Maggie's Farm

Don Boudreaux thinks the wall is a disgrace and that "poor Spanish-speaking people who wish to come here to mow our lawns and to clean our motel rooms."

In fact illegal immigration is bankrupting our country. It costs the federal government about $230 billion a year and costs the stats a similar amount. Illegals kill about 3000 people a year in the U.S. and injure hundreds of thousands not to mention rape and child sex abuse from illegals. If we kept our borders safe none of that would happen.

It is interesting that the ACA was designed to give free health care to illegals and 100% of the proposed replacements to the ACA were equally generous to illegal aliens. All of that enormous cost will be paid for by the middle class. Not the rich, not the poor, not the elite but the middle class. Yet to oppose illegal immigration is to be called bigoted and prejudice.

The illegals only want "to mow our lawns and to clean our motel rooms", he said. But what about our own "poor" stuck on welfare? Don't we have a responsibility to help them get off of the dole? Wouldn't it be better for them to mow our lawns and to clean our motel rooms than live on welfare? Why do we insist on making both problems worse. We would be better off to mow our own lawns.

Is there "global warming"? Yes, of course. With the end of the little ice age in 1850 it was inevitable that there would be global warming. All quite normal and expected.

Is there AGW or man caused global warming? There is no evidence of it. Even the rather feeble CO2 connection is unproved and defies previous earth temperature vs CO2 data. As for other possibilities such as using fossil fuel the best (meaning the honest) calculations indicate that it is possible that burning fossil fuel "could" increase global warming by some fraction of 1%. But there is no evidence of it and in fact there is contrary evidence, i.e. the 30's were much warmer than today followed by the 50's and 60's which were much cooler. So what little evidence there is seems to be saying that we humans and our feeble efforts cannot change the environment and in fact we are snowballed by the natural effects that control the environment.


An important and unarguable fact is that the pro-AGW side of the argument has lied at all levels and about all facts and data concerning the AGW debate. At no time have they been honest and they continue to be dishonest.
WHY? Well look at their demands for "fixing" the problem. In all cases what the left leaning AGW advocates want is higher taxes, some form of globalist government and revocation of constitutional and civil rights.


What is really going on here is a massive conspiracy by far left radical socialist elites to "con" the citizens into willingly giving up their rights, wealth and power to an elite government not dissimilar to the UN or the EU which will rule from Brussels or perhaps Moscow. They think you are stupid (and they are about 51% right) and they think they can pull off this "sting" AND they feel under pressure to close on this soon since the global warming seems to have ended a few years back. So they are doubling down on their lies, fake studies and demands, they are desperate, they need this, they want this and they will not be denied.

This is a perfect example of the left lying about everything connected with the AGW argument. They had to change the historic data about the warm period in the 30's. Otherwise their argument for man mad global warming was unprovable. So they did and now that they did they make believe we didn't see what happened behind the curtain.

Imagine that you had a legitimate argument and proof of AGW. WHY then, would you lie and change historical data???