Election fraud or coincidences?

Quicksearch

Blog Administration

Open login screen

RSS Readers

Sunday, November 22. 2020

Election fraud or coincidences?

Roger Kimball seems persuaded about election fraud, but it's the amount of it, and location, that matters.

He links to The Stream, What are the Odds?

Joe Biden won crucial swing states fair and square — despite getting blown away in bellweather Ohio and Florida, despite being down by hundreds of thousands of votes until the mysterious shutdowns in counting, despite Trump outperforming Biden campaign’s own expectations, despite underperforming Hillary Clinton everywhere else in the country, despite not campaigning, despite having no ground game, despite having zero enthusiasm, despite losing support among minorities, despite pushing policies at odds with the desires of the public, despite aligning himself with BLM and Antifa. And despite having trouble executing a coherent sentence.

Posted by The News Junkie in Hot News & Misc. Short Subjects at 15:44 | Comments (18) | Trackbacks (0)

Trackbacks

Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

If the Left had not spent the past four years trying to cancel Donald Trump, I'd figure this was standard-voter-fraud-as-usual for the Democrat Party.

However, given the past four years' history, I'm calling this an attempted coup, and it should be punished as the crime against the Constitution that it is.

#1 PubliusII on 2020-11-22 16:10 (Reply)

I did not go to the links after seeing the quote. Most of what is listed are unfairnesses that can be attributed to media protection and campaign lies, not anything in the election process. Both are evil, but they are not the same thing.

#2 Assistant Village Idiot on 2020-11-22 16:34 (Reply)

Yeah, I tend to agree. Could be wrong.

#2.1 Bird Dog on 2020-11-22 17:03 (Reply)

I would like to know much more about the suspension of vote-counting on Election Night. In which districts, at what time, for what reason, at who's instruction? And: When did counting resume, under what changed circumstances did counting resume, at who's instruction, and what happened to the vote tallies afterward? For some reason, I haven't been able to find a timeline representing these events. I confess I haven't made the effort to construct one myself.

#3 Aggie on 2020-11-22 16:42 (Reply)

In Fulton County, Atlanta the election observers were sent home at 10:30pm because the count was over for the night — however after the election observers all left action officials kept counting votes until 1 AM. Without any observers present. Why did they continue adding votes for hours after the election observers were sent away?

This is the city where public employees gathered together for ‘erasing parties’ to commit education fraud for a decade. I’m not inclined to give these people the benefit of the doubt.

https://mobile.twitter.com/DavidShafer/status/1325956840769859586?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1325956840769859586%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fnationalfile.com%2Fbusted-evidence-proves-burst-water-pipe-in-georgia-was-used-as-cover-for-secret-vote-counting%2F

#3.1 Jm01 on 2020-11-23 07:27 (Reply)

There are at this point only two possible truths: 1. is that the Democrats and foreign globalists and/or apparatchiks stole the election and since the Trump lead was so enormous they had to resort to massive fraud that can be seen from the space station. Or 2. There was little to no fraud and Biden won and he would welcome sunshine and truth from all involved.

Hmmm! If I were Sydney Powell or any of the investigators into this election I would be afraid, very afraid. Because it is blatantly obvious that the Democrats/Biden do not want sunshine and are in fact united in one thing and that is massive intimidation of anyone trying to put any sunshine on this election process. I would be very afraid that Sydney Powell might commit suicide or something. Just saying.

#4 OneGuy on 2020-11-22 17:14 (Reply)

Quite right One Guy.

The most convincing argument that massive fraud took place is the Democrats' reaction to the accusation.

#4.1 feeblemind on 2020-11-22 18:49 (Reply)

Criminalizing Politics: Michigan GOP Lawmakers Threatened With Criminal Investigation For Meeting With Trump On Certification

https://legalinsurrection.com/2020/11/michigan-gop-lawmakers-threatened-with-criminal-investigation-for-meeting-with-trump-on-certification/

#4.1.1 feeblemind on 2020-11-22 19:31 (Reply)

With all those coincidences, mix in the fact that a substantial segment of the left thinks Trump was the next Hitler, that the cities where the vote is contentious are long-term Democrat strongholds with a history of voter fraud.

So there were enough people (who would feel virtuous for getting rid of Trump - even illegally, who had the opportunity, and no expectation that they would get caught) to do anything necessary to get rid of Trump. It would be unlikely if they didn’t try it.

#5 mudbug on 2020-11-22 18:10 (Reply)

San Francisco 2016; 80% turnout and 7% Trump;
Same 2020 85% turnout, Trump 12%. The most Philadelphia like area is the the Bay View and its turnout was 74%, with some West Philly like precincts in the mid 50s. Any place reporting turnout over 85% is cheating.

Its not their first rodeo; all over the world and all over time, election have been stolen ask Jimmy Carter. You vote I'll count, attributed to the other Joe. Without a bailout a lot of government workers and retirees are nervous; plenty of motive.

So you buy a case of beer, put it in the refrigerator and go out. When you come back, the beer is gone and the loutish neighborhood teenagers are whopping it up in the back yard. When confronted, they snark; what evidence.

#6 Sf jeff on 2020-11-22 19:11 (Reply)

At what point is cheating OK? I lied to get a loaf of bread to feed my starving kids, I lied to get the heat turned on, I lied to pay the mortgage, I lied to make the car payment, I lied to keep my job, I lied to open my business, I lied to keep my business, I lied to keep my mistress quiet, I lied to get that business loan, I lied to keep the company afloat, I lied to get my Representative on my side; I lied to keep my Representative on my side, I lied to get my Governor on my side; I lied to keep my Governor on my side. And finally, I lied to keep my Dominion representative on my side.

#7 Mark on 2020-11-22 20:15 (Reply)

FWIW: Per Robt Barnes, Sydney Powell really stepped into a disinformation campaign which turned her into a joke and which spilled over onto and damaged the legitimate efforts being made by other Trump lawyers in the battle ground states. Unfortunately, Sydney Powell was in over her head having no experience in election law or election protocols so made some laughable rookie mistakes. Per Barnes, there are serious problems in signature verification and ballot chain of custody. It maybe significant in those battle ground states where the delta isn't that great. Still it's a long shot.d

#8 Exasperated on 2020-11-22 20:39 (Reply)

Viva Frei / Barnes Law podcast tonight.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYJUjkpjZbo&feature=youtu.be

Worth listening to, goo on-the-ground insights on the election & post-election issues.

#9 Aggie on 2020-11-22 20:47 (Reply)

Sydney Powell is a straight arrow.

Count her out at your peril.

#10 Jim on 2020-11-22 21:09 (Reply)

I don't think anybody thinks she anything less. The point is, she hasn't been arguing from a position of strength, insight or experience. Barnes presents this very well in the broadcast I linked above, if you have time to listen to it. Her role in the Flynn case plays precisely to her background and professional strengths. Arguing election fraud is a different breed of cat.

#10.1 Aggie on 2020-11-22 21:19 (Reply)

Yes, you said it better. Thanks

#10.1.1 Exasperated on 2020-11-22 21:29 (Reply)

I suspec that is kinda true. If you are arguing a pure legal argument and legal procedure before a legal nerd judge this might well make or break your case. But this case will be in two courts at the highest level of scrutiny. The Circuit or Supreme court and the court of public opinion. If she, or any lawyer has the evidence and presents it so that everyone in the country can hear it and understand it she wins. If the court then goes against her THEN that court has just made the biggest mistake since the attack on Ft. Sumpter. One would hope that the courts at that level would understand this.

To put it another way if she can prove massive voter fraud and that Trump actually won by a landslide (which is what many are claiming) and the courts side with Biden then it's war!!

#10.1.2 OneGuy on 2020-11-22 21:36 (Reply)

Read an article from a guy that used to be an IRS auditor. He explained that when you find one flag someone just made a mistake; when you find 2 or 3 flags someone is either sloppy, or stupid; more than that and you have shenanigans going on. He then proceeded to outline the long list of flags this election threw up.

I know nothing will be done. I’m stuck because I hate the idea of elections being federalized (we’ve seen the sh*t democrats do when they control alphabet agencies), but I’m not sure how else anything gets fixed.

And for everyone wanting direct evidence of fraud I’m reminded of poll worker Melowese Richardson who famously exclaimed upon seeing Obama “Mr. President, Mr. President, I voted for you six times.” Nobody would have had the faintest idea of her fraud had she not opened her yap. How often does that happen alone; I’ll bet it’s staggering.

#11 Hoss on 2020-11-22 23:33 (Reply)

Add Comment

Name
Email	(Your e-mail will not show in your comment)
Homepage
In reply to
Comment	By commenting on this site you agree to the site rules listed here. Email addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for email notifications. Quick reference guide: [i] italics [/i], [b] bold [/b], [u] underline [/u], [url] (web address) [/url]. More tips here. Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (word), underscore are made via _word_. E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications. To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly. Enter the string from the spam-prevention image above: BBCode format allowed
	Remember Information? Subscribe to this entry

Maggie's Farm

Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page

Categories

Quicksearch

Links

Blog Administration

RSS Readers

Sunday, November 22. 2020

Election fraud or coincidences?