Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Monday, December 4. 2017Monday morning linksOn Advent: "We Are All Lying in the Mud, But Some of Us Are Looking at the Stars" A book: The Pioneers of Promotion How The Loss Of U.S. Psychiatric Hospitals Led To A Mental Health Crisis 1 in 5 Americans Can’t Name an Author, New Survey Finds Ain't government education great? Bioethicist: Sex with the Dead OK Maybe only with consent? Chocolate Milk Is Back How volcanoes in the Antarctic could possibly be linked to any human activity is hard to imagine Climate: Earthquake Hits Delaware: You Know What This Means, Right? Sexual Harassment: Eh, No Thanks, We Have Other Things To Do, Like Work. Here are 7 differences Republicans must resolve between their tax bills Politico: Hey, Wouldn’t Chelsea Clinton Make A Great U. S. Senator? I’m A Liberal, And I Agree With Sean Hannity That American Journalism Is Dead Republicans Prepare For War With FBI, DOJ: To File Contempt Action Over Anti-Trump Bias Trump's Right — the FBI Is in Tatters
" So Jeff Sessions is just now aware that the Robert Mueller Special Counsel is filled with liberal hacks? Where the hell has be been? We have been reporting on Mueller’s liberal dream team for months." Trump’s campaign: Big Macs, screaming fits and constant rivalries Sounds about right US WITHDRAWS FROM OBAMA NEGOTIATED UN AGREEMENT ON MASS MIGRATION also, US Tells The UN It Will Forge Its Own Path On Immigration Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Trump's Right — the FBI Is in Tatters
Could it also be that the new director, Christopher Wray, is taking names and kicking some asses at the Bureau? Not likely because he has tolerated stonewalling congress, and is the subject of a contempt of congress resolution.
Wray only took over the reins from Acting Director Andrew McCabe (remember him) in August so I'm willing to cut him some slack...
Besides, look at all the shenanigans revealed since then. The blog, The Last Refuge, ran a piece yesterday that shows the DOJ under Sessions has been investigating the FBI for nearly a year. Between Sessions, the inspector general and Wray it seems that the FBI and Mueller are about to find themselves dancing to a different tune and quite soon.
Congress has subpoenaed the FBI for information about several incidents and investigations and they've ignored it. Trump should start with Wray and each day that information is not forthcoming, he should fire the highest ranking FBI official.
#1.1.1.1.1
mudbug
on
2017-12-04 20:35
(Reply)
"Mike Flynn may have lied, but so, undoubtedly, has the FBI, multiple times, more than Flynn could ever dream of doing or be capable of doing. "
We need a statute making it a crime for FBI personnel to lie in official statements. It should have a qui tam civil penalty for a hefty fine, which can be enforced by and congresscritter, or any US citizen harmed by the lie. IIRC there is some discretionary (ie, unenforced) state criminal law against lies by public officials, but none that I know of which permit a civil penalty. The FBI has been politicized and isn't trust worthy anymore. Instead of Fighting Trump and popular opinion about this the FBI would be better served to rid their ranks of activists and politicians and get back to their job.
Since Martha Stuart and Scooter Libby were tripped up by the FBI in a perjury trap I am surprised that anyone would willingly talk to the FBI. It is the political version of a speed trap. For this reason I suspect that Flynn didn't "lie" but rather made some innocuous mistake under questioning that was in fact intended to cause exactly that. Then they charge him with a serious crime with serious jail time which forces him to do whatever they want in hope of avoiding the full weight of the government coming down on him. I have no doubt that if the FBI or special prosecutor demanded it Flynn would show up on a stage and do a song and dance for the press. This kind of misuse of government power belongs in Russia or banana republics not in the U.S. If the FBI or any Federal agency, were to get rid of all their activists, there wouldn’t be but a handful of people left. Wish it would happen, but I fear our future is set. There are just way too many people in this country that whant Big Government.
Trump’s campaign: Big Macs, screaming fits and constant rivalries
Sounds about right Sounds like any campaign, not just Trump's. Although you could substitute "pizza" for Big Macs, in Hillary's/Podesta's!!! Don't forget the 'copious quantities of ethanol' along with the pizza!
Once Mueller attacked Flynns son, did anyone doubt flynn would turn into an fb i stooge?
Lack of mental hospitals: The liberals wanted patients de-institutionalized (put out on the street) and got their desired result.
The SJW lawyers emptied the mental institutions in the 70's and now the SJW lawyer politicians are complaining about the "homeless" invading every nook and cranny in their big blue cities and crapping in the streets. Now I have to wonder if the SJW lawyers are any more rational than the former inmates and if it would benefit society if both groups were institutionalized.
Bwahahahaa... a WaPo article about the Trump campaign... bwahahaha.. Next, how about a NRO link to how Trump just can't govern and is unpresidential !
Lying?
Breaking over the last few weeks: "It's a Total Psyop Operation" by American Inteligence Media published 11/14/17 covers the real designers of the Facebook source code/platform and the collusion among Harvard (Larry Summers and James Chandler), IBM and others to steal the property rights and patents from the original designers. Zuckerberg was merely the front man. The government's operation was to install a back door into all social media that allows the control of those using it. Within this interview is a discussion of "lying" to the government and/or its agencies, which can be frivolously applied or ignored depending on whose ox is being gored. The CIA and U.S. military; In-Q-Tel; SERCO, a UK-based conglomerate; the Clinton Crime Cartel; and multiple corporations and not-for-profits have been involved in this since the early 1990s. There are a series of interviews released since 11/14/17 and on, but the one below mentions the most players. www.youtube(dot)com/watch?v=dIM9ne_qGMc Re: FBI in tatters
Flynn lied to the FBI. Ok. Did Hillary lie to the FBI? We'll never know because there are not transcripts or recordings of Hillary's interview with the FBI. Even if we could trust Comey, he'd be no help with this questions since he wasn't even there. Excellent point. Which points out that the fix was on from the beginning of the e-mail investigation.
Mental Illness and psychiatric beds...
This NPR article has so many apples and oranges. Private hospital and state hospital beds and care are not the same thing at all. We deal with much sicker and more violent patients, with worse insurance or none. We are grateful for any pressure the private hospitals can take off us. Emergency rooms and correctional facilities do indeed have a lot of patients who would be better served by us at the state facilities, but beds are scant, and the laws governing who gets in are not always sensible. There is plenty of blame to go around. Though observing liberals trying to fix things was indeed one of my great motives for leaving liberalism, conservatives and libertarians are greatly at fault as well. (Short version: conservatives say "we have no idea what we're talking about, but we're sure you're spending way too much." Libertarians "Yeah, you guys just want to lock up and force treatment on merely eccentric people, so we are going to make the laws crazy restrictive on what you can do.") The discussion about what we did in the 60's and 70's is no longer relevant. We cannot in any way go back and redo this. We now have effective treatments, many with bad side effects; patients now are also much more likely substance-abusing, because the level of misery is so high that short-term solutions that are long-term nightmares look very attractive. Most of you cannot imagine the level of misery they face daily. The phrase that you might have missed in the NPR article is the reference to a diagnosed mental illness and mass violence. Hidden in that advocate's comment is the knowledge that a lot of these shooters, bombers, arsonists have a diagnosable mental illness, yet have not come to professional attention before. There is a connection between mental illness and violence. However, there is far more of a connection of them being victims of violence. Dreams are where you take your mind.
Nightmares are where your mind takes you. The problem was/is the ACLU. And perhaps to some extent the constitution. People with mental health problems are free to do what they do until they break the law or endanger themselves or others. Most of our homeless are some part mentally ill and some part addicted to drugs and alcohol. The second part of this problem is the very high cost of mental health treatment. It may well break the state to provide mental health care for all those who cannot provide it themselves (through insurance and/or personal wealth). What aggravates this is that many/most people with treatable mental illness will choose not to continue treating it once they are no longer monitored/forced to medicate. They either prefer drugs and alcohol or cannot help themselves when it comes to drugs and alcohol. (Not all mentally ill people use drugs and alcohol but it is exacerbates their underlying problem so dramatically that it becomes a much bigger problem.) While I am confident that on an individual basis most mental health issues can be dealt with. I think that the scope of the problem and the cost to deal with it guarantees that the greater problem cannot be managed effectively and never will be. Re: 1 in 5 Americans Can’t Name an Author
To be fair, Chester A. Author was not a major president and you have to be of a certain age to know who Author Treacher, Author Fiedler, Author Ashe, or Author Schlesinger were. Still, you'd think surely everybody's heard of King Author and the Knights of the Round Table. |