Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Friday, September 28. 2018Friday morning linksI Drove a Pickup Full of Supplies to a Town Flooded by Florence, and Here Is What I Saw When Conservationists Kill Lots (and Lots) of Animals - Invasive species are sometimes trapped, poisoned, and shot in large numbers to save native species from extinction. Some scientists say the bloodshed isnβt worth it. Kayaker gets smacked by an octopus thrown at him by a seal. Pray without ceasing, is one of the easiest and one of the hardest commands of scripture for me to obey. The Moon Is Open for Business - Commercial companies are proposing lunar missions at a pace the world hasnβt seen since the Apollo program. Chuck Todd: Ford Is a βVictim of the Democrats Playing Politicsβ. "She's done a great job of exposing the Democrats of playing games," Todd said. "It's almost as if Dr. Ford was a victim of the Democrats playing politics."
KAVANAUGH KILLED IT Ex-Czech President Calls For βRevolutionβ Of European Countries Against EU Trump: Two-State Solution 'More Difficult Because It's a Real-Estate Deal' But Better for Peace Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Chuck Todd?
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened." - Winston Churchill The guy is right about a big disaster needing a large-scale response, but it doesn't necessarily need a centrally driven one like the Red Cross. After Harvey an amazing number of small groups sent in people to help down here. Locals, especially the volunteer fire department and local clubs, fanned out first with water, food, and generators. Then came crew after crew after crew of teams with chainsaws to help clear the downed trees, going door to door. These were mostly either churches or volunteer firefighters from up to a thousand miles away. Later came a flood of mostly church groups with carpenter teams to repair roofs and do muck-and-gut rebuilds on water-damaged houses. The former were almost entirely independent, through they coordinated loosely through the pastor network. The latter coordinated a little more formally through the county. FEMA was here, and gave some individual aid, but its primary role has been to fund county projects such as the roadside debris pickup, a project that took over six months and cost about as much as this county's usual annual budget.
I'm convinced that if you want to get through a disaster, the most important thing is small-scale local organization. It's phenomenal how differently our neighborhoods fared, depending on whether they had local clubs. The outside help doesn't seem to be able to do much if there's not a small-scale organization there to do the final door-to-door administration. Know your neighbors. You do NOT want this kind of thing to be entirely in the hands of the Feds. Agree 100%. Two months after Harvey hit, I still had choppers going over my home at least a dozen times a day, on their way to the disaster from their staging points near my home. The day after Harvey had moved out, the highway to Houston had an unending line of commercial work vehicles and pickup trucks towing johnboats, airboats, ATV's, generators, emergency and building supplies. This continued for over a month.
It gives you a certain feeling when you see people responding this way, altruistically, automatically. Now, over a year later, members of my church and other neighbors are still going into the area to volunteer with groups rebuilding homes. The government and FEMA have a role in disaster relief, but there is plenty of need to go around. I am proud of the way both governmental and NGO's responded, and continue to respond, to the disaster. These responses aren't just good for the victims, they're good for society's social fabric. No doubt the same will happen at the site of Florence's wrath. The government is well-suited to large scale emergency response, but there is no substitute for the work done by people to restore a community's life. Oz: "Step one: Stop overstocking cattle. Step two: Stop killing dingoes that might prey on the donkeys and keep their numbers down. Do this and the ecosystem will sort itself outβno killing required." That would be, by humans. Predators will do that for them.
The Moon Is Open for Business: Oh NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!1! Commercializing the moon will RUIN it!!!!!11111!!!! Eastern European countries recognize that the EU is NOT their friend. Two-State Solution: The Palis have their little black hearts set on a one-state solution. Now, if the Israelis could carpet-bomb the PLO, Hamas, and Hezbollah headquarters, the surviving Palis might somehow come to decide their self-proclaimed leaders had been leading them astray. For LO, these many years. But the Israelis won't do that. QUOTE: KAVANAUGH KILLED IT Yeah, pretty much. Kavanaugh falsely claimed he could legally drink at the time. Kavanaugh gets combative when asked about his drinking. Kavanaugh (July 1, 1982): βto Timmyβs for {brew}skis w/Judge, Tom, PJ, Bernie, Squi.β Kavanaugh declines to call for an FBI investigation to clear his name. Kavanaugh blames the Democrats, Trump-haters, the Left, and the Clintons for allegations others have raised about his behavior. Kavanaugh: βA good judge must be an umpireβa neutral and impartial arbiter who favors no litigant or policyβ. Kavanaugh: βif Monica Lewinsky says that on several occasions in the Oval Office area, you used your fingers to stimulate her vagina and bring her to orgasm, would she be lying?β
The central question whether Kavanaugh tried to rape or abuse Dr. Ford. Everybody she said was there disputed her account, including a close friend of hers. Unless one believes that the three people Dr. Ford said were there were lying (no Democrats even suggested that), there is no reason to believe that Dr. Ford's accusation is accurate. Nothing about his yearbook, drinking games, illegal drinking, or any of the other lines of questioning by the Democrats could get over that and without getting over that, questions about his drinking in high school is irrelevant and just an attempt at character assassination.
The delaying ploy of calling for an FBI investigation to clear his name is just that. The FBI has already investigated him half a dozen times and never found any hint of behavior. An FBI investigation of Dr. Ford's accusations could only consist of interviewing the people Dr. Ford said were there. There is nothing else to investigate. They could not even confirm Dr. Ford's description of the house where the event was supposed to have occurred because she doesn't remember where it was nor when it was supposed to have happened. and we already know what they would say since they gave statements under penalty of perjury. She was fifteen years old so she was dependent on somebody to get her home yet she has no memory of how she got home. Dr. Ford and her legal team has her own credibility issues. She claims that her memories were rekindled by working on remodeling her house in 2012 but there were no permits granted for her house in 2012 but there were in 2008 instead. Her said she didn't know of the offer from Grassley to have her interviewed at her home. This was reported in the news so, but maybe she didn't watch the news. Her legal team should have told her but didn't. She said she couldn't fly to DC because of the trauma from her assault but she did end up flying there and many other places like Hawaii, Tahiti, Costa Rica, South Pacific to name just a few. Just more delaying tactics from her side. mudbug: The central question whether Kavanaugh tried to rape or abuse Dr. Ford.
That's not the only allegation, and his integrity and partisanship is also in question. mudbug: Everybody she said was there disputed her account, including a close friend of hers. No. Her close friend didn't dispute her account, but simply said she doesn't remember the day in question. As she wasn't in the room, there's no reason she would remember it. Mark Judge has denied it happened, but has not been questioned on the matter. mudbug: there is no reason to believe that Dr. Ford's accusation is accurate. That there are three allegations, similar in nature, and that many of his classmates say he has dissembled about the extent of his drinking, means there is more than enough evidence to investigate further. mudbug: The FBI has already investigated him half a dozen times and never found any hint of behavior. That's right. But new information has come to light. Whatever... there is no corroboration for her story. In fact, there isn't much of a story.
What new information has come to light? There is an unsubstantiated accusation by a politically active Democrat who is being represented by a leftist law firm (who apparently lied to the Senate committee and also their client) suggested by Sen. Feinstein while Dr. Ford was saying she wanted to remain anonymous. While she was saying she wanted to remain anonymous, she took a polygraph. There is no reason to have legal representation or a polygraph unless you want to bring it public. On second thought. There is new information to be investigated - there is evidence that this whole thing is a political hit job. Let's have the FBI investigate that.
#4.2.2.1.1
mudbug
on
2018-09-28 13:01
(Reply)
mudbug: In fact, there isn't much of a story.
There's quite a story, actually three allegations that have the common thread drunken sexual assault. mudbug: What new information has come to light? The three independent allegations. mudbug: Let's have the FBI investigate that. Glad we are in agreement, then.
#4.2.2.1.1.1
Zachriel
on
2018-09-28 15:40
(Reply)
Z-Team claim: Kavanaugh falsely claimed he could legally drink at the time.
"I reported the Bloomberg article to Facebook as 'False News.'" QUOTE: From the hearing transcript: What a surprise, fake news from the Z-Team."My friends and I sometimes got together and had parties on weekends. The drinking age was 18 in Maryland for most of my time in high school, and was 18 in D.C. for all of my time in high school. I drank beer with my friends. Almost everyone did. Sometimes I had too many beers. Sometimes others did. I liked beer. I still like beer.." Z: Kavanaugh falsely claimed he could legally drink at the time.
Sort of like the "meaning of 'is' is". Notably, Clinton was not found guilty of perjury, but for civil contempt for lying under oath. It is refreshing that someone actually responded to one of our points, though. We will modify our statement: Kavanaugh dissembled by suggesting he could legally drink at the time. Kavanaugh dissembled by suggesting he could legally drink at the time.
Nonsense. He stated the legal drinking age. Most people, but not the Z-Team, are aware that most high school students have not yet turned 18. Gringo: Nonsense. He stated the legal drinking age.
It really does depend on what the meaning of "is" is.
#4.3.1.1.1
Zachriel
on
2018-09-29 13:56
(Reply)
Lindsey Graham seems to have turned the tide, to the extent it wasn't already turned by Kavanaugh's own testimony. My Facebook feed contained about two dozen copies of Graham's furious outburst--and he spoke again this morning, even more compellingly. I didn't know he had it in him.
On the other hand, before I even went to bed last night, there was a sprinkling of posts trying to argue that Kavanaugh's outrage showed he didn't have the temperament to be a judge. What a bunch of tools. Final news: Townhall reported last night that all the wavering pseudo-Rs were a "yes" vote now, and even some Ds are wavering. I hope to see an end to this disgusting travesty tomorrow morning. Next I expect to see riots. This morning the take seems to be that "poor Dr. Ford" is a victim, certainly, but probably a victim of her own lawyers and the rest of the Democratic operatives. Texan99: On the other hand, before I even went to bed last night, there was a sprinkling of posts trying to argue that Kavanaugh's outrage showed he didn't have the temperament to be a judge.
Kavanaugh gave a good impression of an entitled preppy alcoholic. Anyway, there's nothing like lashing out at vast conspiracies that spells judicial temperament. Texan99: This morning the take seems to be that "poor Dr. Ford" is a victim, certainly, but probably a victim of her own lawyers and the rest of the Democratic operatives. The record contradicts that claim. Ford was the agent of her own testimony, sending her initial letter before Kavanaugh had been nominated. So why'd the Dems sit on her accusatory letter for over 30 days, kiddiez?
πππ Zzzzatmypuppies: So why'd the Dems sit on her accusatory letter for over 30 days
The victim specifically asked that the letter "not be released publicly." Only when the story started to break did she agree to be named. The letter could have been discussed privately behind closed doors lIke so many other discussions by the committee but the dems sat on it...
πππ
#5.1.1.1.1
Zzzzatemypuppies
on
2018-09-28 12:06
(Reply)
Zzzzatemypuppies: The letter could have been discussed privately behind closed doors lIke so many other discussions by the committee
The victim asked that the letter be kept confidential.
#5.1.1.1.1.1
Zachriel
on
2018-09-28 12:18
(Reply)
Yes. And the letter was leaked by the dems who sat on it for over a month...
πππ
#5.1.1.1.1.1.1
Zzzzatemypuppies
on
2018-09-28 12:24
(Reply)
Evidently it takes a good month for some folks to decide on an additional FBI investigation.
#5.1.1.1.1.1.1.1
Bill Carson
on
2018-09-28 12:46
(Reply)
QUOTE: Only when the story started to break did she agree to be named. A secular "immaculate conception" - very creative!
#5.1.1.1.2
Bill Carson
on
2018-09-28 12:20
(Reply)
Bill Carson: A secular "immaculate conception" - very creative!
Have no idea what that means.
#5.1.1.1.2.1
Zachriel
on
2018-09-28 12:23
(Reply)
Try a little harder.
#5.1.1.1.2.1.1
Bill Carson
on
2018-09-28 12:26
(Reply)
Thank you, Texan99 for posting your analysis. I limit the amount of this travesty I watch or listen to for my own sanity. I come here to get what I consider a good take, without risk of high blood pressure.
What I have seen by the Democrats in congress is beyond disgusting. The Democrats are a clear and present danger to our constitutional republic. There are a handful of Democrats who I would consider to be honest and have genuine honor. It saddens me that none of them have spoken up against this Witch trial. One wonders what wouldn't the Democrats do at this point to gain/keep power? Is there anything they would consider beneath them and too despicable and harmful to our country???
Almost every thinking person sees through their tactics of mud throwing, delay, false accusations, persecution and lies. Disgusting! GoneWithTheWind: What I have seen by the Democrats in congress is beyond disgusting.
Three women have made serious allegations concerning Kavanaugh. You don't think there should be an investigation? serious, (of a subject, state, or activity) demanding careful consideration or application.
Sorry, since the kiddiez are being soo "literal" this morning,
Define the "serious" allegations by three women concerning Kavanaugh and what makes them so.. πππ
#6.1.1.1.1
Zzzzatemypuppies
on
2018-09-28 11:56
(Reply)
Zzzzatemypuppies: Define the "serious" allegations by three women concerning Kavanaugh and what makes them so
You really need to have someone explain to you why sexual assault is a serious crime? There is more than enough evidence to constitute reasonable suspicion justifying an investigation.
#6.1.1.1.1.1
Zachriel
on
2018-09-28 12:03
(Reply)
Uh no, kiddiez. We were discussing "allegations" and what made them "serious" concerning Kavanaugh..
You dodged the question. πππ
#6.1.1.1.1.1.1
Zzzzatemypuppies
on
2018-09-28 12:14
(Reply)
Zzzzatemypuppies: We were discussing "allegations" and what made them "serious" concerning Kavanaugh..
You probably want to ask what makes the allegations credible. There is more than one allegation indicating a pattern of behavior. While we have only heard from one victim, she appeared sincere and straightforward. That doesn't constitute proof, but is certainly something that should be investigated further. That makes it a serious matter.
#6.1.1.1.1.1.1.1
Zachriel
on
2018-09-28 12:21
(Reply)
"There is more than one allegation"
allegation: a statement that is not supported by proof.
#6.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1
Hank_M
on
2018-09-28 12:29
(Reply)
The accuser changed her story several times and the corroborating witnesses swore she was mistaken in her memory... ergo, no evidence.
And don't start that bullshit comparison with Bill Cosby again. πππ
#6.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.2
Zzzzatemypuppies
on
2018-09-28 12:32
(Reply)
Hank_M: allegation: a statement that is not supported by proof.
The standard of evidence to start an investigation is reasonable suspicion. There are three related allegations, and more than sufficient evidence of his heavy drinking.
#6.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.3
Zachriel
on
2018-09-28 12:38
(Reply)
Uh no, you kiddiez are dodging again.
The witness changed her story several times and the participants she named said she was mistaken. That is not a "reasonable" suspicion unless you subscribe to the Cory "Spartacus, Bring It" Booker School of Law.. πππ
#6.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.3.1
Zzzzatemypuppies
on
2018-09-28 12:49
(Reply)
Cory Booker: a succinct, formidable mix of Spartacus and Kurt GΓΆdel.
#6.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.3.1.1
Bill Carson
on
2018-09-28 13:02
(Reply)
"There is more than enough evidence"
Such as?
#6.1.1.1.1.1.2
Hank_M
on
2018-09-28 12:31
(Reply)
Hank_M: allegation: a statement that is not supported by proof.
Three independent witnesses with similar allegations of drunken sexual assault, and evidence of heavy drinking.
#6.1.1.1.1.1.2.1
Zachriel
on
2018-09-28 12:40
(Reply)
I'll ask again.
What evidence? And spare me the "heavy" drinking of an 18 year old. Considering the times, he's a saint if that's all he did.
#6.1.1.1.1.1.2.1.1
Hank_M
on
2018-09-28 13:08
(Reply)
Hank_M: What evidence?
Three independent witnesses with similar allegations of drunken sexual assault, and evidence of heavy drinking. Hank_M: Considering the times, he's a saint if that's all he did. Uh, no. Even as a seventeen year old in 1982, he should know that sexual assault is wrong.
#6.1.1.1.1.1.2.1.1.1
Zachriel
on
2018-09-28 15:42
(Reply)
So who are these three independent witnesses, kiddiez?
What are their allegations? Is there any corroboration? Why have they waited until now to reveal their allegations?
#6.1.1.1.1.1.2.1.1.1.1
Zzzzatemypuppies
on
2018-09-28 19:01
(Reply)
SERIOUS ALLEGATIONS HAHAHAHAAAHHAHAA
Hurts to keep loosing. Maybe if there was an ounce of REAL serious allegations, instead of a train load of lying lefty patsy's being paraded before America, Kavanaugh would not be going to the Supreme Court. I am sure something happened to Ford, but it was not Kavanaugh who did it to her. I suspect, that it is a lot of self inflicted wounds. What I have read about her High School years, doesn't paint a pretty picture. I am sympathetic to her, she is being used. Team Zachriel, really needs to grow up, wake up, and smell the roses. Unless you all are true believers in tyranny? Are you truly aligned with the likes of what we witnessed from the democrats on the Senate Judiciary committee, power at all costs? Then you need to be utterly and completely defeated. Your ideas of governance, are an abomination. B. Hammer: Maybe if there was an ounce of REAL serious allegations, instead of a train load of lying lefty patsy's being paraded before America
Ford's testimony seemed sincere and straightforward. Multiple witness have not even been deposed. B. Hammer: Unless you all are true believers in tyranny? No. We strongly individual liberty. However, it's not unusual for a great power to struggle as it loses relevance. Now, you have a person set on a course for the U.S. Supreme Court who is clearly a partisan who sees his political opponents as enemy conspirators. Now sure how Democrats, Trump-supporters, the Left, and the Clintons, can expect a fair hearing before a Justice Kavanaugh. Now sure how Democrats, Trump-supporters detractors, the Left, and the Clintons, can expect a fair hearing before a Justice Kavanaugh.
#6.1.2.1.1
Zachriel
on
2018-09-28 12:41
(Reply)
Sow the wind and reap the whirlwind, mofos.
πππ
#6.1.2.1.1.1
Zzzzatemypuppies
on
2018-09-28 12:54
(Reply)
"The guy we violently smeared at the 11th hour with nary a crime scene (at least 3 unspecified crime scenes, actually) after opposing him from the outset might be pissed as a Supreme Court Justice."
Tough titty.
#6.1.2.1.1.2
Bill Carson
on
2018-09-28 12:56
(Reply)
Zzzzatemypuppies: Sow the wind and reap the whirlwind
Bill Carson: Tough titty. Interesting standard you are proposing for appointments to the U.S. Supreme Court.
#6.1.2.1.1.3
Zachriel
on
2018-09-28 15:44
(Reply)
Trump's handing you and your side their asses politically, despite your fraudulent, all-out resistance to him, so an even more committed to the Constitution Justice Kavanaugh - inspired by the howling leftist mob - ought to align with the aforementioned nicely. In other words, you have another week of smug, vacuous dissembling before you - metaphorically, of course - pick yourself up off the mat, dust yourself off, and move the goal posts to a location that allows further needle-dicking on your part.
#6.1.2.1.1.3.1
Bill Carson
on
2018-09-28 17:56
(Reply)
Oh, did you say something?
#6.1.2.1.1.3.1.1
Zachriel
on
2018-09-29 09:02
(Reply)
Your reply answers your question.
#6.1.2.1.1.3.1.1.1
Bill Carson
on
2018-09-29 12:53
(Reply)
In her mind, she is sincere, but not straightforward. Her testimony has more curves in it, than the railroad running through the Rocky Mountains. First she is afraid of flying, then she isn't. She doesn't remember what year, or what house. Come on!
Multiple witness! You mean the three, that refute her story of the drunk party? Now tell me about a real partisan: Ruth Ginsburg. Or is she not a partisan?
#6.1.2.1.2
B. Hammer
on
2018-09-28 12:49
(Reply)
Oh, she's partisan. So partisan she'll probably insist her brain-dead comatose body be left on life support till the end of Trump's second term, just so she can deny her seat to a Conservative.
Frankly, last recent video I saw of her was... sad. I mean no disrespect, but it looked like she's hanging on by a thread. Shrunken, mumbling, halting speech... producers likely did their best with makeup but she looked ready for a slot in a zombie movie as a slow shambler.
#6.1.2.1.2.1
JLawson
on
2018-09-28 13:27
(Reply)
Frankly, I find it hard to believe that you do believe, strongly, in individual liberty. Your strong and unwavering support, for all things left, tell a completely different story. You can not have strong individual liberty with an over bearing, overly controlling, involved in every aspect of my life, central government.
#6.1.2.1.3
B. Hammer
on
2018-09-28 13:01
(Reply)
B. Hammer: Frankly, I find it hard to believe that you do believe, strongly, in individual liberty.
That you can't properly represent our position is more a reflection on you. Our position has been consistent throughout these discussions. B. Hammer: You can not have strong individual liberty with an over bearing, overly controlling, involved in every aspect of my life, central government. And we agree with that. When government becomes too large, it can represent a threat to liberty. (Should we wax eloquent about distributed power and complex networks?) However, not every law represents an overbearing, overly controlling government. You still have to stop at red lights, even if it irks you.
#6.1.2.1.3.1
Zachriel
on
2018-09-28 15:49
(Reply)
Absolutely!!! Investigate. The Democrats and the paid off accusers. Get to the bottom of it. Prof Ford appears to be mentally ill she should be checked out. After the investigation civil law suits against everyone who attacked kavanaugh for political reasons. Sue their pants off. Also charge them with perjury. I want to see some perp walks.
GoneWithTheWind: Absolutely!!! Investigate.
Glad we are in agreement, then. Trump derangement syndrome
http://quadrant.org.au/magazine/2018/09/trump-derangement-syndrome-spreads-intensifies/ The Democrats and their affiliated media have now shown they are a clear and present danger to this country. If anything, this farce also showed that the "Russia conspiracy" is another manufactured smear with nothing to back it up.
And after weeks of coaching, the fake accuser still couldn't come out with a consistent story and was exposed on lying about such items as not being able to travel, willingness to meet with the committee, etc. The good thing is that all the guilty actors have exposed themselves. The New York Times, WaPo, New Yorker, and others have had absolutely no problem putting out totally fabricated stories with nothing to back them up. Most telling was the interlocutor's report to the panel that based on what Ford said, her story would not hold up in a court of law. Agreed, Jim.
They make come to regret having televised this un-edited for the world to see. As to the insanity happening in DC, a friend texted me last night and said the Dems sound evil! This coming from someone that says they don't believe in evil. I believe in evil and see it all around and trying to over take the good in the country/world.
"Pray without ceasing."
I always think of Tevye from Fiddler on the Roof. He's a great example. "tough titty" said the kitty, "but the milk's still good!"
Facts only matter to one side in this twisted binary. It won't matter if the sun stands still, the waters divide and the dead rise again. It's just not about fact-based reality for the progressive. That is a self-evident fact on the face of it from the ground up and all the way down. |
Tracked: Sep 30, 09:27