe it is. About s stupid as believing that once you sit down in a restaurant you won't catch or transmit the virus. Or if you leave a bar before 10 PM you won't catch or transmit the virus.

I especially love the distance rule. 6 feet or 2 meters if you are in Canada. But wait... 2 meters is more than 6 feet! SO! Which one is correct??? Neither! Did you seriously think there was anything magical about 6 feet? Or even 100 feet. Although to misquote you 100 feet would work "well".

Your a fool, and worse, you are a clueless fool. Google video of smoke through mask. Watch it. See how "well" masks work.

I wish Peer-reviewed meant what you think it does. It is literally meaningless. Virtually everything we believed 200 years ago has been proved wrong and it was all peer reviewed and "settled science" then. There is one thing about cloth masks that we absolutely know and cannot be refuted. They do not prevent transmission of all virus. Simple as that. You can study it and twist the date and do data dredges of other fake studies and you cannot change that simple fact. At best a simple mask available to all of us will merely force your exhalation to the person behind you instead of directly in front of you. The air/exhale takes the path of least resistance and it is NOT through the mask.

"The study showed that cloth masks reduce the probability of infection"

There is a huge fault in that logic. What the masks do is filter out a small percentage of virus and germs, That does NOT equate to reduced infections. A test under the same exact conditions with a mask and without would result in exactly the same number of infections. The reason is simple: if you breathe in someone elses exhalations it matter not if there are 100 million virus or if there are 92 million virus. You are conflating the filtering percentage with the infection percentage. PLEASE, take some science and math classes and perhaps a logic class as well.

"Large droplets tend to fall quickly due to gravity".

As it applies to rain; YES. As it applies to the extremely small micro-droplets in exhalation; NO. You are simply wrong. But the question was: Is six feet right? Should it be 60 feet? Is 60 feet even enough? The simple fact is that if you walk into a room where there are 100 people sick with a highly transmittable virus you WILL catch it even if you stay 60 feet away.

I suggest you look up the PPE equipment necessary to fully protect you from viruses.

The biggest scientific hoax in history, before the AGW hoax, was silent spring. It was wrong on everything. The list of "peers" who agreed with it and doubled down on it is huge. Still to this day you will find people wallowing in their ignorance over silent spring. Eventually most people will come to realize that which we call global warming/climate change is an elaborate hoax to gain massive amounts of money and power. The list of peers for the global warming hoax is even greater than the Silent Spring dupes and useful idiots.

I do not believe for a second that you actually believe in the mask hoax. You are merely part of the far left and will say anything to further their cause. I doubt you have said anything honest in your entire adult life.

Perfect! You do realize that most people today have seen the evidence that Silent Spring was a book full of hoaxes. Most people today realize that they were lied to and many/most of the scientific community that lied about it knew they were lying. But it furthered a "good cause" so it was OK. THAT is EXACTLY why most scientists today are lying about AGW; it furthers a good cause".

Global warming official began about 1850 when the mini ice age ended, long before SUV's. Neither the mini ice age nor the inevitable warming that followed it were man caused they were caused by the Milankovitch cycles. Every scientists worth their salt knows this and yet they lie to our face. Why?

Many lie because they have written books, authored studies and gotten promotions based on those lies, what else can they do now admit past lies?

There is one important fact that never seems to make it's way into the discussion of global warming OR AGW and that is thank good for the Milankovitch cycle caused global warming. Without it it would literally be impossible to feed and provide the needs of nearly 8 billion humans. One other thing is absolutely true that never gets discussed; and that is that the Milankovitch cycle will do what it is famous for and bring us global cooling. When it does about half of the 8 billion or so people living at the time will die within a few short years and most of the rest will follow a few years later. In other words please continue global warming, your lives depend on it.

The Milankovitch cycles are about 1000 times more influence on our warming and cooling cycles than the so called greenhouse gases. Interestingly the most signiuficant greenhouse gas is water vapor which by itself accounts for 98+% of greenhouse gas effects.

The greenhouse effect of CO2 is dead wrong, In fact CO2 is a trailing indicator of warming and not the cause.

It is virtually impossible for man to cause global warming (or cooling). By comparison a good size volcanic eruption releases 100-10,000 times more green house gases than man has. and even then the effect on temperatures is minimal and temporary.

"The Milankovitch cycles imply the climate should be cooling"

Absolutely wrong!


"Carbon dioxide accounts for about 10-20% of the greenhouse effect"

Absolutely wrong!


"CO2 acts as both cause and effect, a feedback mechanism..."

A wishy washy statement thatr is partly true. BUT the most significant fact is that CO2 would have to be considerable higher to have any effect on temperatures. A second significant fact is: thank god for higher CO2 levels it makes food and other plants grow better and benefits all living creatures especially man.


"current volcanic activity (200 mt of CO2 annually) accounts for only about 1% of human emissions (24 gt of CO2 annually)..."

Again, wishy washy. When Mt Pinatubo blew it released more greenhouse gases then man did in the entire century. Interestingly all this greenhouse gas had zero lasting effect on our climate.