Maggie's Farm

To say it's not about Creationism completely misses the point. The point is that they are describing Darwinism as a religion, and a demonstrably false religion, mathematically, biologically, and geologically. Henry Adams, who worked side by side with Darwin to introduce his theories to America, wrote this--
"Unbroken Evolution under uniform conditions pleased every one–except curates and bishops; it was the very best substitute for religion; a safe, conservative, practical, thoroughly Common Law deity. Such a working system for the universe suited a young man who had just helped to waste five or ten thousand million dollars and a million lives, more or less, to enforce unity and uniformity on people who objected to it; the idea was only too seductive in its perfection; it had the charm of art. Unity and Uniformity were the whole motive of philosophy, and if Darwin preferred to back into it rather than start from it, the difference of method taught only the moral that the best way of reaching unity was to unite. Any road was good that arrived. To other Darwinians–except Darwin–Natural Selection seemed a dogma to be put in the place of the Athanasian creed; it was a form of religious hope; a promise of ultimate perfection. Adams wished no better, he warmly sympathized in the object; but when he came to ask himself what he truly thought, he felt that he had no Faith; that whenever the next new hobby should be brought out, he should surely drop off the Darwinism like a monkey from a perch."