Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Tuesday, May 28. 2019Tuesday morning linksCialis and Viagra for heart disease? What's Wrong with Vegan Diets How Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity Was Proven Correct a Century Ago This Week 137-year-old Winchester rifle found in Nevada has new home A Professor Who Argues Against Multicultural Ideology and for Western Exceptionalism Now Fears for His Job No Heroes Left: The MLK Revelations How Progressivism Enabled the Rise of the Populist Right VDH: Colluders, Obstructionists, Leakers, and Other Fools Douthat: How Liberalism Loses - An inflexible agenda and a global retreat. Time Magazine Columnist Apologizes After Trump Calls Out His Fake News By Name Cuba, tropical paradise, imports 2/3 of its food. Why? Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
The Chronicle of Higher Education is a sad reflection of the decline of scholarship in American/Canadian universities. I wondered how long it would take before they began the attack on Quillette
https://www.chronicle.com/article/The-Academy-s-New-Favorite/246351?key=HI0G__j9xid1wSeqaH-M7oAcMErgM7lnEoESnmTiaIKh7bCLXO1SrXPiGJh77GPmNXl4SUNfaVpYR1NHVWh6NER0R1RvWW53MXI3ZmI5ZXZld3pnWnN1T1Q3RQ From the [https://www.chronicle.com/article/The-Academy-s-New-Favorite/246351?key=HI0G__j9xid1wSeqaH-M7oAcMErgM7lnEoESnmTiaIKh7bCLXO1SrXPiGJh77GPmNXl4SUNfaVpYR1NHVWh6NER0R1RvWW53MXI3ZmI5ZXZld3pnWnN1T1Q3RQ]link[/url]:
QUOTE: The portrait of university life offered by the online journal Quillette is not a flattering one. Free speech stifled at every turn. Scholars with divergent views relentlessly mobbed. Entire disciplines ruined by left-wing activism. A leafy dystopia populated by irrationally furious undergraduates, pathetically craven administrators, and professors who peddle mindless ideology at the expense of scientific inquiry. It’s enough to make anyone question the mental health of the academy, if not run screaming through the quad. Sounds rather accurate to me. Charles Murray's experience at Middlebury doesn't exactly contradict this, does it?Link done courtesy of More tips here, which pops up at the bottom of a prospective comment. link. Sorry about not getting it right the first time. I neglected to use preview.
Cuba: When government confiscates most of what a farmer grows, there is much less incentive to grow a lot of good, quality food.
Stalin murdered the least-poor Russian farmers because they didn't want to give up their own (hard earned) property and farm on his collectives. Avoid anyone who wants to improve your life by having the government tell you what to do. They keep saying the Winchester was "abandoned" or "left" but I've never seen an article mention that it is highly likely the owner died.
If he were dead, where were his remains? If somebody dragged him off to bury him, why not take the rifle? If he was still alive, why didn't he take the rifle with him?
It is likely that he died. At that time in that place no man would have left his rifle behind. It would be more likely to leave everything else in his possession behind rather than that rifle. As for his remains they would have been scattered by scavengers.
Cuba, tropical paradise, imports 2/3 of its food. Why?
From 1961 to 2017, milk production increased 54% in Cuba, compared with an increase of 328% in Latin America. You can't blame Cuba's low production of milk on the "embargo."Not even the PSF (Pendejos sin Fronteras- idiots beyond borders) have told us that the CIA was shooting the descendants of Ubre Blanca, a.k.a. Fidel’s wonder cow. The low production of milk is entirely the responsibility of the Castro regime. Had Cuba’s milk production increased from 1961 to 2017 as much as milk production increased in Latin America, it would have produced 1.5 million metric tons of milk in 2017 – while Cuba’s actual milk production in 2017 was about a third of that- 541 thousand metric tons. 1961 Milk Production, Metric tons 1961 and 2017. Cuba 1961 350,000 Cuba 2017 541,100 Latin America 1961 18,569,829 Latin America 2017 79,45,712 Regarding the why of poor milk production, there is an interesting comment from Cliff at Quillette:60 Years On: Reflections on the Revolution in Cuba. QUOTE: It used to be said, in jest and in truth, that it was better to kill your mother-in-law than a cow. The penalty re m.i.l. was 15 years in prison, for killing the cow, 25 years. Selling the meat was punished by 5 years, buying was 1 year. If your cow died, the very first thing you did was to call the vet to certify it died of natural causes, otherwise off to jail you went. Milk was for you and your family, not for sale. Unless you had a cow, possession of milk other than the milk ration for kids or provably store bought UHT was proof of black market activity. Rustling was a major problem, so if your cow disappeared, quickly off to the police to report it. Their first reaction was that this was a con, and you were the first suspect, so even if the remains were found 5 miles away, it was you who was to blame. I was in Cuba 1999-2005, and beef was only available ( legally ) in the government run ( redundant ) stores, and pretty low grade it was. With all this, any surprise that few people wanted to keep cows? FAO Stats:Livestock Primary FWIW:
Can States Constitutionally Secede from the United States? http://americanfoundingprinciples.com/can-states-constitutionally-secede-from-the-united-states/ Every semester I teach my students that there is the letter of the Constitution and the spirit of the Constitution. I am convinced that the founding fathers wanted states to be able to secede, and visualized it as a last resort if the federal government became tyrannical. So while the letter of the law is that states CAN secede, Abe Lincoln set the spirit if the law by shooting enough southerners to stop secession in 1865.
We don't necessarily need another war to set the spirit back in line with the letter of the law. But until it changes, the spirit of the Constitution is that if California secedes, Trump will send enough soldiers to shoot Calis until they give up and are reconstructed. Then they will be ruled as conquered territory until they run their state the way Washington wants it run. Oh, and no Cali who votes (or fights) for secession is allowed to vote or hold office until the state is "reconstructed". Finally, Trump gets his face on Mt. Rushmore for his pains. Cuba, tropical paradise, imports 2/3 of its food. Why?
Michael Totten's article discusses the iron hand of the Castro regime on food distribution and food production. The Lost World, Part I. QUOTE: Taking a bus came with another advantage I hadn’t foreseen. I didn’t have to stop at the checkpoints. Totten points out another problem with Cuban agriculture: much of it has been taken over by an invasive shrub/tree.I’m used to seeing military and police checkpoints when I travel abroad. Every country in the Middle East has them, including Israel if you count the one outside the airport. The authorities in that part of the world are looking for guns and bombs mostly. The Cuban authorities aren’t worried about weapons. No one but the regime has anything deadlier than a baseball bat. Castro’s checkpoints are there to ensure nobody has too much or the wrong kind of food. Police officers pull over cars and search the trunk for meat, lobsters, and shrimp. They also search passenger bags on city busses in Havana. Dissident blogger Yoani Sanchez wrote about it sarcastically in her book, Havana Real. “Buses are stopped in the middle of the street and bags inspected to see if we are carrying some cheese, a lobster, or some dangerous shrimp hidden among our personal belongings.” If they find a side of beef in the trunk, so I’m told, you’ll go to prison for five years if you tell the police where you got it and ten years if you don’t. No one is allowed to have lobsters in Cuba. You can’t buy them in stores, and they sure as hell aren’t available on anyone’s ration card. They’re strictly reserved for tourist restaurants owned by the state. Kids will sometimes pull them out of the ocean and sell them on the black market, but I was warned in no uncertain terms not to buy one. I stayed in hotels and couldn’t cook my own food anyway. And what was I supposed to do, stash a live lobster in my backpack? I did see animals once in a while, but nothing I couldn’t have handled in a rental car. Cows sometimes wander across the road on open ranch land in the American West where I live. No big deal. In the forested parts of the West, deer dart in front of cars every day. That can be fatal for deer and driver alike. Cows on the road in Cuba were no kind of problem. I was actually glad to see cows on the road because the bus slowed enough that I could get a good look at them and even take pictures. Whatever the Cubans are doing with cattle, it’s wrong. The poor things are skeletons wrapped in leather. No wonder milk, meat, and cheese are so hard to come by. I know next to nothing about cattle ranching, but the eastern (dry) side of my home state of Oregon has plenty of ranches, and I can tell you this much: Oregon cows have a lot more land to roam free on. They wander for miles eating scrub out in the semi-desert. Agricultural fields in Cuba are microscopic, whether they’re for ranching for farming. They’re misshapen and haphazardly planted as if they’re amateur recreational farms rather than industrial-scale operations that are supposed to feed millions of people. My father grows pinot noir grapes in a vineyard no larger than these, but he really is doing it for recreational purposes in his retirement. He’s happy if he breaks even. Cuba doesn’t even break even—hence the checkpoints to ensure no one is “hoarding.” The country could produce many times the amount of food it currently does. Deforestation wouldn’t be necessary. Most of the Cuban landscape I saw is already deforested. It’s just not being used. It’s tree-free and fallow ex-farmland. I’ve never seen anything like it, though parts of the Soviet Union may have looked similar. QUOTE: Imbecilic communist agriculture practices aren’t the only problem. An invasive weed from Angola is choking half the farmland that would be in use, and no one seems to have a clue how to get rid of it. This would be marabú.QUOTE: Marabou weed, also known as the sicklebush, is a highly aggressive invasive tree species in Cuba. Originally from South Africa, it grows in all soils, altitudes and microclimates, and is located in almost all of the vegetation types on the island. It is a dense woody tree that can grow up to 8-10 meters tall and is covered in thorns. It invaded abandoned sugar cane lands. After the loss of the Soviet "sugar daddy," Cuba had to compete on the international sugar market. Cuban sugar could not compete on the international market, with the result that current Cuban sugar production is about a fifth of what it was 30 years ago. Marabú invaded abandoned sugar cane lands. Better the Cubans had tried to change the abandoned sugar cane lands into cattle pasture.It is estimated that Marabou weed covers 1.7 million hectares of once productive land. It invades abandoned agricultural land and can limit the productive capacity of farming areas currently in use. It competes for space in protected areas preventing the establishment of native vegetation. In forests, its presence hinders management and harvesting, significantly increasing costs. There have been some attempts to market charcoal made from marabú. QUOTE: However, because the wood is termite resistant, it is attractive for domestic use including tool handles, furniture, handicrafts, fence posts and fuelwood. Moreover, its ability to burn slowly made it an ideal source for high quality charcoal – its most widespread use. Despite its undeniable advantages, it a very difficult species to eliminate and is undesired by many farmers and land managers. So far, not too successful, I take it.I ask once more, where IS the Gang of Z to explain at length and then even further why Gringo is wrong.
Question for Gringo:
Several years ago, Prof Perry had a post on Cuban Ag at his Carpe Diem blog. He said that the Cuban authorities had decided to imitate the old Soviet Union and give the farmers plots of land that they could farm for themselves in an effort to increase foof production. Gringo, do you know if this scheme worked or if the Cuban Government stymied or ended it? I have heard nothing of it since the Carpe Diem blog post. While the Cuban government has leased out most of the land it owns to individual farmers and cooperatives, the results are mixed. Here are some reports.
Cuban agriculture faces another hard year as produce sales drop (Sept 2018) QUOTE: - Cuba moved nearly 15 percent less produce through domestic markets during the first six months of the year, compared with the same period in 2017, signaling another bad year for its agricultural sector, according to a government report. The market sales in the report, issued over the weekend, account for 10 percent to 15 percent of agricultural output, according to a local expert, who requested anonymity due to restrictions on talking with journalists. The remainder of food production is earmarked for processing plants, tourism, exports, a rationing system and meals at workplaces, hospitals, schools and other social uses, he said. The country is dotted with outdoor markets and kiosks, more than 70 percent of which are state-run and have fixed prices for many items. QUOTE: The state owns 80 percent of the land and leases most of that to farmers and cooperatives. The remainder is owned by family farmers. For an example of how government controls stymie production, consider cattleThe government often blames bad weather and the U.S. trade embargo for poor production, while critics charge it is due to a lack of private property and foreign investment, rickety infrastructure and a Soviet-style command economy. Cuba’s government under former President Raul Castro began leasing land, decentralizing decision-making and introducing market mechanisms into the sector a decade ago. But the state has backtracked on the reforms, once more assigning resources, setting prices and controlling most distribution. Cuban Agriculture & Farming QUOTE: In 1993, the government started to change its ways and decentralize the management of the country’s farms. It created independent co-ops that farmed government land but were allowed to own their crop — even so, the crop was still sold to the state at a fixed price. There are now private farms that produce about 70 percent of all of the produce in Cuba. The private farms are required to sell 80 percent of their crop to the state, and can sell the remaining 20 percent in markets. Raúl has continued to push through new land reforms. Over 3.5 million acres (1.5 million ha) of state land is leased for free in usufruct to motivate Cuban farmers to take up the plow. These farmers are encouraged to invest time and effort in keeping the land healthy, and are allowed to pass it along to their children. Being able to sell 20% of your production in the market is better than nothing, I guess. But government controls still stymie production, such as for cattle QUOTE: These days, private farmers can raise cattle, but they aren’t allowed to kill the animals for their own consumption or to even sell the meat. If a cow dies, the farmer is fined. Except at upscale of restaurants, one rarely finds beef on the menu in Cuba. Most Cubans have never even tasted beef, as it’s priced out of their budget. Perhaps the "quick and dirty" method to see if it worked is to look at FAO stats. Prof. Perry's article was from 2009, so I will look at 2008-2016 per capita production for Cuba.
Net per capita production growth, 2016/2008 Agriculture (PIN) 1.086 Cereals,Total 1.2 Crops (PIN) 1.06 Food (PIN) 1.088 Livestock (PIN) 1.054 Compare this to China for 1976-1984, which would roughly compare to getting freed from the Maoist collective production cage. Net per capita production growth, 1984/1976 Agriculture (PIN) 1.46 Cereals,Total 1.325 Crops (PIN) 1.401 Food (PIN) 1.417 Livestock (PIN) 1.712 Sorry about not having the same number of years for China and Cuba, but that shouldn't alter the conclusion: China's ag production took off, while Cuba's didn't change much: 46% increase in China's Agriculture per capita output, compared to Cuba's 8.6% increase. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QI One problem that Cuba has that China doesn't is that the Marabu tree has infested ~1.7 million hectares, which I believe is about a quarter of Cuba's arable land. Which is what happens when cropland gets abandoned. "Collective production cage" says it all, and sums up every country that has ever socialized its agriculture. If you run farms like the DMV, people starve.
If you run farms like the DMV, people starve.
The claim has repeatedly made that Venezuela is not socialist. It isn't only US progs who have made such a claim. Francisco Toro, founder of the opposition blog Caracas Chronicles, also believes this. No, Venezuela doesn’t prove anything about socialism. (Toro also has an overweening dislike for The Donald, which he shows in articles like "Is Trump like Maduro, or is Trump like Chavez?") However, Chavista Venezuela has something in common with Latin American Marxist disasters like Cuba, Allende's Chile, and 1979-1990 Sandinista Nicaragua: a collapse in agricultural production. "Land reform" coupled with government controls in all countries has had a similar result.
#6.2.2.1.1
Gringo
on
2019-05-29 15:35
(Reply)
Nothing as long as there are supplements and special foods available to make up for what is missing in their diet. Likely though if you are pregnant it is terrible thing to do to the unborn child.
Amazing how folks with almost no facts can be such die-hard experts.
That said, your move. Let's argue about your uninformed lifestyle signal and how it's the rightist's equivalent of the left's hollering racist all the time. Goddamn commie vegans! How Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity Was Proven Correct a Century Ago This Week
Poppycock. If Mansur wants to both commemorate Einstein and issue truthful proclamations on the general subject, he should start with the basics: 1. There's far more to Einstein than Eddington on relativity. 2. Einstein doubted and even recanted Einstein. 3. Einstein is increasingly questioned re: the current trajectory of cosmology. 4. Relativity (LCDM model) cosmology is increasingly in trouble. Its big bang model began as ad hoc theory. 5. It's the LCDM that's untestable and therefore Einstein's theoretical math remains just that. These elements are uncontested, making Mansur's column boilerplate on but a small fraction of the subject. Mansur arriving at the conclusion that while Einstein is perfected AGW is folly is risably bad science. It's not even good logic. |